[04:56] <hikiko> hello
[06:16] <pitti> Good morning
[07:59] <willcooke> morning all
[07:59] <flexiondotorg> Morning chaps
[08:00] <willcooke> pip pip
[08:02] <didrocks> morning willcooke, flexiondotorg
[08:02] <didrocks> install
[08:02] <didrocks> virtualenv!
[08:02]  * didrocks tries to autocomplete willcooke's prompt
[08:03]  * flexiondotorg asks didrocks to imagine I just wrote something welcoming in French ;-)
[08:03] <Laney> hi homies
[08:03] <flexiondotorg> o/
[08:03] <pitti> hey Laney!
[08:03] <Sweet5hark> moin
[08:03] <didrocks> flexiondotorg: ahah ;)
[08:03] <didrocks> hey Laney!
[08:04]  * Sweet5hark is working from a mobile hotspot right now, so connectivity might be somewhat wobbly.
[08:04] <Sweet5hark> Laney: thanks for the LibreOffice upload!
[08:05] <Laney> hi pitti didrocks & Sweet5hark
[08:05] <Laney> Sweet5hark: welcome
[08:06] <didrocks> hey hey Sweet5hark
[08:20] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I've got a note on my tasks about adding new 16.10 wallpapers.
[08:20] <flexiondotorg> I'm familiar with how to do that, because the process is the same in MATE.
[08:20] <flexiondotorg> But, where do there wallpapers comes from?
[08:22] <Laney> flexiondotorg: nhaines will deliver them, but I don't think it's happened yet
[08:22] <flexiondotorg> OK
[08:22] <Laney> It might get tight so I may JFDI
[08:22] <flexiondotorg> Fair enough :-)
[08:41] <Laney> http://www.beerfestival.nottinghamcamra.org/Assets_pdf/NBF2016_Beer_Prog_Notes.pdf
[08:47]  * duflu is jealous, Laney, alan_g
[08:50] <jbicha> good morning
[08:50] <jbicha> happyaron: you tested the openvpn update, right?
[08:52] <Laney> pitti: Can I steal you for a couple of minutes? (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/im-config/+bug/1630090)
[08:52] <Laney> https://paste.ubuntu.com/23274086/
[08:52] <pitti> Laney: still in "play catch-up from pings over the weekend" mode :/, will look in a bit
[08:53] <Laney> OK
[08:53] <Laney> Don't really understand what's going on there
[08:54] <pitti> Laney: hm, so we do set it in the env?
[08:54] <Laney> It's set using d-u-a-e --systemd
[08:55] <Laney> but then comes out in the session with a slightly different value
[08:55] <pitti> oh, does it need quoting of the '=' perhaps
[08:56] <Laney> in the actual input?
[08:56] <pitti> I mean, '=' is part of the value of that env var
[08:57] <pitti> so we set XMODIFIERS=@im=ibus
[08:57] <pitti> and maybe some parser gets confused and stops at the second =
[08:57] <Laney> Maybe, but it's not at the level of the shell
[08:58] <Laney> because I made it be just d-u-a-e --verbose --systemd XMODIFIERS (without the =...), which grabs the value from the environment
[08:59] <pitti> right
[09:00] <Laney> laney@yakkety-vm:~$ journalctl --user-unit=im-config  | grep FOO
[09:00] <Laney> Oct 04 09:59:31 yakkety-vm sh[1917]: + dbus-update-activation-environment --verbose --systemd FOO=bar=baz
[09:00] <Laney> Oct 04 09:59:31 yakkety-vm sh[1917]: dbus-update-activation-environment: setting FOO=bar=baz
[09:00] <pitti> $ dbus-update-activation-environment --verbose --systemd XMODIFIERS
[09:00] <Laney> laney@yakkety-vm:~$ strings /proc/$(pidof compiz)/environ | grep FOO
[09:00] <pitti> dbus-update-activation-environment: setting XMODIFIERS=@im=ibus
[09:00] <pitti> $ systemctl --user show-environment  |grep XMODIF
[09:00] <Laney> FOO=bar=baz
[09:00] <pitti> XMODIFIERS=@im=ibus
[09:00] <pitti> so taht seems to work too
[09:00] <Laney> laney@yakkety-vm:~$ systemctl --user show-environment | grep XMODIFIERS
[09:00] <Laney> XMODIFIERS=@im
[09:00]  * Laney learns show-environment; thanks!
