[12:13] <wgrant> cjwatson: Thanks for the reviews.
[12:14] <wgrant> cjwatson: (that last one has some serious history... https://launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/i-really-do-hate-views was my first start on it, a week before I joined the company...)
[12:19] <cjwatson> Nice.
[12:22] <cjwatson> Perhaps I should do something with some of my misc branches that are about half that old ...
[12:25] <wgrant> That's where that batch last week came from...
[12:25] <wgrant> I have some dozens sitting in various ~ backups that never quite saw the light of day.
[12:26] <wgrant> cjwatson: Does my reply in https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/bug-1083709-again/+merge/306167 make sense to you?
[12:33] <cjwatson> wgrant: Yep, seems reasonable, just hadn't quite had a chance to think about it.  Approved with one extra comment.
[12:34] <wgrant> cjwatson: Thanks.
[12:34] <cjwatson> I'm making fairly decent progress with the base git-target import model, BTW.  We should talk about the auth arrangements next week.
[12:35] <wgrant> Odd is right.
[12:35] <cjwatson> And resisting the impulse to go and spend a day ripping out the rest of IBranchTarget.
[12:36] <wgrant> It is conceivable that a simple HMAC could work here with minimal database implications.
[12:37] <cjwatson> Push over HTTPS, you mean?
[12:37] <wgrant> Precisely.
[12:37] <cjwatson> How novel.
[12:37] <cjwatson> Certainly worth considering.
[12:37] <wgrant> LP then need only verify the signature and that the encoded job ID is presently Running.
[12:38] <cjwatson> I like avoiding a new celebrity if we can.
[12:38] <wgrant> Avoiding celebrities and limiting excess authority always make me happy.
[12:39] <cjwatson> Right, need to go out shortly, later
[12:39] <wgrant> Indeed, and I should sleep. See you next week.