[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted seabios [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.8.2-1ubuntu2] [00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mako [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.4+ds1-1ubuntu1] [00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-dictionary (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.20.0-2 => 3.20.0-3] (desktop-extra) (sync) [00:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.46.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.46.0-1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntugnome) (sync) [00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (yakkety-proposed/main) [5.4.1-2ubuntu1 => 5.4.1-2ubuntu2] (core) [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.4.1-2ubuntu2] [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-dictionary [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.0-3] [00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.46.0-1] [01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-utils (xenial-proposed/partner) [1.3.3-0ubuntu5~16.04.0 => 1.3.3-0ubuntu5~16.04.1] (no packageset) [03:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kimwitu (yakkety-proposed/universe) [4.6.1-7.1ubuntu1 => 4.6.1-7.2] (no packageset) (sync) [03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kimwitu [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [4.6.1-7.2] [03:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-invaders (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.3-4.1ubuntu1 => 0.3-4.3] (no packageset) (sync) [03:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-invaders [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.3-4.3] [04:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.2-0ubuntu1 => 2.3-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) [04:58] FFe for ^ is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1618159 [04:58] Ubuntu bug 1618159 in lxd (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Feature Exception for LXD in Ubuntu 16.10" [Wishlist,Triaged] [05:33] * sakrecoer echos wxl with a large delay and some acoustic modulation : 'hiophop hurray for release team [05:35] hiphop even, and coffe cup saluts! [05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linaro-image-tools (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2014.11-1 => 2016.05-1] (no packageset) (sync) [05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linaro-image-tools [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2016.05-1] [06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.10.95-4ubuntu4 => 2.10.95-4ubuntu5] (core) [06:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.10.95-4ubuntu5] [06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: diffoscope (yakkety-proposed/universe) [60 => 61] (no packageset) (sync) [06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted diffoscope [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [61] [06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blender (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.77.a+dfsg0-8 => 2.77.a+dfsg0-9] (ubuntustudio) (sync) [06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (yakkety-proposed/main) [231-7 => 231-7ubuntu1] (core) [07:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqalculate (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.9.7-9.1build2 => 0.9.7-9.1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.5] [08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.4 => 2.408.5] (desktop-core) [08:27] Hi, Laney, Seb128, Good morning! Sorry to disturb you again. I have update my new wizard package, Could you please have a look? The link is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1609207 , Thank you ! [08:27] Ubuntu bug 1609207 in Ubuntu Kylin "[needs-packaging] ubuntu-kylin-wizard" [High,Triaged] [08:48] pitti, has the beta gone out far enough that I could ask people to approve the xen ffe upload I did or should that still wait? [09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: owncloud-client (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.1.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2 => 2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync) [09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted owncloud-client [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owncloud-client [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owncloud-client [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:26] I've synced new owncloud-client ^, fixes 1628838 that I've verified [09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owncloud-client [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:26] bug 1628838 [09:26] bug 1628838 in owncloud-client (Ubuntu) "No indicator seen on unity" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1628838 [09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owncloud-client [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:31] sigh, systemd with a security update stuck in unapproved [09:32] and the same security upload is already in the archive for ubuntu stable releases [09:33] Hardly worth sighing about. It's more critical to get security fixes out to releases that are actually stable, and someone will look at the yakkety queue quite soon. [09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.14.0-1] [09:42] this is true, but fixing the development release and then stable isn't a better workflow? [09:42] I mean, SRU works that way AFAIK [09:44] I would have expected security pocket to avoid unapproved queue [09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] [09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xen [source] (yakkety-proposed) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twisted [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [16.4.1-1] [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-wlan-ng (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.2.9+dfsg-5 => 0.2.9+dfsg-6] (lubuntu) (sync) [09:46] oh, no security pocket for yakkety nvm [09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owncloud-client [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:47] do you think bug #1432741 is ok or not, probably quite clear "yeah it's safe" or "waaay too late". [09:47] bug 1432741 in libsdl1.2 (Ubuntu) "[FFe] sdl1.2 needs mir support patch" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1432741 [09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:7.