[09:01] <pitti> but in my VM show-environment clearly just shows =@im
[09:01] <Laney> hmmmm
[09:01] <pitti> I wonder if we set it again later which destroys the value set there
[09:04] <Laney> Oct 04 10:03:48 yakkety-vm sh[2205]: dbus-update-activation-environment: setting XMODIFIERS=@im
[09:04] <Laney> Hmm
[09:04] <Laney> so it's gnome-session calling that
[09:07] <Laney> it still doesn't quite make sense
[09:07] <Laney> why would XMODIFIERS have the wrong value there?
[09:10] <Laney> yeah - adding systemctl --user show-environment to the end of im-config.service shows it's wrong there even
[09:17] <pitti> Laney: hm, but if d-u-a-e already shows it wrong, then the var already gets the wrong value assigned; perhaps im-config.service is just running too early and needs to wait on someting else?
[09:18] <Laney> pitti: d-u-a-e shows it *right*, but show-environment shows it wrong
[09:19] <pitti> Laney | Oct 04 10:03:48 yakkety-vm sh[2205]: dbus-update-activation-environment: setting XMODIFIERS=@im
[09:19] <pitti> that doesn't look right to me
[09:20] <Laney> pitti: That one was from a later call in gnome-session
[09:20] <Laney> that's just d-u-a-e --all re-setting it
[09:20] <Laney> pitti: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/im-config/+bug/1630090/comments/2 <- this is all from im-config itself
[09:22] <dholbach> hiya
[09:22] <dholbach> are https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisccoulson/unity-settings-daemon/lp1542699/+merge/288952 and https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/unity-settings-daemon/lp1554878/+merge/307407 things we still want to get into yakkety?
[09:22] <dholbach> can somebody take a look?
[09:31]  * willcooke -> train
[09:35] <Laney> wtf
[09:36] <Laney> pitti: It's destroyed after the initctl set-env
[09:37] <pitti> Laney: finished unbreaking autopkgtest stuff; I need to run for a quick errand, will then look at this
[09:40] <Laney> It's something to do with the eval
[09:59] <Laney> I bet it's upstart forwarding the activation environment to dbus
[10:05] <Laney> split_vars = NIH_MUST (nih_str_split (dbus_vars[0], envvar, "=", FALSE));
[10:05] <Laney> it's totally this
[10:07] <pitti> Laney: how does that influence d-u-a-e?
[10:07] <pitti> or does upstart get to write its value slightly later?
[10:07] <pitti> how did that work in x then..
[10:07] <Laney> initctl is called second
[10:07] <Laney> and calls UpdateActivationEnvironment
[10:07] <Laney> which overwrites this
[10:08] <Laney> probably got it by the regular environment and not the d-u-a-e'd one then
[10:08] <Laney> or the upstart one (also correct)
[10:08] <pitti> ah
[10:08] <pitti> because we directly started stuff from upstart, not via dbus
[10:08] <Laney> so you can workaround by reversing the calls
[10:09] <Laney> initctl then d-u-a-e
[10:09] <pitti> well spotted
[10:09] <pitti> Laney: thanks for accepting gnome-session, btw; I figured someone would ask me bits about it, but then again we don't actually use this new magic yet (as long as upstart is installed)
[10:10] <pitti> the script is still long, but conceptually a lot simpler now, and no polling loops any more \o/
[10:10] <Laney> pitti: It wasn't me - I actually wanted to test it but it was already accepted by the time I got there :)
[10:11] <pitti> I think I actually must add the Requires=graphical-desktop-pre.target back (as nothing currently pulls that in), will think about that
[10:11] <Laney> are you going to do the upstart one as well?
[10:11] <pitti> Laney: fewer polling loops there (in particular not the one that runs during the session); I can change it in a similar fashion, yes
[10:11] <pitti> I actually pondered just replacing the whole thing with a call to run-systemd-session
[10:12] <pitti> but upstart is meant to run all kinds of sessions, so we can't rely on gnome-session being installed
[10:12] <Laney> I wondered if you shouldn't stop $1 (ubuntu-session.target) too?
[10:12] <pitti> so I guess I'll just continue to duplicate the code
[10:12] <Laney> or does it have BindsTo?
