| blahdeblah | So hallyn was telling me on Friday about using KVM with the local provider; is it also possible to use this with the manual provider, i.e. to control a remote KVM host? | 01:13 |
|---|---|---|
| blahdeblah | Or alternatively, change the container type on a manual host after the environment has been bootstrapped? | 01:14 |
| spaok | if you put maas in a container and use the maas provider, setup ssh keys for the maas user, you can specify the qemu url to a remote machine for the power control, just need ssh | 01:23 |
| spaok | juju add-machine would spin up a KVM instance on that server | 01:24 |
| blahdeblah | spaok: Yeah - I've already done that; but I'd like to avoid having to add KVM instances to the MAAS controller | 01:31 |
| === rmcall_ is now known as rmcall | ||
| kjackal_ | Good morning Juju world! | 06:58 |
| SDBStefano | hi kjackal | 08:01 |
| kjackal | hi SDBStefano, what's up? | 08:02 |
| SDBStefano | how could I create a charm for Xenial instaed of trusty ? | 08:02 |
| kjackal | in the metadata.yaml you set the proper series, let me find an example | 08:02 |
| kjackal | SDBStefano: https://github.com/juju-solutions/layer-apache-bigtop-base/blob/master/metadata.yaml#L10 | 08:03 |
| kjackal | SDBStefano: although the charm build command when there is a single series decides to put it under the trusty build path (but that might be some missconfiguration I have on my side) | 08:05 |
| SDBStefano | so, I have added into the yaml file - series: - xenial | 08:06 |
| SDBStefano | and I done the build | 08:07 |
| SDBStefano | are you saying that the stuff under the trusty directory is now for Xenial ? | 08:07 |
| kjackal | SDBStefano: when you do a charm build first line should say where the output directory is | 08:09 |
| kjackal | SDBStefano: go ahead and open the <build-output-dir>/metadata.yaml . It should say that the series is xenial, right? | 08:10 |
| SDBStefano | ok, it creates a new dirctory name 'builds' there the metadata.yaml contains "series": ["xenial"] | 08:11 |
| SDBStefano | so, now I should deploy using 'juju deploy $JUJU_REPOSITORY/builds/use --series xenial' | 08:12 |
| kjackal | SDBStefano: awesome! then this charm is xenial. Yes, you can deploy it now! | 08:12 |
| SDBStefano | I have to remove the previous app, but it has an error : - ude error 1 ude local 6 ubuntu | 08:14 |
| SDBStefano | so the 'juju remove-application ude' is not removing the app | 08:14 |
| SDBStefano | is it possible to force the removal ? | 08:15 |
| kjackal | you can remove-machine where the unit is with --force | 08:17 |
| kjackal | SDBStefano: ^ | 08:17 |
| SDBStefano | yes, it worked, I'm deploying, thanks for helping | 08:18 |
| kjackal | you can also deploy the same application with a different name like so: juju deploy $JUJU_REPOSITORY/builds/use myappname --series xenial | 08:19 |
| kjackal | SDBStefano: ^ | 08:19 |
| === tinwood_ is now known as tinwood | ||
| neiljerram | jamespage, good morning! | 10:24 |
| jamespage | morning neiljerram | 10:25 |
| jamespage | how things? | 10:25 |
| neiljerram | Quite well, thanks! | 10:25 |
| neiljerram | You suggested that I ping you here in your review of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382563/ | 10:25 |
| * magicaltrout knows from experience, anyone who greats another user specifically whilst saying good morning in reality has an issue or favour to ask..... "quite well" or not ;) | 10:25 | |
| jamespage | neiljerram, yes! | 10:26 |
| magicaltrout | s/greats/greets | 10:26 |
| neiljerram | So doing that. I think your proposal is basically right, so just looking for pointers on how to start reworking the code into the correct form... | 10:26 |
