| _ami_ | apw: calling generic_handle_irq() explicitly on GPIO does the job which i wanted. | 07:52 |
|---|---|---|
| _ami_ | :) | 07:54 |
| apw | _ami_, cool | 08:20 |
| _ami_ | apw: obviously this is the way. emulation of hardware irq to software irq to linux. gutted to not understand this at first place. :/ | 08:30 |
| tjaalton | does the meta package get an update for sru only when the kernel is migrated to -updates? | 09:27 |
| apw | tjaalton, the meta-package migrates with the kernel as it moves -proposed to -updates | 09:29 |
| tjaalton | sure but does it get bumped for the abi only once or with every kernel abi change? | 09:30 |
| tjaalton | one guy claims that xenial-proposed didn't have an update for linux-generic.. | 09:30 |
| tjaalton | yeah it's there | 09:31 |
| tjaalton | should've just checked myself :) | 09:31 |
| apw | tjaalton, -meta gets updated for any ABI change in linux, and copies out to -proposed with the kernel as a matched pair always | 09:32 |
| tjaalton | yeah, thanks | 09:33 |
| tjaalton | for confirming | 09:33 |
| apw | np | 09:33 |
| rtg | elmo, 'apt-get install linux-generic-lts-yakkety' works a little better now that things are done building | 12:39 |
| elmo | rtg: thanks, will try | 12:41 |
| apw | rtg, that reminds me you commiteed that "use src_pkg_name in udebs" thing to yakkety ... | 12:48 |
| apw | rtg, that can't be on the main branch else it breaks the derivative kernels, that is an lts-foo only patch, and so has be carried on those explicitly | 12:48 |
| rtg | apw, hmm, I guess none of the derivatives build udebs this far. Perhaps we could modify the patch so that it works on mainline ? | 12:50 |
| rtg | thus far* | 12:50 |
| apw | we'd only notice when d-i is built as it is only in the name of the linking package to that | 12:50 |
| apw | it won't break the linux-raspi2 for instance, just any d-i respin we did for that | 12:50 |
| apw | rtg, and yes, prolly the right thing to do is make that do some kind of if on src_pkg_name and if it is linux-lts-* then use that, else linux | 12:51 |
| apw | on the master branch, but in the past we have just carried it on the linux-lts-X branch and been happy | 12:51 |
| rtg | apw, I think this regression appeared when we adopted the modern d-i layout for kernel-wedge. This is the first I've encountered this particular udeb generation bug. | 12:53 |
| apw | rtg, the src_pkg_name thing, or the one i just fixed | 12:54 |
| apw | the one i just fixed was introduced by me in the rejig | 12:54 |
| apw | the src_pkg_name thing has been done to all the trees up to now as far as i know | 12:54 |
| apw | its nothing to do with the bit which kernel-wedge plays with | 12:54 |
| apw | rtg, in lts-wily for instance that change is squashed into "UBUNTU: [Packaging] Wily LTS backport" | 12:57 |
| rtg | apw, look at Precise, commit 2fcd9ea38097d1d27837b7a407d3f264e2cf4c7c. Looks like henrix ran into the same problem independently. | 12:59 |
| rtg | apw, nm, I was on the wrong branch | 12:59 |
| apw | rtg, we had a variety of messes with that, one has the default the other way and alllll the derivates have the reversing patch | 13:00 |
| apw | but it is only lts-foo that cannot use the approved linux-<thing>-flavour form because it annoyingly duplicates the flavour names | 13:00 |
| apw | so it is logical for that exceptional branch to carry the exception, or as we said earlier to bodge it in master using the name prefix | 13:01 |
| rtg | apw, I'll work on bodging it so we don't have to remember to port it to every LTS kernel going forward. | 13:14 |
| apw | rtg, fine with me | 13:14 |
| GhostLyrics | We bought a new machine, installed 16.04 and our software setup and now our hardware RAID controller refuses to work after ~3-4 days of uptime with kernel messages similar to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703356 | 13:31 |
| ubot5` | Debian bug 703356 in src:linux "megasas: Failed to alloc kernel SGL buffer for IOCTL (ref.#688198)" [Important,Open] | 13:31 |
| GhostLyrics | So, what do I do? Wait and hope for this to be fixed? Downgrade to 14.04.X since I don't see if my RAID is healthy when running 16.04? | 13:32 |
| GhostLyrics | not the best question or wording, I know, but that bug has been open for 3 years | 13:33 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest68752 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!