[00:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zivot (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20013101-3build2 => 20013101-3.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zivot [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [20013101-3.1]
[00:08] <slangasek> apw, wxl, tsimonq2: hint added to let the kernel in to release, server and lubuntu alternate ISOs will trigger as soon as the publishing is done, so that's still roughly 1.5h away
[00:09] <tsimonq2> slangasek: thank you :)
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: meld (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.16.2-1 => 3.16.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted meld [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.16.3-1]
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: metar (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20061030.1-2.1 => 20061030.1-2.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted metar [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [20061030.1-2.2]
[00:15] <wxl> slangasek: cool. release tomorrow hopefully then?
[00:19] <slangasek> wxl: that seems like a realistic target
[00:19] <wxl> slangasek: alright, cool. thx!
[00:19] <slangasek> I don't trust myself to push all the buttons for the release still tonight
[00:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ccd2iso (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.3-4 => 0.3-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ccd2iso [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.3-5]
[00:28] <lynorian> is it useful to test if this problem happens on a yakkety host with yakkety guest?
[00:29] <tsimonq2> slangasek ^^^^
=== happyaro1 is now known as happyaron
[01:05] <cyphermox> lynorian: tsimonq2: what problem?
[01:05] <tsimonq2> cyphermox: bug 1624096
[01:05] <ubot5> bug 1624096 in shim (Ubuntu) "yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624096
[01:05] <tsimonq2> hi btw ;)
[01:05] <cyphermox> no point in further testing this
[01:06] <cyphermox> it's definitely *not* going to be fixed for the beta.
[01:06] <tsimonq2> well Lubuntu alternates need the testing, even though it might not be fixed for the beta
[01:07] <cyphermox> ok
[01:07] <cyphermox> well, don't know if it was a shim issue that was breaking lubuntu alt
[01:07] <tsimonq2> good point
[01:08] <cyphermox> I know the shim thing is not even a "might not", it's a "definitely impossible to be fixed for the beta", since we're waiting on a third-party for digital signatures before it can make it in the archive at all, and then needs a grub update to go with it
[01:09] <cyphermox> but I'm running a quick test on kubuntu now, I can have a look at lubuntu after if there's something I can fix tonight in time for a respin
[01:10] <valorie> nice!
[01:16] <cyphermox> wallpaper looks pretty cool
[01:17] <cyphermox> also, yay me, ubiquity didn't crash
[01:17] <valorie> :-)
[01:17] <cyphermox> that means yay me, the issue I'm seeing is not ubiquity and not NetworkManager.
[01:18] <cyphermox> (so I still have no idea what is wrong but at least my workaround will work)
[01:19] <slangasek> tsimonq2: lubuntu alt will need retesting because it's getting the new kernel; the previous build only has the 4.4 kernel which isn't our beta kernel
[01:20] <cyphermox> so we're "just" waiting for the image to finish building for now
[01:20] <tsimonq2> slangasek: already sent to lubuntu-devel@l.u.c, we've got that covered :(
[01:20] <tsimonq2> *:)
[01:20] <tsimonq2> thanks though
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[01:27] <cyphermox> slangasek: I don't really love this but my solution to ubiquity crashing in NM for the gtk UI is to run ubiquity in sudo
[01:28] <cyphermox> ubiquity would already try to re-execute itself with pkexec anyway, but somehow this doesn't seem to work correctly anymore
[01:28] <cyphermox> in other words, there is *still* a problem somewhere there, but I haven't been able to find what it is
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927)
[02:42]  * ogasawara starts testing
[02:43] <valorie> wooooooo
[02:44] <tsimonq2> ^
[02:44]  * tsimonq2 grabs an image and joins the party
[02:48] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: I'm grabbing amd64, I assume you'll mark the tests that you're doing as "In Progress" ?
[02:48] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: oh, where do I mark them in progress?
[02:49] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: iso.qa.ubuntu.com
[02:49] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: log in, then you can submit an "In Progress" result
[02:50] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: is that the "Subscribe" button?
[02:50] <tsimonq2> no
[02:51] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: have you used this before?
[02:51] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: yes, we've been submitting our test results here, but I've never done the "In Progress" bit
[02:51] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: go to submit the test as you usually would do, there's an "In Progress" radio box there
[02:52] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: just submit a blank "In Progress" so work isn't duplicated
[02:52] <ogasawara> ah, thanks
[02:52] <tsimonq2> no problem :)
[02:54] <tsimonq2> CD1 missing some packages needed by debootstrap
[02:54] <tsimonq2> make: *** [/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/lubuntu/yakkety/daily/tmp/yakkety-powerpc/packages-stamp] Error 1
[02:54] <tsimonq2> ERROR WHILE BUILDING OFFICIAL IMAGES !!
[02:54] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ping, ^^
[02:54] <tsimonq2> slangasek: that's on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/yakkety/daily-20160927.log
[02:55] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: what test are you doing atm?
[02:55] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: I'm starting http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/367/builds/132013/testcases/1337/results
[02:55] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: I'm still trying to download this damn thing
[02:56] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: but was planning to start with amd64
[02:56] <tsimonq2> ok
[02:56] <tsimonq2> then you might want to do one of the LVM ones
[02:56] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: ack, will do
[02:56] <tsimonq2> awesome :)
[02:56] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: and I've got 2 guys on my team also helping test
[02:57] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: where are they at?
[02:57] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: so they are also divide and conquering amd64 and i386, I've asked them to mark those in progress
[02:57] <tsimonq2> ok cool
[02:57] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: in the meantime I'll be doing some homework, school in the morning ;)
[02:57] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: they're starting with i386
[02:57] <tsimonq2> ok cool
[02:57] <tsimonq2> that works :)
[02:59] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: out of curiosity, you on the server team? what do you do? :)
[02:59] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: I manage the kernel team
[03:00] <tsimonq2> oh nice :)
[03:02] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: within the next hour or two I'll try to do as many amd64 testcases as possible to make sure that we don't fail on an edge case
[03:02] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: perfect, thanks!
[03:03] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: taking a peek at your Launchpad page I see that your tz is PDT, I'm CDT, I plan to be to bed by 11
[03:03] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: and judging by how fast that test just went, I'll be able to get through a few of them ;)
[03:04] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: I'll stay up as late as I have to to get these tested
[03:04] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: good deal, I'll let you know when I head to bed
[03:19] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: done with the default test, moving on to Optional
[03:20] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: ack, I'm mid flight with both the lvm test cases
[03:21] <tsimonq2> ok cool :)
[03:41] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: do you think optional tests are a dealbreaker? do you need those done as well?
