[06:31] <nirlevy> Exception in ev.run(): Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/share/openstack/cloudinstall/ev.py", line 128, in run     self.loop.run()
[06:31] <nirlevy> installing openstack auto pilot I am getting the following, any clues,Thanks.
[06:32] <nirlevy> in addition, although I have defined the DNS in /etc/network/interfaces it assumes DNS is the host node itself.
[07:48] <nirlevy> Hi all,
[07:49] <nirlevy> I keep getting error "(network unreachable) resolving './DNSKEY/IN': 2001:7fd::1#53" trying to install MAAS autopilot, any suggestions?
[08:53] <evidex> Could anyone provide an example of passing user_data when starting a node through the MAAS cli?
[08:53] <evidex> Or it is something that's only possible via the 'deploy' REST api?
[09:11] <brendand> evidex, the cli mirrors the api so it should be possible
[09:13] <evidex> brendand: For the love of me, I can't find any documentation on how to actually do it via the CLI, nor does the command help text show it :/
[09:13] <brendand> evidex, the parameter is 'user_data=', did you try that?
[09:14] <brendand> maas maas machine deploy <system_id> user_data=<base64 encoded unicode>
[09:18] <evidex> ^just figured it out as you replied, thank you
[09:18] <evidex> Once you mentioned that the CLI mirrors the API it was pretty obvious
[09:18] <evidex> Thanks!
[10:20] <mup> Bug #1593344 changed: [2.0b8] Dropdown shadow's have disappeared and dropdown mixes with background <ux> <MAAS:Fix Released by ricgard> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1593344>
[10:50] <mup> Bug #1565731 changed: Rack controller details - change “network” title to “interfaces”  <ui> <MAAS:Fix Released by ricgard> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565731>
[10:50] <mup> Bug #1565734 changed: Change node name button incorrect <ui> <MAAS:Fix Released by ricgard> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1565734>
[12:23] <mup> Bug #1625156 opened: [2.1] Inconsistent casing of DHCP on vlan page <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625156>
[13:32] <mup> Bug #1623599 changed: [2.1, vanilla] Settings page do not have separators for the config sections <ui> <ux> <vanilla> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1623599>
[13:53] <mup> Bug #1625195 opened: Xenial deployments fail after updating boot-source to ‘daily’ instead of ‘releases’ <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625195>
[14:11] <mup> Bug #1625195 changed: Xenial deployments fail after updating boot-source to ‘daily’ instead of ‘releases’ <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625195>
[14:18] <mup> Bug #1625195 opened: Xenial deployments fail after updating boot-source to ‘daily’ instead of ‘releases’ <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625195>
[14:24] <mup> Bug #1625195 changed: Xenial deployments fail after updating boot-source to ‘daily’ instead of ‘releases’ <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625195>
[17:53] <PCdude> hello all :)
[17:54] <PCdude> I am looking for a way to make MAAS 1.9 a HA  setup, what are some good docs I can read? in the MAAS docs itself it is only provided for 2.0 and up, but I heard some stories that 1.9 is also possible, but how?
[18:05] <roaksoax> PCdude: 1.9 doesn't support HA
[18:05] <roaksoax> PCdude: it is only 2.0+
[18:06] <PCdude> roaksoax: really? I heard that someone could at least make the PXE part HA, is that right?
[18:06] <roaksoax> PCdude: we haven't done it
[18:06] <roaksoax> PCdude: we don't support it either
[18:07] <PCdude> roaksoax: well then probably bad informed :) , thanks for the reaction anyway, but MAAS 2.0+ can be setup fully HA?
[18:07] <roaksoax> PCdude: yes, MAAS 2.0 is ha, yes
[18:08] <PCdude> roaksoax: lets hope JUJU is coming out of beta soon, thats the only reason I am not using MAAS 2.0 ....
[18:08] <roaksoax> yeah, although in some places we are alreading using juju 2.0
[18:10] <PCdude> roaksoax: are u an employee for canonical?
[21:09] <boomboomboom> anyone using maas 2.0 with cisco ucs c servers?  having issues with ipmi
[21:10] <boomboomboom> it's activated in cimc but no luck.  tried xmlapi with no sucessess either