=== JanC is now known as Guest21552 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
jtaylor | where should I file bugs for the lts-yakkety from the ppa? | 08:07 |
---|---|---|
apw | jtaylor, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-yakkety/+filebug i guess | 08:16 |
apw | jtaylor, but do tell us the bug # here | 08:16 |
jtaylor | hm is launchpad broken? | 08:27 |
jtaylor | get an oops on submit ... | 08:27 |
apw | lovely... try fileing it against linux itself, and i'll sort it out afterwards | 08:28 |
apw | jtaylor, ^ | 08:28 |
jtaylor | apw: bug 1631298 | 08:31 |
ubot5 | bug 1631298 in linux (Ubuntu) "lts-yakkety 4.8 cannot mount lvm raid1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1631298 | 08:31 |
apw | jtaylor, can i assume this is installing into an existing working system ... if so could you pastebin me a lsinitamfs of the working and not working initrds please | 08:34 |
jtaylor | 4.8 http://paste.ubuntu.com/23288094/ | 08:36 |
jtaylor | 4.4 (working) http://paste.ubuntu.com/23288095/ | 08:36 |
apw | thanks | 08:37 |
apw | jtaylor, could you boot up this test kernel for me so we can find out what the heck the feature flags are set to ... http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lts-backport-yakkety-xenial/ | 10:08 |
apw | jtaylor, not expecting it to fix anything but should drop an APW: in the dmesg with some info | 10:09 |
apw | jtaylor, ok naive testing of raid1s created on 4.4 and booted with 4.8 seem to assemble for me | 10:23 |
jtaylor | apw: my raid is probably a lot older | 10:23 |
apw | jtaylor, so we need to get that debug output to see what differs on yours to mine | 10:23 |
jtaylor | maybe 3.13 or more ;) | 10:23 |
apw | jtaylor, probabally and that is a little scarey :) | 10:23 |
jtaylor | I'll reboot soon | 10:23 |
apw | jtaylor, thanks | 10:23 |
jtaylor | apw: hm all zeros http://paste.ubuntu.com/23288447/ | 10:35 |
apw | jtaylor, oh you are right i have the same error, and yet the lv is there, oh but is it running | 10:37 |
jtaylor | it is displayed but not active | 10:38 |
jtaylor | though I haven't tried activating it manually, I just figured if it puts me in an emergency shell that doesn't work | 10:38 |
apw | i would doubt it will start | 10:38 |
jtaylor | I actually forgot to mention that, the system doesn't boot, despite / and /boot being there | 10:38 |
apw | ok i am reproducing in fact, just not seeing what it is saying | 10:38 |
apw | jtaylor, i am going to assume the data you ahve in your raid1 is something you care about (given it is raid1d) | 10:46 |
apw | jtaylor, ie this is not something you can trivially test :/ | 10:46 |
jtaylor | yes, though I have backups | 10:47 |
jtaylor | but destroying it would still be inconvinient | 10:47 |
apw | jtaylor, do you have a test environment at all? obviously i can test a fix here but this is pretty scarey code to change | 10:47 |
apw | jtaylor, anyhow i have a theory and i am testing it, and if that works i'll ask upstream for safety | 10:48 |
jtaylor | no, this is my home setup I only have this one raid1 system | 10:49 |
apw | jtaylor, though i guess in theory we could pull off one of the mirrors as a backup, hrm anyho | 10:50 |
apw | lets get to that once we have any idea if this is right | 10:50 |
jtaylor | if you are reasonably confident in a fix I can update my backups and test it | 10:50 |
=== mhcerri_ is now known as mhcerri | ||
om26er | jsalisbury: updated comments on the bug report. The last kernel is good, second-last is bad. | 13:56 |
jsalisbury | om26er, great, I'll build the next one. Only one or two left. | 13:59 |
om26er | jsalisbury: ack. | 13:59 |