[03:42] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: not a dealbreaker imo, but I'll leave the final call to slangasek
[03:42] <tsimonq2> ok
[03:42] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: my guys and I are trying to grab some of the optional ones regardless
[03:43] <tsimonq2> nice ok
[03:43] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: I did amd64 bind9 and I'm doing amd64 preseed now
[03:43] <tsimonq2> or it's going on it's own rather :P
[04:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-characters (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.21.91.1-1 => 3.22.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[04:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-mahjongg (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:3.21.90-1 => 1:3.22.0-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-sudoku (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:3.21.90-1 => 1:3.22.0-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gssdp (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.14.16-2 => 1.0.0-1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gupnp (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.99.0-1 => 1.0.0-1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[04:11] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: I'm finishing these three up then going to bed
[04:11] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: thanks
[04:12] <tsimonq2> no problem at all, have a good evening and sorry I couldn't help with the rest ogasawara :)
[04:12] <ogasawara> tsimonq2: you were very helpful, I appreciate it
[04:13] <tsimonq2> ogasawara: any time, don't be afraid to ping if you need help testing or whatevr :)
[04:13] <tsimonq2> *whatever
[04:31] <slangasek> hrm, so the lubuntu alt images didn't build :/
[04:31] <slangasek> retrying now
[04:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgdata (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.17.5-1 => 0.17.6-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[04:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib-networking (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.49.90-1 => 2.50.0-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[04:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tracker (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.9.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.10.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome)
[04:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grilo (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.3.2-1 => 0.3.2-2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[04:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.45.4-2build1 => 1.46.0-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntugnome)
[04:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-contacts (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.20.0-1ubuntu2 => 3.22.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntugnome)
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ncap (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.9.2-2.1 => 1.9.2-2.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ncap [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.9.2-2.2]
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-online-accounts (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.20.3-1 => 3.20.4-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: humanity-icon-theme (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.6.10 => 0.6.11] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[05:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rygel (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.30.3-1 => 0.32.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
[06:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.21.90-2ubuntu1 => 3.22.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.2.2-0ubuntu10 => 1.2.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clamtk (yakkety-proposed/universe) [5.21-1 => 5.22-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clamtk [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [5.22-1]
[06:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: totem (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.21.91-0ubuntu2 => 3.22.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thumbnailer (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4+16.10.20160825-0ubuntu1 => 2.4+16.10.20160926.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accerciser (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.14.0-1build1 => 3.22.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: licensecheck (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.0.18-1 => 3.0.24-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autopkgtest (trusty-backports/main) [4.0.2~ubuntu14.04.1 => 4.0.5~ubuntu14.04.1] (core)
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autopkgtest [source] (trusty-backports) [4.0.5~ubuntu14.04.1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu9]
[08:01] <pitti> cyphermox: initramfs-tools+multipath-tools mystery solved, tests pass; (details in bug 1627933)
[08:01] <ubot5> bug 1627933 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "initramfs-tools 0.125ubuntu4 (ip-config → dhclient) breaks multipath-tools tests" [High,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1627933
[08:03] <michi> pitti: ping
[08:03] <michi> pitti: Could you sign off on silo 1991? Mirv is happy with it, and it’s stuck in the unapproved queue for yakkety.
[08:03] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please accept licensecheck?
[08:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I want to see it migrate
[08:05] <Mirv> what michi means is approving thumbnailer from yakkety UNAPPROVED queue
[08:05] <michi> Yep, sorry if I wasn’t clear
[08:08] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, is that all bug fixes ?
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, the tool is not gaining new features since some time :) http://paste.ubuntu.com/23240130/
[08:10] <LocutusOfBorg> I would say so, just bug fixes and documentation/testsuite fixes
[08:10] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, ack thanks
[08:10] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks to you
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thumbnailer [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.4+16.10.20160926.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted licensecheck [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.0.24-1]
[08:20] <LocutusOfBorg> please remove licensecheck block, and run its testsuite against license-reconcile/proposed version (that will build in half an hour)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted accerciser [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0-1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-mahjongg [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1:3.22.0-1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-characters [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0-1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-sudoku [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1:3.22.0-1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.2.4-0ubuntu1]
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted totem [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:26] <pitti> michi: hm, I don't see it in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+queue?queue_state=1
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0-1ubuntu1]
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rygel [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.32.0-1]
[08:26] <pitti> ah, I suppose apw beat me to it
[08:26] <michi> pitti: It just moved out of there into the proposed pocket.
[08:26] <michi> I don’t know who did that, but it looks like it’s all good now, thanks!
[08:27] <apw> pitti, sorry that was me ... i meant to come and say it was done, and someone asked me a question ...
[08:28] <pitti> apw: no need to be sorry, thansk
[08:28]  * pitti is doing some queue stuff too
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cmake (xenial-proposed/main) [3.5.1-1ubuntu2 => 3.5.1-1ubuntu3] (core)
[08:38] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, ^^ this cmake is easy, trivial fix and regex fix for the libarchive from backports :)
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:45] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: ack, doing a round of SRUs
[08:45] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, :D
[08:52] <Laney> apw: got 2 minutes to take a look at merging https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/ubuntu-archive-tools/cm-show-fix-released perchance?
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.3-0ubuntu4.2]
[08:54]  * Laney spreads the pings out a bit
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pip [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.1.1-2ubuntu0.3]
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.1+git20160923.1.0c571f1-0ubuntu1~xenial1]
[08:59] <apw> Laney, and why am i wanting to add those ?
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:6.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:59] <apw> oh i could read the changelog :)
[09:00] <Laney> there are some things waiting now that are re-promotions
[09:00] <Laney> but the report doesn't make that very obvious
[09:03] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/~laney/ubuntu.svg <- that's the result
[09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.1ubuntu2.15]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cmake [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.1-1ubuntu3]
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.1+git20160923.2.7374bdc-0ubuntu1]
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted humanity-icon-theme [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.6.11]
[09:06] <Laney> are we accepting stuff for the beta or just proposed?
