[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.11.2-0ubuntu5~16.04 => 1.12.1-0ubuntu8] (no packageset) [00:30] ups [00:30] can someone reject that ^ [00:39] mwhudson, done [00:39] apw: thanks [00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.12.1-0ubuntu8] [00:39] apw: you're my favourite SRU queue rejecter! [00:39] i have my uses it seems [02:24] cjwatson, doko, slangasek: temporary home: http://ubuntuqa.tblwd.org/ [05:47] tsimonq2: what are you trying to do? at first sight it just looks like you are missing britney'2 dependencies, such as python3-amqplib? [05:48] tsimonq2: err, Packages_* are supposed to be plain files, not compressed [08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.14.2~16.04 => 2.15] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [09:20] * apw is handling ^ [09:24] pitti, can I go ahead and upload greybird-gtk-theme? It's a bugfix release and has been ack'd by the Xubuntu docs, release, artwork, and QA teams (lp 1623855) [09:24] Launchpad bug 1623855 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Greybird 3.20.1" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1623855 [09:36] bluesabre: erm, sure; you don't need my permission :) [09:36] (already acked by docs and release teams) [09:37] wasn't sure if we needed to ack up to the ubuntu release team or if our own subteams were enough [09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.15] [10:00] tumbleweed, cheeky i know, is there seeded-in-ubuntu info on there too ? [10:01] tumbleweed, and ignore me and assume i can't read [10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-babel-transpiler (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.7.0-1] [10:48] some gitlab-ruby stuff ^^ [10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-sprockets-es6 (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.9.1-1] [10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-prof (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] [10:53] ^^ and we should be good [10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: keeper (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.1.0+16.10.20160915.3-0ubuntu1] [10:57] pitti, ruby-devise-async is utterly broken, and needed only by gitlab. Since the new gitlab in proposed is not using it anymore, I propose you to demote it to proposed (or ignore the autpkgtestsuite), and help me in make gitlab migrate :) [10:57] removing from the archive might be even better :) [10:58] and will be removed from debian in some days too https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837644 [10:58] Debian bug 837644 in ruby-devise-async "ruby-devise-async is not compatible with devise >= 4.0" [Serious,Open] [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keeper [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.1.0+16.10.20160915.3-0ubuntu1] [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-transpiler [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-1] [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sprockets-es6 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.1-1] [11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-babel-source (yakkety-proposed/primary) [5.8.35-1] [11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [i386] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-prof [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [11:28] tumbleweed, temporary change dns too? to unbreak the world... [13:00] is there a way to make an upload, in such a way that it is forced to go through review queue? (even though it normally would not) [13:02] none that i know of... nice thought i would be ... people in my team who wnat that feature tend to upload it to a PPA and ask for review there [13:02] yeah.... i want to upload something that should not be trusted =) [13:06] LocutusOfBorg: kicked to -proposed [13:15] xnox: in our team, we'd probably import it into git and then file an MP against it. [13:16] xnox: I can import a package for you if you'd like to do that. [13:17] it's ok [13:22] xnox: but no new binary or so? [13:22] xnox: I suppose asking someone to review from a git branch and/or PPA is most practical then [13:24] ack. will do. [13:33] ta [14:03] pitti, qemu is stuck in proposed on systemd autopkgtest failure and nova. [14:03] nova used to not be there, i'll check that. [14:03] but the systemd failure is weird to me... does the systemd autopkgtest do nested qemu and my update breaks that? [14:04] xnox: it does use nested qemu, for the "upstream" tests; but that's fine, it's the fsck test that failed [14:04] plymouth-start did not run, hmm [14:04] xnox: so, for sure unrelated to qemu, need to investigate [14:05] ack retried nova test because results are all PASS but cleanup failed. [14:05] it's been doing that for a few days already [14:05] xnox: hm, that should be a tmpfail; mind filing a bug against autopkgtst with a pointer to the