[00:02] <marco-parillo>  <slangasek> marco-parillo: likely [that there will be another spin tomorrow] 
[00:03] <marco-parillo> But I may try an install tongight. Hope I clobber my YY install andnot my XX install.
[00:07] <marco-parillo> OK Installing.
[00:26] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_merger build #672: SUCCESS in 26 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_merger/672/
[00:41] <marco-parillo> Tested custom install into existing partition, wireless, FF, Dolphin, Konsole, and Kate. Note that Update Manager 'knew' there were updates pending even before I made the wireless connection.
[00:43] <valorie> I'm gonna do a test install of our -landing packages in my VM and if that's successful, onto this computer
[00:43] <valorie> which PPA names do I need to have our entire proposed packageset?
 For now plasma
[00:44] <tsimonq2> valorie: ppa:kubuntu-ppa/staging-plasma ppa:kubuntu-ppa/staging-kdeapplications ppa:kubuntu-ppa/staging-frameworks
[00:45] <marco-parillo> Will they go straight from staging- to the archive, or will they pass through landing- first?
 Yes but apps and frameworks are not yet in -proposed
[00:45] <tsimonq2> marco-parillo: right to the archive
[01:08] <valorie> santa_: right, not in Proposed, but still what *we* are proposing
[01:08] <valorie> I know others have been testing it, but I've been too busy
[01:26] <santa_> valorie: of course, for what we are proposing the 3 staging ppas fw/plasma/apps are the way to go
[01:28] <santa_> btw I think plasma is going to crash on xenial -> yakkety dist-upgrades, I have a conjecture about the cause but I need to onvestigate it properly
[01:29] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kopete build #40: STILL UNSTABLE in 57 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kopete/40/
[01:29] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kdevelop-pg-qt build #25: STILL UNSTABLE in 58 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kdevelop-pg-qt/25/
[01:29] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kde-runtime build #161: STILL FAILING in 57 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kde-runtime/161/
[01:29] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kalarmcal build #62: FAILURE in 59 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kalarmcal/62/
[01:29] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kdesdk-kioslaves build #60: STILL UNSTABLE in 50 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kdesdk-kioslaves/60/
[01:29] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kde-runtime build #155: STILL FAILING in 57 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kde-runtime/155/
[01:30] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_libkleo build #49: FAILURE in 59 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_libkleo/49/
[01:30] <valorie> woah, 1018 upgraded, 70 newly installed, 7 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
[01:30] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kppp build #64: STILL UNSTABLE in 50 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kppp/64/
[01:30] <valorie> that vm has been rolled back for awhile
[01:40] <valorie> woah, has anyone else gotten this? http://imgur.com/a/auJpG
[01:41] <tsimonq2> woah...
[01:41] <tsimonq2> valorie: whatcha running again?
[01:41] <valorie> attempting to upgrade YY in the virtualbox
[01:42] <valorie> I had to reset it
[01:42] <tsimonq2> to what?
[01:42] <valorie> YY as of a month or so ago
[01:42] <tsimonq2> no PPA?s
[01:42] <valorie> hmmm, I don't think so
[01:43] <valorie> I think I'll try a regular upgrade first
[01:43] <valorie> instead of just adding the -landing PPAs and doing it all at once
[01:45] <santa_> yes, that would be better I think
 +1
[01:48] <valorie> hmmm, I had staging
[01:48] <valorie> gone now
[01:49] <tsimonq2> good
[01:51] <valorie> it removed gwenview, when I asked for apt-get install -f install
[01:52] <valorie> seems like YY isn't quite getting the new apt and falls back on apt-get
[02:05] <tsimonq2> hmm
[02:05]  * tsimonq2 shrugs
[02:05] <valorie> so frameworks and plasma - no change
[02:05] <valorie> huh
[02:06] <valorie> kdeapplications, no change
[02:06] <tsimonq2> weird...
[02:06] <valorie> I guess it was the class to having both staging and landing?
[02:06] <valorie> most bizarre
[02:06] <tsimonq2> ...you enabled landing?!?!?!?!?!????????
[02:06] <valorie> clash I mean
[02:06]  * tsimonq2 rereads
[02:06] <tsimonq2> OH I didn't catch that
[02:06] <tsimonq2> do NOT touch Landing
[02:06] <valorie> yes, enabled landing in my vm
[02:06] <tsimonq2> revert pls
[02:07] <valorie> that is our proposed packageset, no?
[02:07] <valorie> I always revert
[02:07] <tsimonq2> nope
[02:07] <tsimonq2> it's all in staging or -proposed
[02:07] <valorie> ah, ok
[02:08] <valorie> pff, I'm confused, it was staging
[02:08] <valorie> gosh
[02:08] <tsimonq2> assuming there are no hiccups, I'm uploading 5.7.95 to a PPA for users that want an adventure :P
[02:08] <valorie> anyway, no more weird-ass broken screenlocker stuff
[02:08] <tsimonq2> I won't push to Git anywhere, it'll just be for the lolz (for 5.7.95)
[02:08] <tsimonq2> \o/
[02:11] <valorie> ok, all staging removed again
[02:11] <valorie> and shutting it down
[02:12] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_okular build #74: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 32 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_okular/74/
[02:12] <valorie> I guess I'll just wait with my production computer......