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib-networking [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.50.0-1]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grilo [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.3.2-2]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dia-shapes [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.6.0-3]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gupnp [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gssdp [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.46.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kio [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.26.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kwidgetsaddons [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.26.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kactivities-kf5 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.26.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted threadweaver [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.26.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kwayland [source] (yakkety-proposed) [4:5.26.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:09] <pitti> Laney: just -proposed, still frozen
[09:09] <Laney> unblocks exist though
[09:09] <pitti> Laney: stuff for beta-2 still needs to get a manual unblock
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.1+git20160923.1.0c571f1-0ubuntu1]
[09:09] <pitti> well, *I* only accept stuff for post-beta, nothing there semeed urgent
[09:10] <Laney> one example is gnome-software there fixes a crash on startup on i386
[09:10] <pitti> AFAIUI, queue is frozen for general post-beta FF/sanity review
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firefox [source] (yakkety-proposed) [49.0+build4-0ubuntu1]
[09:10] <pitti> and propagation is frozen for beta-2 prep
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgdata [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.17.6-1ubuntu1]
[09:10] <pitti> (and infinity actively asked apw and me to do reviews)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tracker [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.10.0-1ubuntu1]
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-contacts [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-online-accounts [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.4-0ubuntu1]
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libecap [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.1-3ubuntu4]
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpam-radius-auth [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.3.17-0ubuntu5]
[09:14] <apw> pitti, same nothing beta2 critical
[09:15] <apw> pitti, and i concur on the state and request to review
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: location-service (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.0.0+16.10.20160811-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.0+16.10.20160912-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:19] <Laney> I know about the two freezes; was just wondering if stuff could be unblocked onto the beta or if it is tighly locked down
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: biometryd (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.0.1+16.10.20160628-0ubuntu4 => 0.0.1+16.10.20160922.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927.2)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate powerpc [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927.2)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927.2)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.6.0-1ubuntu5 => 4.7.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)
[09:27] <pitti> meh, this is like whack-a-rat :)
[09:29] <apw> pitti, indeed :
[09:29] <apw> :)
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.2]
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snap-confine (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.0.41-0ubuntu2 => 1.0.42-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:44] <LocutusOfBorg> can I know why licensecheck is in main? I don't find a MIR
[09:45] <LocutusOfBorg> devscripts
[09:45] <LocutusOfBorg> :(
[09:45] <Laney> Probably because it was split out of devscripts so it was considered that it didn't need one
[09:45] <LocutusOfBorg> the problem is that the new version has 3 new perl dependencies
[09:46] <LocutusOfBorg> :(
[09:46] <LocutusOfBorg> my effort in seeing it migrate is probably wasted
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: mcloud (yakkety-proposed/primary) [1.0.0+16.10.20160927.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:58] <apw> Laney, looks good to em
[10:01] <Laney> ♥
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.49.6-1 => 2.50.0-1] (core) (sync)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nplan (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.12~16.04]
[10:43] <pitti> morphis, apw: ^ remaining item for netplan/xenial; this has the snap support hack (note that it is in NEW, not UNAPPROVED)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.50.0-1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snap-confine [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.42-0ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted biometryd [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.0.1+16.10.20160922.3-0ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted location-service [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.0.0+16.10.20160912-0ubuntu1]
[11:06] <zyga> RAOF: hello, I'm trying to get an SRU of snap-confine out, I see that there are four bugs that need verification
[11:06] <zyga> RAOF: what can I do to make the process move forward?
[11:09] <apw> zyga, well the bugs need verification by someone who knows how to do that ... can you mobilise people to do that ?
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-tidylib (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.2.4~dfsg-4 => 0.3.0~dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tidylib [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.3.0~dfsg-1]
[11:12] <zyga> apw: I see, can anyone verify bugs?
[11:13] <apw> zyga, yes, and the 4th one you verified in the first proposed upload by the looks of it ...
[11:14] <apw> which was superceeded by this latest one
[11:15] <zyga> apw: "this latest one" being? 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.10?
[11:15] <apw> zyga, yes, the latest in xenial-proposed
[11:16] <zyga> OK
[11:16] <zyga> so I need to get the remaining bugs verified, update the tags and poke the release team again?
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-getting-started-docs (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.20.0-1ubuntu2 => 3.22.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntugnome)
[11:22] <apw> zyga, that is the quickest way to get it out yes
[11:23] <apw> zyga, all but the ptmx one looks to be easily testible in any install, that one might only be verifiable properly on the hardware, but if we can confirm the profile as installed with the new package has the relevant lines it would likley be ok if we cannot get the original reporter to wake up
[11:23] <zyga> ok
=== marcoceppi_ is now known as marcoceppi
[11:25] <apw> but do try and wake them up ... it seems while since the bug was filed
[11:31] <zyga> yep, I will
=== maxb_ is now known as maxb
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qqwing (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.3.4-1 => 1.3.4-1.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openbmap-logger (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-6 => 0.4.0-7] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openbmap-logger [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.4.0-7]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtkimageview (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.6.4+dfsg-1 => 1.6.4+dfsg-1.1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: commons-pool2 (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.2-1 => 2.4.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maria (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.3.5-4build2 => 1.3.5-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: easymock (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.3.1+ds-3 => 3.3.1+ds-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted commons-pool2 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.4.2-2]
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maria [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.3.5-4ubuntu1]
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted easymock [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.3.1+ds-4]
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libproxool-java (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.9.1-8 => 0.9.1-9] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libproxool-java [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.1-9]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: enigma (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.20-dfsg.1-2build2 => 1.20-dfsg.1-2.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted enigma [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.20-dfsg.1-2.1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xarchiver (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.4-4 => 1:0.5.4-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xarchiver [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1:0.5.4-5]
=== mp is now known as Guest73139
[12:07] <mdeslaur> cjwatson, infinity, wgrant : can we stop the publisher (emergency)
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dico (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2-9build2 => 2.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:10] <cjwatson> mdeslaur: done
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dico [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.3-1]
[12:10] <rcj> slangasek, infinity: cloud-images are ready for beta.  When the release announcement draft is up I would add that our download location is http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/daily/server/yakkety/ and the beta build is 20160927 (or later as we only keep the last 5 or so)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: geary (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-1ubuntu1 => 0.11.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted geary [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.11.2-1ubuntu1]
[12:23] <cjwatson> (publisher restarted)
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: media-hub (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.6.0+16.10.20160826-0ubuntu1 => 4.6.0+16.10.20160909-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mediaplayer-app (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.20.5+16.10.20160921-0ubuntu1 => 0.20.5+16.10.20160922-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mediaplayer-app [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.20.5+16.10.20160922-0ubuntu1]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aodh (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.0.4-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.5-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nplan [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nplan (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.12~16.04]
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.6.5.8-0ubuntu1 => 0.6.5.8-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valadoc (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.23.2~git20150422-3.1 => 0.30.0~git20160518-1~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valadoc [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.30.0~git20160518-1~ubuntu1]
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nplan [i386] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.12~16.04] (no packageset)
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nplan [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.12~16.04] (no packageset)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vmware-nsx (xenial-proposed/universe) [8.0.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 => 8.0.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.3] (no packageset)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nplan [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.12~16.04] (no packageset)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nplan [arm64] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.12~16.04] (no packageset)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nplan [armhf] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.12~16.04] (no packageset)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nplan [s390x] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.12~16.04] (no packageset)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nplan [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.12~16.04] (no packageset)
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nplan [i386] (xenial-proposed) [0.12~16.04]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:8.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-lbaas (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:8.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:11] <sergiusens> apw hey, mind helping me out with releasing snapcraft/xenial-proposed in snapcraft/xenial-updates?
