[18:00] <Gehenna> We have gotten all the nice and several data of a girl with her photos in Mega. The access link is just on the Onion Network and will be available for 1 hour only, then it will be destroyed automatically and we will post it with a new link again here or in any other place: http://zerobinqmdqd236y.onion/?cba299c34f92e825#ZIefAgO9RJfAr3miBUfvomyM7YIVz8dbhksPnNQAB5Y=
[18:45] <Bluefoxicy> How appropriate.  Gehenna can go to hell.
[23:29] <remote> yo
[23:30] <remote> someone has produced a ubuntu-server image for armhf (rpi3) devices, but ubuntu only released an image for rpi2 -- where can I find the discussions on this (if there are any) ?
[23:30] <remote> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/releases/16.04/release/
[23:30] <remote> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RaspberryPi
[23:32] <remote> fo0bar: you made that image
[23:32] <remote> why isn't it officially supported?
[23:38] <xnox> remote, can't remember the progress. there was some progress on it. i think generic armhf runs on rpi3 now, or some such, no?
[23:38] <xnox> the progress on those, may have stalled.
[23:40] <remote> i don't know but from what i've seen at this point the information is a bit messy
[23:42] <remote> there was first mention that images for rpi worked on rpi2, and rpi3, then I faced a large heading link saying "download image for RPI2" after which I found there were two different images, one of them wasn't hosted on ubuntu servers and so i'm trying to find out what's up with it as I may decide to use it
[23:42] <remote> xnox: can we find out quickly if the official armhf supports rpi3?
[23:43] <xnox> remote, rpi3 should be able to run arm64 images.
[23:43] <xnox> not armhf images
[23:44] <xnox> however, given small amount of ram armhf images make sense too.
[23:44] <xnox> i do not know what is "supported". I'm sure binaries do run fine =)
[23:44]  * xnox does not buy support
[23:44] <remote> feck, i didn't even know it had an arm 64 processor
[23:46] <remote> i can't stand this lack of information it's like a bunch of people produce a lot of different software packages to help rpi users but nobody talks about why it's needed in first place
[23:46] <remote> i need to learn how to read and type 10x faster
[23:48] <remote> xnox: it does run fine (as-in it boots, and I can login)
[23:49] <xnox> remote, i took a keyboarding course and it took forever typing pointless sequences. But i did learn touch typing, it was ~4h a week for three months.
[23:49] <xnox> so if you schedule to work on it, via keyboaring apps, it can be done.
[23:50] <remote> i never met someoneone who types faster than me
[23:50] <xnox> oh, ok.
[23:50] <remote> it's just too slow
[23:51]  * xnox can't wait for focus follows eye sight
[23:51] <remote> humans need better output
[23:51] <fo0bar> remote: see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RaspberryPi/RaspberryPi3 for info, including a list of outstanding bugs to get proper support at the end.  in short, the biggest blocker was u-boot didn't have rpi3 support as of xenial's release
[23:51] <remote> what's that?
[23:51] <fo0bar> so the one-off rpi3 xenial image uses a PPA with some backported packages
[23:51] <remote> fo0bar: awesome, thanks for digging it for me
[23:52] <xnox> did you ever look at one window, and use shortcuts for that window, whilst cursor is another? e.g. press Ctrl-L to type a URL in a webbrowser window, only to clear your bash screen instead?
[23:52] <remote> this means nothing to me, i'm never used ubuntu before (debian)
[23:52] <remote> what's PPA?
[23:52] <fo0bar> (this is for 32-bit kernel/userland.  64-bit is possible as explained in that wiki page, but the kernel support was still in its very early days last I checked)
[23:52] <remote> yeah i'm going to read through it
[23:52] <clivejo> !ppa
[23:53] <remote> fo0bar: did you have any problems with your custom image for rpi3?
[23:55] <remote> some service failed at boot time but i can't find it back