[02:12] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kopete build #63: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 32 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kopete/63/
[02:15] <tsimonq2> valorie: you want to take the new KDE Plasma 5.8 Beta for a spin on your production machine? :P
[02:18] <valorie> well, I would test in my VM first!
[02:18] <valorie> I don't fancy the thought of having to use my travel computer for days.....
[02:18] <valorie> just in case there are problems with drivers, etc.
[02:19]  * valorie is writing a blogpost about testing the beta atm
 good stuff ;)
[02:19] <valorie> lol
[02:29] <tsimonq2> hey valorie 
[02:29] <tsimonq2> valorie: uploading now: https://launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/+archive/ubuntu/plasma-5.8-beta
[02:38] <tsimonq2> valorie: please respond to Ahmed: http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.com/2016/09/kubuntu-needs-some-kubuntu-developer.html#gpluscomments
[02:50] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kde-runtime build #162: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 15 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kde-runtime/162/
[02:50] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kde-runtime build #156: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 15 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kde-runtime/156/
[02:50] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kcoreaddons build #99: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 15 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kcoreaddons/99/
[02:51] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kcoreaddons build #256: STILL UNSTABLE in 38 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kcoreaddons/256/
[02:52] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kidletime build #257: STILL UNSTABLE in 39 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kidletime/257/
[03:04] <tsimonq2> night night all
[03:06] <valorie> tsimonq2: I'll try on FF
[03:07] <valorie> chromium is one more time not allowing me to post/respond on G+
 ?
[03:07] <valorie> so delightful
 fun :/
 well I *need* sleep, o/ for real
[03:07] <valorie> happens every few months that they screw up *their own product*
[03:07] <valorie> I'll test while you're asleep
 ok nai
[03:07] <valorie> needed to get the dishwasher going
[03:08] <valorie> sweet dreams
[03:14] <valorie> tsimonq2: see PM when you can
[03:33] <valorie> http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.com/2016/09/kubuntu-beta-please-test.html
[03:38] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kauth build #134: STILL UNSTABLE in 47 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kauth/134/
[06:38] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_umbrello build #63: STILL FAILING in 19 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_umbrello/63/
[06:54] <acheronuk> santa_ Mirv armhf failure here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khtml/5.24.0-0ubuntu2 is causing via dep chain the 'Depends: libkf5kdelibs4support-dev (>= 5.24.0~) but it is not going to be installed'  failure on some plasma I think
[06:55] <acheronuk> if we are to get new Frameworks, then sure if worth fixing? now anyway?
[06:55] <santa_> acheronuk: I think we could get 5.26 uploaded and fix it if anything
[06:56] <santa_> probably is going to fail again in 5.26 but we need the build logs
[06:57] <acheronuk> did any of the other 'fixes' on FW 5.24 do the same do you know?
[06:57] <santa_> they are 3 packages ftbfsing in arm
[06:58] <santa_> I can fix 5.24 if that's needed
[06:58] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_umbrello build #64: STILL FAILING in 14 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_umbrello/64/
[06:58] <santa_> but we need someone to upload
[06:58] <acheronuk> as you say, not worth it IF we are for sure going to get 5.26 building
[06:58] <santa_> we passed the ffe I think
[06:59] <santa_> so lets hope shadeslayerappears soon
[07:02] <acheronuk> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/285811546/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-ppc64el.plasma-workspace_4%3A5.7.5-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[07:02] <Mirv> acheronuk: seems like it'd be a simple symbol fixing issue
[07:02] <acheronuk> ^^^ segfault, though not sure why
[07:04] <acheronuk> Mirv: Thanks. :) I get that now. Coffee not quite kicked in yet this morning :P
[07:07] <Mirv> acheronuk: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23214721/ can be uploaded if needed
[07:09] <acheronuk> Mirv: that's great to have. thank you
[07:19] <santa_> Mirv: feel free, we can sync our git from the archive once its done (we are still using separate branches for 5.24 and 5.26)
[07:24] <acheronuk> at least I now know how to set up a armhf chroot to test dep problems :)
[07:30] <kfunk> can't click on 'continue' (does not accept mouse clicks; though not being greyed out either) in the "preparing to install kubuntu" page in the current yakkety installer. known issue?
[07:32] <acheronuk> kfunk: In this in a virtual machine?
[07:33] <kfunk> yes
[07:34] <acheronuk> virtual HD perhaps too small then? VBox default of 8GB for example has that effect of the ubuntu installer
[07:34] <kfunk> acheronuk: oh. that could be
[07:34] <kfunk> whoops, yep. 8GB...
[07:34] <kfunk> the installer... could tell me this being the reason :)
[07:35] <acheronuk> I know. I though there was a nug on it, but couldn't find it the other day when someone else had the same issue
[07:35] <acheronuk> *bug
[07:37] <kfunk> thanks!
[07:39] <kfunk> woah, okay. the icon in the top left was indicating it (red something); but it's impossible to figure out that this means 'disk space low'...
[07:39] <kfunk> anyway, works now. thanks again.
[07:46] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_akonadi build #172: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 27 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_akonadi/172/
[07:46] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kpimtextedit build #84: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 27 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kpimtextedit/84/
[07:46] <Mirv> ok, uploaded
[07:53] <lordievader> Good morning.
[07:59] <acheronuk> Mirv: thank you
[08:00] <acheronuk> santa_: now need to sync that to archive and update the FW 5.26 I guess
[08:00] <acheronuk> sync to our git I mean
[08:07] <acheronuk> Nirv: that is 'unapproved'. does that mean it will go through eventually?