[13:13]  * apw looks
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-fwaas (xenial-proposed/main) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:8.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-vpnaas (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.1.2-0ubuntu1 => 2:8.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (xenial-proposed/main) [2:9.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:9.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:21] <apw> sergiusens, looks ok ...
[13:22] <sergiusens> thanks!
[13:23] <apw> i wish all testing was documented as well as that
[13:37] <ogra_> apw, just make sergiusens maintain all packages ... fixed :)
[13:38] <sergiusens> lol ogra_, the documentation is all elopio; bt we try to have traceability everywhere to know where things went wrong if they do go wrong
[13:38] <ogra_> :)
[13:38] <sergiusens> you have to always plan for things to go wrong ;-)
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.4 => 2.408.5] (desktop-core)
[14:04] <Laney> snapcraft doesn't have to wait for 7 days?
[14:04] <apw> Laney, nope, it has an exception
[14:05] <Laney> indeed
[14:05] <apw> Laney, it is documented at the bottom of the linked exceptions thing in the bug
[14:05] <Laney> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapcraftUpdates
[14:05] <Laney> lucky them
[14:05] <apw> thats the one ... yeah i was supprised it was completely waved
[14:05] <apw> but it did also appear to have been rather well tested in this case
[14:24] <apw> slangasek, i am seeing an issue in the lubuntu images which looks like a seeds issue
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.1.2-0ubuntu1 => 2:8.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:28] <gQuigs> so the 'wine' binary package was dropped from the new wine1.8 build (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1558480)
[14:28] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1558480 in wine1.6 (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Transition from src:wine1.6 to src:wine from Debian" [High,Fix released]
[14:29] <gQuigs> will the old 'wine' package get cleaned up on it's own or should I request it explicitly like with wine-gecko
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgksu (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.0.13~pre1-8ubuntu1 => 2.0.13~pre1-9ubuntu1] (edubuntu)
[14:30] <slangasek> apw: howso?
[14:30] <pitti> apw: crap, forgot to backport the NM test fix after the isc-dhcp change in bug 1609898; I uploaded a follow-up NM, if you could review it? (it's simple, I just don't want the tests to keep failing)
[14:30] <ubot5> bug 1609898 in network-manager (Ubuntu Trusty) "dhclient incorrectly assumes a /64 ipv6 prefix" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1609898
[14:31] <apw> slangasek, just filing a bug on the error it throws
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 => 1.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:32] <apw> slangasek,
[14:32] <apw> lubuntu beta2 install fails with: "lubuntu-core : Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all but it is not going to be installed"
[14:33] <apw> any idea what one files that against?
[14:33] <pitti> start with lubuntu-meta?
[14:34] <apw> bug: #1628133
[14:34] <ubot5> bug 1628133 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "lubuntu beta2 install fails with: "lubuntu-core : Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all but it is not going to be installed"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1628133
[14:35] <apw> iso tracker updated also
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ironic (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.1.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.3]
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-django (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.8.7-1ubuntu7 => 1.8.7-1ubuntu8] (ubuntu-server)
=== PaulW2U_ is now known as PaulW2U
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-games [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [1.5ubuntu1]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kjsembed (yakkety-proposed/universe) [5.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.26.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sahara (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:4.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-iscsi (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-14ubuntu3.1 => 2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-14ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:33] <ChrisTownsend> Hi! Will packages stuck in yakkety-proposed due to the freeze be handled "automatically" or do we explicitly have to ask to get them promoted?
[15:35] <zyga> RAOF: hello, I've verified all the bugs associated with the current SRU of snap-confine
[15:35] <apw> zyga, for xenial ?
=== daniel1 is now known as Odd_Bloke
[15:40] <zyga> apw: yes
[15:40] <Laney> ChrisTownsend: They will be taken care of
[15:40] <ChrisTownsend> Laney: k, thanks
[15:45] <apw> zyga, once that clears there is a queued snap-confine in the queue is that still relevant or is a replacement coming
[15:46] <zyga> apw: I think we'll get .42 which contains a tiny fix on top of .41
[15:46] <zyga> apw: AFAIK mvo uploaded something today, let me look
[15:47] <apw> zyga, should i reject the queued entry in deferance to that then
[15:47] <zyga> apw: yes please
[15:47] <zyga> apw: I'll work on sponsoring the .42 one
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (xenial-proposed/main) [0.6.5.6-0ubuntu12 => 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13] (no packageset)
[15:48] <apw> zyga, done
[15:49] <zyga> thank you
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snap-confine [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.41-0ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[15:52] <lamont> coudl someone kindly reject open-iscsi (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-14ubuntu3.1 => 2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-14ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:53] <lamont> thanks
[15:54] <lamont> slangasek: `^^ ?
[15:54]  * apw looks
[15:56] <apw> lamont, slangasek done
[15:56] <lamont> ta
[15:56] <lamont> apw: I had not realized you had such power
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected open-iscsi [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-14ubuntu3.2]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.6.5.8-0ubuntu2]
[16:20] <slangasek> mdeslaur: looks like this is the relevant log: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting-2/2016/ubuntu-meeting-2.2016-04-26-16.00.log.html
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: networking-sfc (yakkety-proposed/primary) [2.0.1~git20160926.27f311e-1]
[16:22] <slangasek> mdeslaur: so http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-publishing/trunk/view/head:/scripts/maintenance-check.py is buggy, according to that log, and we need to include all supported seeds to get proper metadata; but it's not clear to me that you're consuming the output of this
=== daniel is now known as Guest11181
=== Guest11181 is now known as Odd_Bloke
=== santa is now known as Guest43478
=== Guest43478 is now known as santa_
=== xnox_ is now known as xnox
=== ChrisTownsend1 is now known as ChrisTownsend
[16:41] <mdeslaur> slangasek: ah, right, it's not the seeds themselves that are problematic. I see.