[10:12] <pitti> as soon as that indicator silo lands (if ever :( ), I'll port the lightdm session and then it's gone anyway
[10:12] <pitti> Laney: no need to -- systemctl start --wait already waits until it stopped
[10:13] <pitti> and if gnome-session stops, so does the target (BindsTo)
[10:13] <Laney> I think it's ubuntu-session.target BindsTo=graphical-session.target -> stopping graphical-session.target is enough
[10:13] <Laney> for the "lingering active" case
[10:14] <pitti> the script stops both before starting again, to clean up after X crashes
[10:14] <pitti> and I don't think we can get rid of that easily, as run-systemd-session itself might be killed too
[10:14] <Laney> it's okay I think
[10:15] <pitti> Laney: so for the upstart one I could replace the "wait until units finished stopping" with the "generate Requires/After=g-s-pre.target and stop pre.target"
[10:16] <pitti> which is conceptually nicer, but harder to do in shell (until we either fix https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3750 or add After=g-s-pre to all units)
[10:24] <pitti> Laney: want me to test/upload the im-config fix, or are you at it?
[10:24] <Laney> pitti: I am, but it doesn't work(!)
[10:24] <Laney> something else must be setting it too
[10:28] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I've attached a debdiff to #797485
[10:28] <flexiondotorg> How to I approve the Xenial nomination?
[10:36] <jbicha> flexiondotorg: I believe you need to have upload rights to the package to nominate for a series (or there might be other ways to have that LP permission)
[10:37] <jbicha> *to approve the nomination
[10:37] <flexiondotorg> Yeah, I thought so. There was mention of attaching a patching should approve it.
[10:37] <flexiondotorg> But I must have mis-understood.
[10:40] <jbicha> it might be nice if at least ~ubuntu-dev could mark a bug in any Ubuntu package as affecting a series
[10:42] <Laney> ubuntu-dev is in bug control, so that should work
[10:43] <Laney> unless I forgot the perissions
[10:45] <Laney> flexiondotorg: I was saying that you shouldn't need to ping anyone at all, because the person that sponsors can approve the nomination when they do that
[10:45] <Laney> I'm not sure that the thing will show up on the overview if all tasks are Fix Released though (that would be a nice thing to fix)
[10:46] <jbicha> if you have upload rights for any pkg in a bug, you can mark the bug (and all its attached pkgs) for a series, so there's a workaround hack there
[10:47] <Laney> I don't want a workflow where someone has to be interrupted to approve a nomination for every SRU
[10:47] <Laney> nominate, attach, subscribe should be enough
[10:48] <jbicha> Laney: should I open a bug against Launchpad for bugcontrol being unable to mark pkgs for a series?
[10:48] <flexiondotorg> Laney, I understand the process now. I won't ping needlessly from now on.
[10:49] <Laney> jbicha: I probably forgot what the intention is
[10:49] <Laney> flexiondotorg: I think there might have been a hole in this case though
[10:49] <Laney> since all the tasks were Fix Released, it may have been hidden from http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/
[10:50] <Laney> not sure - and I foolishly approved it, so we won't know this time :)
[10:55] <Laney> pitti: argh!
[10:55] <Laney> gnome-session soes some environment variable propagation too
[10:55] <Laney> s/soes/does/
[10:55] <Laney> :(
[10:55] <pitti> Laney: and that misparses it too?
[10:56] <Laney> it calls into to upstart
[10:56] <pitti> ah
[10:56] <Laney> so just hits the exact same bug again
[10:56]  * Laney stabs
[10:56] <Laney> we *really* wanted the environment to be right :)
[10:56] <pitti> is that in gnome-session's binary? I can't see it in /usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session.service
[10:56] <Laney> yep
[10:56] <Laney> dbus calls in code
[10:57] <Laney> probably can do the same trick of swapping the order
[10:57] <Laney> any more though and it'll start becoming more profitable to fix upstart
[10:57] <pitti> Laney: btw, I committed your upstart chagne to bzr, and committed a release tag to gnome-session; your local bzr repo might be diverted now
[10:58] <pitti> why do we need to set it multiple times in the first place? shouldn't im-config.{service,conf} suffice for that?
[10:58] <pitti> or did we try to work around a too random startup sequence?
[10:59] <Laney> pitti: Thanks - I had a tag for g-session but evidently didn't push it
[10:59] <Laney> g-session sets a lot of things of which XMODIFIERS is just one
[11:00] <Laney> this is some kind of technical debt
[11:00] <pitti> so it re-computes the value for it, or just takes it from its env and pokes it back into dbus?
