[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.11.2-0ubuntu5~16.04 => 1.12.1-0ubuntu8] (no packageset)
[00:30] <mwhudson> ups
[00:30] <mwhudson> can someone reject that ^
[00:39] <apw> mwhudson, done
[00:39] <mwhudson> apw: thanks
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.12.1-0ubuntu8]
[00:39] <mwhudson> apw: you're my favourite SRU queue rejecter!
[00:39] <apw> i have my uses it seems
[02:24] <tumbleweed> cjwatson, doko, slangasek: temporary home: http://ubuntuqa.tblwd.org/
[05:47] <pitti> tsimonq2: what are you trying to do? at first sight it just looks like you are missing  britney'2 dependencies, such as python3-amqplib?
[05:48] <pitti> tsimonq2: err, Packages_* are supposed to be plain files, not compressed
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.14.2~16.04 => 2.15] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[09:20]  * apw is handling ^
[09:24] <bluesabre> pitti, can I go ahead and upload greybird-gtk-theme? It's a bugfix release and has been ack'd by the Xubuntu docs, release, artwork, and QA teams (lp 1623855)
[09:24] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1623855 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Greybird 3.20.1" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1623855
[09:36] <pitti> bluesabre: erm, sure; you don't need my permission :)
[09:36] <pitti> (already acked by docs and release teams)
[09:37] <bluesabre> wasn't sure if we needed to ack up to the ubuntu release team or if our own subteams were enough
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.15]
[10:00] <apw> tumbleweed, cheeky i know, is there seeded-in-ubuntu info on there too ?
[10:01] <apw> tumbleweed, and ignore me and assume i can't read
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-babel-transpiler (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.7.0-1]
[10:48] <LocutusOfBorg> some gitlab-ruby stuff ^^
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-sprockets-es6 (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.9.1-1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-prof (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1]
[10:53] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ and we should be good
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: keeper (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.1.0+16.10.20160915.3-0ubuntu1]
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, ruby-devise-async is utterly broken, and needed only by gitlab. Since the new gitlab in proposed is not using it anymore, I propose you to demote it to proposed (or ignore the autpkgtestsuite), and help me in make gitlab migrate :)
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> removing from the archive might be even better :)
[10:58] <LocutusOfBorg> and will be removed from debian in some days too https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837644
[10:58] <ubot5`> Debian bug 837644 in ruby-devise-async "ruby-devise-async is not compatible with devise >= 4.0" [Serious,Open]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keeper [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.1.0+16.10.20160915.3-0ubuntu1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-transpiler [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sprockets-es6 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.1-1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-babel-source (yakkety-proposed/primary) [5.8.35-1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [i386] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[11:28] <xnox> tumbleweed, temporary change dns too? to unbreak the world...
[13:00] <xnox> is there a way to make an upload, in such a way that it is forced to go through review queue? (even though it normally would not)
[13:02] <apw> none that i know of... nice thought i would be ... people in my team who wnat that feature tend to upload it to a PPA and ask for review there
[13:02] <xnox> yeah.... i want to upload something that should not be trusted =)
[13:06] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: kicked to -proposed
[13:15] <rbasak> xnox: in our team, we'd probably import it into git and then file an MP against it.
[13:16] <rbasak> xnox: I can import a package for you if you'd like to do that.
[13:17] <xnox> it's ok
[13:22] <pitti> xnox: but no new binary or so?
[13:22] <pitti> xnox: I suppose asking someone to review from a git branch and/or PPA is most practical then
[13:24] <xnox> ack. will do.
[13:33] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[14:03] <xnox> pitti, qemu is stuck in proposed on systemd autopkgtest failure and nova.
[14:03] <xnox> nova used to not be there, i'll check that.
[14:03] <xnox> but the systemd failure is weird to me... does the systemd autopkgtest do nested qemu and my update breaks that?
[14:04] <pitti> xnox: it does use nested qemu, for the "upstream" tests; but that's fine, it's the fsck test that failed
[14:04] <pitti> plymouth-start did not run, hmm
[14:04] <pitti> xnox: so, for sure unrelated to qemu, need to investigate
[14:05] <xnox> ack retried nova test because results are all PASS but cleanup failed.
[14:05] <pitti> it's been doing that for a few days already
[14:05] <pitti> xnox: hm, that should be a tmpfail; mind filing a bug against autopkgtst with a pointer to the log?
