=== petevg_ is now known as petevg === dooferlad_ is now known as dooferlad === frankban_ is now known as frankban === rogpeppe is now known as rogpeppe1 === rogpeppe1 is now known as rogpeppe [12:09] anyone else having problems with canonical irc? [12:10] uiteam are you able to connect to canonical irc? [12:11] frankban, mhilton: no, it's down [12:11] frankban: I can't [12:11] down [12:11] ok [12:11] frankban, mhilton: see discussion on #juju-dev [12:15] uiteam: sorry, i don't think I made it clear - I'll need this to be approved and landed before the testing changes: https://github.com/juju/utils/pull/242 [14:21] kadams54: you could take another look at that revision branch you were working on and switch it from using the setup.py to not [14:22] and this channel comes alive :P [14:23] hatch_: Yeah, that's what I'm doing at the moment. Just didn't know if there was anything that should take precedent. [14:23] rick_h_: I know! I saw the notification for hatch's message and then couldn't find it ;-) [14:24] kadams54: here is how you can get the version in the Makefile [14:24] $(eval GUI_VERSION=$(shell sed -n -e '/current_version =/ s/.*\= *//p' .bumpversion.cfg)) [14:24] kadams54: I'd also like it to grab the current git sha and include it in the file === hatch_ is now known as hatch [14:24] probably in a json format [14:24] or js === hatch is now known as Guest72453 [14:25] { "version": "2.1.13", "sha": "asdfasdfasdf" } [14:25] bah [14:30] hatch: Yeah, so... when we talked last, we wanted to use the same version that goes on the tarball. That version is pulled from setup.py (`python setup.py sdist --formats=bztar` in the fast-dist target), which is why I took the approach I did. .bumpversion.cfg updates setup.py when you run `make bumpversion`, so I'd like to keep both the dist and version [14:30] targets using the same approach. === BradCrittenden is now known as bac === hatch_ is now known as hatch [14:39] there we go [14:39] kadams54: sorry did you see my messages there? I was having issues :) [14:40] ha ha, no, I did not. [14:40] last one was about the version in json? [14:40] or in js [14:48] sha in json [14:49] hatch: The message you sent as Guest72453 [14:50] ;-) [14:50] uiteam call in 10 [15:00] kadams54, antdillon: standup [15:14] hatch: I am now available for any GUI tasks that you need for 2.2. I am near my EOD but please fire me an email before your EOD with anything I can help doing tomorrow [15:15] frankban: sure thing - honestly the big thing right now I think is that subordinate issue [15:15] frankban: the DF was working quite well [15:15] so I haven't had enough time to really try and break it [15:15] :D [15:15] kadams54: [15:15] kadams54: did you need any help? [15:15] on your charm? [15:17] frankban: so if you remember that subordinat issue lazypower had actually brought it up again [15:17] and then ther ewas also the juju-info issue with subordinates [15:17] not being able to create them [15:17] frankban: does this sound like something you'd be interested in? [15:18] hatch: on my charm? You mean on the version stuff? [15:18] yeah the version stuff [15:18] did that sed stuff work for you? [15:19] kadams54: I was working on it for when I was generating a custom tarball not using setup.py [15:20] hatch: probably if I'd put it in place yet :-) working on the route issue first. [15:20] hatch: sure, is this https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/issues/1483 ? [15:20] frankban: yeah that's the juju-info one thanks [15:20] hatch: still not sold on that approach. If we change that I feel like we ought to change the fast-dist target [15:20] hatch: ok I'll take a look at that one tomorrow [15:21] kadams54: yeah totally it's all going to change - but it's going to be a slack task [15:21] thanks frankban [15:21] I'm sure lazypower would be very happy :D [15:21] frankban: plus there are some bundles that can't be made in the GUI, and this will fix that [15:24] bac: let me know when you have a moment and I can fill you in on the charm release stuff [15:24] for whatever reason it wasn't working for me (even after jrwren got me settled on the proper charm version) [15:25] jrwren: you had mentioned something about azure and python from js? But I couldn't find a js version of those tools [15:26] or maybe that was jcsackett ? [15:30] frankban: maybe while you're in there you could take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/issues/1975 [15:30] assuming it is indeed in that area [15:32] hatch: sure [15:34] frankban: we're down under 90 open issues now :) [15:34] yay [15:39] Makyo: have you experienced this in a while https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/issues/1767 [15:39] since you're now back on the gui stuff? [15:41] hatch: uh, hmm. I think so, but I'll keep an eye on it. [15:41] Makyo: sure thing, it might have been another one of those vagrant only issues [15:41] since i haven't actually ever experienced it :) [15:49] Taking a quick lunch break. === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-lunch [15:50] mm [15:51] oh I can qa these using local charms :) [15:51] great [15:55] frankban: https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/authors-subordinate-services#declaring-subordinate-charms here is some information about the 'container vs scope' it sort of helps haha [15:56] :-) sort of [16:00] hatch: https://www.npmjs.com/package/azure has lots of cli tools and used to be the official cli tools for azure. [16:01] jrwren: oh I always thought this was a library for use with node tools [16:01] not a cli tool [16:02] hatch: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/xplat-cli-install/ [16:02] interesting [16:02] hatch: nice how juju hides all that cmdline stuff for you, eh? [16:03] haha oh yes, yes Juju is pretty awesome there [16:04] jrwren: so they aren't going to support this any longer and switch exclusively to the Python implementation? [16:04] hatch: i don't know. I expect they will tell us, eventually. Maybe they will support both? [16:06] hatch: the github calls the python one "2.0 - preview" so maybe they are abandoning the node cli tools and moving it all to the new python ones for 2.0. That was my assumption. [16:06] that's a good guess [16:06] I could see the advantage [16:06] everyone has python ;) [16:08] hatch: that isn't true. no one on windows has python OOTB. so its just as much a support nightmare for their 99% use case. [16:08] ohh, that's a good point! === kadams54-lunch is now known as kadams54 === frankban is now known as frankban|afk