/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/09/15/#xubuntu-devel.txt

flocculantochosi: mmm - ubiquity started with adwaita http://i.imgur.com/qQpdIKJ.png04:46
flocculantcommented eventually and changed bug to ubiquity07:10
ochosiflocculant: awesome, thanks!07:50
ochosilet's hope they care a little about it07:51
ochosihave you tried with Ambiance as well?07:51
ochosi(cause if it's broken there too, they'll certainly care more)07:51
-SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xfce4-announce:: ANNOUNCE: libxfce4ui 4.13.1 released @ http://xfce.10915.n7.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-libxfce4ui-4-13-1-released-tp48263.html (by Simon Steinbeiss)08:04
-SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xfce4-announce:: ANNOUNCE: xfce4-clipman-plugin 1.4.0 released @ http://xfce.10915.n7.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-xfce4-clipman-plugin-1-4-0-released-tp48266.html (by Simon Steinbeiss)08:26
akxwi-daveflocculant: ack..... just give me a shout and I'm all yours..08:54
=== sakrecoe1 is now known as sakrecoer
bluesabreknome, ochosi, flocculant want to ACK https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/greybird-gtk-theme/+bug/1623855 ?09:22
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1623855 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Greybird 3.20.1" [Undecided,New]09:22
knomesure09:23
knomenot in the release team though, so09:24
bluesabreknome, but you're in docs, right?09:25
knomeyep, and i acked it already09:25
bluesabregood sir :D09:25
flocculantbluesabre: acked with both hats on11:06
flocculantknome: re "not in the release team though, so" yes you are - ochosi shouldn't be seperately I guess (old XPL) council is member of release :)11:07
flocculantakxwi-dave: might be better if I run it by you on e-mail 11:07
flocculantochosi: I had checked ambiance unfortunately - as a rule I always check Ubuntu as well as Xubuntu if something ubiquityish is wrong 11:09
-SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xfce4-announce:: ANNOUNCE: xfce4-settings 4.12.1 released @ http://xfce.10915.n7.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-xfce4-settings-4-12-1-released-tp48268.html (by Sean Davis-6)11:15
knomeflocculant, though i don't think council == release team11:40
akxwi-daveflocculant: KK..  13:54
flocculantknome: didn't say council ==release team - but if xpl was on there then why not council, and if council not why was xpl :p14:19
flocculantfrankly I couldn't care one way or the other though14:20
flocculantknome: when you've got 30 minutes or so to mull something over :)14:52
flocculantno rush btw - before zealous zebedee gets to us :D15:00
ochosibluesabre: would be great if settings could make it into the final of yakkety and with an SRu go to xenial15:27
flocculantochosi: re resize bug - checked other flavours - gnome affected, but I assume that'd be expected15:44
ochosiflocculant: yeah that's expected. so at least we're not alone blaming ubiquity ;)15:58
=== PaulW2U_ is now known as PaulW2U
flocculant:)16:34
flocculantnot easy to find anyone gnomeish of late to saddle up for the blame session 16:34
ochosijbicha maybe?16:47
flocculantdon't know - is he something to do with Ubuntu Gnome - or just happens to do stuff because others are away 16:48
flocculantcan't even remember Tim's nick :(16:49
ochosiknot sure, but i thought he was pretty active in the gnome ubuntu community16:50
krytarikflocculant: darkxst16:52
flocculantkrytarik: thanks :)16:55
flocculantochosi: ok - well if I don't see you letting him know - I will - think you're away on hols aren't you?16:56
flocculantin the meantime I'll at least flag it on their iso tracker builds16:57
knomeflocculant, could do 15ish now if that's enough17:57
knomeflocculant, otherwise "tomorrow"17:57
flocculantmanana in the good old Spanish way will be fine - really no rush :)18:17
knomeoki18:17
knomeyou at work on the daytime?18:17
flocculantyea tomorrow I am 18:17
knomeoki, then let's try to catch up in the evening18:17
knomejust ping - i'm lurking more often than one'd think...18:18
flocculantI was serious when I said 'before zz' :)18:18
knomeyeah, but better get it done sooner than later anyway18:18
flocculantyep ok - more or less the same here too lol18:18
knomere: council/xpl on release, i think we need to rethink that18:18
knomeunless that's what this is about :P18:19
flocculantright18:19
flocculantno - this is something completely different than that :)18:19
knomei mean again, xpl was a single person who had a lot of "decision power"18:19
flocculantyea18:19
knomeso it made sense that he was a member of the release team18:19
flocculantright18:19
knomenow the council is much more like an arbiter18:20
flocculantat a minimum needs qa/tech 18:20
knomeyeah18:20