[08:22] <kfunk> hmm, there seem to be some problems with Yakketty + VBox' guest additions. mouse integration woes, the virtual machine does ignore the mouse movements. sigh.
[08:26] <acheronuk> kfunk: daily iso or beta? and what additions? the ones on the additions iso from the VBox site? I will try to test later
[08:26] <kfunk> acheronuk: daily iso. guest additions from VBox itself (when you do device -> insert guest additions)
[08:27] <kfunk> downloaded the iso one hour ago, fwiw
[08:28] <acheronuk> kfunk: ok. zyscing the daily. I shall *try* to test at some point today
[09:19] <acheronuk> kfunk: with current daily iso installed with Vbox 5.1.6 and the additions from Vbox site, I have full mouse control in the installed system
[09:23] <kfunk> weird
[09:23] <kfunk> vbox 5.0.24 over here
[09:26] <acheronuk> kfunk: there have been some mouse control bugs on older versions with newer X or somesuch. the ones I recall were things like the mouse pointer shown being offset by some way from where it would actually click or select. if you can upgrade you Vbox without breaking anything else you use it for, then perhaps that is worth a try
[09:39] <santa_> acheronuk: done
[09:40] <acheronuk> santa_: khtml?
[09:40] <santa_> acheronuk: yes
[09:42] <acheronuk> santa_: ok, I will need to give shadeslayer a replacement 5.26 upload for that which includes the 5.24-0ubuntu2 changelog entry then?
[09:42] <acheronuk> s/ubuntu2/ubuntu3
[09:43] <santa_> did he got the tarball already?
[09:44] <acheronuk> I don't think so, and I took it off Simon's webspace as a precaution
[09:45] <santa_> acheronuk: ok, let me merge the branch so you can build from there, ok?
[09:45] <acheronuk> how to I generate just that release package without re-running the whole ubuntu-archive-upload script?
[09:48] <jimarvan> good morning peeps :)
[09:49] <santa_> well, the old tooling in all its greatness, you can't. I will make the thing for the new tooling quickly
[09:49] <santa_> acheronuk: I'm working on the assumption you have a collection of git clones which you are going to use to push the changes when appropiate, right?
[09:50] <acheronuk> I don't mind re-running the old. I have not committed any tags yet
[09:51] <acheronuk> yes, the old tooling produced
[09:51] <acheronuk> total 2120
[09:51] <acheronuk> drwxrwxr-x  4 neo neo    4096 Sep 21 15:54 ./
[09:51] <acheronuk> drwxrwxr-x 75 neo neo    4096 Sep 21 16:04 ../
[09:51] <acheronuk> drwxrwxr-x  4 neo neo    4096 Sep 21 15:54 git/
[09:51] <acheronuk> drwxrwxr-x  8 neo neo    4096 Sep 21 15:54 khtml-5.26.0/
[09:51] <acheronuk> -rw-r--r--  1 neo neo   27732 Sep 21 15:54 khtml_5.26.0-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
[09:51] <acheronuk> -rw-r--r--  1 neo neo    2201 Sep 21 15:54 khtml_5.26.0-0ubuntu1.dsc
[09:51] <acheronuk> -rw-r--r--  1 neo neo    2478 Sep 21 15:54 khtml_5.26.0-0ubuntu1_source.build
[09:51] <acheronuk> -rw-r--r--  1 neo neo    1477 Sep 21 15:54 khtml_5.26.0-0ubuntu1_source.changes
[09:51] <acheronuk> -rw-rw-r--  1 neo neo   27628 Sep 21 15:54 khtml_5.26.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.10~ppa1.debian.tar.xz
[09:51] <acheronuk> -rw-rw-r--  1 neo neo    3059 Sep 21 15:54 khtml_5.26.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.10~ppa1.dsc
[09:51] <acheronuk> -rw-rw-r--  1 neo neo 2077824 Sep 21 15:54 khtml_5.26.0.orig.tar.xz
[09:51] <acheronuk> in a folder for each package, and tagged by not pushed it the git one
[09:52] <acheronuk> *but not pushed
[09:53] <santa_> acheronuk: may I get those files?
[09:53] <santa_> including the git repository
[09:54] <acheronuk> I'll scp to my container where you can grab them from?
[09:56] <santa_> thats ok
[09:56] <santa_> I think I can scp from there right?
[09:57] <acheronuk> your key is still there, so if I can so can you
[09:58]  * acheronuk should have tar's it. doh
[10:02] <acheronuk> santa_: dev.kubuntu.co.uk:~/tmp/khtml.tar.gz
[10:02] <Riddell> Mirv: you make the Finnish remix? is it just me or is ubuntu-defaults-builder mostly non-functional in its locale customisation? the finnish remix seems to just boot up in english
 Kubuntu beta; please test!
 
 http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.com/2016/09/kubuntu-beta-please-test.html
 can someone please make a blog post on our site about this? ^
[10:10] <acheronuk> santa_: sgclark has merged some stuff so I think I will need to re-run anyway
[10:11] <santa_> acheronuk: git-buildpackage-real will do the thing I think
[10:11] <acheronuk> unless Scarlett has her internet back and is preparing to do the lot herself?