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] [09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.5 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.5.2-6] [09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.174] [09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.1.0-1ubuntu7] [09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [231-7ubuntu1] [09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owncloud-client [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xen [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt) [09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xen [i386] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt) [09:54] Mirv, for sure I'm not authoritative, but I sponsored the same work for libsdl2 a few times for the same person, without troubles [09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xen [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt) [09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xen [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt) [09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owncloud-client [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:55] LocutusOfBorg: yeah, I just raised it here since the FFe has been waiting since Monday so if it's wanted in the earlier the better [09:55] LocutusOfBorg: brandon's work is pretty solid, yes [09:55] * LocutusOfBorg is doing some dak command on coccia, to see how libsdl1.2 is deprecated [09:57] lots of stuff [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3:10.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] [09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtkhash (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-3 => 0.7.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ironic [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:6.2.0-0ubuntu1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtkhash [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-3ubuntu1] [10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautilus-python (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.1-4 => 1.1-4ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus-python [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1-4ubuntu1] [10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-os-client-config [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.21.1-0ubuntu1] [10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-swiftclient [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:3.1.0-0ubuntu1] [10:05] coreycb: Oops, I typed the wrong reason for rejecting python-swiftclient. I meant to say that I'll sync it instead. [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-swiftclient (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:3.0.0-3 => 1:3.1.0-1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) (sync) [10:09] oho, you already did [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:10.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-swiftclient [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1:3.1.0-1] [10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:9.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] [10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-vpnaas [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:9.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] [10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-swiftclient [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1:3.1.0-1] [10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-lbaas [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:9.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] [10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:9.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] [10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.10.0-0ubuntu1] === davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: address-book-app (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.2+16.10.20160920-0ubuntu1 => 0.2+16.10.20160929-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings-components (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.9+16.10.20160909-0ubuntu1 => 0.9+16.10.20160927-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) === ara_ is now known as ara [10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted address-book-app [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.2+16.10.20160929-0ubuntu1] [10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings-components [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9+16.10.20160927-0ubuntu1] [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [4.7.0-0ubuntu1] [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.3-0ubuntu1] [10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blender [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.77.a+dfsg0-9] [10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libqalculate [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.7-9.1ubuntu1] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: totem-pl-parser (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.10.6-4ubuntu2 => 3.10.7-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-wlan-ng [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.2.9+dfsg-6] [10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted totem-pl-parser [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.10.7-1ubuntu1] [10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-adal (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.4.1-2] [10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-applicationinsights (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.10.0-2] [10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-msrest (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.4.4-1] [10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-timeliness (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.3.8-1] [10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: vagrant-azure (yakkety-proposed/primary) [2.0.0~pre1-2] [10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-haikunator (yakkety-proposed/primary) [1.1.0-1] [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-ms-rest (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.5.0-1] [11:10] smb: yes; also, the beta freeze is completely independent of approving FFEs [11:20] pitti, thinks for letting it in. I was just trying to avoid more work for the builders and stuff while we already cause so much work with the one-kernel-a-day project ;) [11:20] thanks I mean [11:21] smb: I actually didn't let it in, but yw :) (I'm on systemd.conf today to Sat, not much time for work) [11:22] oh well then thanks to whomever :) [11:23] pitti: good timing with the celebrity bug :-) [11:23] heh [11:23] I thought most people considered systemd in and by itself as a local DoS already :-P [11:24] Sure! Been there, got the t-shirt (literally) :) [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (yakkety-proposed/main) [2:10.