flocculantthe 'can mark ready' thing isn't so much a necessirty ofc as anyone with powers can do that18:20
knomecould be those and one from council - just for any unrealistic but potential veto stuff18:21
flocculantmmm18:21
knomebut that person shouldn't likely be very active in that team - at least with their council hat on18:21
flocculantyea18:22
knomemaybe it would make sense that bluesabre served as both technical and council member18:22
knomehe'd then know - as anybody really18:22
knome- when to be in touch with council18:22
knomeeg. if the situation looks really disastrous18:23
flocculantyea - except that on release days is kind of pants - cos he's not available usually at those times18:23
knomemhm18:23
knomei think i have all mark-powers via the qa tracker dev team18:23
flocculantI think anyone half tech would know if something was looking disastrous - and could shout at least to delay 18:23
knomeyeah, that18:23
flocculantknome: yea you will have - I can mark anyone's image ready18:24
knomei guess i have any powers you can ever imagine :P18:24
flocculanteven I'd know if something techish was looking disastrous :)18:24
flocculantanyway - needs a rethink now I guess - but once more not really a rush there 18:24
knomeyep18:25
knomeoh, even council is a member of that team18:25
flocculantideally before 13th October is all :D18:25
flocculantyea18:25
flocculantcos s/xpl/council :)18:25
knomeyep18:25
knomebut simon is a member individually too18:25
flocculantyes - not sure why that - maybe some xpl/individual stuff - no idea18:26
flocculantcan you remember how it was when you were xpl? 18:26
knomewe didn't have the xpl team then18:26
knomebut if the council/xpl team is a member, then simon doesn't have to be18:27
flocculantcos as 'not xpl' art team lead in release is odd :)18:27
flocculantyea - same as bluesabre in release18:27
knomei think the rationale behind this is that we explicitly wanted to communicate that simon is part of the release team18:27
flocculantcurrently it's effectively me/dave and council18:27
knomeyep18:27
knomei deactivated simon18:28
flocculantk18:28
knomenow it's more like it likely should be, i think18:28
flocculantnot sure really - the only other non qa/council person logically should be there would be Unit193 18:28
knomedoes anybody have any reason why the council needs to be a *member* of the bugs team?18:29
flocculantdon't think there's need for Sean to be there perhaps 18:29
flocculanton release18:29
flocculantdoes it not own bug team?18:29
knomewell, that explicitly states he's the tech lead18:30
knomeit does, yes18:30
flocculantok - that works for me 18:30
knomebut it's also a member of the team18:30
knomewhich is a bit different18:30
flocculantthen it'll be a member won't it? 18:30
knomenope18:30
knomei think, weight on the word *think*18:30
flocculantlose elfy from that team ... 18:30
knomethat *members* get the bug mail18:31
knomeowners don't18:31
knomedone18:31
flocculantmmm18:31
flocculanttrying to remember back18:31
flocculantty :)18:31
knomeanyway, as council is the owner, it doesn't "need" to be a member18:31
flocculantknome: maybe amend council bug mail options ? 18:32
flocculantthough given sean is there twice - might screw that up 18:32
knomeoh well,18:32
knomei'll send a mail to the council to see what they think :P18:32
flocculant:)18:32
knomeand now time to run18:33
knomettyl18:33
flocculantcya 18:33
flocculantUnit193: uefi bug being reported in -release :p20:17
Unit193Thanks.20:21
flocculantwelcome :)20:21
Unit193Got a list of those of us on Yak that you can ask to test stuff, btw?20:40
Unit193Also, that bug means that I haven't tested Core with UEFI (or secure boot) either. :320:40
flocculantUnit193: nope - no list20:40
flocculantI've subbed to that uefi bug now I worked out what I needed to install to make it work :p20:41
Unit193Oh, could have asked. :320:41
Unit193I pull a RPM from OpenSuse's build system (like PPAs, though can build more than just rpms) and extracted the EFI module, placing it in /usr/share/ovmf/.  I really don't remember what it was with the packaged one that prevents secure boot though. :D20:43
flocculantwell yes could have asked - but we don't much talk about testing uefi here :p20:43
Unit193I, uh, first noticed because of something non-Xubuntu, then went up the line (Non-xubuntu, xubuntu-core, xubuntu-desktop, xenial releases.)20:44
-SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [yakkety] r315 Update icons from upstream... (by Simon Steinbeiß)21:45
=== ubott2 is now known as ubottu
jbichabluesabre: I borrowed your packaging to update Debian: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/greybird-gtk-theme22:58
Unit193libxfce4ui 4.13.1-1; xfce4-clipman-plugin 2:1.4.0-1; xfce4-settings 4.12.1-1 uploaded to Debian too.23:12
bluesabrejbicha, cool, glad to help :)23:41

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!