=== superm1_ is now known as superm1
[16:41] <mdeslaur> slangasek: ok, I'll revisit...not sure why I thought I had to wait
[16:41] <mdeslaur> slangasek: thanks
[16:41] <slangasek> mdeslaur: ok cheers :)
=== popey_ is now known as popey
=== med_ is now known as Guest44064
=== Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000
=== kip is now known as kip_
=== kip_ is now known as kip
=== kip is now known as Loopeth
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-utils (yakkety-proposed/partner) [1.3.3-0ubuntu5 => 1.3.3-0ubuntu6] (no packageset)
[17:01] <slangasek> apw: ugh; xserver-xorg-input-all is my fault, I thought xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse was only a Recommends rather than a Depends and I removed it because dropped in Debian. fixing
[17:02] <rcj> slangasek, Can you approve ^ gce-utils and get it into partner for yakkety?
[17:02] <slangasek> rcj: not until after beta is sorted
[17:03] <Odd_Bloke> slangasek: Because you don't have cycles, or because you more generally don't want it landing before beta?
[17:08] <slangasek> Odd_Bloke: the former
=== eylul- is now known as eylul
[17:13] <slangasek> apw, wxl_: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu4 uploaded, lubuntu alternate images will be retriggered automatically once it publishes
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.27-8ubuntu1 => 2.27-8ubuntu2] (core)
=== wxl_ is now known as wxl
[17:21] <lamont> slangasek: to make sure, one of the yakkety-proposed things is the whole overlayroot= kernel param going away (so it's not just maas/ipv6 that's hurting, it's all of maas)
[17:21] <lamont> slangasek: acocordingly, I'm likely to be focusing on that after lunch, and may want to smash cloud-initramfs-tools into yakkety sooner than later
[17:22] <doko> pitti, slangasek: licencecheck dependencies were again demoted :-(
[17:22] <slangasek> doko: yeah, I noticed. Sure as hell wasn't me :)
[17:22] <slangasek> lamont: "one of the yakkety-proposed things"> sorry, I'm not sure I got the start of this conversation (netsplit?)
[17:23] <wxl> netsplits are exceptional today
[17:23] <lamont> slangasek: nah, I just didn't give it to you...
[17:23] <wxl> DoS :( https://twitter.com/freenodestaff/status/780813276733210629
[17:24] <lamont> maas/ipv6 has several packages in-flight (1621515 1621507) which are also the focus of that xenial-sru fun
[17:24] <lamont> slangasek: one other change (which isn't either of those bugs, dunno what number it is) was the cloud-initramfs-tools change you accepted into  yakkety-proposed on Sat
[17:25] <lamont> that change should be discussed with smoser to make sure whether or not that's a blocker for cloud images
[17:25] <lamont> slangasek: and with that, I'll drop it at the feet of you, Odd_Bloke and smoser (who isn't in this channel, it seems)
=== kees_ is now known as kees
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-utils [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.3.3-0ubuntu6]
=== med_ is now known as Guest79278
[18:13] <slangasek> Laney: it appears no one has marked Ubuntu Desktop 'ready' on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/367/builds; who can make that call?
[18:14] <slangasek> ogasawara__, jgrimm: where did we get to on testing of Ubuntu Server on power?  I see there are no test results for them on the tracker yet
[18:14] <Odd_Bloke> slangasek: Is there somewhere we should be adding words for the beta email?
[18:15] <slangasek> acheronuk: and it looks like we still need someone to make the call on the Kubuntu images being ready for beta release
[18:15] <slangasek> Odd_Bloke: I've pinged infinity about a draft but he's at conference this week.  If someone were to create a wiki page for the email draft and stick their words in it, I would be happy to take it from there
[18:16] <acheronuk> slangasek: not me, but I will pass that on
[18:16] <slangasek> valorie: ^^
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been disabled
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been disabled
[18:21] <ogasawara__> slangasek: unfortunately my team doesn't have access to powerpc kit.  jgrimm does your team?  and for ppc64el, our machine is tied down with some testing for a xenial respin, so we're blocked there.
[18:22] <jgrimm> slangasek, ogasawara__: yes, getting someone on this right now
[18:22] <ogasawara__> jgrimm: thank you!
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: classic-theme-restorer (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.5.6-1 => 1.5.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted classic-theme-restorer [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.5.7-1]
[18:29] <jgrimm> ogasawara__, slangasek:   nacc is on it as powersj is at a sprint this week
=== med_ is now known as Guest40876
[18:45] <valorie> slangasek: I can't seem to raise yofel, but our beta image is well-tested
[18:45] <slangasek> valorie: I can do the marking on the tracker, if someone can vouch that it's ready
[18:45] <valorie> gulp
[18:45] <valorie> I'll vouch
[18:46] <slangasek> ok :)
[18:46] <valorie> thank you
[18:46] <acheronuk> and from me ^^
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[18:52] <wxl> exactly
[18:52] <wxl> oops wrong channel
[18:52] <wxl> slangasek: so alternates are currently disabled? we're giving up?
[18:53] <slangasek> wxl: the current images are known bad (my fault) and a respin is pending
[18:53] <slangasek> but waits for new xorg package to propagate
[18:53] <wxl> slangasek: i understand that but i just got a notice that the alternates were disabled. i assume you're just trying to keep people from wasting tests on them?