| neiljerram | magicaltrout, I just thought that 'good morning' was a little more friendly than 'ping'! | 10:27 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, so since the original calico integration was written, we've done quite a bit of work to minimize the amount of vendor specific code that is required in the core principle charms | 10:27 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, you already have a subordinate for nova-compute | 10:27 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, that's been complemented with the same approach for neutron-api | 10:27 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, yes, agreed, and makes sense. | 10:28 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, so that all of the SDN specific bits can reside in an SDN specific charm | 10:28 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, right and the nice bit of this is that gnuoy's just completed some work to make writing those a whole lot easier | 10:28 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, Ah, nice. | 10:28 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, we've done quite a bit of work on making reactive and layers work for openstack charming this cycle | 10:28 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, so your charm can be quite minimal | 10:28 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, https://github.com/openstack/charm-neutron-api-odl has been refactored as an example for reference | 10:29 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, but we also have a template for charm create | 10:29 |
| === caribou_ is now known as caribou | ||
| jamespage | gnuoy`, ^^ is that live yet? | 10:29 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, I'd love to get a neutron-api-calico charm up and running, so we can deprecate the neutron-api bits for ocata release and remove them next cycle | 10:30 |
| gnuoy` | jamespage, the template ? That is very nearly ready. I just need to run the guide using the template to check they are both in sync and work | 10:31 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, Just as a thought, might it even make sense to have a single 'neutron-calico' charm that provides both the compute and the server function? I assume it can detect at runtime which charm it is subordinate to? If it's subordinate to nova-compute, it would provide the compute function; if it's subordinate to neutron-api, it would provide the server side function. | 10:31 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, that's absolutely fine | 10:31 |
| jamespage | +1 | 10:31 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, neutron-calico already exists right? | 10:31 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, Thanks. So, is there an example of another SDN subordinate charm that already uses gnuoy's new facilities? | 10:32 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, Yes, neutron-calico already exists (for the compute function). | 10:32 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, https://github.com/openstack/charm-neutron-api-odl does | 10:32 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, so approach re neutron-calico as a 'does both' type charm | 10:32 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, right now its not possible to upgrade from a non-reactive charm to a reactive charm | 10:32 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, neutron-calico is an older style python charm I think | 10:33 |
| gnuoy` | neiljerram, I'm still smoothing of the rough corners but https://github.com/gnuoy/charm-guide/blob/master/doc/source/new-sdn-charm.rst may help | 10:33 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, TBH we've never really tested for upgrading yet at all. | 10:33 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, how many live deployments are you aware of using calico deployed via juju? | 10:33 |
| gnuoy` | haha good point | 10:33 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, in which case I'd take the hit and move to the new layers+reactive approach now | 10:34 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, Just two: OIL, and a Canonical customer that I'm not sure I can name here. | 10:34 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, ok OIL is manageable | 10:34 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, I'll poke on the other one :-) | 10:34 |
| jamespage | gnuoy`, what do you think to the single subordinate doing both roles approach discussed above? | 10:35 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, I think you're right about neutron-calico being an older style charm. So perhaps it would be a simpler first step to make a separate neutron-api-calico, in the most up-to-date style (reactive) | 10:35 |