[11:00] <Laney> both - it tries to fix up bad values
[11:01] <Laney> and it still acts as the session root too, so poking things around is kind of right for it to do
[11:01] <pitti> *nod*
[11:04]  * Laney crosses fingers
[11:04] <Laney> nope :|
[11:05] <Laney> wait, did I install it? ¬_¬
[11:05] <Laney> la la la
[11:06] <Laney> laney@yakkety-vm:~$ strings /proc/$(pidof compiz)/environ | grep XMODIFIERS
[11:06] <Laney> XMODIFIERS=@im=ibus
[11:07] <pitti> WINNER!
[11:07] <Laney> phew!
[11:07]  * Laney uploads
[11:08] <pitti> Laney: one second
[11:09] <pitti> Laney: I'd like to slip in a change to gnome-session
[11:09] <Laney> haha
[11:10] <Laney> ok, give me a second to push
[11:12] <jbicha> Laney: filed bug 1630206
[11:13] <pitti> Laney: can I remove your tag and push --overwrite?
[11:13] <pitti> Laney: sorry, nevermind, you  didn't push your current changes yet
[11:14] <Laney> pitti: Just pushed the environment variable stuff; /me is hands off now
[11:15] <Laney> jbicha: good luck ;-)
[11:15] <Laney> I think it would also be good to fix the sponsor queue to show such bugs
[11:16] <pitti> Laney: pushed my change too
[11:16]  * pitti uploads
[11:16] <Laney> *this* is the final one, for real guys!
[11:16] <pitti> not until ubuntu42!
[11:17] <pitti> Laney: so I think formally you need to review gnome-session from the queue; you have my review ack for your change
[11:17] <pitti> well, s/you need/someone else than me needs/
[11:17] <Laney> sure
[11:18] <Laney> I'll swap with you for im-config
[11:18] <pitti> *nod*
[11:19]  * pitti doing queue review ATM anyway
[11:19] <Laney> $$v=$$(eval "echo \\$$$${v}") is an aesthetically pleasing piece of shell
[11:21]  * pitti takes the cat off the keyboard
[11:22] <pitti> Laney: of course I just effortlessly typed that in, and it totally worked at the first try
[11:22] <pitti> *smirk*
[11:22] <pitti> lunch o'clock
[11:22]  * flexiondotorg goes salad hunting...
[11:22] <Laney> pitti: heh
[11:22] <Laney> systemd is definitely not on your side if you want to write complicated logic into units
[11:24] <ogra_> systemd is evil ... it made me run out of popcorn this weekend
[11:25] <jbicha> ogra_: you have systemd in your popcorn maker? :)
[11:26] <ogra_> lol, no, but i made the mistake to read all the flame comments :)
[11:27] <Laney> we should have a referendum about it
[11:27] <Laney> sexit
[11:28] <ogra_> haha
[11:30]  * willcooke --> office
[11:31] <Laney> what's going on there?
[11:31] <davmor2> willcooke: when you get there pick on popey from me ;)
[11:31] <willcooke> Laney, meeting
[11:31] <willcooke> davmor2, consider it done
[11:31] <davmor2> willcooke: good man
[11:32] <Laney> enlightening!
[11:41] <Laney> willcooke: maybe you could chase the non-banded wallpaper while there? ;-)
[11:42] <willcooke> Laney, been having some back and forth with them on that, but yeah, I will pop and see them this afternoon
[11:42] <Laney> win
[11:42] <Laney> always fun in the design area
[12:14] <hikiko> Trevinho, andyrock hi
[12:14] <hikiko> [15:02:09] <hikiko> Trevinho, andyrock if you have some time could you please review the move plugin additions, the expo bug and a grid low gfx optimisation here: https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/compiz/compiz.fix-expo-gap-bug/+merge/304076 https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/compiz/compiz.move-additions/+merge/305008 https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/compiz/compiz.grid-blend-option/+merge/305094
[12:14] <hikiko> [15:13:52] <hikiko> https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/unity/unity.opt-when-no-blur/+merge/300864 and this one too if possible
[12:14] <hikiko> I accidentally wrote that in ubuntukylin-desktop instead of ubuntu-desktop \m/
[12:15] <Trevinho> hikiko: jey
[12:15] <Trevinho> hikiko: no worries
[12:15] <hikiko> then was wondering why nobody replies :p
[12:15] <Trevinho> hikiko: i'll check that
[12:15] <hikiko> thanks Trevinho
[12:15] <hikiko> :)
[12:25]  * flexiondotorg returns
[13:05] <desrt> hi all
[13:42] <flexiondotorg> desrt, o/
[14:22] <Trevinho> hikiko: as for the compiz expo gap there was a comment requesting you to fix another issue
[14:22] <Trevinho> did you see it?
