sky | is there a /var/mail directory in 16.04? | 03:30 |
---|---|---|
Javezim | Hey All, anyone had issues with Samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu on Ubuntu Server 14.04.4 and being able to Read/Write Data from Windows Clients? ""An Unexpected Network Error has occurred"" | 03:31 |
Javezim | log.smbd - http://paste.ubuntu.com/23336705/, log.<HOSTNAME> seeing a tonne of - http://paste.ubuntu.com/23336648/ | 03:31 |
sky | are /var/mail and /var/spool/mail somehow linked? | 03:36 |
sky | i deleted a file in var/mail and the same file gets rmed from /var/spool/mail. but i cant tell that there is a symlink or anything | 03:37 |
sky | oh, I fuound it | 03:38 |
sky | looks like /var/spool/mail is a symlink to /var/mail | 03:38 |
lucas_ai | How can I have execute permissions on my files in an NTFS drive? Can't I use it as my /home ? | 04:22 |
Gorian | do you guys prefer to run LTS or non-LTS for your servers/ | 06:01 |
hateball | Gorian: I only use LTS, but it is personal preference really. Depending if you *need* newer packages. | 06:17 |
Gorian | hmm.. okay | 06:22 |
=== _ruben_ is now known as _ruben | ||
hateball | Gorian: and depending on your scale of course | 06:27 |
hateball | upgrading every 6-9 months can be a headache | 06:27 |
Gorian | that's a good point | 06:27 |
=== tinwood_ is now known as tinwood | ||
maxagaz | Hi | 09:44 |
maxagaz | my user is in the group www-data, ownership of /var/www/html is www-data:www-data, why I don't have permission to execute "touch myfile.txt" in this directory ? | 09:45 |
sarnold | what are the permissions on /var/www/html? | 09:46 |
maxagaz | sorry, my bad, chmod g+w fixed it | 09:47 |
sarnold | :) | 09:48 |
sarnold | maxagaz: investigate the bsdgroups mount option; with that you can setgid on the directory, and all new files/directories in a setgid directory will get the group ownership set correctly | 09:50 |
=== caribou_ is now known as caribou | ||
=== gnuoy` is now known as gnuoy | ||
=== _degorenko|afk is now known as degorenko | ||
jamespage | ddellav, coreycb`: creating stable/newton branches in all git repos now | 13:45 |
coreycb` | jamespage, sounds good | 13:45 |
coreycb` | jamespage, I have a pull-uca-source script working. think I should push this to ubuntu-dev-tools? http://paste.ubuntu.com/23338714/ | 13:47 |
jamespage | coreycb`, I don't see why not | 13:50 |
coreycb` | jamespage, ok doing that now then | 13:51 |
=== coreycb` is now known as coreycb | ||
coreycb | jamespage, zul, ddellav: I pushed pull-uca-source to ubuntu-dev-tools: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/ubuntu-dev-tools/trunk/revision/1451 | 14:00 |
ddellav | coreycb nice | 14:00 |
zul | coreycb: sweet | 14:00 |
=== Ussat is now known as They-All-Suck-20 | ||
=== They-All-Suck-20 is now known as They-suck-2016 | ||
=== mfisch` is now known as mfisch | ||
=== mfisch is now known as Guest56218 | ||
=== They-suck-2016 is now known as VoteCthulu2016 | ||
=== baggar11_ is now known as baggar11 | ||
=== MrBIOS_ is now known as MrBIOS | ||
=== Guest56218 is now known as mfisch | ||
=== mfisch is now known as Guest8770 | ||
=== Guest8770 is now known as mfisch | ||
=== dames is now known as thedac | ||
powersj | rbasak: still around? | 16:31 |
rbasak | powersj: o/ | 16:34 |
powersj | rbasak: there are 4 heimdal bugs all reporting install failures because of version mismatches. | 16:34 |
powersj | thoughts on adding to backlog? | 16:34 |
rbasak | Are they using yakkety-proposed by any chance? | 16:35 |
powersj | all four have the tag "package-from-proposed" | 16:35 |
rbasak | Dupe of bug 1617963? | 16:35 |
ubottu | bug 1617963 in heimdal (Ubuntu) "package libasn1-8-heimdal:amd64 1.7~git20160703+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: package libasn1-8-heimdal:amd64 1.7~git20160703+dfsg-1 cannot be configured because libasn1-8-heimdal:i386 is at a different version (1.7~git20150920+dfsg-4ubuntu1)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1617963 | 16:35 |
rbasak | Looks like yakkety-proposed has not yet been cleared for SRUs. | 16:36 |
rbasak | So using yakkety-proposed is currently still wrong. | 16:36 |
rbasak | Though that's interesting, because I wonder if that's a problem for users? | 16:36 |
* rbasak asked in #ubuntu-devel | 16:37 | |
powersj | rbasak: looks like the version each is trying to install is in fact the one from proposed. | 16:39 |
