[08:48] <chamois> sakrecoer Is it ok? http://pasteall.org/pic/index.php?id=107586
[13:48] <Rosco2> Hi All. Anyone able to give the 32 bit ISO a spin?
[13:49] <Rosco2> I have just tired twice in a VM, and it freezes at the Welcome screen
[13:49] <Rosco2> s/tired/tried - but maybe the first is also true
[14:18] <Rosco2> Release notes drafted:
[14:18] <Rosco2> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseNotes/UbuntuStudio
[14:18] <Rosco2> Just checking bug list & package versions
[14:19] <Rosco2> Feel free to check for mistakes
[14:49] <sakrecoer> hi Rosco2 i'll soon be home from work in 2 hours.. i'll try then.
[14:49] <sakrecoer> yeah not so soon..
[14:49] <sakrecoer> haha
[14:50] <sakrecoer> trying to understand what happened with calligra in the end...? is it in? is it out? 
[14:55] <sakrecoer> from -release this morning:
[14:55] <sakrecoer> 08:37:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted  openfoam [amd64] (yakkety-proposed)  [4.0+dfsg1-3ubuntu1]
[14:55] <sakrecoer> erhm.. wrong line hehe
[14:56] <sakrecoer> doing this from my phone with my head full of work stuff still..
[14:59] <Rosco2> krita was removed by infinity yesterday - not sure why
[15:06] <Rosco2> calibre still seems to be in the seeds (publishing)
[15:06] <Rosco2> But no krita
[15:08] <sakrecoer> Rosco2: irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/10/10/%23ubuntu-release.html
[15:09] <sakrecoer> krytarik sent me that, it ecplains the thing 
[15:09] <sakrecoer> search for calligra in the page and you night understand better than i do..
[15:09] <sakrecoer> *might...
[15:12] <sakrecoer> but... calligra is the old krita.. no? the one before 3.0? 
[15:13] <sakrecoer> anyways, i really need to clear ny head a little before i throw myself in i think... i'll be back when i'm home but feel free to feed my backlog :)
[15:17] <Rosco2> Haven't checked the log yet.
[15:17] <Rosco2> But it appears that krita is dropped from the callibre source package in Debian
[15:17] <Rosco2> It will be it's own source package
[15:18] <Rosco2> https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/calligra/news/20160916T220058Z.html
[15:19] <Rosco2> Launchpad is a pain these days trying to review changelogs
[15:23] <Rosco2> just read irc log - Your bug is not quite right
[15:24] <Rosco2> Best not to reopen a bug closed by an upload unless it was the wrong fix
[15:24] <Rosco2> better to open a new bug
[15:26] <Rosco2> Whoops - I was looking at wrong irc log & at this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-menu/+bug/1616823/
[15:29] <Rosco2> OK I am confused calibre/calligra :-)
[15:41] <Rosco2> OK - I have it. calligra has been removed from Yakkety because it was failing to build
[15:41] <Rosco2> A new version is being worked on by KDE team but it won't make it for release
[15:42] <Rosco2> They might get it in post-release
[15:42] <Rosco2> I will update the release notes
[15:51] <Rosco2> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/1633129
[16:05] <Rosco2> Release notes updated with krita situation and version numbers bumped
[16:06] <Rosco2> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseNotes/UbuntuStudio
[16:07] <Rosco2> I would mark the amd64 image ready - but would prefer confirmation from another tester
[16:07] <Rosco2> The 32 bit fails in VM on my laptop too (Virtual Box on Debian Jessie)
[16:08] <Rosco2> I will go see if there is any food and hope magically that someone else can confirm ISOs working
[16:08] <Rosco2> :-)
[16:11] <nicowe> hello
[16:43] <eylul> it could have been the new one
[16:44] <eylul> sakrecoer: I am not entirely sure why you told them to not add it to the respin but oh well
[16:44] <eylul> :)
[16:48] <eylul> I can give a second confirm that the iso for 64bit works (at least on a VM install)
[16:50] <sakrecoer> Rosco2: i386 installs prima here :)
[16:50] <sakrecoer> writing from it..
[16:51] <Rosco2> Excellent news
[16:51] <Rosco2> eylul, A quick confirmation spin would be great
[16:52] <eylul> oh no I mean it does work
[16:52] <eylul> :)
[16:52] <eylul> I tried it last night but forgot to put it in because.. got distracted with krita ;)
[16:52] <sakrecoer> i haven't read all the backlog yet... about to have dinner, mama sakrecoer last night before travel back
[16:52] <Rosco2> Ok - understand
[16:52]  * eylul is adding the record now
[16:52] <sakrecoer> but i will after dinner (and after having marked the test as passed
[16:53] <eylul> do you guys need another VM install attempt with i386?
[16:53] <Rosco2> It wouldn't hurt
[16:53] <eylul> ok
[16:54] <sakrecoer> yeah, i installed on disk...
