[06:29] <Unit193> +    - Fix guest AppArmor profile to allow guest sessions more access to the
[06:29] <Unit193> +      upstart session socket (LP: #1627304)
[06:40] <flocculant> was expecting that
[08:46] <Unit193> flocculant: Been accepted.
[11:03] <flocculant> grabbed from proposed - because I'm never sure till I see it work with my own eyeses
[11:07] <Unit193> Trying the systemd session with it too or no?
[11:08] <flocculant> just default whatever I have 
[11:08] <flocculant> and there was a systemd update
[11:08] <flocculant> oic - the failing lock thing?
[11:08] <flocculant> if so - I know that failed with the profile change 
[11:09] <Unit193> Ah, nice.
[11:10] <flocculant> so we have (or will have) the old working x-d-s, the new lightdm - which all works together
[11:39] <bluesabre> good to hear
[15:21] <flocculant> after the last fortnight, anything lightdm is probably good to hear :p
[16:25] <flocculant> I do still see the DENIED messgaes in logs, but I guess because we're not using the 'new' x-d-s we can laugh for the time being
[16:25] <flocculant> I will keep watch on any updates I see between now and release and retest if I see anything that might affect it
[17:23] <ochosi> evening everyone
[17:23] <ochosi> <- is back in town
[17:26] <ochosi> i read some emails about light-locker issues which turned out to be issues with pitti's changes
[17:26] <ochosi> and something about guest mode being fixed in lightdm
[17:26] <ochosi> anything important other than that which i missed?
[17:35] <flocculant> we moved to qt 
[17:36] <flocculant> welcome back ochosi :)
[17:36] <flocculant> other than l-l and associated nothing I know of 
[18:07] <ochosi> flocculant: so everything is on track (again)?
[18:09] <flocculant> ochosi: yea - we reverted xubuntu-default-settings - which got lock and guest working properly
[18:09] <flocculant> there's been a change to lightdm to get guest working elsewhere
[18:09] <flocculant> I would guess that we'll need to revisit the x-d-s next cycle - and it'll fall over - but not at this stage of the cycle :)
[18:10] <flocculant> currently we have no need to change out light-locker for something else - but we at least know where we stand of options for next cycle
[18:10] <flocculant> I think that sums it all up
[18:12] <ochosi> right
[18:12] <flocculant> as far as anything else on the iso goes - I think the only horrid thing is the dodgy resize dialogue
[18:12] <ochosi> well if there are no issues with l-l i don't think there
[18:12] <ochosi> 's any need to exchange it
[18:12] <flocculant> well - as soon as we revert x-d-s then it'll fail 
[18:12] <ochosi> right
[18:13] <ochosi> did you get anywhere in terms of what changes would be needed?
[18:13] <flocculant> locker changes?
[18:13] <ochosi> yup
[18:13] <flocculant> gnome-screensaver is the best of the 2 in my opinion (bluesabre's too:) visually at least
[18:14] <flocculant> doesn't add much size wise either afaik
[18:14] <flocculant> hang on 
[18:14] <ochosi> and dependency-wise?
[18:15] <ochosi> cause i remember it dragged in gnome-* heavily around 3.16
[18:15] <ochosi> haven't revisited it since then
[18:15] <flocculant> gnome-screensaver just dragged in itself
[18:15] <flocculant> let me find a thing
[18:15] <ochosi> k, that sounds fair
[18:16] <flocculant> http://imgur.com/lQIC7KD
[18:16] <flocculant> that's a default vm - removing light-locker on left, adding g-s top right, removing g-s and adding x-s bottom right
[18:17] <flocculant> http://pad.ubuntu.com/xubuntu-y-locker
[18:18] <ochosi> sry, gotta run, bbiab
[18:18] <flocculant> ok - well those links etc are data we had
[19:17] <ochosi> flocculant: hm, interesting, seems they cleared it off its gnome depends...
[19:17] <ochosi> i thought that it was more tightly integrated into gdm and the gnomeshell itself
[19:18] <ochosi> looking at the git log it was only recently resurrected: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-screensaver/log/
[19:18] <ochosi> 3.6.0 is from 2012...
[19:23] <flocculant> right 
[19:23] <flocculant> long and short of it is it's easier for us if necessary then :)
[19:24] <flocculant> I'm just glad we didn't need to swap this close to the finish line :p
[19:25] <flocculant> not at all sure what I was thinking of when I tried reverting x-d-s - at that time of the morning I'm not really thinking of anything but tea ...
[19:55] <ochosi> looks a bit crappy, the gnome-screensaver unlock dialog
[19:56] <ochosi> maybe i can do some theming magic on it though if we really decide to go down that road
[20:03] <flocculant> yea - though it does look better than the other one we were looking at :)
[20:04] <Unit193> Did someone leave the awful white border on it still?
[20:04] <flocculant> Unit193: not that I recall
[20:04] <Unit193> Goooood.
[20:08] <flocculant> http://i.imgur.com/tcptBBQ.png
[20:08] <flocculant> no white border
[20:10] <flocculant> .