log? [14:06] i. e. those should auto-retry [14:07] i might be impatient =) [14:07] xnox: oh, it's fine to manually retry, I just mean for the future [14:09] xnox: filed bug 1624406, will hint over systemd [14:09] bug 1624406 in systemd (Ubuntu) "systemd-fsck test started to fail" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624406 [14:13] tah! [14:35] LocutusOfBorg: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ruby-devise is a valid candidate now, but still blocked on some transition [14:37] xnox: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qemu → really close now! [14:37] xnox: did you retry nova/amd64 too? [14:38] no idea where it went [14:38] xnox: so you did? hang on [14:39] sso did do it [14:40] pitti, we need ruby* accepted from new queue [14:40] and demoting ruby-handlebars-assets might be appreciated :) [14:41] so, demoting handlebars, accepting the three packages in new, migration! [14:41] (handlebars has one rdep, diaspora) [14:41] xnox: hmm, no trace of it anywhere [14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-source [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [5.8.35-1] [14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] [14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] [14:42] LocutusOfBorg: ^ [14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] [14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-prof [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [0.15.9+dfsg1-1] [14:42] <3 pitti [14:42] LocutusOfBorg: WDYM with "demoting"? it already is in universe [14:42] ruby-handlebars-assets | 2:0.21.0-5 | yakkety/universe | source, all [14:42] demoting to proposed [14:42] ruby-handlebars-assets | 2:0.23.0-3 | yakkety-proposed/universe | source, all [14:42] or remove, in debian the new version is in non-free [14:42] I'm wondering if you did some mistake in letting it be in universe [14:43] bugs.debian.org/830987 [14:43] LocutusOfBorg: ruby-babel-source is in Debian main, WDYM? [14:44] oh, -handlebars; no idea, did I let that in? [14:44] LocutusOfBorg: anyway, if it has reverse dependencies then we can't just remove it, the reverse depends need to be fixed first [14:44] move both on multiverse :) or demote also diaspora? [14:45] the popcon is "1" [14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-babel-source [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [5.8.35-1] (no packageset) [14:45] bah, diaspora also has a gazillion reverse depends [14:45] oh... [14:46] * pitti wants reverse-depends back [14:47] ok, not that bad [14:48] I'm using coccia since reverse-depends is not in place [14:48] even if it is [14:48] $ change-override -S -c multiverse diaspora diaspora-installer ruby-handlebars-assets [14:49] (in contrib in Debian) [14:49] LocutusOfBorg: and once that's published, move hte three to -proposed? [14:50] sure [14:50] if you mean the three now in multiverse [14:50] but they are broken in Debian, and needs fixing there before ubuntu [14:50] incompatible with the other ruby stuff [14:51] babel-source is in new [14:53] LocutusOfBorg: no, it's not :) [14:54] this unblocks ruby-sprockets-es6 and ruby-babel-transpiler. Once they are cleared from new, everything migrates (if everything is good) [14:54] :) [14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-source [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [5.8.35-1] [15:33] LocutusOfBorg: I think I moved everything now, now needs another publisher cycle [15:38] thanks [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-babel-transpiler [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset) [15:56] pitti, ^^ [16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-babel-transpiler [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-1] [16:29] pitti, ruby-sprockets (universe) is still doing autopkgtest against ruby-handlebars-assets (multiverse) <-- is that normal? [16:44] pitti: does "Confirmed" mean you approved the uife for bug 1623855? [16:44] bug 1623855 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Greybird 3.20.1" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1623855 [16:56] the process says triaged means approved [17:00] right, that's why I'm clarifying what pitti meant [17:48] xnox: DNS is in the same hands as the server that's down [17:49] pitti: there's a temporary reverse-depends on http://ubuntuqa.tblwd.org/ [17:52] pitti: I want to get a britney setup running locally to test Kubuntu packages before we whip up an FFe so we are absolutely 100% sure it breaks nothing [17:52] pitti: (britney2) [17:52] pitti: is there a dep list for britney2 that I'm missing? [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-sprockets-es6 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.9.1-1] (no packageset) [18:36] pitti, last one I hope :D [20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sprockets-es6 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.1-1]