[07:55] <cc> hi,pals
[07:55] <cc> https://thepb.in/p/Q1hBng33GV4H8
[07:55] <cc> how can i make it possible
[07:58] <duflu> cc: If you can't buy an Ubuntu phone then see if you can buy a Nexus 4 or Nexus 5 and install Ubuntu on it
[07:59] <cc> i already have one
[07:59] <cc> Meizu pro 5
[08:03] <duflu> cc: The best advice I can find is: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/DisplayCasting
[08:11] <sil2100> pitti: hey! I noticed that two of the unity8 autopkgtests are failing possibly due to not using ubuntu-keyboard from -proposed
[08:11] <sil2100> pitti: is it somehow possible to re-run those tests with all-proposed?
[08:12] <pitti> sil2100: sure; you can even do it yourself now
[08:12] <sil2100> Oooh
[08:12] <pitti> (since last week or so)
[08:12] <sil2100> How? Through the recycle icon?
[08:12] <pitti> sil2100: grab the URL from the recycle icon and append &all-proposed=1
[08:12] <sil2100> !
[08:12] <sil2100> pitti: awesome!
[08:12] <sil2100> Thanks :)
[08:13] <pitti> sil2100: I don't want to expose that on excuses.html, as it would look totally confusing and cluttering, and second one shold know what she's doing when using that
[08:13] <pitti> sil2100: as this would usually point out too lax dependencies
[08:13] <sil2100> pitti: yeah, makes sense
[08:27] <pitti> sil2100: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#queue-ubuntu-yakkety-i386 → worked
[08:27] <pitti> sil2100: (still working on the infra, test will start in a bit)
[08:29] <cc> duflu: thanks a lot,does that mean it must has WIFI?
[08:30] <duflu> cc: Yes, either a smart TV with wifi or one of the listed adapters plugged in
[08:30] <duflu> I'm not sure if there is a cabled solution for the Pro 5
[08:30] <sil2100> \o/
[08:31] <cc> duflu: by the way,i want to install some file like .click
[08:31] <cc> but it told me i have no application to open
[08:31] <cc> what do i need ?
[08:32] <duflu> I don't know. Someone else here might
[08:32] <cc> pitti: hi,do you know which application can make my phone open .click?
[08:33] <cc> i'm new on ubuntu phone
[08:33] <pitti> sorry, I don't
[08:33] <pitti> "sudo click install"?
[08:33] <cc> :(
[08:33] <pitti> (I don't know if there is a graphical UI for that)
[08:34] <cc> 1.i download a package,named "shadowsocks.ubuntu-dawndily_1.0.5_armhf.click"
[08:34] <cc> but i cant run it
[08:34] <cc> it told me i have no application to run it
[08:35] <MCMic> cc: Where and why did you download this?
[08:36] <cc> i want to use vpn on my phone
[08:36] <cc> and i search it on google
[08:36] <cc> https://open.uappexplorer.com/app/shadowsocks.ubuntu-dawndiy
[08:37] <MCMic> cc: you can install this with the openstore
[08:37] <MCMic> cc: https://open.uappexplorer.com/docs#install
[08:38] <MCMic> Follow the 4 steps of how to install and then you should have an openstore app in which you can browse and install openstore packages
[08:45] <MCMic> Oh, does someone manage to send sound to a bluetooth speaker?
[08:46] <MCMic> When I tried I could pair, but then I did not find how to tell the music app to send the sound to it, same failure with the browser (youtube video, sound came out of the phone instead of the speaker).
[08:58] <mardy> Mirv: hi! I just commented on bug 1613670; I think you need to reopen it :-(
[09:07] <cc> MCMic: it told me
[09:07] <cc> "could not resolve:openstore.openstore-team_0.10._armhf.click"
[09:08] <MCMic> cc: then you might not be in the download folder
[09:08] <cc> 0.103
[09:08] <MCMic> You did download the file?
[09:08] <cc> yes
[09:08] <MCMic> (on your phone)
[09:08] <cc> i have download it
[09:08] <cc> on my phone
[09:08] <MCMic> And you went to the download folder in the terminal?
[09:09] <MCMic> you should see the file if you do «ls»
[09:09] <cc> i can see what i have download in my phone
[09:10] <cc> oh,maybe i'm wrong
[09:12] <cc> MCMic: when i download the openstore,i cant run it
[09:12] <popey> cc: installed it?