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1 => 2:10.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:10.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2] [12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (yakkety-proposed/main) [2:9.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1 => 2:9.0.0~rc3-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:9.0.0~rc3-0ubuntu1] [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-azure (yakkety-proposed/primary) [2.0.0~rc6+dfsg-2] [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-azure-storage (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.33.0-1] [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-msrestazure (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.4.3-1] [13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-ms-rest-azure (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.5.0-1] [13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-azure-sdk (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.6.0-1] [13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyzmq (yakkety-proposed/universe) [15.2.0-1fakesync1 => 15.2.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyzmq [source] (yakkety-proposed) [15.2.0-1ubuntu1] [13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.20.3-2ubuntu2 => 3.22.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-app-launch (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.9+16.10.20160913.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.9+16.10.20160928-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) [14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hw-detect (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.117ubuntu2 => 1.117ubuntu3] (core) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simple-scan (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.22.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.22.0.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hw-detect (xenial-proposed/main) [1.117ubuntu2 => 1.117ubuntu2.1] (core) [14:20] cyphermox: around ? [14:21] lamont: yep [14:22] what's up? [14:22] 1621615, 1621507 <-- I figure we both need to agree on those, I'm +1 on verfied=true. 1628306 I think is all yours, yes? [14:22] in my fantasy world, I'd like to see those hit -updates today [14:23] cloud-init hasn't been in proposed for 7 days.. [14:24] ah, is that the other criteria? [14:24] seems the same applies to the other SRUs [14:24] usually, yes. I suppose you may be able to convince SRU team members otherwise [14:24] almost certainly, given the uploads were friday/sat and maybe a touch on monday (8306) [14:25] apw: who do I need to convince? :D [14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: empathy (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.12.12-2ubuntu1 => 3.12.12-3ubuntu1] (ubuntugnome) [14:25] cyphermox: otoh, I'm inclined to work on my maas bug that's at least partially to blame for yakkety issues, before I go on from there [14:27] well, SRUs aren't my call given that I'm not on the SRU team. I will however verify ...306 now so it's fine to migrate when it's time [14:31] is that maas bug something I should be looking at? [14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-keyring (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.20.0-2ubuntu2 => 3.20.0-2ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted owncloud-client [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted owncloud-client [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted owncloud-client [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted owncloud-client [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted owncloud-client [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted owncloud-client [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted owncloud-client [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.2+dfsg-1] [14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pciutils (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:3.3.1-1.1ubuntu3 => 1:3.3.1-1.1ubuntu4] (core) [14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.21.91-0ubuntu1 => 3.22.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:58] cyphermox: the maas bug is all us, related to queries coming from IPs that we should accept, but don't, because we don't think they belong to the client. At least I htink that's what's going on as I dig into it [14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gitg (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.20.1-1 => 3.20.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [14:59] ok [14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gitg [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.3-0ubuntu1] [15:03] hi, can someone poke ubuntu-app-launch through unapproved queue please? :) [15:03] cyphermox: so yeah, I guess the big question is, are you +1 on all the 1621{507,615} packages being marked as verified too? [15:05] yep [15:05] cool. I'll finish myh verification runs today, and mark them [15:39] apw or someone: please kick cloud-initramfs-tools 0.27ubuntu1.1 and 0.29ubuntu1.1 into -proposed (x and y) [15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gabbi (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.12.0-2 => 1.24.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-gabbi [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.24.0-1] [15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mediaplayer-app (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.20.5+16.10.20160922-0ubuntu1 => 0.20.5+16.10.20160928-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) [15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mediaplayer-app [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.20.5+16.10.20160928-0ubuntu1] [15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pbr (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.10.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.10.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.6.5.8-0ubuntu2 => 0.6.5.8-0ubuntu3] (no packageset) [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (yakkety-proposed/main) [2016f-1 => 2016g-1] (core) (sync) [16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2016g-1] [16:11] slangasek, Could you approve my upload of gce-utils for xenial-proposed partner? [16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pylxd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.1.