[18:53] <slangasek> wxl: yes
[18:54] <wxl> slangasek: k cool, thx :)
=== popey_ is now known as popey
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar (yakkety-proposed/universe) [52.0-1 => 52.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-taskbar [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [52.0-3]
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jing-trang (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20131210+dfsg+1-5 => 20131210+dfsg+1-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jing-trang [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [20131210+dfsg+1-6]
[19:07] <nacc> slangasek: jgrimm: looks like ppc64el passes fine with the default case, in a VM. Marked as such on qa tracker
[19:07] <jgrimm> nacc, thanks
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libopenraw (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.0.9-3.9 => 0.0.9-3.10] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libopenraw [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.0.9-3.10]
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fastqc (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.11.5+dfsg-3 => 0.11.5+dfsg-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fastqc [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.11.5+dfsg-4]
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtkballs (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.1.5-10 => 3.1.5-11] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:17] <slangasek> nacc: do you have time to test powerpc also? (should also be doable in a vm)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtkballs [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.1.5-11]
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: krb5-auth-dialog (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.20.0-1 => 3.20.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted krb5-auth-dialog [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.0-2]
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kpcli (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.1-2 => 3.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:22] <smoser> anyone able to ack https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/1493188
[19:22] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1493188 in cloud-utils (Ubuntu Xenial) ""overlayfs" no longer exists" [Medium,Confirmed]
[19:25] <pitti> doko: this time it wasn't me
[19:26] <doko> ta, but it still seems to happen ...
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtorrent-rasterbar [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.0-3]
=== pcw_ is now known as pcw
=== med_ is now known as Guest45789
=== philroche_ is now known as philroche
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libffi (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.2.1-4 => 3.2.1-6] (core) (sync)
[20:05] <valorie> wonderful release team, I wanted to seed the beta2 torrents, but so far am not seeing them on http://torrent.ubuntu.com:6969/
[20:10] <slangasek> valorie: I haven't started staging any of the beta2 stuff, still waiting for everything to be marked ready
[20:10] <slangasek> which currently means ubuntu server, xubuntu, and lubuntu (which will take longer because the images aren't yet built)
[20:11] <valorie> ok
[20:11] <valorie> I'll chill then
[20:12] <valorie> thanks for all your hard work and I hope you get some sleep after this past week's intensity
[20:14] <flocculant> slangasek: hi - as intimated last week at the start of beta 2 - we are not releasing this beta
[20:14] <nacc> slangasek: yes i can
[20:15] <flocculant> slangasek: mostly because of bug 1622303
[20:15] <ubot5> bug 1622303 in light-locker (Ubuntu) "Fails to unlock/ resumes to black screen" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1622303
[20:16] <slangasek> flocculant: ah, you consider that bug severe enough to not release the beta at all?
[20:16] <flocculant> yep
[20:16] <slangasek> ok, gotcha - thanks
[20:17] <flocculant> slangasek: you know what people are like - install something like final beta and not read anything about it ;)
[20:17] <slangasek> and, normally "no beta" would mean "no release", but in this case it's clear that the community has done the testing and found a showstopper that's currently out of your control
[20:17] <slangasek> not that you're just skipping to skip ;)
[20:18] <flocculant> :)
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: crash (yakkety-proposed/main) [7.1.5-1ubuntu1 => 7.1.5-1ubuntu2] (core)
[20:19] <flocculant> at least we found one for you while fiddling about too :)
[20:20] <flocculant> slangasek: also we've been patiently waiting for final beta to finish before we talk to people in -release about what we can do
[20:20] <flocculant> *we* mostly being bluesabre :p
[20:21] <slangasek> flocculant: well, you should probably bypass the release team and talk directly with the lightdm devs
[20:21] <flocculant> slangasek: currently because we don't know what's likely to happen - and not much time, we've been looking at not using light-locker
[20:22] <flocculant> but - the ins and outs I'm not proficient enough to really discuss that
=== pcw is now known as Guest2544
=== Guest2544 is now known as pcw
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openstack-trove (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:5.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:5.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [0.27ubuntu1 => 0.27ubuntu1.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[20:31] <tsimonq2> flocculant: "oh, we're only participating in the final beta"
[20:31]  * tsimonq2 runs
[20:31] <tsimonq2> :P
[20:31] <flocculant> tsimonq2: yes - we did - it fails - we're not releasing - seems pretty sensible to us
[20:33] <tsimonq2> flocculant: I know, I was joking ;)
[20:33] <tsimonq2> flocculant: it's logical
=== pcw is now known as Guest45253
=== Guest45253 is now known as pcw
=== PaulW2U is now known as Guest66500
=== PaulW2U_ is now known as PaulW2U
[20:45] <lamont> dear archive masters... Can I have cloud-initramfs-tools in xenial-proposed pls?
[20:46] <nacc> slangasek: hrm, you wouldn't happen to have a reference command-line, do you? virt-manager is having quite a bit of trouble setting up any such guest, so I think i'll have to use qemu directly (afaict)
[20:46] <lamont> nacc: what are you trying to get it to do?
=== pcw is now known as Guest48988
[20:47] <nacc> lamont: trying to help test the powerpc iso (server)
[20:47] <lamont> oh.  yeah, that'd be ENOCLUE for me
[20:47] <nacc> lamont: i was able to test the ppc64le iso using virt-manager
[20:47] <nacc> and iirc, i should be able to do powerpc, but it might ... take some fiddling with options :)
=== Guest48988 is now known as pcw
[21:10] <nacc> slangasek: ok, i got some help from smoser -- and it seems like something might be wrong on the powerpc isos, i'm not able to get hte installer to see the cdrom in a guest
[21:10] <slangasek> pitti: ppc64el and armhf autopkgtests unhappy?  I see we have quite the queue
[21:10] <nacc> slangasek: i just tested 16.04 daily and it works fine
[21:10] <tsimonq2> slangasek: what are we waiting on now?
[21:11] <slangasek> nacc: right, so it's still affected by the sort of problem we're dealing with from the 4.8 kernel reorg.  Please file a bug on linux, and we'll omit the powerpc image from the beta
[21:11] <wxl> tsimonq2: images
[21:11] <tsimonq2> wxl: Lubuntu Alternate? that's disabled in iso.qa.ubuntu.com...
