-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.11.2-0ubuntu5~16.04 => 1.12.1-0ubuntu8] (no packageset) | 00:29 | |
mwhudson | ups | 00:30 |
---|---|---|
mwhudson | can someone reject that ^ | 00:30 |
apw | mwhudson, done | 00:39 |
mwhudson | apw: thanks | 00:39 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.12.1-0ubuntu8] | 00:39 | |
mwhudson | apw: you're my favourite SRU queue rejecter! | 00:39 |
apw | i have my uses it seems | 00:39 |
tumbleweed | cjwatson, doko, slangasek: temporary home: http://ubuntuqa.tblwd.org/ | 02:24 |
pitti | tsimonq2: what are you trying to do? at first sight it just looks like you are missing britney'2 dependencies, such as python3-amqplib? | 05:47 |
pitti | tsimonq2: err, Packages_* are supposed to be plain files, not compressed | 05:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.14.2~16.04 => 2.15] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 08:30 | |
* apw is handling ^ | 09:20 | |
bluesabre | pitti, can I go ahead and upload greybird-gtk-theme? It's a bugfix release and has been ack'd by the Xubuntu docs, release, artwork, and QA teams (lp 1623855) | 09:24 |
ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1623855 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Greybird 3.20.1" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1623855 | 09:24 |
pitti | bluesabre: erm, sure; you don't need my permission :) | 09:36 |
pitti | (already acked by docs and release teams) | 09:36 |
bluesabre | wasn't sure if we needed to ack up to the ubuntu release team or if our own subteams were enough | 09:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.15] | 09:46 | |
apw | tumbleweed, cheeky i know, is there seeded-in-ubuntu info on there too ? | 10:00 |
apw | tumbleweed, and ignore me and assume i can't read | 10:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-babel-transpiler (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.7.0-1] | 10:48 | |
LocutusOfBorg | some gitlab-ruby stuff ^^ | 10:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-sprockets-es6 (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.9.1-1] | 10:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-prof (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] | 10:51 | |
LocutusOfBorg | ^^ and we should be good | 10:53 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: keeper (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.1.0+16.10.20160915.3-0ubuntu1] | 10:54 | |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, ruby-devise-async is utterly broken, and needed only by gitlab. Since the new gitlab in proposed is not using it anymore, I propose you to demote it to proposed (or ignore the autpkgtestsuite), and help me in make gitlab migrate :) | 10:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | removing from the archive might be even better :) | 10:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | and will be removed from debian in some days too https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837644 | 10:58 |
ubot5` | Debian bug 837644 in ruby-devise-async "ruby-devise-async is not compatible with devise >= 4.0" [Serious,Open] | 10:58 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keeper [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.1.0+16.10.20160915.3-0ubuntu1] | 11:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] | 11:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-transpiler [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-1] | 11:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sprockets-es6 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.1-1] | 11:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-babel-source (yakkety-proposed/primary) [5.8.35-1] | 11:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 11:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [i386] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 11:12 | |
xnox | tumbleweed, temporary change dns too? to unbreak the world... | 11:28 |
xnox | is there a way to make an upload, in such a way that it is forced to go through review queue? (even though it normally would not) | 13:00 |
apw | none that i know of... nice thought i would be ... people in my team who wnat that feature tend to upload it to a PPA and ask for review there | 13:02 |
xnox | yeah.... i want to upload something that should not be trusted =) | 13:02 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: kicked to -proposed | 13:06 |
rbasak | xnox: in our team, we'd probably import it into git and then file an MP against it. | 13:15 |
rbasak | xnox: I can import a package for you if you'd like to do that. | 13:16 |
xnox | it's ok | 13:17 |
pitti | xnox: but no new binary or so? | 13:22 |
pitti | xnox: I suppose asking someone to review from a git branch and/or PPA is most practical then | 13:22 |
xnox | ack. will do. | 13:24 |
LocutusOfBorg | ta | 13:33 |
xnox | pitti, qemu is stuck in proposed on systemd autopkgtest failure and nova. | 14:03 |
xnox | nova used to not be there, i'll check that. | 14:03 |
xnox | but the systemd failure is weird to me... does the systemd autopkgtest do nested qemu and my update breaks that? | 14:03 |
pitti | xnox: it does use nested qemu, for the "upstream" tests; but that's fine, it's the fsck test that failed | 14:04 |
pitti | plymouth-start did not run, hmm | 14:04 |
pitti | xnox: so, for sure unrelated to qemu, need to investigate | 14:04 |
xnox | ack retried nova test because results are all PASS but cleanup failed. | 14:05 |
pitti | it's been doing that for a few days already | 14:05 |
pitti | xnox: hm, that should be a tmpfail; mind filing a bug against autopkgtst with a pointer to the log? | 14:05 |
pitti | i. e. those should auto-retry | 14:06 |
xnox | i might be impatient =) | 14:07 |
pitti | xnox: oh, it's fine to manually retry, I just mean for the future | 14:07 |
pitti | xnox: filed bug 1624406, will hint over systemd | 14:09 |
ubot5` | bug 1624406 in systemd (Ubuntu) "systemd-fsck test started to fail" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624406 | 14:09 |
