=== menn0 is now known as menn0-afk
=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban
[12:31] <rock__> roaksoax:  Hi. I have MAAS 1.9.4 0n trusty. And 4 physical servers commissioned. Now I want to test our Openstack bundle on MAAS. On MAAS node I installed juju 2.0. And then I followed  https://jujucharms.com/docs/2.0/clouds-maas. MAAS cloud juju model bootstrapping failed. Issue details :  http://paste.openstack.org/show/581940/. Can anyone help me in this.
[12:32] <rock__> roaksoax: Please help if you have any idea on this MAAS cloud bootstrapping.
[12:33] <rock__> roaksoax: from MAAS UI: Events Info:  http://paste.openstack.org/show/582228/
[12:33] <rock__> roaksoax: Console of the server https://imagebin.ca/v/2vj11ogqr5ud.
[12:40] <rock__> roaksoax: That deploying server released . MAAS UI Events info:  MAAS UI: Events Info: http://paste.openstack.org/show/582231/. That server released.
[12:52] <baldpope> rock__, not sure - but sounds identical to what I'm working on this week
[12:53] <baldpope> kiko had pointed me to a different article, 1sec
[12:53] <baldpope> https://insights.ubuntu.com/2015/11/08/deploying-openstack-on-maas-1-9-with-juju/
[12:54] <baldpope> also, these are probably of decent value - https://insights.ubuntu.com/?s=maas+1.9
[13:05] <rock__> baldpope: Thank you. But my issue is different right. Once juju bootstrap done. Next directly we deploy the OpenStack base bundle here. You have successful  [MAAS+openstack base] bundle setup?.
[13:07] <baldpope> no, keep getting interrupted by other work/prod issues
[13:07] <baldpope> but the 'plan' was to setup maas (done, bm server) and then be able to deploy/bootstrap openstack through maas
[13:08] <baldpope> the original doc I was following I was told is not correct, by kiko
[13:08] <baldpope> he pointed me to some of the articles I posted a moment ago
[13:08] <baldpope> there's a at least 1 other person on the same path as you and I
[13:09] <baldpope> and kiko and some of the other channel participants have been helpful
[13:09] <baldpope> if you have questions, post and stay idle - someone will be along who can answer
[13:11] <baldpope> are you attempting to deploy openstack through the juju charm?
[13:12] <baldpope> side note - curious how you have your networking configured for the openstack servers
[13:13] <baldpope> i have 5 boxes with a total of 7 nics, 1 ilom/ipmi , 2 on board, 4 via secondary nic
[13:13] <baldpope> i had planned to put the 2 onboard into a lag, and use that as the networking for traffic, and then the 4 in a lag for disk sharing
[13:14] <roaksoax> rock__: it seems you aborted the deployment
[13:14] <roaksoax> or something aborted the deployment
[13:17] <rock__> roaksoax: Yesterday, It worked fine. But today due some other issue I reconfigured everything. Then I tried 5 times to bootstrap the maas cloud. But it was giving the same issue. I reconfigured MAAS again. But facing the same issue. How can I resolve this. Do you have any idea? please help me.
[13:19] <rock__> roaksoax: MAAS able to commission successfuly everytime. But curtin installation is aborting.
[13:20] <roaksoax> rock__: what I see in the logs is the machine moves from Ready -> Deploying to Deploying -> Releasing -> Ready
[13:20] <roaksoax> rock__: if it went through "Releasing" that means someone told MAAS to release the machine
[13:20] <roaksoax> rock__: and that /may/ be juju
[13:23] <rock__> baldpope: Yes. I am thinkng that might be a juju bootstrap timeout. I am not sure. But Yesterday when I was doing the same thing curtin installation moving fastly without taking much time. Nearly it was taking 30 min. But today curtin installation has taken 30 min. But not bootstrapped.
[13:23] <rock__> roaksoax: sorry. previous message pointing you.
[13:25] <rock__> roaksoax: So in this situation, any idea from your side?
[13:27] <rock__> baldpope: I have taken 5 servers with 2 nics each. All are having IPMI connection.