[14:23] <hikiko> the top gap?
[14:24] <hikiko> Trevinho, do you mean the top gap?
[14:24] <hikiko> let me see
[14:24] <Trevinho> hikiko: yes
[14:25] <hikiko> doesn't it work now?
[14:26] <hikiko> Trevinho, I think you shouldn't see it anymore
[14:26] <hikiko> I made a change that seemed to work for me
[14:27] <hikiko> it's in the branch
[14:27] <Trevinho> hikiko: I commented after testsing the branch, there is still an issue
[14:27] <hikiko> mmm I didn't see the other comment wait a sec
[14:28] <hikiko> wtf I can't find the other comment
[14:30] <hikiko> Trevinho, that's the only comment I see: https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/compiz/compiz.fix-expo-gap-bug/+merge/304076/comments/785316
[14:30] <Trevinho> hikiko: https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/compiz/compiz.fix-expo-gap-bug/+merge/304076/comments/785316
[14:30] <Trevinho> hikiko: that's the one... I don't see any change pushed after that comment
[14:30] <Trevinho> thus I think that anything has changed
[14:31] <Trevinho> hikiko: sorry
[14:31] <Trevinho> hikiko: my bad... In general new commmits were listed afterwards
[14:31] <hikiko> maybe it wasn't refreshed
[14:32] <hikiko> btw this bug pre-existed it wasn't caused by the bottom launcher change
[14:35] <Trevinho> hikiko: might be, yeah.. but it made it visible :-)
[14:35] <hikiko> yup
[14:35] <hikiko> but you still see it now?
[14:35] <hikiko> it should not be seen anymore
[15:30] <willcooke> #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2016-10-04
[15:30] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Oct  4 15:30:28 2016 UTC.  The chair is willcooke. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[15:30] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[15:30] <willcooke> Roll call:  andyrock, attente, desrt,  dgadomski, fjkong (hols), flexiondotorg, happyaron (hols), hikiko (out), laney, qengho, seb128 (hols), sweet5hark, themuso (out), tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out)
[15:30] <qengho> Aiee!
[15:30] <andyrock> o/
[15:30] <flexiondotorg> o/
[15:30] <willcooke> Hi all, sorry for the urgent start, dashing around a bit here
[15:31] <Sweet5hark> aye
[15:31] <willcooke> Laney, got a meeting with design in 30 mins
[15:31] <dgadomski> hi
[15:31] <Laney> nice
[15:33] <willcooke> oki, let's run through this then...
[15:33] <willcooke> #topic andyrock
[15:33] <andyrock> hey all
[15:33] <andyrock> working on unity8
[15:34] <andyrock> some work to finish the tooltips and all related branches
[15:34] <andyrock> + some inital work to make unity8 launcher mouse pointer aware
[15:34] <andyrock> eof
[15:34] <willcooke> thanks andyrock
[15:34] <willcooke> #topic attente
[15:35] <attente> fixed some issues with combo boxes not popping up their menus properly in gtk
[15:35] <attente> working on gtk-mir clipboard support via content-hub
[15:35] <attente> (eof)
[15:35] <willcooke> coolio, thanks attente
[15:36] <willcooke> skipping desrt who is out (missed that on the roll call)
[15:36] <willcooke> #topic dgadomski
[15:36] <dgadomski> hey
[15:36] <dgadomski> * updating snaps before offering upstream
[15:36] <dgadomski> * working on bug #1550983
[15:36] <dgadomski> * debugging an issue similar to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815807
[15:36] <dgadomski> eof
[15:37] <willcooke> thanks dgadomski
[15:37] <willcooke> #topic flexiondotorg
[15:37] <flexiondotorg> Hiya!
[15:37] <flexiondotorg> • Completed all New Starter tasks.
[15:37] <flexiondotorg> • Raised tickets to get @ubuntu.com email aliases (to conform to Ubuntu Engineering Email policy) and updated signing keys.
[15:37] <flexiondotorg> • Some time invested in refining my work-flow using 'yadm' and 'direnv'.
[15:37] <flexiondotorg> • Completed travel arrangements for UES Sprint.