xnox | tah! | 14:13 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ruby-devise is a valid candidate now, but still blocked on some transition | 14:35 |
pitti | xnox: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qemu → really close now! | 14:37 |
pitti | xnox: did you retry nova/amd64 too? | 14:37 |
xnox | no idea where it went | 14:38 |
pitti | xnox: so you did? hang on | 14:38 |
xnox | sso did do it | 14:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, we need ruby* accepted from new queue | 14:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | and demoting ruby-handlebars-assets might be appreciated :) | 14:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | so, demoting handlebars, accepting the three packages in new, migration! | 14:41 |
LocutusOfBorg | (handlebars has one rdep, diaspora) | 14:41 |
pitti | xnox: hmm, no trace of it anywhere | 14:41 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-source [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [5.8.35-1] | 14:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] | 14:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] | 14:42 | |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: ^ | 14:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] | 14:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] | 14:42 | |
LocutusOfBorg | <3 pitti | 14:42 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: WDYM with "demoting"? it already is in universe | 14:42 |
pitti | ruby-handlebars-assets | 2:0.21.0-5 | yakkety/universe | source, all | 14:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | demoting to proposed | 14:42 |
pitti | ruby-handlebars-assets | 2:0.23.0-3 | yakkety-proposed/universe | source, all | 14:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | or remove, in debian the new version is in non-free | 14:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm wondering if you did some mistake in letting it be in universe | 14:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | bugs.debian.org/830987 | 14:43 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: ruby-babel-source is in Debian main, WDYM? | 14:43 |
pitti | oh, -handlebars; no idea, did I let that in? | 14:44 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: anyway, if it has reverse dependencies then we can't just remove it, the reverse depends need to be fixed first | 14:44 |
LocutusOfBorg | move both on multiverse :) or demote also diaspora? | 14:44 |
LocutusOfBorg | the popcon is "1" | 14:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-babel-source [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [5.8.35-1] (no packageset) | 14:45 | |
pitti | bah, diaspora also has a gazillion reverse depends | 14:45 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh... | 14:45 |
* pitti wants reverse-depends back | 14:46 | |
pitti | ok, not that bad | 14:47 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm using coccia since reverse-depends is not in place | 14:48 |
LocutusOfBorg | even if it is | 14:48 |
pitti | $ change-override -S -c multiverse diaspora diaspora-installer ruby-handlebars-assets | 14:48 |
pitti | (in contrib in Debian) | 14:49 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: and once that's published, move hte three to -proposed? | 14:49 |
LocutusOfBorg | sure | 14:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | if you mean the three now in multiverse | 14:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | but they are broken in Debian, and needs fixing there before ubuntu | 14:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | incompatible with the other ruby stuff | 14:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | babel-source is in new | 14:51 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: no, it's not :) | 14:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | this unblocks ruby-sprockets-es6 and ruby-babel-transpiler. Once they are cleared from new, everything migrates (if everything is good) | 14:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | :) | 14:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-source [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [5.8.35-1] | 14:54 | |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: I think I moved everything now, now needs another publisher cycle | 15:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 15:38 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-babel-transpiler [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset) | 15:50 | |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, ^^ | 15:56 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-transpiler [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-1] | 16:26 | |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, ruby-sprockets (universe) is still doing autopkgtest against ruby-handlebars-assets (multiverse) <-- is that normal? | 16:29 |
jbicha | pitti: does "Confirmed" mean you approved the uife for bug 1623855? | 16:44 |
ubot5` | bug 1623855 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Greybird 3.20.1" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1623855 | 16:44 |
apw | the process says triaged means approved | 16:56 |
jbicha | right, that's why I'm clarifying what pitti meant | 17:00 |
tumbleweed | xnox: DNS is in the same hands as the server that's down | 17:48 |
tumbleweed | pitti: there's a temporary reverse-depends on http://ubuntuqa.tblwd.org/ | 17:49 |
tsimonq2 | pitti: I want to get a britney setup running locally to test Kubuntu packages before we whip up an FFe so we are absolutely 100% sure it breaks nothing | 17:52 |
tsimonq2 | pitti: (britney2) | 17:52 |
tsimonq2 | pitti: is there a dep list for britney2 that I'm missing? | 17:52 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-sprockets-es6 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.9.1-1] (no packageset) | 18:29 | |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, last one I hope :D | 18:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sprockets-es6 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.1-1] | 20:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!