[13:30] <rock__> baldpope: On one server I installed VBox. On top of that I created one VM. In that VM I installed MAAS. In that server for, first nic I provided public network. Second nic I created as router. I done with port forwarding and masqurading.
[13:39] <kenytux> hello everyone
[13:40] <kenytux> I really want to ask a question!
[13:40] <kiko> good morning
[13:40] <baldpope> rock__, sounds nearly identical - only difference is I re-purposed an old dell 2950 to act as the maas head
[13:40] <baldpope> kenytux, ask away - sup kiko
[13:40] <kiko> kenytux, it's your lucky day, questions are allowed on tuesdays
[13:40] <kenytux> you make happy
[13:40] <kiko> we try
[13:40] <baldpope> 0_q
[13:40] <kenytux> thank you
[13:41] <baldpope> kiko make happy make baldpope cry ;)
[13:41] <kenytux> how can I deploy a debian distribution with MAAS 2.0 please?
[13:41] <kenytux> There's a way?
[13:41] <baldpope> kenytux, guessing you'd need to import a debian image?
[13:42] <kenytux> yes
[13:43] <baldpope> kenytux, found this after quick search -http://www.travnewmatic.com/2015/02/ubuntu-maas-maas-image-builder-centos-6.html
[13:44] <roaksoax> kenytux: /win 4
[13:44] <roaksoax> err
[13:44] <roaksoax> kenytux: debain is not supported by defailt
[13:44] <mup> Bug #1625636 opened: [2.1] bridge_all on allocate needs to bridge all unconfigured interfaces too <juju> <MAAS:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625636>
[13:45] <kenytux> i've tried with image builder "maas-image-builder" on ubuntu 16.04/MAAS 2.0 failed at make step because of python version
[13:47] <kenytux> is there clear steps should I do on iso file?
[13:57] <kiko> kenytux, no clear steps unfortunately. we can help you with paid consulting, but the docs right now /are/ the source code for curtin
[13:57] <kiko> I wish I had a better answer honestly and we are getting there
[14:03] <kenytux> thank you very much!!!! ;)
=== Guest14517 is now known as med_
[14:31] <rock__> roaksoax: HI. I am trying to entire thing on MAAS 2.0. The node which is commissioning in MAAS 1.9 is not able to commission in MAAS 2.0. I mean not doing PXE boot to selected NIC. ERROR:  PXE-E51 ,  No DHCP (or) Proxy DHCP offers were received.
[14:32] <rock__> roaksoax: Please help me in this. This is a network problem?
[14:35] <kiko> rock__, maybe. the node is unable to get a DHCP response.
[14:35] <kiko> rock__, have you enabled DHCP on the VLAN
[14:38] <rock__> Kiko: How to enable in MAAS 2.0.? I gave DHCP and Static Ip ranges.
[14:43] <rock__> Kiko: Yes. From MAAS2.0 UI, I observed   dhcpd, dhcpd6 not enabled. and rackd — Missing connections to 1 region controller(s).
[14:44] <mup> Bug #1625663 opened: [2.1] CLI usage differs from actual command <ssh-import> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625663>
[14:47] <rock__> kiko: https://imagebin.ca/v/2vjhM0dTBu8E
[14:49] <rock__> Kiko: please tell me how to enable DHCP in MAAS 2.0.
[14:53] <mup> Bug #1625668 opened: [2.1] When trying to add SSH keys for a GH user that doesn't exist, there's no feedback <ssh-import> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625668>
[14:56] <nirlevy> Hi all, can someone exlain to me the DNS configuration in MAAS to be use by landscape install
[14:58] <nirlevy> I believe I do not configure the private network correctly, once landscape is spawned it looks for DNS in the MAAS node, which should be somewhat configured/
[14:59] <mup> Bug #1625668 changed: [2.1] When trying to add SSH keys for a GH user that doesn't exist, there's no feedback <ssh-import> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625668>
[15:01] <rock__> nirlevy: You are using MAAS 1.9 (or) MAAS 2.0?