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (precise-proposed/main) [2016f-0ubuntu0.12.04 => 2016g-0ubuntu0.12.04] (core) [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (xenial-proposed/main) [2016f-0ubuntu0.16.04 => 2016g-0ubuntu0.16.04] (core) [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (trusty-proposed/main) [2016f-0ubuntu0.14.04 => 2016g-0ubuntu0.14.04] (core) [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: squashfuse (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.1.100-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1] [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smbldap-tools (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu2 => 0.9.9-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smbldap-tools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu3] [16:22] hello, can an archive admin please accept python-os-api-ref from the yakkety new queue? this is a required build-depend for openstack packages. [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (xenial-proposed) [2016g-0ubuntu0.16.04] [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (trusty-proposed) [2016g-0ubuntu0.14.04] [16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (precise-proposed) [2016g-0ubuntu0.12.04] [16:47] hmm [16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-tools (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1 => 1.1.0-2] (ubuntustudio) (sync) [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: amide (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-6build2 => 1.0.5-7] (no packageset) (sync) [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted amide [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.5-7] [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: audiolink (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.05-1.2 => 0.05-2] (no packageset) (sync) [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-k8sclient (yakkety-proposed/primary) [0.3.0-1] [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted audiolink [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.05-2] [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: berkeley-express (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.5.1-2build2 => 1.5.1-3] (no packageset) (sync) [16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted berkeley-express [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.5.1-3] [17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0-1ubuntu1] [17:01] coreycb: python-os-api-ref accepted. will this also be a runtime dep? (will it need an MIR?) [17:01] rcj: looking [17:01] slangasek, thank you [17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-os-api-ref [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.3.0+dfsg1-1] [17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-app-launch [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9+16.10.20160928-0ubuntu1] [17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hw-detect [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.117ubuntu3] [17:04] slangasek, thanks. I think it's just a build-depend so shouldn't need an MIR. [17:04] ddellav, ^ [17:04] coreycb ack [17:05] rcj: why is this gce-utils_1.3.3-0ubuntu5~16.04.1 instead of gce-utils_1.3.3-0ubuntu6~16.04.0? [17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-os-api-ref [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.3.0+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [17:07] slangasek, it shouldn't be, I'll correct it. [17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-utils [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.3-0ubuntu5~16.04.1] [17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-utils (xenial-proposed/partner) [1.3.3-0ubuntu5~16.04.0 => 1.3.3-0ubuntu6~16.04.0] (no packageset) [17:10] slangasek, I have fixed that and re-uploaded. Sorry. [17:10] rcj: no prob [17:12] good evening [17:13] I have some questions about the freezes, release management and such in ubuntu (I'm still not familiar with ubuntu's release management) [17:13] so I would like to ask about the status of our kubuntu's packaging [17:14] we have for instance kde frameworks 5.26 (composed by many packages) stuck in proposed [17:14] rcj: and accepted [17:15] slangasek, thank you [17:15] santa_: what do you mean by "stuck in proposed"? [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-utils [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.3-0ubuntu6~16.04.0] [17:15] slangasek: meaning they are in proposed but not in the main archive if I'm not mistaken [17:16] santa_: yes, but what do you mean by "stuck" [17:16] packages migrate from -proposed when they meet all the consistency requirements [17:16] there was a beta milestone freeze holding packages out of the release, but that is now cleared [17:17] slangasek: so if we get them "blessed" by britney they will migrate [17:17] right? [17:17] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html [17:18] when the package has passed its autopkgtests, and it can be migrated to the release without regressing archive installability [17:18] ↑ I'm asking because I see here a problem which we may need to address [17:18] ok, so it's still feasible to get fw 5.26 and plasma 5.7.5 in yakety [17:19] what about apps 16.04.3? would be feasible, at this point, to get them in yakkety? [17:19] what problem are you referring to? that's a very long page [17:19] I believe apps should also be feasible [17:20] apps = 203 package upload [17:20] there is unfortunately an autopkgtest backlog right now on armhf (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running) so it's not guaranteed [17:20] but fortunately the apps don't trigger quite so many autopkgtests beyond their own [17:21] slangasek: e-c-m 5.26 (part of kde frameworks and already in -proposed) is triggering some build failures on some apps [17:21] so we could patch 5.26 with a very very ugly workaround to get things migrated [17:21] santa_: no abbreviations, please, I have no idea what 'e-c-m' is [17:22] slangasek: sorry, extra-cmake-modules [17:23] extra-cmake-modules itself is failing its own autopkgtest [17:23] so it's either patching frameworks 5.26, or uploading apps 16.04.3 [17:23] plus there is a more general issue of failing tests with kde frameworks and plasma. you addressed that with yofl last time round as shown in this paste: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23250241/ [17:23] I see that, at least [17:23] acheronuk: last time, it was "we're in