[10:12] <acheronuk> ummm. not sure what to do now
[10:16] <acheronuk> santa_: I am temped to just re-run it all to make sure
[10:21] <santa_> acheronuk: just rebuild the source package with -real and recreate the ubuntu/5.26.0-0ubuntu1 tag, just check what you have now with 'tig'
[10:21] <santa_> no need to re-run everything again
[10:25] <acheronuk> so run without arguments?
[10:27] <Mirv> Riddell: I do. with 16.04 the legacy boot default language setting stopped working, echo fi | sudo tee extract-cd/isolinux/lang still worked in 14.04. luckily in legacy boot the default behavior is to boot to the language selection + Try or Install mode. in UEFI mode however the default is Finnish correctly.
[10:27] <Mirv> Riddell: I couldn't find out how to make the legacy boot default changed
[10:28] <acheronuk> gbp:info: All Orig tarballs 'khtml_5.26.0.orig.tar.gz' found at '../build-area'
[10:28] <acheronuk> santa_: ^^
[10:30] <Mirv> Riddell: I'm not using ubuntu-defaults-builder but I assume it did something similar and hasn't been updated
[10:33] <santa_> acheronuk: so does it work or not?
[10:33] <acheronuk> not
[10:33] <acheronuk> gbp:info: All Orig tarballs 'khtml_5.26.0.orig.tar.gz' found at '../build-area'
[10:33] <acheronuk> gbp:info: Extracting khtml_5.26.0.orig.tar.gz to '/home/neo/workspace/frameworks/khtml/build-area/khtml-tmp'
[10:33] <acheronuk> tar: /home/neo/workspace/frameworks/khtml/build-area/khtml_5.26.0.orig.tar.gz: Cannot open: No such file or directory
[10:33] <acheronuk> tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
[10:33] <acheronuk> gbp:error: Couldn't unpack "/home/neo/workspace/frameworks/khtml/build-area/khtml_5.26.0.orig.tar.gz": it exited with 2
[10:35] <acheronuk> santa_: I have started a full run in a new output folder as insurance. no harm doing that.
[10:35] <acheronuk> and I will be back in 30mins or so
[10:36] <santa_> so now you can't test the fix for automation :P
[10:51] <BluesKaj> HIyas all
[10:52] <acheronuk> santa_: it complained that "Package khtml from the PPA differs from bzr" anyway, so halted and uploading that
[10:52] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kio build #258: FAILURE in 4 hr 0 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kio/258/
[10:55] <jimarvan> BluesKaj: hello! :)
[10:55]  * acheronuk lunches
[10:58] <BluesKaj> hi jimarvan
[10:59] <jimarvan> same here, lunch time!
[11:05] <BluesKaj> Morning coffee here
[11:09] <mparillo> Hiyas BluesKaj. YY Beta 2 Release Candidates: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/367/builds
[11:15] <tsimonq2> o/
[11:15] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: https://launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/+archive/ubuntu/plasma-5.8-beta/+packages
[11:15] <Mirv> khtml seems ok now https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khtml/5.24.0-0ubuntu3
[11:15] <tsimonq2> :D
[11:16] <BluesKaj> ok DL ing 64bit image as we speak, mparillo . Xserver is broken on my yakkety install anyway 
[11:17] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_akonadi build #173: STILL FAILING in 3 hr 26 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_akonadi/173/
[11:17] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kldap build #95: FAILURE in 3 hr 31 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kldap/95/
[11:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kpimtextedit build #85: STILL FAILING in 3 hr 26 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kpimtextedit/85/
[11:18] <mparillo> I have been running -staging so long, it feels like a step back.
[11:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kstars build #112: STILL UNSTABLE in 3 hr 32 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kstars/112/
[11:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_grantleetheme build #27: STILL FAILING in 3 hr 32 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_grantleetheme/27/
[11:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_cantor build #85: NOW UNSTABLE in 3 hr 32 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_cantor/85/
[11:21] <acheronuk> Mirv: yep :) the failures here http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/#kubuntu which are actually dep fails on libkf5kdelibs4support-dev from khtml need prodding on for a rebuild I think? I can look through and list and link the ones in question in a bit if you like
[11:22]  * ahoneybun pokes Rick about doing a Ninja session at UOS
[11:25] <Mirv> acheronuk: yeah feel free to eg pastebin links of the form of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khtml/5.24.0-0ubuntu3/ and I can run the rebuilds
[11:28] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kde-baseapps build #84: STILL FAILING in 1 min 37 sec: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kde-baseapps/84/
[11:30] <tsimonq2> ok I'm off o/
[11:34] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kde-baseapps build #85: STILL FAILING in 50 sec: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kde-baseapps/85/
[11:35] <acheronuk> Mirv: great I'll do that in 30mins or so. thanks again
[11:52] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kdevplatform build #20: STILL FAILING in 25 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kdevplatform/20/
[12:08] <acheronuk> Mirv: if there is not another issue, I think a rebuild should do for these now: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23215567/
[12:14] <Mirv> acheronuk: done, lots of armhf and one ppc64el
[12:16] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kdevplatform build #21: STILL FAILING in 19 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kdevplatform/21/
[12:18] <acheronuk> Mirv: if you mean that ppc64el for plasma-workspace, that is a seg fault, and I honestly have not much clue why that is happening
[12:19] <Mirv> acheronuk: I don't know, I just restarted everything and closed the tabs :)
[12:20] <acheronuk> Mirv: no problem :)
[12:22] <acheronuk> Mirv: ah wrong one, I meant https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-workspace/4:5.7.5-0ubuntu1/+build/10937355 which could you try as well if you would be so kind?