[09:12] <cc> yeah,i cant install it
[09:12] <popey> pkcon install-local --allow-untrusted openstore.openstore-team_0.10._armhf.click
[09:12] <cc> it told me i have no application to run it
[09:12] <vwxyz> can someone help me installing ubuntu touch on my lenovo a1000 smartphone
[09:13] <popey> vwxyz: I don't think it's been ported to that yet
[09:13] <cc> so , i tpye "pkcon install-local --allow-untrusted openstore.openstore-team_0.10._armhf.click "on terminal
[09:13] <popey> yes
[09:13] <cc> and it told me could not resolve:openstore.openstore-team_0.10._armhf.click
[09:13] <popey> yes
[09:13] <popey> you need to install it first
[09:13] <vwxyz> popey : how  can i port an ubuntu touch image to it?
[09:13] <cc> but i cant install it ,that's the problem
[09:14] <popey> cc: have you typed the above command?
[09:14] <popey> in the directory where the open store click is?
[09:14] <k1l> vwxyz: Porting (advanced) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
[09:14] <popey> vwxyz: see the porting link above
[09:14] <popey> (in the topic)
[09:15] <cc> popey: where can i find it
[09:15] <MCMic> popey: The command tells him «could not resolve:openstore.openstore-team_0.10._armhf.click», I guess he’is in the wrong folder
[09:15] <cc> when i download it ,i can see it on my
[09:15] <cc> Browser
[09:16] <popey> it's easier to do this over adb from a pc tbh
[09:16] <popey> wget the click url and then issue the pkcon command
[09:16] <popey> all from adb from a pc
[09:17] <vwxyz> popey : can you then help me with that... I didn't understand anything
[09:17] <popey> vwxyz: no, but the people in #ubports might
[09:17] <popey> cc: so:- enable developer mode on your phone, and attach via usb cable to pc
[09:17] <popey> cc: on pc:- adb shell
[09:17] <vwxyz> popey : okaaay thanks popey
[09:17] <popey> cc: in adb, run wget https://open.uappexplorer.com/api/download/openstore.openstore-team/openstore.openstore-team_0.103_armhf.click
[09:18] <popey> cc: then pkcon install local-install --allow-untrusted openstore.openstore-team_0.103_armhf.click
[09:18] <popey> job done
[09:19] <MCMic> I did it without adb
[09:20] <MCMic> I think it’s simpler just to type the command on the phone it’s not that long
[09:20] <MCMic> cc: You need to go in the download folder on your phone terminal, using «cd» command to change directory
[09:21] <MCMic> Should be «cd Downloads»
[09:21] <MCMic> cc: Then you can check with «ls» that you see the openstore click file
[09:21] <MCMic> If yes you can run the pkcon command
[09:24] <cc> MCMic: where can i download folder?
[09:25] <MCMic> cc: What??
[09:26] <cc> sorry
[09:26] <cc> cd
[09:26] <MCMic> You just need to go in the right folder before running the command, the one with you downloads
[09:26] <MCMic> *your downloads
[09:26] <MCMic> On my phone the command for this is «cd Downloads»
[09:26] <MCMic> I guess it’s the same on yours, you need to try and then run «ls» to check if you see the openstore file or not
[09:27] <cc> you mean i should tpye "cd download"on terminal?
[09:28] <cc> when i type " cd downloads",it told me "No such file or directory
[09:29] <MCMic> No, "cd Downloads"
[09:29] <MCMic> Case is important
[09:29] <cc> ho
[09:29] <cc> it's right
[09:29] <cc> and then?
[09:29] <MCMic> "ls"
[09:29] <cc> "ls"?
[09:29] <MCMic> And see if there is the openstore file in the list it gives you
[09:30] <cc> yeah
[09:30] <cc> i see it
[09:30] <MCMic> So "pkcon install local-install --allow-untrusted openstore.openstore-team_0.103_armhf.click" should work now
[09:36] <cc> debsig:Origin Signature chenk failed.This deb might not be signed
[09:36] <cc> what's that?
[09:45] <cc> it's time to leave now,i'll back tomorrow,MCMic,thanks for your help
[09:48] <vandenoever> i'd like to file a bug for the hotspot on ubuntu touch, what bugtracker is that?