[21:12] <wxl> tsimonq2: it's disabled so no one wastes their time testing. read lubuntu-devel :)
[21:12] <tsimonq2> oh sorry Steve
[21:12] <slangasek> yes, and autopkgtest results didn't come through timely for the new xorg build so I'm now pushing xorg through in parallel to kicking the autopkgtest runners
[21:12] <tsimonq2> ok
[21:13] <slangasek> (I think we can safely assume that a one-line packaging change to one of the xorg metapackages on amd64 and i386 will not have regressed systemd on armhf or ppc64el :P)
[21:13] <nacc> slangasek: ok, will do, thanks
[21:14] <slangasek> hmmmm ppc64el seems to be genuinely behind rather than dead
[21:15] <slangasek> so no kicking after all, just staring
[21:15] <slangasek> but xorg hinted through all the same, which means ETA 1.5-2h for lubuntu alternate images tsimonq2 wxl
[21:15] <wxl> thx slangasek
[21:15] <tsimonq2> ok thank you slangasek
[21:15] <nacc> slangasek: LP: #1628284 and tagged in the isoqa
[21:15] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1628284 in linux (Ubuntu) "yakkety: daily powerpc server ISO fails to find cdrom during install in a VM" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1628284
[21:16] <tsimonq2> slangasek: in the meantime, Ubuntu Server seems well tested, so idk who is the contact for that (or if you want to do it yourself) but it looks to me like it's good to go
[21:17] <slangasek> tsimonq2: yes, I'm flipping the switch on those right now (except powerpc which is a dud)
[21:17] <tsimonq2> ok thank you slangasek
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Yakkety Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Yakkety Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vte2.91 (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.44.2-1ubuntu2 => 0.44.2-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[21:17] <nacc> slangasek: thanks!
[21:23] <slangasek> stgraber: where do I set the default milestone for the iso tracker, so that publish-image-set DTRT?
[21:24] <stgraber> slangasek: ~/.isotracker.conf
[21:24] <slangasek> heh
[21:24] <slangasek> so it is
[21:25] <pitti> ⟫ pgrep -af runner/autopkgtest.*ppc64|wc -l
[21:25] <pitti> 20
[21:25] <pitti> slangasek: ^ running at full steam, we just have a loooot of requests
[21:25] <slangasek> pitti: yup, seems so
[21:26] <pitti> slangasek: two Qts last night again, plus lots in unapproved that got acked this morning
[21:26] <slangasek> pitti: does this mean ppc64el is underpowered compared with x86+s390x?
[21:27] <pitti> slangasek: certainly less power than x86; we have 56 parallel slots for i386+amd64 combined, and ppc64el instances boot significantly slower
[21:27] <pitti> it spends like a minute or two in OF
[21:27] <slangasek> right
[21:36] <infinity> pitti: Err, it does what not?
[21:36] <infinity> pitti: OF should be a blink of an eye.
[21:36] <slangasek> wxl, tsimonq2: just got notification that xorg has been accepted into yakkety, so confirming my earlier estimation of the timeline
[21:36] <infinity> s/not/now/
[21:36] <tsimonq2> slangasek: awesome!!! :D
[21:36] <infinity> pitti: IME, ppc64 VMs boot much faster than x86, not the other way around, so maybe we're doing something very wrong in scalingstack.
[21:36] <pitti> infinity: well, I know that reboots take ages, unlike on x86 where it's like 10s
[21:37] <infinity> pitti: There is a grub bug that makes it sit around asking for a key for 5 or 10s if you're not at the console.  But hardly any 2m delays.  And OF itself is pretty much instant and then gone.
[21:37] <nacc> yeah, something sounds off there
[21:38] <infinity> pitti: If you have console access to one of those, I'd be quite interested to know what it appears to be doing, or where the delay appears to be.
[21:38] <slangasek> pitti: perhaps it's shutdown rather than boot?
[21:38] <infinity> Shutdown of an ephemeral image should be just cutting the power.
[21:39] <infinity> Oh, I guess not for autopkgtest, where you install and reboot.
[21:39] <pitti> ah, indeed it's more like 30s these days
[21:39] <slangasek> maybe it needs kbd 1.15.5-1ubuntu5 from xenial-proposed :)
[21:39] <pitti> I suppose I mixed it up with arm64 then
[21:39] <pitti> where I do see a massive wait/delay at boot
[21:39] <infinity> pitti: Even 30s is dog slow, so I'd love to debug a bit some time.
[21:39] <infinity> (And we really should fix that grub bug, which is a good chunk of that time, I bet)
[22:14] <tsimonq2> heyo release team. *after beta is shipped* it would be good to get eyes on these: bug 1615437 bug 1626332 , even though Lubuntu doesn't ship PowerPC for non-LTS releases, it might affect server as well.
[22:15] <ubot5> bug 1615437 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Lubuntu 'entire disk installation' doesn't find yaboot (16.10, ppc)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1615437
[22:15] <ubot5> bug 1626332 in linux (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu MATE 16.10 fails to boot with linux-image-4.8.0-11-generic kernel on PowerMac G5 7,3" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1626332
[22:15]  * tsimonq2 wants beta shipped if you couldn't tell ;)
[22:15] <wxl> bro, chillax. :)
[22:15] <tsimonq2> oh, and I forgot, MATE too ;)
[22:16] <tsimonq2> wxl: about what? :P
=== Guest45789 is now known as med_
[22:29] <bdmurray> cjwatson, infinity: does wily still need to be supported?
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.125ubuntu4 => 0.125ubuntu5] (core)
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [0.122ubuntu8.2 => 0.122ubuntu8.3] (core)
[22:38] <infinity> bdmurray: No.
[22:38] <infinity> bdmurray: Oh, do you mean "set to supported in the UI" or actually supported?
[22:38] <slangasek> the first :)
[22:38] <infinity> bdmurray: I got sidetracked while working on an archive cleaning script that needs to be run before the former happens.
[22:38] <infinity> Well, doesn't "need" to, but it'd save a ton of space.
[22:39] <valorie> wily eof: July 28, 2016
[22:39] <infinity> Maybe I'll finish that off tonight.  Feeling antisocial.
[22:40] <infinity> tsimonq2: I can have a look on the weekend, but without a PMac, I might need a victim^Wtester to walk through things.
[22:40] <cyphermox> infinity: I volunteer.
[22:41] <slangasek> (.oO "as tribute")
[22:41] <infinity> cyphermox: Your G5 is happy enough to abuse now?  Yay.
[22:41] <tsimonq2> infinity: that's what I lack. Thank you.
[22:41] <cyphermox> I have a powered-off pmac laying under the desk
[22:41] <cyphermox> infinity: I managed to install MATE on it, so things should "work"
[22:41] <infinity> cyphermox: Kay.  Hit me up outside work hours and we'll play.  If we can make everything work on my Powerstation, your G5, and a SLOF VM, I call it good.
[22:42] <cyphermox> well, just ping me whenever you're ready, in the meantime I'll do a new install to make sure it hasn't rotted to death yet
[22:42] <bdmurray> infinity: I also meant in the meta-release files
[22:42] <infinity> bdmurray: Absolutely shouldn't be supported in meta-release.