[14:06] <pitti> i. e. those should auto-retry
[14:07] <xnox> i might be impatient =)
[14:07] <pitti> xnox: oh, it's fine to manually retry, I just mean for the future
[14:09] <pitti> xnox: filed bug 1624406, will hint over systemd
[14:09] <ubot5`> bug 1624406 in systemd (Ubuntu) "systemd-fsck test started to fail" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624406
[14:13] <xnox> tah!
[14:35] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ruby-devise is a valid candidate now, but still blocked on some transition
[14:37] <pitti> xnox: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qemu → really close now!
[14:37] <pitti> xnox: did you retry nova/amd64 too?
[14:38] <xnox> no idea where it went
[14:38] <pitti> xnox: so you did? hang on
[14:39] <xnox> sso did do it
[14:40] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, we need ruby* accepted from new queue
[14:40] <LocutusOfBorg> and demoting ruby-handlebars-assets might be appreciated :)
[14:41] <LocutusOfBorg> so, demoting handlebars, accepting the three packages in new, migration!
[14:41] <LocutusOfBorg> (handlebars has one rdep, diaspora)
[14:41] <pitti> xnox: hmm, no trace of it anywhere
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-source [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [5.8.35-1]
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1]
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1]
[14:42] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: ^
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1]
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1]
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> <3 pitti
[14:42] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: WDYM with "demoting"? it already is in universe
[14:42] <pitti>  ruby-handlebars-assets | 2:0.21.0-5 | yakkety/universe          | source, all
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> demoting to proposed
[14:42] <pitti>  ruby-handlebars-assets | 2:0.23.0-3 | yakkety-proposed/universe | source, all
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> or remove, in debian the new version is in non-free
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm wondering if you did some mistake in letting it be in universe
[14:43] <LocutusOfBorg> bugs.debian.org/830987
[14:43] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: ruby-babel-source is in Debian main, WDYM?
[14:44] <pitti> oh, -handlebars; no idea, did I let that in?
[14:44] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: anyway, if it has reverse dependencies then we can't just remove it, the reverse depends need to be fixed first
[14:44] <LocutusOfBorg> move both on multiverse :) or demote also diaspora?
[14:45] <LocutusOfBorg> the popcon is "1"
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-babel-source [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [5.8.35-1] (no packageset)
[14:45] <pitti> bah, diaspora also has a gazillion reverse depends
[14:45] <LocutusOfBorg> oh...
[14:46]  * pitti wants reverse-depends back
[14:47] <pitti> ok, not that bad
[14:48] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm using coccia since reverse-depends is not in place
[14:48] <LocutusOfBorg> even if it is
[14:48] <pitti> $ change-override -S -c multiverse diaspora diaspora-installer ruby-handlebars-assets
[14:49] <pitti> (in contrib in Debian)
[14:49] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: and once that's published, move hte three to -proposed?
[14:50] <LocutusOfBorg> sure
[14:50] <LocutusOfBorg> if you mean the three now in multiverse
[14:50] <LocutusOfBorg> but they are broken in Debian, and needs fixing there before ubuntu
[14:50] <LocutusOfBorg> incompatible with the other ruby stuff
[14:51] <LocutusOfBorg> babel-source is in new
[14:53] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: no, it's not :)
[14:54] <LocutusOfBorg> this unblocks ruby-sprockets-es6 and ruby-babel-transpiler. Once they are cleared from new, everything migrates (if everything is good)
[14:54] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-source [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [5.8.35-1]
[15:33] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: I think I moved everything now, now needs another publisher cycle
[15:38] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-babel-transpiler [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[15:56] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, ^^
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-transpiler [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-1]
[16:29] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, ruby-sprockets (universe) is still doing autopkgtest against ruby-handlebars-assets (multiverse) <-- is that normal?
[16:44] <jbicha> pitti: does "Confirmed" mean you approved the uife for bug 1623855?
[16:44] <ubot5`> bug 1623855 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Greybird 3.20.1" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1623855
[16:56] <apw> the process says triaged means approved
[17:00] <jbicha> right, that's why I'm clarifying what pitti meant
[17:48] <tumbleweed> xnox: DNS is in the same hands as the server that's down
[17:49] <tumbleweed> pitti: there's a temporary reverse-depends on http://ubuntuqa.tblwd.org/
[17:52] <tsimonq2> pitti: I want to get a britney setup running locally to test Kubuntu packages before we whip up an FFe so we are absolutely 100% sure it breaks nothing
[17:52] <tsimonq2> pitti: (britney2)
[17:52] <tsimonq2> pitti: is there a dep list for britney2 that I'm missing?
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-sprockets-es6 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.9.1-1] (no packageset)
[18:36] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, last one I hope :D
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sprockets-es6 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.1-1]