[09:52] <duflu> vandenoever: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+filebug
[09:52] <duflu> At least that's a starting point
[09:53] <popey> vandenoever: which device?
[09:55] <vandenoever> duflu: meizu mx4
[09:55] <vandenoever> basically, to get hotspot working, i first have to enable it in system settings and then with the notification toggle
[09:55] <vandenoever> so the toggles are somehow not properly connected
[09:56] <sil2100> pitti: I know you're probably busy, but I just wanted to make sure that all is good - is there a way to check if the unity8 amd64 re-run of autopkgtests with all-proposed is queued somewhere?
[09:56] <matv1> vandenoever you might also check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network
[09:56] <sil2100> pitti: since the i386 finished successfully, but the amd64 one didn't seem to get run yet?
[09:56] <pitti> sil2100: I saw it queued earlier, so should be good; but I don't remember if it was on all arches
[09:57] <pitti> sil2100: the queue view is a bit broken right now, it often leaves out queued entries
[09:57] <sil2100> Ah, ok, thanks
[09:57] <pitti> sil2100: actually it did run: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/unity8/yakkety/amd64
[09:57] <vandenoever> ah, reported already: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/+bug/1589149
[09:57] <pitti> sil2100: it just finished quickly on uninstallability
[09:58] <ondra> javier4_ if you want to get rid of them, then just git clean -fdx will do the trick
[09:58] <Mirv> mardy: :( but wasn't even the final silo tested as well earlier? or was it confusing that the scrolling worked but clicking not? finally, is it all about the webview and not something that would require what just landed for ubuntuone-credentials to fix blank page https://code.launchpad.net/~mardy/ubuntuone-credentials/loader-1620338/+merge/305193 ?
[09:58] <pitti> sil2100: search for "broken count: 35"
[09:59] <mardy> Mirv: the U1 is a different issue, it doesn't use the webview and is about unity8; this one is about webview and unity7
[10:00] <mardy> Mirv: AFAICT, scrolling always worked; it's when getting focus, that the problem manifests itself
[10:00] <mardy> Mirv: you are not basing Qt on 5.6.1, are you?
[10:01] <javier4_> ondra, I could get rid, stash, or simply branch them and checkout on original commit and restart from that, that's not a problem... What I really need is a safe way to get ALL the modifications Ubuntu applied to aosp tree. That's why I asked you if the initial commit of the branch is a plain aosp, or an already modified version.
[10:03] <ondra> javier4_ build repository is heavily modified by mtk, so usually you have to dump down patches and apply them one by one by hand. Or if you do not want to do it patch by patch, dump big diff and do it as one big diff
[10:03] <ondra> javier4_ so do you want it as diff on file level, or as set of patches for each git repo?
[10:04] <ondra> javier4_ set of patches  you can apply as git am --3way <patch set>
[10:04] <ondra> javier4_ though I think it won't work that we as you probably lack history, so 3way merge usually fails
[10:07] <javier4_> ondra, I could give a chance to the automatic apllying, but due to modifications inside mtk tree, I doubt they would fit as-they-are. So probably a file-per-file diff should be preferable. The fact is that I have to be sure that I will get ALL the differences betwenn pure AOSP and Ubuntu.
[10:12] <ondra> javier4_ there are only few problematic ones, build and frameworks, rest usually applies almost clean or with little help
[10:12] <ondra> javier4_ to be sure to take it all, take it patch by patch
[10:13] <ondra> javier4_ if you take is as massive diff, it's easy to miss something as there are then too many changes in build dir  you can't be sure what is mtk change and what is Ubuntu related
[10:14] <NeKit> I think, another patch by patch approach advantage is that you keep those changes in git history with basic description for them
[10:14] <Mirv> mardy: sorry I don't get what you asked on the basing part?
[10:15] <javier4_> Nekit, didn't you say in private that you used the big diff approach?
[10:15] <Mirv> mardy: 5.6.1 is the newest upstream release and the one in yakkety + xenial (plus big pile of our patches)
 git am for most of patches, and manually where it failed
[10:15] <NeKit> I mean that if git am fails to apply patch, you need to do it manually
[10:16] <Mirv> mardy: and you were testing the 5.6.1+dfsg-3ubuntu5~1
[10:16] <NeKit> but it will be a small change and not a big diff
[10:17] <mardy> Mirv: right, now I remember, that I was not testing the upstream 5.6.1, but 5.6, which probably has many more patches on top
[10:17] <javier4_> NeKit, oh... git am on every single patch. Now i understand.
