| === decoder_ is now known as decoder | ||
| shalq | hello | 13:09 |
|---|---|---|
| shalq | is there anyone compiled ubuntu xenial kernel on ubuntu trusty ? | 13:10 |
| shalq | It seems it requires linux-libc-dev_4.4.0-36.55_amd64.deb installed on ubuntu trusty | 13:12 |
| shalq | I am talking about https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626838, can any one can help ? | 13:14 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1626838 in linux (Ubuntu) "yakkety compiling failed on ubuntu trusty" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 13:14 |
| JanC | shalq: the missing modules all seem related to ZFS ? | 13:46 |
| JanC | also, there are xenial kernels in the trusty-updates repositories, but they don't include ZFS support | 13:51 |
| rtg | JanC, ZFS was not supported until Wily (which is EOL) | 13:58 |
| JanC | yeah, I know, but in theory ZFS modules/utilities/libraries/etc. could have been added together with the xenial kernels in trusty | 14:02 |
| rtg | JanC, until there is user space support, it doesn't make much sense to turn on ZFS modules in the kernel. | 14:07 |
| JanC | oh sure (I don't know exactly what would need support even) | 14:08 |
| JanC | I guess it would all have to go in -backports | 14:09 |
| JanC | actually, I have a bug with ZFS in nautilus that I should file :) | 14:10 |
| rtg | I think there is a plan to backport user space | 14:10 |
| JanC | probably a bug in gvfs | 14:13 |
| shalq | JanC: so if the ZFS is backport, then the issue should be gone , right ? | 14:25 |
| JanC | I don't know | 14:25 |
| shalq | I run the compile inside a xenial docker, the compile has no any issue. | 14:26 |
| JanC | I'm not even sure what causes your problem, just saw that the "missing modules" are all ZFS-related | 14:26 |
| JanC | and if it works otherwise, then the missing modules is probably harmless | 14:27 |
| JanC | maybe you could build the yakkety kernel without ZFS & its related modules | 14:29 |
| shalq | you mean remove those missing modules from generic flavor ? | 14:29 |
| shalq | I am not farmilar with ZFS, not sure what impact if remove them, so I don't want to remove modules if I really know it well and don't want it . | 14:34 |
| JanC | ZFS is a file system; if you don't use it then you don't need any of those modules... | 14:36 |
| JanC | and like I said before: the xenial kerel in trusty has ZFS-support removed too | 14:37 |
| shalq | just wonder different build result between trusty and xenial. If I want to build a xenial kernel, which build server version should I use , trusty or xenial ? I suppose both have the same result, not sure | 14:41 |
| shalq | it is interesting topic, I don't find any doc for suggestion . | 14:42 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest73904 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| shalq | I think it is better to build xenial kernel on xenial server, it then has no dependency, so if I only have trusty, I can start a docker container with xenial, and run compile in the xenial container, and then get the kernel pkg | 15:00 |
| shalq | is there any concern if I build ubuntu kernel inside a docker container ? from my testing, it works very well, no any depencency issue. | 15:01 |
| om26er | apw, Hi! My system comes to a crawl while compiling code. This was definitely not happening with the 4.4 kernel. Is that something of a known issue ? | 16:37 |
| om26er | Its a thinkpad X1Carbon. | 16:38 |
| apw | om26er, not known i don't think no, which kernel, there is a new -16 (yep, yet another kernel) as of today | 16:39 |
| om26er | apw, yes, updated that as well. Same results. | 16:39 |
| apw | om26er, ok cna you file a bug please | 16:39 |
| om26er | apw, will do that. Also now there is a lag in screen brightness key press and the brightness actually changing. | 16:40 |
| om26er | like 2seconds | 16:40 |
| apw | om26er, yes _that_ one we know, that is related to a ubuntu-settings-daemon change whihc is triggering a whole login to set the brightness | 16:41 |
| apw | _that_ one is not kernel, most every other problem is, but not that one | 16:41 |
| om26er | apw, ok, thanks. Reporting the system slowness now. | 16:42 |
| apw | om26er, drop the bug number in here please | 16:42 |
| om26er | bug 1627108 | 16:44 |
| ubot5` | bug 1627108 in linux (Ubuntu) "X1Carbon comes to a crawl during high CPU usage tasks" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1627108 | 16:44 |
| apw | om26er, hey htat is reporting that you have -15 running | 16:45 |
| om26er | apw, it came in today in updates | 16:46 |
| apw | and there is a -16 since then, its moving like a train | 16:46 |
| om26er | apw, ah, -16 is in -proposed | 16:46 |
| om26er | will update to that first. | 16:46 |
| apw | ahh yes, i thought it had made it further | 16:47 |
| zyga | jdstrand: offtopic, this branch was there to test if the unexpected unmount of the core snap is caused by the test that was fiddling with cgroups: https://github.com/snapcore/snap-confine/pull/152 | 21:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!