[19:16] <krytarik> sakrecoer: Heh, notice the forth and back between RFP and ITP on Debian #774005. :P
[19:33] <sakrecoer> krytarik: ah nice!
[19:33] <sakrecoer> this is odd: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gfxboot-theme-ubuntu/+bug/1550186
[19:34] <sakrecoer> says fix released but latest iso is still having it... at least i386.. haven't got to amd64 yet..
[19:35] <sakrecoer> chamois, JtLively, you testing the live session? :) it would be very kind of you
[19:36] <sakrecoer> like, just a smoke-test, boot from a USB and open your fav software... to get some hardware variation :)
[19:36] <sakrecoer> a full install is also welcome of course :D
[19:50] <krytarik> sakrecoer: That now depends on the provided translations - most are missing still: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+source/gfxboot-theme-ubuntu/+pots/bootloader
[19:51] <sakrecoer> oh... thank you!
[19:51] <sakrecoer> ^ krytarik.
[19:51] <krytarik> Sure.
[19:52] <sakrecoer> and also, it hits me, now maybe Ross knows where the graphics for that boot prompt is located? :D
[19:52] <sakrecoer> it would be nice to revamp them graphics for bday party :D
[19:52] <sakrecoer> maybe something for you chamois ? :)
[19:53] <sakrecoer> make some nice ubuntu studio splash-art for first contact boot screen of the ISO?
[20:35] <sakrecoer> krytarik found it \o/ finaly!!! http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/debian-cd/ubuntu/view/head:/data/yakkety/ubuntustudio.pcx
[20:35] <sakrecoer> chamois: ^ fancy redoing that? :)
[20:36] <sakrecoer> ( chamois: you might have to click "download" to view it)
[20:39] <chamois> sakrecoer ok!
[20:40] <sakrecoer> \o/ <3
[20:51] <krytarik> sakrecoer: Ftm, I didn't have to "find" it - but I was surprised how old-style it is.. :P
[20:52] <sakrecoer> krytarik: well to me you did, i asked about it, but i guess i forgot to ask you :)
[20:54] <eylul> are we getting a respin?
[20:55] <sakrecoer> eylul: yes :)
[20:55] <sakrecoer> in 27 minutes https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/yakkety/ubuntustudio
[20:56] <eylul> oh ok
[20:56] <sakrecoer> well... estimated... i guess then there is upload, tracker burp and what not :D
[20:56] <eylul> hahah
[20:56] <eylul> well
[20:57] <eylul> if the release happens tomorrow on time I'll be glad
[20:57] <eylul> respin 24 hours to release is not a good sign
[20:57]  * eylul patiently waits
[20:58] <eylul> jokes aside I have a VM, and possibly 2 hours or so before I head to sleep. what do you want me to test?
[21:03] <sakrecoer> eylul: just don't mug yourself :) test what you can; health goes first and sleep is important. but yeah... 
[21:04]  * sakrecoer touches wood by putting hand to head
[21:04] <eylul> aww
[21:24] <chamois> sakrecoer do I have to keep the original logo? I mean: Can I use the 3d model?
[21:25] <eylul> ok re the bug nicowe ran into btw, I can launch the program from command line after setting a profile in displayCal
[21:25] <eylul> so I guess the problem is that.. *totally hazards a guess* there is no default color profile?
[21:25] <sakrecoer> eylul: sounds absolutely logic indeed :D
[21:26] <sakrecoer> but well... i'll file the bug with my output from terminal so we remember :)
[21:27] <eylul> I don't have the latest iso yet, but if you can sakrecoer I can add my workaround comment
[21:27] <sakrecoer> awesome!
[21:31] <eylul> (Ok plot twist. it is not setting the profile that fixes things, it is having displaycal running) 
[21:31] <eylul> (gives up and just adds to the bug)
[21:32] <sakrecoer> right, this is the proper channel for it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dispcalgui/+bug/1632859
[21:34]  * eylul copy pastes for record
[21:34] <eylul> (12:33:24 AM) eylul: 1) launch displaycal-apply-profiles from terminal. fails
[21:34] <eylul> (12:34:00 AM) eylul: 2) start displaycal from menu (displaycalgui I think?). while displaycal is on, the terminal command works without error
[21:34] <eylul> (12:34:09 AM) eylul: 3) close the program error is back
[21:38] <sakrecoer> [23:35:24] < sakrecoer> 1.) fails
[21:38] <sakrecoer> [23:35:52] < sakrecoer> 2.) displaycalgui starts but while it is on, the  terminal command does nothing, not even an error  message as in 1.)
[21:38] <sakrecoer> [23:36:21] < sakrecoer> 3.) still broken, but error message is back..
[21:38] <sakrecoer> but the thing is this...
[21:38] <sakrecoer> the software is made to measure your screen...
[21:38] <sakrecoer> it might be so that you need to create a profile for it first...
[21:39] <eylul> well I did select a profile from displaycal
[21:39] <eylul> I think
[21:39] <sakrecoer> ok..
[21:39] <eylul> didn't change anything for me
[21:39] <eylul> I am running an older version of iso, until the new one respins through
[21:39] <eylul> ergo, asking for double checking
[21:39] <sakrecoer> i cna't find any profiles..
[21:40] <sakrecoer> i have "Auto (None)" or "None"
[21:40] <sakrecoer> if i open the filebrowser, all i find in the discal folder is log files.
[21:40] <sakrecoer> the "check online button" finds nothing
[21:40] <eylul> menu -> graphics -> DisplayCal on top. there is a settings bit. there are some presets there. do they come up with color profiles?
[21:40] <sakrecoer> and the "+" button wants me to plug a calorimeter
[21:41] <eylul> (and color profiles are there)
[21:41] <eylul> (if you look at the folder next to the settings, that folder contains a bunch of ICC profiles)
[21:41] <eylul> that part is calibration
[21:42]  * eylul is about 50% guessworking this
[21:42] <sakrecoer> yeah, i see the menu you mention... picked a different entry in it...
[21:43] <eylul> *nods*
[21:43] <sakrecoer> but same as before: displaycal-apply-profiles in cli does nothing, but doesn't print any error message, so maybe robot is happy..
[21:43] <eylul> that's what I thought but the other option is
[21:43] <sakrecoer> hehe
[21:43] <eylul> when displaycal is running maybe it does something 
[21:43] <sakrecoer> i mean, something looks less broken, but i don't really get it..
[21:43] <eylul> if it is not running it runs a separate command that requires dispwin (which btw runs fine on its own)
[21:44] <sakrecoer> if only someone of us had one of those devices...
[21:44] <eylul> (not quite sure what it does except demonstrating colors btw, which might be for a colorimeter)
[21:44]  * eylul is completely out of her depth in this one
[21:44] <eylul> that would be nice
[21:44] <sakrecoer> yes... i'm sure that is what it does. the point with this software is to calibrate your screen and create aprofile for it.
[21:45] <sakrecoer> so, in many ways, testing it without a calorimeter is a bit like testing swizz cheese without a knife.
[21:46] <eylul> I suppose you COULD print something out
[21:47] <eylul> then test it that way
[21:49] <eylul> btw the 64bit iso has just built
[21:49] <eylul> (sakrecoer, kryten, chimois, whoever else is still up and about and waiting for it)
[21:49] <eylul> 32bit is ongoing
[21:53] <sakrecoer> ye... both are now \o/ so begins the upload and tracker-burping 
[21:56] <eylul> heh
[22:25] <sakrecoer> finaly!
[22:25] <sakrecoer> puh... zsyncing..
[23:06] <eylul> kryten: did we remove krita back out from the distro?