| gnuoy` | jamespage, I'm fine with that | 10:35 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, ack | 10:36 |
| jamespage | gnuoy`, that charm-guide update is for the hypervisor integration - do we have the equiv for API? | 10:36 |
| gnuoy` | jamespage, yep, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387238/ | 10:37 |
| === gnuoy` is now known as gnuoy | ||
| jamespage | gnuoy, sorry I mean't the neutron-api subordinate charm version | 10:38 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, no, not atm. | 10:39 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, ok that's what neiljerram will be after | 10:39 |
| gnuoy | ack | 10:39 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, you might need to give us a week or two to pull that bit into shape | 10:39 |
| gnuoy | jamespage, then https://github.com/openstack/charm-neutron-api-od is the best bet | 10:40 |
| gnuoy | * https://github.com/openstack/charm-neutron-api-odl | 10:40 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, But I could start by looking at https://github.com/openstack/charm-neutron-api-odl for inspiration, and ask any questions here? | 10:40 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, ^^ yeah that byt example is our current doc - but we'll be working on that | 10:40 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, yeah that's fine - but we've move openstack charm discussion over to #openstack-charms | 10:40 |
| jamespage | but either is still fine | 10:40 |
| neiljerram | jamespage, Ah OK, I'll go there now... | 10:40 |
| jamespage | neiljerram, ta | 10:41 |
| SDBStefano | Hi hackal, I deployed a local charm, but it's stucked into : | 10:52 |
| SDBStefano | UNIT WORKLOAD AGENT MACHINE PUBLIC-ADDRESS PORTS MESSAGE ude/11 waiting allocating 20 10.15.177.80 waiting for machine MACHINE STATE DNS INS-ID SERIES AZ 20 pending 10.15.177.80 juju-19dc1e-20 xenial | 10:52 |
| SDBStefano | ok, it has just changed into : | 10:53 |
| SDBStefano | MACHINE STATE DNS INS-ID SERIES AZ 20 started 10.15.177.80 juju-19dc1e-20 xenial | 10:53 |
| SDBStefano | so it seems very slow | 10:53 |
| === saibarspeis is now known as saibarAuei | ||
| icey | bdx, do I remember you trying to get Juju working with Digital Ocean? | 12:26 |
| Spaulding | Hmm... | 13:24 |
| Spaulding | Why my "juju status" saying to me that: | 13:24 |
| Spaulding | Unit Workload Agent Machine Public address Ports Message | 13:24 |
| Spaulding | sme/5* maintenance idle 5 10.190.134.241 Enabling Apache2 modules | 13:24 |
| Spaulding | But as I see all of my tasks has been made. | 13:25 |
| Spaulding | So the last one should set up state "active" | 13:25 |
| Spaulding | How I can track it? | 13:25 |
| kjackal | Spaulding: is there any info in juju debug-log | 13:32 |
| Spaulding | kjackal: | 13:33 |
| Spaulding | unit-sme-5: 14:31:32 INFO unit.sme/5.juju-log Invoking reactive handler: reactive/sme.py:95:enable_apache_mods | 13:33 |
| Spaulding | Hm... it looks like reactive ran this task again | 13:33 |
| Spaulding | that's why my status changed... | 13:34 |
| lazyPower | Spaulding - thats the rub. you cannot gauarantee ordering of the methods in reactive unless its a tightly controlled flow through states. if you want something to be run only once, it would be a good idea to decorate with a @when_not, and then subsequently, set the state its decorating against. do note, that you'll have to handle removal of that state if you ever want ot re-execute that body of code again. | 13:40 |
| Spaulding | lazyPower: yeah, i already noticed that | 13:46 |
| Spaulding | and I'm using when & when_not | 13:47 |
| Spaulding | it's like puppet | 13:47 |
| Spaulding | lazyPower: I found it! | 13:50 |
| Spaulding | @when_not('http_mods_enabled') | 13:50 |
| Spaulding | it should be sme.http ... | 13:50 |
| lazyPower | Spaulding - Sounds like you're on the right track :) | 13:50 |
| Spaulding | because of you guys! :) | 13:51 |
| === coreycb` is now known as coreycb | ||
| magicaltrout | s/greats/greets | 14:01 |
| lazyPower | o/ magicaltrout | 14:17 |
| fbarilla | I've the 'juju machines' command that does not list any machines but trying to add one leads to the following error message: ERROR machine is already provisioned | 14:51 |
| rick_h_ | fbarilla: ah, is the machine you're trying to add in use in another model? | 14:52 |