[10:19] <NeKit> you can use git am on all the patches for specific repo at once, it will apply them step by step and ask to do it manually when it fails, then continue
[10:19] <Mirv> mardy: hmm, right I don't remember either if you tested the final PPA or not. but given that you tried with and without that patch, it's still weird it wouldn't work with the patch.
[10:19] <Mirv> mardy: maybe there's something else touching the same files between 5.6.1 and 5.6 tip?
[10:19] <mardy> Mirv: yep, I suspect that... I'll try some bisecting
[10:21] <Mirv> mardy: my plan is to land 5.6.2 (+ our patches) to xenial-overlay eventually, but that won't help yakkety users
[10:48] <javier4_> NeKit, ondra , I have another doubt: the mtk tree on which I would apply the patches, is not divided into many repos. It's just a huge unique repo. Will I be able to apply on it the various big dump taken with git format-patch from the various sub-repos Ubuntu is divided into?
[10:50] <NeKit> I created new repos as in AOSP structure for parts I needed to apply patches too
[10:50] <NeKit> *to
[10:50] <sil2100> pitti: the ubuntu-keyboard thing worries me a bit, since the amd64 unity8 autopkgtest is failing because of ubuntu-keyboard being uninstallable - and that's uninstallable because, huh, ubuntu-keyboard-data is not available for the latest keyboard version
[10:52] <sil2100> pitti: e.g. doing apt-cache policy ubuntu-keyboard-data on a yakkety-amd64 chroot returns only 0.100+16.10.20160818-0ubuntu1, no mention of the 0.100+16.10.20160921-0ubuntu1 version in proposed
[10:52] <sil2100> (with -proposed enabled)
[10:52] <Mirv> ahayzen: not sure who is leading the ticket https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1972 but the next step would be testing the built silo and getting the Lander Signoff clicked to "Approved" if it works ok. comment on the bug report would be ok too.
[10:53] <sil2100> pitti: what could be the cases when a certain binary package is missing from -proposed? I checked the changes of the package but there's nothing that could have caused it, just a dep change
[10:53] <Trevinho> mardy: about that system settings issue... I've that also in my xenial+overlay installation
[10:53] <javier4_> NeKit, did you create them on mtk tree or on the ubuntu one?
[10:53] <NeKit> mtk tree
[10:53] <sil2100> pitti: so, in this case it seems that even though ubuntu-keyboard=0.100+16.10.20160921-0ubuntu1 is available in -proposed, ubuntu-keyboard-data=0.100+16.10.20160921-0ubuntu1 is not
[10:53] <NeKit> the tree I have is without any git repos at all
[10:54] <sil2100> (while both come from the same source)
[10:54] <ahayzen> Mirv, ok thanks i'm going to give it a try tonight, if it works i'll let you know :-)
[10:54] <javier4_> NeKit, Mine was too, then I initialized one on it, but a big one. Non a wise choice.
[11:03] <Mirv> ahayzen: ok! or get Jim to test it, whichever is fine.
[11:13] <mardy> Trevinho: you mean the webview turning white when it gets focus?
[11:15] <ogra_> Trevinho, overlay seems pretty broken currently (i tried it on the WE. empty apps scope, cant create U1 account)
[11:16] <jgdx> pete-woods, hey, using libqtdbusmock, do you ever get failures where a name fails to appear on the bus in time?
[11:24] <pete-woods> jgdx: usually only if the build server is incredibly slow
[11:24] <pete-woods> jgdx: it's (IIRC) a 30 second timeout
[11:24] <sil2100> pitti: ok, nvm my earlier ping, cjwatson helped out with that
[11:25] <sil2100> (it was actually my fault partially)
[11:25] <pete-woods> so sometimes with our heavily overloaded build system the python daemons can take longer than that to grab the DBus name
[11:25] <jgdx> pete-woods, we seem to hit it quite frequently on our jaas. Do you see that? Or have you taken steps to mitigate the risk for it to happen?