[15:37] <flexiondotorg> • Looked at  humanity-icon-theme (adding missing icon symlinks) but it  was fixed before I got to it :-) (LP: #1623768)
[15:38] <flexiondotorg> • Created debdiff (add symlink to /usr/bin/browse) for xdg-utils  for Yakkety and Xenial SRU and subscribed ubuntu-sponsors (LP: #1624022)
[15:38] <flexiondotorg> • Created debdiff (fix image rotation) for nautilus-image-converter Xenial SRU and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors (LP: #1581094)
[15:38] <flexiondotorg> • Created debdiff (prevent segfault) for gnome-calculator for a Xenial SRU and subscribed ubuntu-sponsors (LP: #1622379)
[15:38] <flexiondotorg> • Created debdiff (hide floatingbar on hover) for nautilus for a Xenial SRU and subscribed ubuntu-sponsors (LP: #797485)
[15:38] <flexiondotorg> • Started testing Ubuntu 16.10 daily images on hardware.
[15:38] <flexiondotorg> eof
[15:38] <willcooke> good stuff!  thanks flexiondotorg
[15:38] <willcooke> #topic hikiko
[15:38] <willcooke> - I spent most of the time debugging unity, also looked at the rolling
[15:38] <willcooke> windows bug but I haven't fix it yet.
[15:38] <willcooke> - I also finalized some stuff for the low gfx mode and I am looking for
[15:38] <willcooke> further optimisations that could be done in compiz and unity.
[15:39] <willcooke> #topic Laney
[15:39] <Laney> hi pals
[15:39] <Laney> • Made Unity 7 have XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=Unity:Unity7, so that the new terminal could have NotShowIn=Unity7. This exposed a few bugs where stuff assumed there was one value in the variable. I fixed a lot of these, but not being confident this close to release that I can get them all, reverted it and applied another (hacky) fix.
[15:39] <Laney> • Patch piloted & reviewed stuff for f_lexiondotorg and Kylin
[15:39] <Laney> • Some fixes to gnome-session & upstart for unclean session recovery (systemd)
[15:39] <Laney> • Debugging of bad environment variable propagation affecting im-config (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/im-config/+bug/1630090) - thanks to pitti for the help / rubber ducking
[15:39] <Laney> • Much MUCH queue review
[15:39] <Laney> • Testing of non-stripping of .pyc files on the Ubuntu Desktop ISO & coming up with a plan of implementation (Z-cycle)
[15:39] <Laney> • Theme fixes & landing (hidpi icons branch)
[15:39] <Laney> • Deployment of new armhf-on-arm64 lxd workers for autopkgtest, thanks pitti²
[15:39] <Laney> • Now: investigating overlapping nautilus icons (#1611955, doesn't happen every time)
[15:39] <Laney> 😭
[15:40] <willcooke> thanks Laney
[15:40] <willcooke> #topic qengho
[15:40] <qengho> Hello, my pretties.
[15:40] <qengho> * Final switching of Cr build system from GYP to GN. GYP dies with v54. REALLY wants me to use clang. :(
[15:40] <qengho> * Fixed Cr 53.0.2785.143 for Y. Was a libc/kernel incompatibiltiy bug. Gave to #security for upload.
[15:40] <qengho> * New version of browser snap. 2 hours after upstream release. So nice.
[15:41] <qengho> * Sent Google API trouble through side channels.
[15:41] <qengho> EOF
[15:41] <willcooke> thanks qengho, keep me posted on $GOOG
[15:41] <willcooke> #topic Sweet5hark
[15:41] <qengho> ack
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> - Friday PTO, Monday national holiday
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> - bumped LibreOffice on Yakkety to 5.2.2 (thanks Laney for sponsoring)
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> -- we needed an upload anyway for libabw transition
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> -- also seems to have fixed bug 1619442, yay
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> - build LibreOffice 5.2.2 as snap
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> -- tried to upload, but store rejected with "oops" lacking any further feedback, couldnt find help about it => punted
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> - Currently working again on a CGAified theme using ugly colors to find out what triggers the theming for bug 1527053
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> -- (looks e.g. like this: http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/ambience-cga.png)
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> -- good progress, should yield another vendor patch like bug 1562513 did => 0-day SRU candidate?
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> - upsteam bug: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101898 likely also a candidate for a 0-day SRU?