[12:24] <BluesKaj> mparillo, ok, gonna give YY Beta a try
[12:25] <BluesKaj> Beta 2
[12:28] <shadeslayer> acheronuk: let me know what to upload @ frameworks
[12:30] <acheronuk> shadeslayer: had to amend what we were going to give you as some symbol fixes for armhf came to light. I'll be able to re tar it all up again and upload somewhere a little bit later
[12:31] <shadeslayer> ah sure
[12:37] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_grantleetheme build #28: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 11 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_grantleetheme/28/
[12:37] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[12:37] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kio build #259: FIXED in 1 hr 11 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kio/259/
[12:38] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kdeconnect-kde build #49: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 11 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kdeconnect-kde/49/
[12:38] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kalarmcal build #63: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 11 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kalarmcal/63/
[12:39] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_libkleo build #50: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 12 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_libkleo/50/
[12:39] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kldap build #96: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 12 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kldap/96/
[12:57] <acheronuk> clivejo: you about?
[13:06] <clivejo> in and out
[13:06] <clivejo> not able to keep up with the conversation though
[13:07] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_marble build #171: STILL FAILING in 28 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_marble/171/
[13:09] <acheronuk> clivejo: nearly ready to give frameworks to Rohan. You ok with that, as much as you can be considering circumstances? 
[13:10] <clivejo> all I can say is Im running them and cant see any issues
[13:11] <acheronuk> ok. I just thought I would give you the chance to shout 'HALT' if there did happen to be something.
[13:12] <clivejo> nah
[13:12] <clivejo> but as I said to Simon, please be careful
[13:12] <acheronuk> lol. yes
[13:12] <clivejo> look at past releases and use our tooling
[13:13] <acheronuk> I am letting the tooling so the work and checking the results (as much as you can with 72 packages)
[13:14] <clivejo> then Im happy :)
[13:15] <acheronuk> I hope you/we still are when it's uploaded and tried to build :P
[13:16] <acheronuk> that makes me nervous. but then it should. if I was not, then I would be being to casual about a serious thing
[13:16] <clivejo> you bumped all the FW build deps?
[13:17] <clivejo> so that it will build in the correct order
[13:17] <acheronuk> yes
[13:17] <clivejo> should be fine then
[13:18] <acheronuk> did that all when it was staged
[13:18] <clivejo> and Mirv is on hand to help fix issues with other archs
[13:18] <acheronuk> yep, he's been great as usual :)
[13:19] <clivejo> yes he is
[13:19] <acheronuk> tagging looks ok, and I can push that as soon as I'm sure the upload is actually going up
[13:20] <acheronuk> then update the yakkety_archive branch
[13:20] <clivejo> the the yakkety_archive branch this time :P
[13:20] <clivejo> to
[13:20] <acheronuk> that will have to be a merge to
[13:21] <acheronuk> that will take the tags with it, yes?
[13:28] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_akonadi-search build #62: FAILURE in 48 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_akonadi-search/62/
[13:31] <acheronuk> santa_: the tag in the kubuntu_yakkety_backports and a merge to kubuntu_yakkety_archive should be a clean one and give expected results for the archive branch, yes?
[13:32] <acheronuk> I have the tar reading to give to Rohan....
[13:32] <acheronuk> *ready
[13:32] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_marble build #172: STILL FAILING in 19 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_marble/172/
[13:34]  * acheronuk acheron will looks at the dev apps later and find cookies, if someone answers
[13:44] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_umbrello build #66: STILL FAILING in 16 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_umbrello/66/
[13:45] <acheronuk> ok. I copied my clones to a test dir and tried, and all merges were clean without conflicts
[13:48] <acheronuk> Mirv: could we retry? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-workspace/4:5.7.5-0ubuntu1/+build/10937355
[13:51] <acheronuk> shadeslayer: to the best of my knowledge this should be complete http://people.ubuntu.com/~tsimonq2/frameworks-5.26-yakkety.tar.gz
[13:52] <shadeslayer> ack
[13:53] <shadeslayer> acheronuk: uploading
[13:54]  * acheronuk gulps
[13:54] <acheronuk> http://i.imgur.com/xRtt6Tv.png
[13:54] <acheronuk> thanks
[13:54] <marco-parillo> I successfully ran the live ISO yesterday (no try/install dialogue, just the way I like it) and successfully installed on real HW. Today in a VMware VM, I got the black breeze cursor, but never got a plasma session. I allocated 2MB of memory to my VM. Last time this happened (maybe a couple of weeks ago), I found I could get the try/install dialogue when I tried to install immediately after booting, when my Win7 host disk
[13:58] <shadeslayer> acheronuk: uploaded
[13:58] <clivejo> thanks Rohan :)
[13:58] <shadeslayer> clivejo: acheronuk: I'll need you to coordinate with ubuntu-release btw
[13:58] <shadeslayer> if you need to upload fixes, just point me to where
[13:59] <shadeslayer> or co-ordinate with peeps from ubuntu-release :)
[13:59] <acheronuk> shadeslayer: understood, and thank you once again
[13:59] <shadeslayer> np
[14:00] <clivejo> shadeslayer: you done any work on discover and KDE Store integration ?