manjo | rtg, something going on with tangerine ? compiling arm64 Error: selected processor does not support `staddlh w0,[x1]' | 15:38 |
manjo | rtg, looks like assembler messages from xenial-amd64 chroot | 15:40 |
manjo | bjf, apw ^^ anyone know ? trying to build 4.8.0-21.23 | 15:43 |
manjo | I am also seeing ==> Error: attempt to move .org backwards | 15:45 |
manjo | build works fine with yakkety-amd64 chroot.. .something broken with xenial-amd64 chroot ? | 15:47 |
om26er | jsalisbury: Hi! that's a good kernel. | 15:56 |
jsalisbury | om26er, ack | 15:56 |
om26er | jsalisbury: how big is the diff from this stage ? (or number of commits) | 15:58 |
jsalisbury | om26er, this next kernel will narrow it down between 5 sched commits: | 16:01 |
jsalisbury | 55e16d3 sched/fair: Rework throttle_count sync | 16:01 |
jsalisbury | 599b484 sched/core: Fix sched_getaffinity() return value kerneldoc comment | 16:01 |
jsalisbury | 8663e24 sched/fair: Reorder cgroup creation code | 16:01 |
jsalisbury | 3d30544 sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes | 16:01 |
jsalisbury | 7dc603c sched/fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks | 16:01 |
om26er | jsalisbury: I am betting on the first one | 16:02 |
jsalisbury | om26er, :-) We shall know shortly | 16:03 |
jsalisbury | om26er, next kernel is posted | 16:45 |
om26er | jsalisbury: that's a bad kernel | 17:24 |
om26er | jsalisbury: do we finally have a commit blame ? | 17:30 |
=== om26er is now known as om26er1 | ||
=== om26er1 is now known as om26er | ||
jsalisbury | om26er, we have to test only one more. Then I'll bulild a test kernel with the reported commit reverted. The next kernel should be done in a few moments | 18:20 |
georgios | hi. i saw gresurity related utilities but no grsecurity kernel. how so? | 18:20 |
om26er | jsalisbury: great | 18:20 |
jsalisbury | om26er, next test kernel is posted | 18:42 |
om26er | jsalisbury: thanks, testing it now. | 18:42 |
jsalisbury | om26er, ack | 18:42 |
om26er | jsalisbury: that's a good one. | 18:49 |
jsalisbury | om26er, The bisect reports this as the offending commit: | 18:49 |
jsalisbury | commit 3d30544f02120b884bba2a9466c87dba980e3be5 | 18:49 |
jsalisbury | Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 18:49 |
jsalisbury | Date: Tue Jun 21 14:27:50 2016 +0200 | 18:49 |
jsalisbury | sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes | 18:49 |
jsalisbury | om26er, I'll build a test kerne with it reverted to see if it fixes the bug. | 18:50 |
om26er | jsalisbury: you mean 4.8 release minus that commit ? | 18:51 |
jsalisbury | om26er, I'll build a yakkety kernel, minus that commit | 18:51 |
om26er | jsalisbury: great | 18:51 |
om26er | feels like a small diff https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip/+/3d30544f02120b884bba2a9466c87dba980e3be5%5E%21/ | 18:54 |
jsalisbury | om26er, kernel posted. Note with this kernel, you need to install both the linux-image and linux-image-extra .deb packages. | 19:19 |
om26er | jsalisbury: that's it. | 19:30 |
om26er | latest kernel is good | 19:30 |
jsalisbury | om26er, good news. I'm going to ping upstream and the patch author and get their feedback | 19:30 |
om26er | jsalisbury: ok, the test case is `stress -c $your_total_cpu_cores` | 19:31 |
jsalisbury | om26er, thanks. Can you post that in the bug? I'll be pointing upstream there. | 19:32 |
=== leftyfb_ is now known as leftyfb | ||
om26er | done. | 19:34 |
=== sts is now known as Guest59171 | ||
=== xnox_ is now known as xnox | ||
=== Darcy is now known as Spydar007 | ||
=== kloeri_ is now known as kloeri | ||
=== bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!