[15:08] <mup> Bug #1625668 opened: [2.1] When trying to add SSH keys for a GH user that doesn't exist, there's no feedback <ssh-import> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625668>
[15:09] <rock__> Kiko: From UI I enabled DHCP now. Thank you. Previouly I worked on MAAS 1.9.4. Present first time I am doing on MAAS 2.0
[15:10] <nirlevy> kiko: MAAS 1.9
[15:10] <nirlevy> MAAS Version 1.9.4+bzr4592-0ubuntu1 (trusty1) to be exact.
[15:12] <nirlevy> which is the default for apt-get install maas  over ubuntu 14.04.5
[15:14] <rock__> nirlevy: You got MAAS UI right?
[15:15] <rock__> From MAAS UI, go to cluster there you will configure network interface. then modify "unmanaged" to "DHCP and DNS". Then mention static and dynamic ranges there.
[15:23] <nirlevy> kiko, I have set clusters wrong previously, now I have public and private interfaces where private should be DHCP and DNS and public should be unmanaged.
[15:23] <mup> Bug # changed: 1403257, 1452557, 1507724, 1512187, 1596522, 1597541, 1603590, 1607403, 1607980, 1609194, 1613701, 1613702, 1613704, 1615618, 1615686, 1616772,
[15:23] <mup> 1616773, 1616962, 1617195, 1617591, 1617596, 1619202, 1620514, 1620903, 1621981, 1622770, 1623752, 1623753, 1624035, 1624154, 1624380, 1624516
[15:23] <mup> Bug #1625671 opened: [2.1] Need better error message when trying to add SSH keys for LP/GH user that doesn't exist <ssh-import> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625671>
[15:23] <mup> Bug #1625674 opened: [2.1] No feedback when there are no keys to import from LP/GH <ssh-import> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625674>
[15:23] <mup> Bug #1625676 opened: [2.0, 2.1, UI] MAAS webui allows boot disk to be changed on an already deployed node <sts> <ui> <MAAS:Confirmed> <MAAS 2.0:New> <MAAS trunk:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625676>
[15:24] <nirlevy> I do not get the DNS zone though
[15:36] <mup> Bug #1625689 opened: default gateway cannot be set to fe80::/64 via web ui <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625689>
[15:57] <mup> Bug #1625707 opened: NTP servers on regions and racks do not run in orphan mode <ntp> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625707>
[16:15] <mup> Bug #1625709 opened: Rack controllers only sync NTP from region controllers, not externally <ntp> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625709>
[16:15] <mup> Bug #1625711 opened: Peer selection for NTP servers on region controllers is broken <ntp> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625711>
[16:15] <mup> Bug #1625714 opened: DHCP services on rack controllers only publishes NTP servers on rack controllers <ntp> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625714>
=== saibarspeis is now known as saibarAuei
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk
=== beisner is now known as beisner-food
=== beisner-food is now known as beisner
[20:45] <kkkkk> is there any requirements for conjure-up on 16.04?
[20:46] <kkkkk> do i need unbuntu-desktop ?
[20:48] <kiko> kkkkk, just apt-get install and go
[20:49] <kkkkk> it's not working kiko
[20:57] <kiko> kkkkk, that's not surprising, but without more information there's not much I can say! :)
[21:00] <mup> Bug #1625809 opened: MAAS needs to detect and manage BMCs that are IPv6-only <maas-ipv6> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625809>
[21:00] <mup> Bug #1625812 opened: [2.1] Error message is not user friendly <ssh-import> <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625812>
[21:57] <kkkkk> kilo
[21:58] <kkkkk> yaml.reader.ReaderError: unacceptable character #x0080: special characters are not allowed
[21:58] <kkkkk>   in "<unicode string>", position 1971
[21:58] <kkkkk>  i keep getting that error with conjure-up 2
[21:59] <kiko> kkkkk, what are you deploying?
[22:00] <kkkkk> i am trying to deploy openstack with maas 2
[22:01] <kiko> mmcc, stokachu: any clue what this is?
[22:01] <kiko> kkkkk, reads like a bug to me, though, maybe report it to launchpad?
[22:03]  * kiko waves out for the night
[22:15] <kkkkk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/conjure-up/+bug/1625839
[23:12] <mup> Bug #1625847 opened: IPv6 commissioning needs to aggregate /128 networks <maas-ipv6> <MAAS:New for lamont> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1625847>