[14:01] <shadeslayer> nope
[14:01] <shadeslayer> apol is your guy
[14:01] <clivejo> is he Blue Systems guy?
[14:02] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_ktp-common-internals build #116: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 23 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_ktp-common-internals/116/
[14:02] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Starting build #145 for job mgmt_pause_integration (previous build: ABORTED)
[14:02] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_grantleetheme build #65: STILL FAILING in 34 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_grantleetheme/65/
[14:02]  * clivejo rolls eyes
[14:03] <clivejo> my pup is swinging my welly around him and kicking himself with it!
[14:03] <acheronuk> LOL
[14:03] <acheronuk> what breed BTW?
[14:03] <shadeslayer> clivejo: yeah
[14:04]  * soee spots that new Firefox and Thunderbird land in Xenial
[14:05] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_umbrello build #67: STILL FAILING in 15 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_umbrello/67/
[14:10] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project merger_kcoreaddons build #749: FAILURE in 18 sec: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/merger_kcoreaddons/749/
[14:13] <acheronuk> clivejo: tagged and merged in yakkety_archive
[14:14] <clivejo> Im not seeing a 5.26 tag?
[14:15] <acheronuk> not am I
[14:15] <acheronuk> nor
[14:16] <acheronuk> .......
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.12.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.13.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16]  * clivejo does not like all this non standard workflow!
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.14.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.15.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.15.0-0ubuntu2
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.15.0-0ubuntu3
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.18.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.22.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.23.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.24.0-0ubuntu1
[14:16] <acheronuk> ubuntu/5.26.0-0ubuntu1
[14:17] <acheronuk> is what I have locally
[14:17] <clivejo> why isnt it showing on the git html gui
[14:20] <acheronuk> git push --tags needed?
[14:21] <clivejo> maybe :/
[14:22] <acheronuk> yes, looks like it. 
[14:22] <Mirv> acheronuk: done
[14:23] <acheronuk> Mirv: ty. :) also if you have a sec https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khotkeys/4:5.7.5-0ubuntu1/+build/10937200 
[14:24] <acheronuk> may still fail, but *shrug*
[14:26] <acheronuk> clivejo: tags going on now
[14:27] <clivejo> looks better!
[14:27] <acheronuk> I won't forget that step in ah hurry now
[14:38] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_akonadi-search build #63: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 5 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_akonadi-search/63/
[14:39] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kstars build #237: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 11 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kstars/237/
[15:40] <jimarvan> see ya later peeps!
[15:45] <marco-parillo> OK, I am giving up on trying to install YY Beta2 in VMware, and have started the LVM Encryption Test Case: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/367/builds/131689/testcases/1451/results I recall it being clearer that the two text entry boxes were for your disk encryption key. If you do not enter a key at all, or enter mis-matched keys, instead of some kind of error, the continue button just does not work.
[15:57] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project mgmt_pause_integration build #145: ABORTED in 1 hr 54 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/mgmt_pause_integration/145/
[15:59] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Yippee, build fixed!
[15:59] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project merger_kcoreaddons build #750: FIXED in 23 sec: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/merger_kcoreaddons/750/
[16:16] <marco-parillo> So I got further with VirtualBox, but was ultimately not successful. I am unwilling to mark my test case as failed, as it might be my fault.
[16:38] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kcoreaddons build #100: STILL UNSTABLE in 40 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kcoreaddons/100/
[17:00] <santa_> good evening everyone
[17:00] <santa_> acheronuk: sorry I was afk. everything of with fw 5.26?
[17:01] <acheronuk> santa_: Hi. no problem :)
[17:01] <santa_> ok, I'm going to pull git, have you merged _backports into _archive already?
[17:02] <acheronuk> santa_: it's uploaded and sitting unapproved in the queue due to the beta freezed as far as I can tell
[17:02] <acheronuk> santa_: yes, all merged and tagged
[17:03] <santa_> oh, I see that now in the pulls
[17:03] <santa_> good job
[17:03] <acheronuk> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[17:04] <acheronuk> so hopefully when they decide beta is done, that will all get approved
[17:07] <acheronuk> I image simon will be along in abut 8 mins, give or take
[17:07] <acheronuk> imagine
 Hey hey hey!
 How are y'all?
[17:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kcoreaddons build #257: STILL UNSTABLE in 40 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kcoreaddons/257/
[17:18] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_kauth build #135: STILL UNSTABLE in 40 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kauth/135/
[17:19] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kidletime build #258: STILL UNSTABLE in 41 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kidletime/258/
 Has all of Plasma landed yet?
[17:32] <acheronuk> not quite yet, and I think even if it did it would not clear proposed until the archive unfreezes
[17:33] <tsimonq2> ic
[17:33] <tsimonq2> ok
[17:34] <acheronuk> one build failure left to prod, and the rest are dep waits that *should* clear eventually 
[17:34] <tsimonq2> BUENO COSAS!
[18:07] <tsimonq2> ok I'm off o/
[18:07]  * clivejo wondered what the smell was
 Lol
[18:24] <clivejo> ;)
[18:25] <clivejo> one kinda expects that from teenage boys 
[18:25]  * clivejo nods knowingly at Granny Valorie
[18:57] <acheronuk> ouch! https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/4:5.7.5-0ubuntu1/+build/10937306
[19:07] <mamarley> acheronuk: If I were a gambler, I would bet that isn't your fault.