| fbarilla | I've two models, 'controller and default' . None of them list the machine I want to add | 14:55 |
| fbarilla | In the 'controller' model I've the LXD container where juju has been bootstrapped | 14:56 |
| Spaulding | lazyPower: i broke it! :( | 15:02 |
| Spaulding | https://gist.github.com/pananormalny/765622f3d2c332bd9dece6f35b9ff267 | 15:02 |
| Spaulding | maybe someone can spot an issue? | 15:02 |
| Spaulding | it's running in a loop - again... :/ | 15:03 |
| Spaulding | the main idea was to run those tasks one by one... | 15:03 |
| Spaulding | from the top to the beginning... in that order | 15:04 |
| Spaulding | to the bottom** | 15:04 |
| lazyPower | Spaulding - i left a few comments on the gist, nothing stands out other than the state of sme.ready being commented out, and instead being set on 331 | 15:07 |
| lazyPower | Spaulding i dont see a remove_state however, and thats the other tell-tale, as removing states cause the reactive dispatcher to re-test the state queue to determine what needs to be run, which makes it possible to enter an inf. loop if you're not careful with how you're decorating the methods. | 15:08 |
| lazyPower | but that doesn't appear to be the case, so that last message is more FYI than anything else. | 15:08 |
| Spaulding | lazyPower: about jinja2 I'll probably use it | 15:09 |
| Spaulding | but basically i would like to have any "prototype" of juju - before OpenStack Barcelona | 15:09 |
| Spaulding | so I'm trying to do this ASAP | 15:09 |
| Spaulding | After that I'll have more time to do it properly... now it's just proof-of-concept | 15:10 |
| lazyPower | right, just a suggestion | 15:11 |
| lazyPower | its not wrong to put heredocs in there, its not best practice. | 15:11 |
| Spaulding | I know | 15:11 |
| Spaulding | It's dirty way - but in this case - it's working | 15:11 |
| lazyPower | Spaulding - get me an update on that gist with the output of charms.reactive get_states | 15:12 |
| lazyPower | i imagine whats happened is this isn't a fresh deploy, and you've modified state progression and run an upgrade-charm and now its misbehaving - is that consistent with whats happened? | 15:12 |
| Spaulding | basically - i'm trying every time to deploy it from scratch | 15:13 |
| lazyPower | Spaulding - `juju run --unit sme/0 "charms.reactive get_states" ` | 15:15 |
| lazyPower | assuming sme is the name of your charm and its unit 0 | 15:15 |
| Spaulding | lazyPower: will do | 15:15 |
| Spaulding | lazyPower: is there any other way to remove application if it fails at install hook? | 15:16 |
| lazyPower | juju remove-machine # --force | 15:16 |
| Spaulding | cause right now I'm destroying the model | 15:16 |
| lazyPower | that'll strip the underlying machine unit from the charm and the charm should finish removal on its own | 15:16 |
| Spaulding | i tried with force with 2.0rc3... couldn't get that working... | 15:16 |
| Spaulding | maybe it's fixed(?) now... | 15:16 |
| lazyPower | http://paste.ubuntu.com/23339079/ | 15:18 |
| lazyPower | seems like its functioning fine in 2.0.0 | 15:18 |
| lazyPower | notice that it leaves/orphans the application/charm for a short while before reaping the charm. | 15:19 |
| === saibarAuei is now known as saibarspeis | ||
| === saibarspeis is now known as saibarAuei | ||
| === saibarAuei is now known as saibarspeis | ||
| cory_fu | petevg: I added a bunch comments in reply to and based on your review on https://github.com/juju-solutions/matrix/pull/2 | 16:14 |
| cory_fu | bcsaller: Our feedback awaits you. :) | 16:14 |
| bcsaller | cory_fu, petevg: thank you both | 16:15 |
| petevg | np | 16:15 |
| petevg | cory_fu: thx. Reading your comments ... | 16:16 |
| aisrael | cory_fu: Do you know what might be causing this? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23339455/ | 16:19 |
| aisrael | From running charm build | 16:19 |
| cory_fu | aisrael: Not sure, but I'd guess that the log message contains utf8 encoded data and should maybe be .decode('utf8')ed before being logged? | 16:22 |
| cory_fu | aisrael: Can you drop a breakpoint into /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/charmtools/utils.py and see what the output var holds? | 16:22 |