transition, please override all of these failing tests because they're meaningless" [17:23] or maybe with infinity [17:23] that's not the answer for release [17:25] santa_: I think it's clear that you should be uploading the apps, not patching the frameworks [17:26] yes please!!! /me is happy with that [17:27] if we can find an uploader [17:27] slangasek: when apps migrate to release would the respective proposed migration pages be updated? [17:27] I assume yes? [17:28] tsimonq2: which pages are you referring to? [17:28] uploader found :) [17:29] slangasek: Proposed Migration excuses page, the pretty one [17:29] slangasek: ok, we will work on fixes apps 16.04.3, so they won't fail against latest extra-cmake-modules and work with the sponsor. thank you for your time, advice and patience [17:29] tsimonq2: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html tracks packages in -proposed that have yet to migrate; if they migrate, that page is updated [17:30] santa_: cheers [17:31] slangasek: nvm, stupid/obvious question [17:31] and we have an uploader too ;) [17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.1+git20160923.2.7374bdc-0ubuntu1~xenial1] [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vmware-nsx [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.3] [18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-django [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.7-1ubuntu5.3] [18:11] sil2100: re livecd-rootfs SRU are the changes in Yakkety? [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hw-detect [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.117ubuntu2.1] [18:17] kirkland: your pollinate SRU makes reference to a private bug which we don't really allow. [18:18] nacc: ^^ [18:18] bdmurray: ack, what's the best way to go about that? can you reject and i can re-upload w/o the bug references? [18:20] bdmurray: very sorry for that -- the header bug is the public version, i should have scrubbed the changelog more actively [18:22] nacc: No problem, yes I can reject them. [18:23] bdmurray: ok, and for rejected SRUs, since they were not publisehd, i can reupload with the same version and a corrected changelog? or should i bump the suffix version for consistency? Also, it does appare the yakkety changelog refers to an internal bug [18:24] nacc: Yes, reupload with same version. I think the private bug reference is less important for the development release. [18:24] bdmurray: ack, will do that asap, thanks! [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pollinate [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.23-0ubuntu1~16.04] [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pollinate [source] (precise-proposed) [4.23-0ubuntu1~12.04] [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.22.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.22.0-1ubuntu2] (desktop-extra) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pollinate [source] (trusty-proposed) [4.23-0ubuntu1~14.04] [18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.3-0ubuntu1 => 2.3-0ubuntu2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) [18:28] bdmurray: yes, as per the SRU bug, there is one change that's not in yakkety but the reason for that is that it wouldn't work there [18:28] As we don't support arm64 clicks for anything else than xenial [18:28] ^ trivial fix for cases where LXD isn't running (as discovered by lamont) [18:29] \o/ [18:29] * lamont the explorer [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pollinate (precise-proposed/main) [4.21-0ubuntu1~12.04 => 4.23-0ubuntu1~12.04] (no packageset) [18:30] bdmurray: should be fixed now, thanks! [18:30] lamont: one of those rare people who tests stuff with -proposed enabled :) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pollinate (trusty-proposed/main) [4.21-0ubuntu1~14.04 => 4.23-0ubuntu1~14.04] (no packageset) [18:30] I'm sure we'd have had a bunch more people run into problems pretty quick had that hit the release pocket :) [18:30] stgraber: only because I need like 5 packages from -proposed to actually verify said fixes [18:30] in an initramfs. [18:31] FML [18:31] sil2100: Could you update the bug tasks to reflect that? There is no xenial one and the default task in In Progress. [18:31] :) [18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pollinate (xenial-proposed/main) [4.21-0ubuntu1~16.04 => 4.23-0ubuntu1~16.04] (ubuntu-server) [18:31] Oh [18:31] bdmurray: right, sorry about that, let me do that quick [18:31] sil2100: no problem [18:32] bdmurray: ok, nominated to xenial, set the main one to Fix Released [18:32] Thanks for looking into this! [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.7.8-8-g0439d8a-0ubuntu1 => 0.7.8-11-g02f6c4b-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smbldap-tools (trusty-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1.14.04.1 => 0.9.9-1ubuntu1.14.04.2] (no packageset) [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smbldap-tools (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.9.9-1ubuntu1.16.04.1 => 0.9.9-1ubuntu1.16.04.2] (no packageset) [18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-utils (xenial-release/partner) [1.3.3-0ubuntu6~16.04.0 => 1.3.3-0ubuntu6~16.04.0] (no packageset) (sync) [18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-utils [sync] (xenial-release) [1.3.3-0ubuntu6~16.04.0] [18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr415-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.0~bzr425-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) [19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.5] [19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pollinate [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.23-0ubuntu1~16.04] [19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pollinate [source] (trusty-proposed) [4.23-0ubuntu1~14.04] [19:12] nacc: Do you know anything about the existing SRU for pollinate in Precise? [19:12] bdmurray: no, it seems like it just got missed somehow? [19:12] bdmurray: i've pinged kirkland on it [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nagios-nrpe (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.15-1ubuntu1 => 2.15-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) [19:12] bdmurray: ah he did respond in the bug, but i didn't get notified! [19:13] bdmurray: LP: #1593625 [19:13] Launchpad bug 1593625 in cloud-images "[SRU] add pollinate to precise, update all" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1593625 [19:14] bdmurray: it was tested (by kirkland) so seems like it should have gone through; i'm not privy to why it