[11:26] <pete-woods> jgdx: I don't use JAAS at the moment because half the indicator-network tests just timeout due to its slowness
[11:26] <jgdx> pete-woods, what times out?
[11:26] <pete-woods> sometimes things like you are experiencing there
[11:27] <pete-woods> where even reasonable timeouts of 30+ seconds are failing
[11:27] <pete-woods> but the other thing it exposes is that there are still a few race conditions in the tests
[11:27] <pete-woods> and it makes those fail with regularity
[11:28] <pete-woods> however, I don't have the time to fix those right now
[11:28] <pete-woods> so for the moment, we're just using CI train
[11:30] <jgdx> pete-woods, okay. Looking at the time stamps and run times of those tests, that corresponds with what you're telling me. But I'm partly suspecting the kind of template used has something to do with the timeouts.
[11:31] <jgdx> the bluetooth template seems to always produce something on the bus, e.g.
[11:31]  * pete-woods listens
[11:32] <jgdx> that's all I've got
[11:32] <pete-woods> oh
[11:32] <pete-woods> e.g. made me think there was more
[11:32] <pete-woods> jgdx: that's a very interesting observation
[11:32] <pete-woods> however the ordering could be significant
[11:32] <pete-woods> it could also be a bug in one of the templates, as you're implying
[11:33] <jgdx> pete-woods, I'll take a look at it, maybe I can find something interesting
[11:33] <pete-woods> jgdx: what I'd really like to see is you guys moving back to using the shared templates
[11:33] <pete-woods> as they have had a lot of fixes applied to them
[11:33] <pete-woods> and then at least both of us are singing from the same hymn sheet with our tests
[11:34] <ogra_> record ... or it didnt happen !
[11:37] <jgdx> pete-woods, yea… But we have to migrate to shared templates after we've rewritten most of the AP tests into unit tests. but time
[11:37] <pete-woods> I understand
[11:38] <pete-woods> would be great to see you using qmltestrunner
[11:38] <pete-woods> instead of AP
[11:38] <pete-woods> should give you much more reliable tests
[11:38] <pete-woods> anyway, not my job to push requirements onto you :)
[11:38] <jgdx> yeah, that work has started, and e.g. the network panel now uses mostly qmltestrunner
[11:39] <jgdx> + nm mock via libqdbusmock
[11:51] <ondra> javier4_ yeah that is usual mtk style, as they use internally perforce so they throw over the fence one huge repo with no history
[11:51] <ondra> javier4_ so you won't able to use git apply or git am in this case
[11:51] <ondra> javier4_ all manual work
[12:08] <Trevinho> mardy: yeah speaking of the white webview
[12:23] <pitti> sil2100: that sounds like binNEW, let me check
[12:26] <pitti> sil2100: hm, I don't see it in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=
[12:27] <mardy> Mirv: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxide-qt/+bug/1613670/comments/16 now I'm making a rebuild from the yakkety sources, with that patch in, to double check that it's indeed helping
[12:29] <pitti> sil2100: ah, good
[12:31] <sil2100> pitti: yeah, resolved, it was caused by a double-copy to UNAPPROVED, with both migrating to the -proposed pocket and superseeding eachother (with the same version number)
[12:31] <sil2100> Crazy stuff
[12:58] <sverzegnassi> faenil: ping
[13:02] <mardy> Mirv: yes, it helps! That's the patch! Can you please put it in a silo?
[13:04] <Mirv> mardy: right, I was just checking that indeed it's not in 5.6.1 despite being put to 5.6 branch before 5.6.1 release.
[13:04] <Mirv> mardy: sir, yes, sir
[13:04] <mardy> :-)
[13:12] <faenil> sverzegnassi: pong
[13:14] <sverzegnassi> faenil: o/ Do you have a moment so we can discuss about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1627078 ? :)
[13:14] <faenil> sverzegnassi: sure
[13:14] <faenil> zsombi: you there?
[13:15] <zsombi> faenil: yes
[13:15] <faenil> zsombi: can you have a look ^
[13:18] <zsombi> faenil: sverzegnassi: ok, read the comments
[13:19] <zsombi> faenil: sverzegnassi: for the sake of QQC2 compatibility, we could add a pressed property to the scrollbars. question is do we need similar thing to ScrollView?