| aisrael | cory_fu: Not yet. I'm doing a charm school/training and they hit it. I'll dig in deeper, though. Thanks! | 16:25 |
| === dames is now known as thedac | ||
| cory_fu | aisrael: I'd look for unicode characters in their yaml files, then. metadata.yaml and layer.yaml specifically. Otherwise, I'm not really sure | 16:26 |
| aisrael | Weird. We haven't touched those at all. | 16:27 |
| aisrael | cory_fu: looks like it may be related to an actions.yaml that's UTF-8-encoded | 16:35 |
| cory_fu | aisrael: Strange. Well, we should definitely handle that better | 16:35 |
| lazyPower | is there any particular reason we're limiting that to ascii? (just curious) | 16:36 |
| aisrael | cory_fu: definitely. Once I confirm, I'll file a bug | 16:36 |
| cory_fu | Thanks | 16:37 |
| aisrael | It definitely looks like a locale/encoding issue. I had them send me the charm and I built it locally with no problem | 16:45 |
| cory_fu | Hrm | 16:45 |
| cory_fu | Is anyone having an issue with 2.0 and lxd where the agents never report as started? Just started for me with the GA release | 17:08 |
| cory_fu | Seems to be an issue with the ssh keys | 17:10 |
| bdx | cory_fu: I've been having successful deploys so far | 17:11 |
| bdx | cory_fu, cmars: should we also set status to 'blocked', or 'error' here -> http://paste.ubuntu.com/23339654/ | 17:13 |
| cory_fu | bdx: I'd say "blocked", yeah | 17:14 |
| bdx | cory_fu, cmars: or is setting the supported series in metadata enough? | 17:15 |
| bdx | probably both for good measure? | 17:15 |
| cory_fu | bdx, cmars: Setting the supported series in the metadata could (probably would) be overwritten by the charm layer. | 17:15 |
| cmars | bdx, cory_fu please open an issue. iirc think you can force series with juju deploy --series | 17:15 |
| cmars | cory_fu, i've noticed something with that.. if you have multiple layers that both specify the same series in metadata, the series gets output twice. and the CS rejects that | 17:16 |
| cmars | cory_fu, i think I opened a bug.. | 17:16 |
| cmars | (but i forget where.. so many projects) | 17:17 |
| cmars | bdx, interested to get your thoughts on https://github.com/cmars/layer-lets-encrypt/issues/1 as well | 17:17 |
| cmars | i think we might be able to make this a little more reusable without introducing too much complexity | 17:18 |
| cory_fu | cmars: https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/257 I do think the series list needs to be de-duped | 17:18 |
| cmars | cory_fu, thanks :) | 17:18 |
| cory_fu | Odd. It seems to only be trusty lxd instances that get stuck in pending. Guess I'll try torching my trusty image | 17:45 |
| * magicaltrout hands cory_fu the matches | 18:02 | |
| cory_fu | magicaltrout: Thanks, but it didn't help | 18:03 |
| magicaltrout | awww | 18:26 |
| cmars | cory_fu, xenial host and trusty container? | 18:35 |
| cory_fu | cmars: Yes | 18:35 |
| cory_fu | cmars: It looks like the trusty image isn't getting the lxdbr0 interface for some reason, but I can't find anything obvious in any of the logs I could think of to check | 18:35 |
| cmars | cory_fu, one thing it could be, is a known systemd issue | 18:36 |
| cory_fu | Oh? | 18:36 |
| cmars | cory_fu: 22-09-2016 15:23:18 < stgraber!~stgraber@ubuntu/member/stgraber: cmars: if you mask (systemctl mask) the systemd units related to binfmt (systemctl -a | grep binfmt) and reboot, then the problem is gone for good. This is related to systemd's use of automount and not to binfmt-misc (which just ships a bunch of binfmt hooks) | 18:36 |
| cmars | cory_fu, a telltale symptom is that the trusty container gets stuck in mountall | 18:37 |
| cory_fu | cmars: Huh. Worth a shot. FWIW, this only started with the GA. It was fine on the last RC | 18:37 |
| cory_fu | cmars: How do I tell where it's stuck? | 18:37 |
| cmars | cory_fu, a ps -ef would show a mountall process, and /var/log/upstart/mountall.log shows some binfmt errors | 18:38 |
| cmars | cory_fu, a quickfix is this (pardon my language): https://github.com/cmars/tools/blob/master/bin/lxc-unfuck | 18:38 |
| cmars | but masking the systemd units is a better solution | 18:38 |
| cmars | cory_fu, unless this is a completely different issue, in which case, forget everything I've said :) | 18:39 |
