[05:31] <sakrecoer> hi
[05:37] <sakrecoer> didn't make it back yesterday, solly..
[05:38] <sakrecoer> chamois proposition is a bit far off typographicaly.
[05:38] <sakrecoer> what do you guys think?
[05:39] <sakrecoer> the glow is kindof neat, though, not sure abour it tbh. and we do have Woodmark already.
[05:40] <sakrecoer> sorry to read about ladi.... makes me want to go back homr and test lol...
[05:42] <sakrecoer> i'll look at the testcases at lunch.. if they look good i figure we should share the link all over www
[05:42] <sakrecoer> will type a post for release on website tonight... maybe krytarik can check my spellung before i post it? 
[05:43]  * sakrecoer crosses fingers.
[05:45] <sakrecoer> off to digg out rent money from the office. happy friday y'all! 
[05:56] <krytarik> sakrecoer: Sure can do - already updated the download page at least, ftm.
[09:28] <studio-devel716> Has anyone noticed that Rosegarden cannot import audio files?
[09:28] <studio-devel716> Seems related to https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1494/
[09:33] <studio-devel716> Under 16.04.1 LTS Rosegarden also appears not to be linked against libsndfile...
[09:34] <studio-devel716> More info here: https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1503/
[18:32] <chamois> sakrecoer Is the boot logo fine?
[18:32] <sakrecoer> hi chamois!
[18:33] <sakrecoer> no... its not, its half way there, i susp3ct you can do better. my first question is:
[18:33] <sakrecoer> can you read it?
[18:34] <sakrecoer> my second question is a leadinf question: glow is nice, can glow be subtile?
[18:35] <sakrecoer> by 'can you read it' i question the readability. we do have a woodmark established, so you can be lazy on it, or you can use it to soeak loud.
[18:36] <krytarik> Woorrrdmark!
[18:36] <sakrecoer> by 'can the glow be subtile' i acknowlege the beauty of gloow, but wonder about its efficiency
[18:40] <sakrecoer> yes, word is bond prefarbly not decipherable :)http://youtu.be/7kDf_hqdEFI 
[19:04] <sakrecoer> chamois: what i see is another proof of creativity, i think ubuntustudio needs a compromise between that (creativity) and esperanto (universal symbolic)
[19:05] <sakrecoer> symboÃ¶ic is only televant if everyone knows the symbol
[19:06] <sakrecoer> yeah..*symbolic and  *relevant 
[20:23] <chamois> sakrecoer you're right I'll work on it. How many time do I have?
[20:29] <sakrecoer> chamois: thank you for considering that! tbh, none of us gave you any hints about what and how. Nor did we tell you what techincal limitations might exist. I would say, the earilier the best. We need a definit version 3 moths before final realase of next cycle, so that is january. :)
[20:32] <sakrecoer> feel free to present options as many times as you want until then :) 
[20:39] <sakrecoer> PCX is a werid format https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCX but it seems it might be possible to have PNG too... krytarik, can you help chamois and me regarding the techincal requirements for the boot image?
[20:41] <krytarik> Well, it definitely has to be PCX anyway - although then I'd provide a PNG version alongside too.  And examples of how other flavors are doing it are here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/debian-cd/ubuntu/files/head:/data/yakkety/
[20:42] <sakrecoer> chamois: never the less, in terms of actual graphics, we something that respects the actual Ubuntu Studio CoF (Circle Of Friends) and Woodmark
[20:42] <sakrecoer> we *need
[21:21] <chamois> Goodnight everybody!
[21:24] <chamois> Ok I'll consider that. I'll send a new version as soon as I get new ideas