=== hyperair is now known as Guest16390 [09:15] I created app in ubuntu 16.04 using qt shared library and when i run this on my virtual box using ubuntu it gives error " no version information available " [09:16] appdevs [09:18] I created app in ubuntu 16.04 using qt shared library and when i run this on my virtual box using ubuntu it gives error " no version information available " [09:19] Hi, I have juset finished a course in core and advance java(J2EE), I was wondering if I can contribute to the development of ubuntu in any way? [09:25] adroit_machine: you can create application(system) or application for ubuntu store which si used by users. === aldrog is now known as aldrog_ === maxed_ is now known as maxed [12:20] Hi everyone, I have just completed a course in advance and core java(J2EE), I was wondering if I can contribute to the development of ubuntu? [12:57] adddevs, I'm still stuck with implementing payments in my game for Ubuntu Touch. In short, I need to show Qt-based pay ui from non-Qt-based OpenGL application. I filled a bug about lack of API for non-Qt apps, but for now, I'd be happy with any kind of a hack. I guess I need to start a Qt application FROM my app, communicate with using some form of IPC to get information about available... [12:57] ...puchases etc., then somehow show its window over MY app's windo for payment process, then come back. Any ideas how to do any of that? Or am I thinking in the wrong direction? === aldrog is now known as aldrog_ === aldrog is now known as aldrog_ [13:40] maxed: I think you meant "appdevs", not "adddevs"? :) [13:40] JanC, oh, yeah :) === aldrog is now known as aldrog_ === aldrog is now known as aldrog_ === JanC_ is now known as JanC [16:23] Another new interesting problem :) If I try to link my app with Qt, I get error saying undefined reference to symbol '_ZNSaIcEC2Ev@@GLIBCXX_3.4' in one of my files (but if I don't link with Qt, everything compiles) [16:24] However, if I compile a separate Qt-using app, again, the error does not surface... [16:28] "The kit UbuntuSDK for device-armhf (GCC armhf-ubuntu-sdk-15.04) has configuration issues which might be the root cause for this problem." [16:29] Yes, IDE shows this kit with a warning sign, and warning include "Device type is not supported by Qt version". [16:30] Yet, I see that Qt version in kit is Qt 5.4.1 (device-armhf) [16:30] What is even broken here... Is it IDE (reporting problems with kit which actually aren't problems), or kit, or something else? [16:33] Maybe I should just re-install the whole development package... [16:36] But how to do that properly... Which packages to remove... Questions, questions, and no answers in sight :( [16:36] I think bzoltan is the person who might be able to help with the SDK/IDE [16:37] but not sure he's around right now (it's Saturday evening, after all) [16:37] What better time to mess around with your PC?! :) [16:38] OK, brb, rebooting... [16:50] Actually, the first problem I get (after updating to 4.1 version of SDK) is that sometimes after I change CMakeLists.txt, "Run CMake" breaks. It starts giving error message "Qt Creator needs a CMake Tool set up to build. Configure a CMake Tool in the kit options." [16:50] Even though CMake IS configured, and was working just a minute ago... [16:59] The more I dig, the more things seem completely broken. [17:00] It seems I lost the ability to specify CMake parameters. In theroy, SDK 4.1 provides a nice dialog to set them up instead of just command line specification that was used before. [17:00] In practice, it seems that whatever I set there is NOT passed to CMake. [17:02] Either the new SDK release is beyond broken, or my system is totally misconfigured (possibly after the update). I believe this channel isn't a proper place to discuss this in depth. But I don't want to file bugs, because I'm not sure it's not my fault... [17:10] maxed: hey! bzoltan or zbenjamin would be the guys to talk to about SDK issues. I know some others have had similar issues. They might not be around until monday though :-( [17:11] DanChapman, I'll try emailing bzlotan, I think. This might be a lenghty discussion which is better suited to e-mail than to IRC anyway.