| cory_fu | cmars: Yep, that seems to be exactly the issue! | 18:39 |
| bdx | cory_fu: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23340056/ | 18:40 |
| bdx | cory_fu: can't seem to replicate :-( | 18:41 |
| cory_fu | bdx: That looks like what I'm seeing. The trusty machine never goes out of pending | 18:42 |
| cory_fu | cmars: I'm not really familiar with systemd mask. Do you have the exact commands handy, or can you point me to some docs? | 18:42 |
| bdx | cory_fu: it started .... http://paste.ubuntu.com/23340072/ | 18:43 |
| cory_fu | bdx: Oh, well, it never does for me. But it sounds like cmars has the solution for me | 18:43 |
| bdx | strange ... nice | 18:43 |
| cmars | cory_fu, this *should* do it: sudo systemctl mask $(systemctl -a | awk '/binfmt/{print $2}') | 18:46 |
| cmars | cory_fu, this might break binfmt on your host, if you run .NET exe binaries directly, for example, that might stop working | 18:46 |
| cory_fu | cmars: I don't think I do, but good to know. No way to have both work, I take it? | 18:47 |
| cmars | cory_fu, ideally, someone would fix this issue in systemd or binfmt or wherever it needs to be done | 18:47 |
| cory_fu | cmars: I don't think that awk is right. It just gives me "loaded" four times | 18:48 |
| cmars | cory_fu, what do you get from: systemctl -a | grep binfmt ? | 18:48 |
| cory_fu | I assume it should be $1 instead | 18:48 |
| cory_fu | cmars: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23340090/ | 18:49 |
| cmars | cory_fu, on my machine, $1 is a big white dot for some reason. could be my terminal type? | 18:49 |
| cmars | cory_fu, yep, $1 for you | 18:49 |
| cory_fu | Could be. I just have leading whitespace. | 18:49 |
| cory_fu | cmars: In case this causes issues, what would be the command to undo this? | 18:49 |
| cmars | cory_fu, systemctl unmask the units that were masked | 18:50 |
| cory_fu | Ok, thanks | 18:50 |
| === alexisb is now known as alexisb-afk | ||
| === med_` is now known as medberry | ||
| troontje | hi all :) | 19:06 |
| troontje | I followed this instruction : https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/getting-started | 19:06 |
| troontje | its pretty clear, except what exaclty does that 20GB mean? | 19:07 |
| marcoceppi | troontje: during the lxd init step? | 19:08 |
| troontje | exaclty | 19:08 |
| troontje | when setting the loop device | 19:08 |
| marcoceppi | troontje: the size of the loop back device to use for storage on LXD machiens | 19:08 |
| marcoceppi | when LXD boots machiens, they'll all be allocated a slice of that storage | 19:08 |
| troontje | marcoceppi: ah ok, so when setting that 20GB that will the 20GB that will be shared with all the machines together? | 19:09 |
| marcoceppi | troontje: exactly | 19:09 |
| troontje | marcoceppi: I was trying to install openstack base with that 20 GB ,athough it does not fail it just not continues the process | 19:10 |
| troontje | I first thought that value was per machine | 19:10 |
| marcoceppi | troontje: yeah, it's for all machines, and each machine boots with like 8GB of storage from that 20 | 19:11 |
| troontje | haha, well I cant blame it that it sort of failed | 19:11 |
| === alexisb-afk is now known as alexisb | ||
| troontje | marcoceppi: ok, so I set everything back and the canvas is clean again | 19:17 |
| troontje | How can I increase that value for the storage | 19:17 |
| troontje | destorying it and make it new is no problem btw | 19:18 |
| cory_fu | bcsaller, petevg: Resolved merge conflicts and added TODO comment re: the model connection. Going to merge now | 19:19 |
| bdx | cmars: what happens when you don't have an 'A' record precreated -> http://paste.ubuntu.com/23340240/ | 19:20 |
| bdx | cmars: or created pointing at another ip :/ | 19:21 |
| cmars | bdx, pretty sure in that case that the standalone method will fail | 19:21 |
| bdx | yea | 19:22 |
| bdx | we should call that out in layer le readme | 19:22 |
| cmars | bdx, ack, good call | 19:22 |
| cory_fu | bcsaller, petevg: Merged | 19:23 |
| petevg | bcsaller, cory_fu: Just pushed a small fix to master: glitch now grabs context.juju_model rather than context.model (good name change; just needed to update glitch's assumptions). | 19:28 |
| troontje | how can I increase that zfs disk for JUJU? | 19:31 |