[19:09] <acheronuk> mamarley: that was a "why now?" ouch, not a "was that my fault? ouch. that builder just fell over all on it's own I would guess
[19:09] <mamarley> "If something bad can happen, it will, and at the worst possible moment."
[19:11] <acheronuk> what I want to know is will the build get auto-retried?
[19:11]  * mamarley doesn't know that, sorry.
[19:16]  * mhall119 just discovered https://launchpad.net/~we-love-harald :)
[19:17] <acheronuk> and you joined XD
[19:17]  * clivejo joins it too
[19:19] <clivejo> apparently his name is Haruld
[19:22] <clivejo> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWermoaDDUo
[19:24] <mhall119> acheronuk: of course I joined it :)
 One of the few I have actually watched
[19:25] <clivejo> hes very posh!
 /me resists resists resists.......
[19:29] <clivejo> unit tested and lovely !
[19:30] <acheronuk> shadeslayer Mirv or anyone with superpowers: can we retry builds https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/4:5.7.5-0ubuntu1/+build/10937306 & https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khotkeys/4:5.7.5-0ubuntu1/+build/10937200
[19:49] <clivejo> acheronuk: how are the archive builds going?
[19:50] <acheronuk> clivejo: plasma needs the 2 builds I linked to above retrying. I think it's just flaky builders for those.
[19:50] <clivejo> would anyone on the release team poke them for us?
[19:51] <acheronuk> plasma also needs a frameworks build fixing for armhf (symbols), but now I guess it's best to wait for new frameworks to fix that as they are already in the queue
[19:52] <acheronuk> frameworks are in the queue and I hope will get accepted by the release team once freeze is ended
[19:53] <acheronuk> clivejo: I was reluctant to poke the release team why they are still sorting beta issues?
[19:57] <acheronuk> http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/#kubuntu mostly amrhf waiting on that plasma-workspace build, which is waiting on the frameworks fix for kjsembed
[19:58] <shadeslayer> acheronuk: done
[19:58] <acheronuk> whoo! thanks :)
[20:01]  * acheronuk prays for stable builders this time
[20:02] <santa_> shadeslayer: thanks! we also have a pending upload for plasma discover, I reached an agreement with someone from the release team, so I have the agreed solution in kubuntu_yakkety_archive
[20:04] <acheronuk> santa_: I'm a bit annoyed I missed this :/ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kjsembed/5.24.0-0ubuntu2/+build/10758158
 Fun :/
[20:09] <santa_> acheronuk: well me might get more of those once 5.26 is built so no prob, if anything we will fix the symbols files
[20:10] <acheronuk> yeah, I figured. It was only very mild annoyance :P
[20:11]  * acheronuk ponders KDEapps
[20:13] <acheronuk> do we, don't we? can we, can't we? ummmm.............
[20:13] <santa_> they are various failing to build after gcc 6
[20:13] <santa_> including kdelibs kdepimlibs
[20:13] <santa_> they should be updated
[20:14] <acheronuk> yeah, I saw the email on the rebuilds. they featured a fair bit
[20:15] <acheronuk> so that is a argument addressing the concerns here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/1625756/comments/2
[20:17] <acheronuk> I'm not sure if we can prevail on shadeslayers's good will, as adding that to what he has already done is a LOT to put your name to
[20:17] <santa_> keeping them as they are will do more harm than updating them
[20:18] <santa_> we are talking about releasing with packages which doesn't build
[20:19] <santa_> * don't
[20:20] <acheronuk> if you put it like that, then it's a gimme. just slightly worried if we will have time to knock them into shape if we get unexpected issues
[20:21] <santa_> they are already in shape, if anything we can fix them
[20:21] <santa_> if we release them as they are then it's going to be more difficult to maintain the release
[20:22] <santa_> because if you want to fix anything failing to build, you will have to fix the FTBFS first
[20:27] <acheronuk> ok. running ubuntu-archive-upload as a test on those
[20:30] <acheronuk> clivejo: what is the status of ffmpegthumbs, as there is already a 16.04.3 in the archive?
[20:30] <clivejo> Phil uploaded it to fix a LP bug
[20:31] <acheronuk> It will work then? with dolphin etc? I don't use them thumbnails, so don't know
[20:33] <acheronuk> clivejo: and are translations up to date enough? Phil said something about them?
[20:34] <acheronuk> ohh.. you weren't in that meeting :/
[20:36] <clivejo> nope!
[20:38] <acheronuk> nope to translations not up to date enough? or just the meeting bit? or both?
[20:39] <acheronuk> or ffmpegthumbs is still broke?
[20:40] <clivejo> I wasnt as the meeting
[20:45] <acheronuk> hmmm. script halted at this http://paste.ubuntu.com/23217515/
[20:50] <acheronuk> Simon fixed the maintainers in git I think, but didn't upload a changed package to the ppa.
 You are correct
 I'm supposed to do that?!?
[21:09] <acheronuk> at this stage, yes
 I just pushed to Git to get my own script working :P
 Didn't think to push to the PPA
 You talking about staging?
[21:10] <acheronuk> the upload script compares the staging ppa contents with git yakkety_archive 
 Oh
 :/
[21:11] <acheronuk> I didn't know that to a few days ago :P
[21:32] <clivejo> why did you push to yakkety_archive?