[16:54] <sakrecoer> (just saying... no pÃ¥articular reason..)
[16:54] <Rosco2> sakrecoer, no need to test after dinner. I think there is enough evidence to mark them read after eylul does a quick confirm
[16:55] <Rosco2> read > ready
[16:55] <sakrecoer> \o/
[16:56] <sakrecoer> I'll be back later, but for now: THANK YOU GUYS!!!!!
[16:57] <sakrecoer> You are the bestest nicest!!
[16:59] <sakrecoer> also: hi nicowe :)
[17:00] <sakrecoer> and wb chamois: haven't had the time to look at your picture yet *shamepillowÃ* but i will after dinner: pinky promise!
[17:00] <sakrecoer> ryl! o/
[17:03] <eylul> bye sakrecoer!
[17:03] <chamois> sakrecoer ok, enjoy your meal!
[17:04] <eylul> rosco did you run into any issues on live CD that has ladi-tray and ladi player not working?
[17:05] <Rosco2> eylul, that is new to me
[17:05] <eylul> yeah
[17:06] <eylul> I can't get the ladi player to run, if you still have the install can you double check?
[17:06] <eylul> (and if you are not busy)
[17:07]  * eylul runs into same problem with the install. (qjackctl runs fine)
[17:08] <Rosco2> It was working when I had it uploaded in Debian :-)
[17:09] <Rosco2> I will check. We may need to report a bug and work on it after release
[17:10] <Rosco2> eulul, did it work on amd64?
[17:16] <eylul> the problem I ran into was in amd64
[17:16] <eylul> :D
[17:16] <eylul> I am downloading the 32bit now. 
[17:17]  * eylul was fiddling with that while waiting
[17:18] <Rosco2> Clear
[17:19] <eylul> ok it might be a bug with kvm then
[17:19] <Rosco2> Just firing up a live session on laptop hardware now
[17:26]  * eylul is trying to figure out why VMM doesn't give an option to have 32bit architecture
[17:32] <eylul> rosco did you set the 32 bit as ready?
[17:33] <eylul> nvm
[17:33] <Rosco2> NOt yet - I was just waiting to see how you got on
[17:34] <Rosco2> But I will if you are not getting anywhere with the VM
[17:35] <Rosco2> eylul, no success here with ladi either
[17:36] <eylul> ok. (looks like they did hit the release with yakkety, which was why I couldn't submit bug report. 32bit live cd is fine. installing now)
[17:36] <Rosco2> icon in the tray reflects jack status, but none of the menu options do anything
[17:36] <eylul> yeah exactly
[17:36] <eylul> I can run gladish from menu
[17:36] <eylul> I can't start ladi from menu
[17:36] <eylul> ladi player
[17:36] <eylul> its not like a giant problem considering there is alternatives all around but..
[17:37] <eylul> something to look into probably post release so that we can either fix or remove them
[17:37] <eylul> :/
[17:37] <eylul> will file the bugs
[17:37] <Rosco2> Excellent - thanks for your help.
[17:38] <Rosco2> Will mark the release ready and sit down for a strong drink :-)
[17:40] <Rosco2> Whoops - can't mark it ready. Like you say - Yakkety is already released anyway
[17:40] <Rosco2> \o/
[17:42] <eylul> hehehe
[17:43]  * eylul is still testing the install just in case ;D 
[17:43]  * eylul and also looking into the ladi bug
[17:52] <eylul> and belated \o/
[18:02] <eylul> Rosco2: if you are still around, could you confirm these two? :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laditools/+bug/1633170
[18:02] <eylul> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laditools/+bug/1633173
[18:03] <eylul> (and belatedly the 32bit install is fine :D) 
[18:22] <krytarik> Rosco2: Btw, since you are here, please fix up your recent change to -default-settings, so we don't get another LP #1617846.
[19:57] <eylul> http://pad.ubuntu.com/4FDYvUeq1Q brainstorming pad for test cases, to avoid future problems similar to the way we had with krita. (I hope it is ok to use the ubuntupad for this) kryten
[20:51] <Rosco2> Thanks krytarik: I don't know what happened there. The diff looks fine fine from 0.62 to 0.63. The diff from 0.61 to 0.62 shows the desktop files being removed.
[20:52] <Rosco2> But the desktop files are still there in both tarballs (0.62 & 0.63)
[20:52] <Rosco2> Will take a look
[20:53] <Rosco2> eylul, Thanks for your help. Will followup on the laditools bug
[20:54] <eylul> Rosco2 thank you as well!!! 
[20:54] <Rosco2> Have you seen http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/361/builds/117793/testcases
[20:55] <Rosco2> They have only been there for this release
[20:55] <Rosco2> But noone really used them
[20:55] <Rosco2> They could do with checking & updating
[20:56] <Rosco2> Anyway - off to bed
[20:56] <eylul> oh wow
[20:56] <eylul> gnight rosco2!
[21:30] <krytarik> eylul: There - dumped the seeds in there. :P