[12:13] cjwatson: Thanks for the reviews. [12:14] cjwatson: (that last one has some serious history... https://launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/i-really-do-hate-views was my first start on it, a week before I joined the company...) [12:19] Nice. [12:22] Perhaps I should do something with some of my misc branches that are about half that old ... [12:25] That's where that batch last week came from... [12:25] I have some dozens sitting in various ~ backups that never quite saw the light of day. [12:26] cjwatson: Does my reply in https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/bug-1083709-again/+merge/306167 make sense to you? [12:33] wgrant: Yep, seems reasonable, just hadn't quite had a chance to think about it. Approved with one extra comment. [12:34] cjwatson: Thanks. [12:34] I'm making fairly decent progress with the base git-target import model, BTW. We should talk about the auth arrangements next week. [12:35] Odd is right. [12:35] And resisting the impulse to go and spend a day ripping out the rest of IBranchTarget. [12:36] It is conceivable that a simple HMAC could work here with minimal database implications. [12:37] Push over HTTPS, you mean? [12:37] Precisely. [12:37] How novel. [12:37] Certainly worth considering. [12:37] LP then need only verify the signature and that the encoded job ID is presently Running. [12:38] I like avoiding a new celebrity if we can. [12:38] Avoiding celebrities and limiting excess authority always make me happy. [12:39] Right, need to go out shortly, later [12:39] Indeed, and I should sleep. See you next week.