 Me?
 does that change you pushed stand?
 FFS Internet is rubbish
 why do I pay £35 a month for this BS
[21:47] <valorie> 35!
[21:48] <valorie> I think ours is at least double that
[21:48] <valorie> but maybe twice as good?
[21:48] <valorie> dunno
 Simon, did you run it by anyone before you "fixed" the maintainer fields?
 @CliffordTheBigRedDoggie, Should I have not done that?
 I just don't understand why, in the grand scheme of things its a wishlist job and the potential problems by pushing to yakkety archive
 How many packages did you do?
 I just fixed the maintainer field on that
[22:18] <shadeslayer> santa_: diff plz
[22:23] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_umbrello build #65: NOW UNSTABLE in 1 hr 1 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_umbrello/65/
[22:23] <acheronuk> Hummm. [22:24] <acheronuk> Upload script on Apps ^^^
[22:32] <acheronuk> so I would guess kde4libs": "4.14.10" in packaging-exceptions.json needs updating to "4.14.22"?
[22:33] <acheronuk> santa_: if you are lurking? ^^
 ...then do it?
 Or can't you?
[22:34] <acheronuk> who are you talking to? me?
 Yep
 Is it just in KA?
[22:35] <acheronuk> Well, if someone is around who knows the tooling better than me, I would prefer to double check first
[22:35] <acheronuk> I *can* make that change, of course..
[22:38] <santa_> yo
[22:40] <santa_> https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/09/21/%23ubuntu-release.html#t22:51
[22:40] <santa_> https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/09/21/%23ubuntu-release.html#t23:11
[22:40] <santa_> shadeslayer: ↑
[22:42] <santa_> acheronuk: I guess so, keep in mind that the old tooling is kind of unmaintaned and the new one will be ready to manage archive uploads soon
 santa_: what's it written in?
[22:43] <santa_> tsimonq2: python, like the old one
[22:43] <santa_> 3
[22:44] <santa_> python 3
 GOOD STUFF! :D
 And have you written unit tests?
 And hooked up to Travis CO?
 *CI
 And what's it licensed under?
[22:45] <santa_> gplv2 or later
[22:45] <santa_> it's in the same git repo
[22:45] <santa_> the next time we stage something I would like to guide you trough its usage if you are up to do the work
 Please write the detailed process on the packaging notes pad
[22:46] <santa_> I already worked with rik on this, I mean we used the new tooling to stage framewors 5.26
[22:47] <santa_> yes, I have to release one of these days the version 2 of that pdf explaining the design
[22:47] <acheronuk> I sent you the notes I took
 santa_: what about a Qt frontend? :P
[22:49] <santa_> srlsy
[22:50] <acheronuk> fatal: remote error: Repository '~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/libkf5kgeomap' not found.
[22:51] <santa_> acheronuk: what are you doing? trying to build the sources of apps for an sponsored upload?
[22:51] <acheronuk> santa_: I'm running the upload script though to test it for when we do
 I'm joking santa_
 Lol
[22:52] <santa_> it could be done
[22:52] <santa_> maybe with pyqt
[22:52] <santa_> not worth the effort, but could "make sense"
[22:53] <santa_> the problem is that it's something just for us, so...
[22:54] <acheronuk> the repo is just libkgeomap
 pyqt
 @ahoneybun, pyqt
[22:57] <valorie> do we have to fix some stuff here: http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/test-rebuild-20160916-yakkety.html is what is in queue going to fix?
 PyQt
 santa_ ^
 @ahoneybun, PyWt
 /me assigns Simon to fix the slideshow since he says he's good with Python
[22:59] <valorie> what happened to Blaze?
[22:59] <valorie> he was fixing, then disappeared
[22:59] <acheronuk> valorie: some of it if we get applications in
 well I don't think anything tested it tbh
 *anyone
 @ahoneybun, +1
[23:00] <santa_> valorie: yes, we have to fix some of those
[23:01] <santa_> many of them are fixed in apps 16.04.3
[23:01] <valorie> I suppose if we are good citizens and do that, our apps are more likely to land
 Well dayum
[23:01] <acheronuk> if I can work out what to do with libgeopmap :P
[23:02] <santa_> valorie: 16.04.3 are fine, we rebuilt everything a few days ago while we fixed the build depends versioning issues
[23:02] <valorie> cool
[23:06] <acheronuk> so package-name-lists/applications-yakkety has libkf5kgeomap
[23:07] <acheronuk> but repo is libgeopmap, so fail!
[23:17] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_grantleetheme build #66: STILL FAILING in 54 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_grantleetheme/66/
[23:43] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kdevplatform build #18: STILL FAILING in 24 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kdevplatform/18/
[23:43] <valorie> tsimonq2: is your plasma PPA all up to snuff for my testing?
[23:48] <tsimonq2> valorie: not yet
[23:50] <valorie> ok
[23:52] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_umbrello build #68: NOW UNSTABLE in 1 hr 28 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_umbrello/68/
[23:53] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project yakkety_unstable_ktp-auth-handler build #117: STILL UNSTABLE in 37 min: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_ktp-auth-handler/117/
[23:56] -kubuntu-ci:#kubuntu-devel- Project xenial_unstable_kde-baseapps build #81: STILL FAILING in 48 sec: http://kci.pangea.pub/job/xenial_unstable_kde-baseapps/81/