| bdx | cmars: it would be worth noting that layer le cannot be used on lxd/contianer deploys | 19:57 |
| cmars | bdx, true, true. wish there was a way to expose containers through the host machine.. | 19:57 |
| kwmonroe | cory_fu: can you have a hyphen in auto_accessors? https://github.com/juju-solutions/interface-dfs/blob/master/requires.py#L25 | 19:58 |
| cory_fu | kwmonroe: Hyphens are translated to underscores | 19:58 |
| kwmonroe | cool, thx cory_fu | 19:59 |
| === med_ is now known as Guest62846 | ||
| cory_fu | cmars: That systemctl mask fix worked perfectly. Thanks! | 20:01 |
| jrwren | bdx, cmars, you could use it with some tweaking of juju-default lxd profile, but its not likely to do what you want. | 20:01 |
| cmars | cory_fu, sure thing | 20:01 |
| cmars | jrwren, ah, that's true. i do some lxd bridging at home, but that doesn't always work on public clouds. ipv4 addresses are in short supply | 20:02 |
| bdx | cmars, jrwren: I'm thinking layer:letsencrypt might be best consumed by a public facing endpoint | 20:05 |
| bdx | the public endpoint (nginx/haproxy), could also be a reverse proxy | 20:06 |
| bdx | cmars, jrwren: so it could be used as an ssl termination + reverse proxy | 20:06 |
| cmars | bdx, a frontend that negotiates certs for its backends, and then does a passthrough to them (haproxy's tcp mode)... interesting | 20:07 |
| bdx | cmars: exactly | 20:07 |
| bdx | ^ is a skewed model bc it takes for granted that a user would be deploying lxd continers on the aws provider :/ | 20:09 |
| bdx | but not in all cases | 20:12 |
| bdx | just the one I want | 20:12 |
| cmars | bdx, i think i'd like to keep layer:lets-encrypt lightweight and usable in standalone web apps like mattermost.. but also usable in such a frontend charm as you describe | 20:12 |
| bdx | entirely | 20:13 |
| cmars | bdx, with the layer:nginx part removed, i think we'll have something reusable to this end | 20:13 |
| bdx | right | 20:13 |
| arosales | bdx: did you see the fixes for lxd/local | 20:15 |
| arosales | it was indeed to tune kernel settings | 20:15 |
| arosales | bdx: ping if you are still hitting the 8 lxd limit | 20:15 |
| cmars | bdx, it'd be really cool if the frontend could operate as a DNS server too. then it could register subdomains AND obtain certs | 20:15 |
| bdx | arosales: no I haven't .... just the warning to reference the production lxd docs when bootstrapping .... is this what you are talking about? | 20:16 |
| bdx | cmars: thats a great idea ... just what I've been thinking too | 20:17 |
| bdx | arosales, rick_h_: I've seen and heard bits and pieces about the rbd lxd backend, and also that getting rbd backend compat with nova-lxd isn't on the current roadmap. Can you comment on the status/progress of lxd rbd backend work to any extent? | 20:24 |
| arosales | bdx: yes, you have to tune settings on the host to spawn more than 8 lxd | 20:40 |
| arosales | bdx: re nova-lxd rockstar may have more info | 20:41 |
| arosales | bdx: but for general bootstrapping with lxd make sure to tune your host settings per the bootstrap info | 20:41 |
| arosales | if you want > 8 | 20:42 |
| arosales | :-) | 20:42 |
| jhobbs | is there a way to rename a model? | 20:47 |
| rick_h_ | jhobbs: no, not currently | 20:48 |
| jhobbs | rick_h_: ok, thanks | 20:48 |
| * magicaltrout went to production with a model called Jeff recently..... | 20:49 | |
| arosales | magicaltrout: even for testing I would have been thought of a more whimsical model name than Jeff | 20:50 |
| magicaltrout | ah well, when you're trying to get LXD containers running inside Mesos my ability to come up with names fails me | 20:51 |
| arosales | mesos is taxing :-) | 21:04 |
| icey | arosales: I deployed the entirety of openstack (16 units?) onto LXD at the charmer's summit without tuning lxd at all... | 21:10 |
| bdx | icey: you were using ubuntu desktop which has different default /etc/sysctl | 21:15 |
| icey | touche bdx :) | 21:16 |
| bdx | :) | 21:16 |
| arosales | icey: I have as well. It depends on your host settings. We do know on stock ubuntu server that the host settings need to be adjusted | 21:16 |
| anastasiamac | lazyPower: ping | 22:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!