didn't? [19:14] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html [19:14] it doesn't seem to have a reference to the bug [19:15] you're right, it doesn't [19:15] * nacc blames kirkland's publishing method :) [19:15] nacc: if there's no bug reference then it doesn't turn green so its dead to the SRU team (or me at least!) [19:16] interesting -- well, my upload supersedes (and includes what's in -proposed now), but not sure how best to proceed [19:17] nacc: Well, nobody was clamoring for it so we might as well let yours into -proposed. Agreed? [19:18] bdmurray: agreed [19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nagios3 (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu2 => 3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server) [19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pollinate [source] (precise-proposed) [4.23-0ubuntu1~12.04] [19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios-nrpe [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.15-1ubuntu2] [19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios3 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu3] [19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-control-center (yakkety-proposed/main) [15.04.0+16.10.20160705.1-0ubuntu1 => 15.04.0+16.10.20160705.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) === slangase` is now known as slangasek [20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.0.4-0ubuntu4 => 2.0.4-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-server) [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.0.4-0ubuntu5] [20:21] doko_: you broke lxc, please fix: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/287321815/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.lxc_2.0.4-0ubuntu5_BUILDING.txt.gz [20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.8-11-g02f6c4b-0ubuntu1] [20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.3-0ubuntu2] [20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0-1ubuntu2] [20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted simple-scan [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0.1-0ubuntu2] [20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted empathy [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.12.12-3ubuntu1] [20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-keyring [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.0-2ubuntu3] [20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pylxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.1.1-0ubuntu1] [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-systemd (yakkety-proposed/main) [231-2build1 => 232-1] (core) (sync) [21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-docs (yakkety-proposed/main) [16.10.2 => 16.10.3] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) [21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-utils (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.1.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-utils (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu1.16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-systemd [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [232-1] [21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-docs [source] (yakkety-proposed) [16.10.3] [21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.6.5.8-0ubuntu3] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.0-1ubuntu1] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pciutils [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:3.3.1-1.1ubuntu4] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-tools [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.0-2] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pbr [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.10.0-0ubuntu2] [21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: e2fsprogs (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.43.1-1 => 1.43.3-1] (core) (sync) [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (yakkety-proposed/main) [231-8 => 231-9] (core) [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted e2fsprogs [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.43.3-1] [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-utils [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2] [22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [231-9] === nacc_ is now known as nacc [22:52] infinity: Do you have any plans for bug 1571456? [22:52] bug 1571456 in glibc (Ubuntu Xenial) "id crashed with SIGSEGV in sock_eq()" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1571456 [22:53] stgraber: I'll have a look. looks like lxc wasn't built with pie before [22:54] doko_: pretty sure it was but hardening-wrapper was doing some magic to do the right thing for the library vs binaries [22:55] stgraber@dakara:~$ hardening-check /usr/bin/lxc-start [22:55] /usr/bin/lxc-start: [22:55] Position Independent Executable: yes [22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (yakkety-proposed/main) [10.2.2-0ubuntu5 => 10.2.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [22:55] ugh, so hardening-wrapper was hiding the real arguments? excellent :-/ [22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fcitx (xenial-proposed/main) [1:4.2.9.1-1ubuntu1 => 1:4.2.9.1-1ubuntu1.16.04.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [23:22] https://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20160930-1.txt [23:22] santa_, acheronuk, clivejo ^^^ [23:22] that was just pasted in the Debian KDE channel [23:22] !info kde-cli-tools [23:22] kde-cli-tools (source: kde-cli-tools): tools to use KDE services from the command line. In component universe, is extra. Version 4:5.5.5-0ubuntu1 (xenial), package size 138 kB, installed size 680 kB [23:22] !info kde-cli-tools yakkety [23:22] kde-cli-tools (source: kde-cli-tools): tools to use KDE services from the command line. In component universe, is extra. Version 4:5.7.2-0ubuntu1 (yakkety), package size 130 kB, installed size 657 kB [23:23] aaand we're affected... [23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autopkgtest (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.0.5 => 4.0.5ubuntu1] (core) [23:25] !info kde-cli-tools trusty [23:25] Package kde-cli-tools does not exist in trusty [23:26] ok, I'm getting a patch ready for Xenial then [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autopkgtest [source] (yakkety-proposed) [4.0.5ubuntu1] [23:39] stgraber: why isn't lxc using libtool? [23:53] ok, release team, here's a diff fixing that: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23253427/ [23:53] * tsimonq2 hunts for some documentation on this