[00:33] yay for fast backlight [01:28] cyphermox: See anything interesting/fixable/fixed in those logs? [01:28] have yet to clone. [01:28] Ah, KK. [01:32] wow, things blew up spectacularly [01:35] Unit193: are you sure the disk is good? [01:35] and are you using JFS? [01:35] Yes, VM `gksudo` workith. Nooope, normal run of the mill. [01:37] Is there perhaps an undeclared dep? [01:41] cyphermox: I'd have reported a bug, but when I tried that apport died (reported that one at least.) [01:44] well, we run ubiquity in sudo now [01:44] (if you start it with the link that is) [01:45] That's what I did as a workaround, sed -i s/Exec=/Exec=sudo / on the desktop file. :3 [01:45] ack [01:45] well that should already be in now [01:45] Nasty, but functional. Except for the maybe-ubiquity. [01:45] So, thanks then. I guess the problem is at least hidden. [01:46] and pkexec should get fixed in the next image maybe, if the fix works [01:46] well, if it works the way I think it does [01:46] maybe-ubiuqity should not have been affected, afaik [01:48] Coolio. [01:50] Thanks for taking a look. [01:57] flocculant: Tomorrow's ISO may have 60% less blowing up. [02:03] that sounds promising [02:10] bluesabre: Nice uploads. [02:10] yup [02:10] will probably get kicked tomorrow :D [02:11] \o [02:12] __/ [02:17] flocculant, uploaded a new lightdm-gtk-greeter to https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/ppa, if you want to take a look to make sure nothing goes kablooey... :) [02:21] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-docs:: [16.10.0] r623 Include patch from krytarik to fix build, update changelog, ... (by Sean Davis) [02:22] never mind, failed to build x.x [02:22] :D [02:23] too tired to look into that, bbl, night all [02:34] bluesabre: "Successfully built on lgw01-25" And thanks! [02:36] (To be precise: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-docs/16.10/+build/10999976) [02:37] flocculant: Also did two upgrade tests today. [06:22] Unit193: thanks :) [06:22] rebuilding our iso to catch the new ubiquity [06:23] and that detail view thing in thunar keeps catching me out - don't always use that view :p [06:35] Unit193: you mean the core one I assume btw? [07:17] ochosi: http://i.imgur.com/JZ7EJry.png [07:17] :) [07:17] thanks cyphermox [07:19] shut down on an image doesn't work ... [08:53] Yeeeep. [08:59] morning all [09:24] ristretto 0.8.1-1, xfce4-radio-plugin 0.5.1-4, xfce4-cpufreq-plugin 1.1.3-1, xfce4-dict 0.7.2-1, and xfce4-notifyd 0.3.3-1 uploaded to Debian. [09:26] cool [09:27] -docs built and accepted, x-d-s good too. [09:33] Oh meh, xfce4-notifyd 0.3.3-1 deps on 3.20.. [09:36] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ATTN: Xubuntu Core 16.10 - i386 - i386 built. [09:40] Unit193, are you familiar with build errors when generating confdefs.h ? [09:40] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/288669084/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.lightdm-gtk-greeter_2.0.2-0ubuntu1~ppa16.10.1_BUILDING.txt.gz [09:40] never seen anything die at that stage [09:41] checking for exo-csource... no [09:41] configure: error: in `/«PKGBUILDDIR»': [09:41] configure: error: exo-csource not installed [09:41] is that where it fails [09:43] trying another build with that in the deps [09:52] Unit193, that seems to fix it... I guess that used to get pulled in by another package [09:53] Could easily be, aye. [10:11] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ATTN: Xubuntu Core 16.10 - amd64 - amd64 built. [10:36] flocculant, now there is a new greeter in https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/ppa [10:36] should only require a quick spot check, will likely try to get it in later [11:22] bluesabre: mmm [11:22] so I updated, logged out [11:23] logged in - locked - chnaged to guest went to logout, mistakenly restarted instead - on reboot it takes a looooong time to get the login dialogue up when you've restarted from guest [11:24] dbus-user-session still installed? [11:24] yup [11:24] not needed? [11:26] purged it - redid the same fail I did before - same [13:51] hi everyone, I should try some upgrade this weekend [13:51] I will tell you if I see something wrong. [13:51] "tell you" means it will be reported to the tracker [14:14] flocculant: awesome, nice to see that fixed. thanks for poking folks! [14:28] 😃 [16:11] ochosi: welcome of course - I had time to do so :) [20:15] Unit193: don't know if you know - or even expected so but, core installs from desktop, not from the install option at menu [20:16] Dangit. I was getting to that! Why you have to be so fast? :( [20:16] (Thanks!) [20:16] cos it was there :p [20:18] Once I finish up this crypted install, I'll look. Thanks. [20:19] k - appears to be the same issue as previously - not easy to tell :p === knome_ is now known as knome [20:52] flocculant: So wait, I don't remember. Do I report these? :3 [20:55] you can if you want - I do - just keeping my hand in for when core is not an add-on at tracker ... [20:57] Step 15. There's no slideshow. [21:01] wut [21:02] oic [21:02] I'd not bother too much about that - haven't created a testcase tailored to core - but wanted something to let people at least record against [21:03] all we had was http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1655/info [21:03] I guess the best thing to do for zebedee would be rejig that one [21:04] Sure, just figured I'd mention it. Figured it wasn't really noteworthy but IRC is cheap. Also mainly noticed because this time I was trying to find the difference between the two. :P [21:04] well - difference between the 2 is enormous :p [21:05] Yep, not in title, but mini vs squashfs. Latter is muuch faster. :P [21:05] yea [21:07] there - reported on testcases - I'll get to it next month ish [21:07] Oh hah, I was just going to ignore from now on. :P [21:07] I'd not have tested this as often using mini with dial-up that's for sure :p [21:07] Unit193: well yea - but one day perhaps more than you and I will check it :D [21:08] And, err.. Maybe one day I'll actually report it every time I do. I suuuuck. >_< [21:08] "Oh it's just a spot check, hardly worth reporting" >_< [21:08] :) [21:08] I only test it when I see it in here tbh [21:09] I reported all upgrades! And yeah, that still has you testing it a lot. [21:09] hah [21:09] yep - I see upgrade testings [21:13] (I'm going to be upset if this install doesn't fail...) At what point during the install does it fail if you select from the boot menu? [21:13] more or less at the end [21:14] is it still installing ? [21:15] First install went fine, doing the menu one now. It's still going. [21:16] oh no - actually as soon as it finishes 'copying files' [21:17] that's zsynced iso here [21:17] I selected the wrong ISO, but same version of ubiquity and generally similer setup. [21:18] testing the 64bit [21:18] I was ^^ [21:18] Well crap, going to do 3 installs it looks like.. [21:19] mmm [21:19] so it's working for you? [21:19] That's my fault, I'll fix it and re-try. [21:53] hey everyone [21:53] how's the release coming along? === ochosi_ is now known as ochosi [21:54] Well, flocculant is right and using the install-only menu crashes. :P [21:54] ..On Core. [21:57] cyphermox: Want another syslog output? ;3 [21:58] (Which I understand is poorly formed English, but oh well.) [22:08] Unit193, file a bug, i will look later when i am back home [22:11] And now LP starts OOPsing. :D