[22:43] <infinity> bdmurray: Consider the LP state an oops of the same type as vivid.  For all external purposes, V and W are unsupported.
[22:44] <infinity> (V is more complicated, but from the community distro POV, it's dead)
[22:44] <bdmurray> infinity: I do but thought cjwatson mentioned sometthing about some servers in the DC and some RT I've forgotten
[22:44] <infinity> bdmurray: He was mistaken.  Ish.
[22:44] <infinity> bdmurray: Some arm64 kit is running wily kernels, but the kernel team isn't supporting them regardless of the LP state, so it's a moot point.  If we need new kernels before upgrading to xenial, we can build in a PPA.
[22:46] <bdmurray> Okay
[22:46] <wxl> hey i've got a G5 PowerMac if you guys want
[22:46] <wxl> someone's gotta pay shipping for the beast tho
[22:46] <infinity> wxl: Which generation?
[22:47] <infinity> wxl: I'd be interested in the last and shiniest (need to look up the model number), but nothing earlier.
[22:47] <infinity> wxl: Oh, wait, which continent are you on?
[22:47] <wxl> infinity: it's an A1047. i'm in the US.
[22:48] <tsimonq2> hm I wonder where I can get one
[22:49] <wxl> i've got some G4s but i doubt you want those :)
[22:49] <tsimonq2> why not?
[22:49] <infinity> wxl: A1047 covers a bunch of models.  I'm looking for 7,2, 7,3, 11,2... Those numbers.
[22:49] <infinity> (Personally, I'm after an 11,2, which is hard to find)
[22:49] <wxl> infinity: bah, it doesn't say on the outside
[22:50] <infinity> wxl: Do you know the CPU specs?
[22:50] <wxl> no
[22:50] <wxl> i'll boot it sometime for you
[22:50] <infinity> Heh.  Kay.
[22:53] <slangasek> lubuntu alternate images didn't spin on their own because epoch + grep fail (grr), but we should still manage to keep the original ETA
[22:56] <tsimonq2> argh ok cool slangasek
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfsprogs (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.3.0+nmu1ubuntu1 => 4.3.0+nmu1ubuntu2] (core)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927.5)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate powerpc [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927.5)
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927.5)
[23:06] <slangasek> rcj, gaughen, Odd_Bloke: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta2/ReleaseAnnouncement created with a pointer to http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/daily/server/yakkety/, please season to taste
[23:09] <gaughen> slangasek, I don't like it too salty, but I like it spicy!
[23:10] <slangasek> gaughen: http://weebls-stuff.com/toons/hot-tamales-animated-music-video-mrweebl/
[23:14] <sarnold> it'd be nice if zeromq3 could move through the update_excuses; zmqpp went through yesterday with a versioned build dependency upon zeromq3 that's stuck in proposed. As it stands, zmqpp will FTBFS if built against what's in the archive.
[23:15] <sarnold> (the zmqpp package was compiled in a ppa with the newer zeromq3 package, and slid in to the archive sideways like..)
[23:17] <gaughen> great slangasek now I have that stuck in my head. I deserved that though.
[23:19] <slangasek> sarnold: AIUI there is a legit regression in pyzmq that sil2100 needs to fix in order to get the autopkgtests passing; and the fact that this came from a ppa doesn't affect how it was built, we always build against -proposed. So this is normal churn and will be sorted for release
[23:19] <sarnold> slangasek: aha, nice.
[23:20] <sarnold> slangasek: for myself, it'd be nice to have it sorted out sooner than later, because my review tooling goes way better if I can build it locally; but I at least don't have to be a hardass about "FTBFS means we can't support it"  :)
[23:20] <sarnold> thanks slangasek :)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfsdump (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.1.6+nmu1 => 3.1.6+nmu1build1] (core)
[23:24] <slangasek> tsimonq2, wxl: right, lubuntu alternate have just posted
[23:24] <wxl> slangasek: yep, saw. emailed our team and started downloading
[23:25] <slangasek> ok
[23:25] <slangasek> "just" posted, I guess you have 20 minutes lead on me ;)
[23:25] <wxl> well apparently
[23:25] <wxl> so did queuebot
[23:25] <wxl> 1602 -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Yakkety Beta 2] has been updated (20160927.5)
[23:25] <slangasek> yup!
[23:26] <tsimonq2> downloading myself
[23:26] <tsimonq2> slangasek: this is what y'all are waiting for then? ;)
[23:29] <slangasek> wxl: also, it appears https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta2/Lubuntu is a dead link
[23:29] <slangasek> as is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta2/UbuntuKylin
[23:30] <wxl> tsimonq2: i thought you took care of the release notes?
[23:30] <slangasek> and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseNotes/Beta2/UbuntuStudio
[23:31] <wxl> sakrecoer: your beta2 notes don't seem to be in the canonical place
[23:31] <wxl> i don't think i've ever seen one of the release managers of kylin here so you should try email on that slangasek
[23:32] <slangasek> ah https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta2/UbuntuStudio exists so I'll point there instead
[23:32] <wxl> sakrecoer: nevermind :)
[23:34] <tsimonq2> wxl: not dead any more ;)
[23:34] <valorie> all those links are dead until we create the pages, correct?
[23:35]  * valorie started the Kubuntu one
[23:35] <tsimonq2> valorie: correct
[23:36] <wxl> thx tsimonq2
[23:36] <tsimonq2> np wxl
[23:38] <slangasek> ypwong: hi, I noticed you had a hand in editing of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta1/UbuntuKylin - will you also be creating https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Beta2/UbuntuKylin ?
[23:39] <slangasek> ypwong: (release delayed from last week but finally getting there, we're just a couple hours from being in a position to send out the announcement mail)
[23:40] <wxl> booting
[23:40] <tsimonq2> wxl: you marking as in progress on the tracker so work isn't duplicated? ;)
[23:40] <wxl> yes yes i'm getting there
[23:41] <tsimonq2> (cause if you mean booting after installation we might have duplicated work if you're doing amd64)
[23:42] <wxl> i'm on i386
[23:42] <tsimonq2> oh cool
[23:42] <tsimonq2> ok
[23:43] <wxl> ugh chrome crashed on me
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twm (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1:1.0.9-1ubuntu1 => 1:1.0.9-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twm [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:1.0.9-1ubuntu2]
[23:56] <cyphermox> slangasek: if you're still around, could you please review initramfs-tools's in xenial and yakkety?