[13:19] <sverzegnassi> zsombi: as long as each ScrollBar can be accessed from ScrollView, I'd say it's okay
[13:20] <faenil> zsombi: ScrollView already exposes the scrollbars, so you can manually bind to horizontalScrollbar.pressed
[13:20] <zsombi> sverzegnassi: ok, so we can go for a readonly alias names as pressed
[13:20] <sverzegnassi> zsombi, faenil: that's great! thanks!
[13:20] <faenil> one other question, which is still pending time/investigation, is whether ScrollView should instantiate both scrollbars every time (which it does, at the moment, for simplicity/time)
[13:21] <faenil> zsombi: ok, can you comment on hte bug please?
[13:21] <zsombi> faenil: sure
[13:21] <faenil> I'm not sure when I'll have the time to do the change, it might have to go through yu guys
[13:21] <faenil> you*
[13:22] <faenil> (it's not just about the property, it's about making sure the semantic of that property is correct)
[13:25] <sverzegnassi> faenil: np, I can workaround it for now, by binding to the 'verticalVelocity' of the Flickable, as suggested in the report
[13:26] <faenil> sverzegnassi: mmm I'd expect verticalyVelocity == 0 while you're dragging the scrollbar
[13:32] <sverzegnassi> faenil: ack, right! ScrollBar sets 'contentX/contentY' directly... ok, no problem, i can disable that overlay for now :)
[13:34] <faenil> sverzegnassi: heh :)
[13:38] <javier4_> ondra, shouldn't work at all, or should it fails time to time needing manual intervention, as NeKit said?
[13:39] <NeKit> you can't use 3-way-merge due to lack of history, but can use git am/git apply if you create the repos yourself
[13:58] <Raghuveer> help
[13:58] <Raghuveer> HELP
[13:59] <dobey> !ask | Raghuveer
[13:59] <ogra_> !ask | Raghuveer
[13:59] <ogra_> bah, dobey beats me
[13:59] <dobey> heh
[13:59] <ogra_> seems we scared him
[13:59] <ogra_> (or her)
[14:02] <dobey> because someone falling into your taxi cab and yelling HAAALP isn't scary at all
[14:05] <ogra_> hmpf ... so i'd really like to be able to create a U1 account again :/
[14:06] <dobey> you can
[14:06] <dobey> why can't you?
[14:06] <ogra_> dunno ...
[14:06] <javier4_> NeKit, thanks again man.
[14:06] <ogra_> my apps scope is empty on the desktop since the weekend
[14:07] <dobey> on xenial+overlay, or yakkety?
[14:07] <ogra_> so i thought i'd be a clever boy and re-create my U1 account ... deleted it ... and now i only get an empty window when trying to add one
[14:07] <ogra_> xenial+overlay
[14:07] <ogra_> but even in unity7 i dont get the U1 option
[14:07] <dobey> the blank window is fixed in overlay now, the fix landed earlier today
[14:08] <ogra_> running system-settings under U7 gets me the option but the same behaviour
[14:08] <dobey> yeah, we don't provide a gtk+ plug-in
[14:08] <ogra_> ah, i'll dist-upgrade then
[14:08] <dobey> and ubuntu-system-settings requires mir for the trusted prompt stuff
[14:09] <ogra_> ah
[14:09] <ogra_> well, it behaves identical on both unities atm :)
[14:09] <ogra_> ok, dist-upgrade got me something
[14:10]  * ogra_ needs to wait for some processes to finish before switching to U8 
[14:12] <dobey> for the apps scope being blank, i'm not sure what exactly would cause that. we switched to using ubuntu-app-launch to get list of installed apps in yakkety/xenial, but it's been working fine for me for several weeks before we landed that, and worked fine for a few others too.
[14:12] <dobey> ogra_: do you have libertine container with apps configured there?
[14:12] <ogra_> yes
[14:13] <dobey> hmmmm
[14:13] <dobey> how can i create a libertine container on PC?
[14:14] <ogra_> install the libertine stuff and run libertine-container-manager create ...
[14:15] <jibel> dobey, blank app scope is bug 1618590
[14:15] <jibel> it's a crash of scoperunner
[14:15] <ogra_> aha
[14:15] <dobey> huh?
[14:15] <jibel> lp down doesn't help
[14:15] <ogra_> is it still ?
[14:15] <dobey> jibel: is that the QObject::disconnect crash?