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> - finally a heads-up: Xorg guys might want to have a look at bug 1625595, corrupted rendering on Intel drivers
[15:41] <Sweet5hark> EOF
[15:41] <Laney> 4 day weekend YEEHAW
[15:42] <Sweet5hark> ;)
[15:42] <willcooke> thanks Sweet5hark
[15:42] <willcooke> #topic TheMuso
[15:42] <willcooke> * More work on bug 1574324. More info was posted to the bug from another user experiencing the bug, who has also started digging through code, which is helpful.
[15:42] <willcooke> * Uploaded more fixes for the ubuntu terminal app.
[15:42] <willcooke> * Yakkety iso testing, experiencing a weird bug on a UEFI machine where the UEFI entry for Ubuntu is not added, but can't easily reproduce. Accessibility profile activation works when done from the desktop, but not in installer only mode. Not entirely bothered by this, its not an LTS and probably can't easily be fixed by release.
[15:43] <willcooke> poor bot
[15:43] <willcooke> #topic tkamppeter
[15:44] <willcooke> need to move on, we can come back
[15:44] <willcooke> #topic Trevinho
[15:45] <Trevinho> · Fixed a bug in ListItemLayout paddings
[15:45] <Trevinho> · Contiued the work in slots layout based menu items
[15:45] <Trevinho> · Done a cleanup of unity8 menu item factory to use new capabilities
[15:45] <Trevinho> · Created Touch and Pointer styles for Ubuntu settings components (menu items)
[15:45] <Trevinho> · Workin in the new calendar indicator UI
[15:45] <Trevinho> · A libdbusmenu review, landing and SRU
[15:45] <Trevinho>  /EOF
[15:45] <willcooke> thanks Trevinho
[15:46] <willcooke> #topic robert_ancell
[15:46] <willcooke> Forgot update again ;P
[15:46] <willcooke> But he's been landing lots of fixes in to G-S
[15:46] <willcooke> snapdlib-glib is pending a security review.  It's next in the queue right after the last 2 u8 related ones
[15:46] <willcooke> #topic AOB
[15:47] <willcooke> Potentially seeding U8 before the reviews are complete to get a bit more runway for testing.  Being discussed with Foundations and others atm
[15:47] <willcooke> Please do some ISO testing over the next few weeks
[15:47] <Laney> it is seeded
[15:47] <Laney> just the promotion needs executing to make it come onto the iso
[15:47] <willcooke> thanks for the clarification
[15:48] <Laney> just makes it someone else's work than me :P
[15:48] <willcooke> :DD
[15:48] <willcooke> erm,
[15:48] <willcooke> call for topics.  Please see my email on that topic
[15:48] <willcooke> I think that's all
[15:48] <willcooke> anyone got anything to share?
[15:49] <willcooke> going once....
[15:49] <willcooke> twice
[15:49] <willcooke> thrice
[15:50] <willcooke> #endmeeting
[15:50] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Oct  4 15:50:12 2016 UTC.
[15:50] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-desktop/2016/ubuntu-desktop.2016-10-04-15.30.moin.txt
[15:50] <willcooke> thanks all
[15:50] <Laney> efficient
[15:50]  * willcooke dashes 
[15:50] <Laney> Sweet5hark: 101898
[15:50] <Laney> hilarious
[15:50] <Sweet5hark> Laney: ya :/
[15:53] <jbicha> flexiondotorg: if I had known you wanted to work on the humany icon name bug, I would have left it for you :)
[15:53] <flexiondotorg> ;-)
[15:54] <jbicha> I don't mind the totem icon anyway :)
[16:27] <Laney> What
[16:27] <Laney> the nautilus bug just randomly disappeared
[16:27]  * Laney cries
[16:27] <jbicha> which nautilus bug?
[16:28] <Laney> haha
[16:28] <Laney> hi jbicha
[16:28] <Laney> overlapping icons thingy
[16:29] <jbicha> just disable desktop icons ;)
[16:29] <Laney> good idea
[16:29] <Laney> they encourage bad behaviour anyway
[16:32] <Laney> got it
[17:04] <Laney> meh
[17:04] <Laney> you win for today, nautilus
[17:04]  * Laney schedules round 2 for 09:00 tomorrow
[17:04] <Laney> o/
[17:14] <flexiondotorg> Right, LP: #1576424 is sorted :-)
[17:14] <flexiondotorg> Good stopping point I think.
[17:15] <flexiondotorg> Until tomorrow desktopers...