[14:15] <jibel> not only lp
[14:15] <ogra_> damn
[14:16] <ogra_> yeah, it is
[14:16] <dobey> then no, that would not cause a blank scope
[14:16] <jibel> dobey, I filed another bug this morning but Marcus marked it as duplicate of this report
[14:16] <dobey> that crash happens when the scope is being shut down
[14:17] <dobey> so results would have already been returned and shown in unity
[14:17] <jibel> dobey, my original report was [Bug 1627668] [NEW] /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/unity-scopes/scoperunner:11:QObject::disconnect:QObject::disconnect:QDBusConnectionPrivate::closeConnection:QDBusConnectionManager::run:QThreadPrivate::start
[14:17] <dobey> jibel: yes if you filed a bug about that crash it's a duplicate
[14:17] <dobey> jibel: but that is a separate issue from getting a blank scope
[14:18] <jibel> dobey, it's the only error I found
[14:19] <dobey> jibel: sure. the scope is blank because something is causing it to return 0 results
[14:19] <jibel> otherwise I've this warning "** (process:4294): WARNING **: Unable to get snap information for 'yakkety': Status code is: 404"
[14:20] <jibel> there is a unity8 crash too
[14:20] <jibel> and signon-ui
[14:22] <dobey> jibel: do you have a libertine container?
[14:23] <jibel> dobey, I do
[14:25] <dobey> jibel: ok, i'm trying to create one now. i think maybe there's a bug in ual with getting libertine app info or something.
[14:25] <jibel> dobey, is there any info I can provide? I cannot find anything obvious from the logs
[14:27] <dobey> jibel: i just recreated the issue in my vm, so i think i can debug from here now
[14:27] <dobey> hopefully can figure it out quickly
[14:29] <jibel> dobey, thanks
[14:32] <dobey> jibel: when lp comes back on, can you file a new bug about the scope being blank please?
[14:35] <jibel> dobey, sure
[15:54] <kgunn> bfiller: hey, is the u8 snap catch up meeting time tomorrow ok?
[16:11] <bfiller> kgunn, works for me
[16:20] <jibel> dobey, bug 1627759
[16:20] <jibel> let me know if you need some logs
[16:22] <davmor2> jibel: I have webbrowser and system-settings vissible in on a fresh install of unity8-desktop-session
[16:22] <davmor2> -s
[16:31] <dobey> davmor2: yeah, it only breaks after you set up libertine
[16:33] <MichalP> Hello, I need flash UT to Meizu MX4 android version. I asking for it many times here without any good answer, but I want try last one if somebody know hot flash UT to MX4. If not I will need to start used ANDROID but this is for me very bad thing. I used UT more than one year on Nexus and I don't wont stop use UT.
[16:34] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: Do you have any ideas why Libertine triggers that?
[16:34] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: small implementation difference in the backend in ual i guess
[16:34] <bregma> prolly triggers some code path
[16:34] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: Is tedg on it to fix?
[16:34] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: i'm looking at it
[16:35] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: i'm still not sure if i need to change something in the scope too; but i should have a fix today i hope
[16:35] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: Ah, ok.  Do you need any other debugging from me from our Friday debugging session?
[16:35] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: nah, i've set up a libertine container in my VM and can replicate the issue, so i can debug myself now
[16:36] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: Ok, cool.  Let me know if there is anything I can do to help test.
[16:36] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: yep i will
[16:37] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: thanks!
[16:44] <fw190d13> hello!
[16:44] <fw190d13> Is there some way to block adds on stock Ubuntu touch browser?
[16:55] <MichalP> Or do sombody why MTK tool show me error 5000?
[16:58] <dobey> i guess only mtk would know that
[16:59] <MichalP> So It looks that no any choice, just leave from UT :(  I tried all method, but all fails....
[17:03] <MichalP> Ok, anyway thanks. Maybe when will release any new Ut phone and it will more then 100 pcs than I will have lucky to buy. So jump to android now :( . Thanks
[17:04] <dobey> my best guess with the mtk tool not working would be either usb cable/port/chipset, or the device is locked bootloader
[17:07] <MichalP> probably locked bootloader (i listen that internacional deveices are locked and chinesse are unlocked. It detect my device good, so looks no way
[20:31] <Jiraiya_> hi