zul | coreycb: ping | 17:00 |
jamespage | zul, coreycb: any reason why we can't make the pylxd integration tests run in autopkg test | 17:12 |
zul | jamespage: no | 17:13 |
zul | jamespage: ill open up a bug to remind me | 17:13 |
zul | jamespage: #1634207 | 17:14 |
=== degorenko is now known as degorenko|afk | ||
basilAB | Noticed 4.4.0-43 kernel has added in xenial-updates on 10-14-2016. But the same didn't get added in trusty-updates. Does anyone know whether it is expected? | 18:03 |
=== nodouble` is now known as nodoubleg | ||
RoyK | basilAB: new kernels are added to the repos, but not installed automatically. If you (really) need the new kernel with its new features (read the changelog), just apt-get install it | 18:46 |
RoyK | or apt install it, if you prefer the new method | 18:47 |
=== alexisb is now known as alexisb-afk | ||
basilAB | RoyK: I was looking at the trusty-updates repo and not seeing the 4.4.0-43. Still can see only 4.4.0-42. | 19:02 |
=== med_` is now known as medberry | ||
RoyK | basilAB: oh - I see - possibly some mirrors being out of sync | 19:03 |
basilAB | In xenial-updates, I can see the latest though. Yeah, may be a sync problem | 19:04 |
basilAB | I am running trusty lxd containers on top of Xenial with 4.4.0-43. To install new packages on trusty, some of dependencies are failing because of this. | 19:05 |
tarpman | doesn't look like a mirror sync issue - there's no 4.4.0-43 upload on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-xenial either | 19:09 |
=== alexisb-afk is now known as alexisb | ||
=== med_ is now known as Guest62846 | ||
dannf | smoser: you still the right person to poke about maas-images? Need a merge to fix arm64/yakkety - https://code.launchpad.net/~dannf/maas-images/xgene-uboot-compressed-images/+merge/308515 | 20:42 |
smoser | dannf, myself or ltrager | 20:46 |
smoser | i am ok with that change, i assume you've tested ? | 20:46 |
dannf | smoser: i've built trusty & yakkety images and verified that the image has the correct metadata in each case. i have not pointed a maas server at a custom stream w/ it (maas server w/ those systems is production) | 20:48 |
smoser | dannf, merged | 21:09 |
dannf | smoser: thx! | 21:10 |
drab_ | hi, anybody running 14.04 on a proliant DL585? | 22:20 |
drab_ | this box has s 4 ports nic loadind the e1000 module, but then only one port is recognized per adapter | 22:21 |
drab_ | 2xquad nics pci-e | 22:21 |
drab_ | the weird this is that ifconfig -a shows 8 eth | 22:21 |
drab_ | but then I get no link on any of them | 22:22 |
RoyK | drab_: never seen that - I've used ubuntu with quad e1000 cards, and it's worked well | 22:24 |
RoyK | drab_: does ethtool tell you anything about link status? | 22:25 |
drab_ | the weird thing is that in both cases it's the top port that works, the bottom 3 don't on either | 22:25 |
drab_ | checking that, was trying with mii-tool | 22:25 |
drab_ | RoyK: it gives the same exact info as the ones that work minus Link detect: no | 22:28 |
RoyK | switch config correct? | 22:28 |
drab_ | snd speed/duplex set to Unknown | 22:28 |
mybalzitch | drab_: tried bringing the interface up to see if that does anything? | 22:29 |
drab_ | yeah I even tested taking out the cable of the nic that works | 22:29 |
drab_ | and putting into the one that does't, no joy | 22:29 |
drab_ | so port/cable is not the issue | 22:29 |
RoyK | what happens if you do an ifconfig ethx up? | 22:29 |
drab_ | I need a /dighole alias I guess... | 22:31 |
=== yoink_ is now known as yoink | ||
drab_ | RoyK: it worked. I don't get it tho | 22:31 |
drab_ | why wouldnt' the light on the card come up? I don't think I've seen that before | 22:32 |
RoyK | drab_: pastebin /etc/network/interfaces, please | 22:32 |
drab_ | I get tyhat an interface may not come up if you don't configure it, but the link should still show I thought | 22:32 |
drab_ | even if the itnerface is unconfigured | 22:32 |
drab_ | RoyK: it only has the two interfaces that were working | 22:33 |
drab_ | I guess my problem is that I assume link light should have shown regardless | 22:33 |
RoyK | ok, add some more ;) | 22:33 |
RoyK | will you be trunking some of these? | 22:33 |
drab_ | nah, gonna run 8 VMs, each one gets one | 22:34 |
drab_ | well, 7 | 22:34 |
drab_ | one for the host | 22:34 |
RoyK | erm - why? wouldn't VLANs be easier? | 22:34 |
RoyK | just setup a trunk and VLANs and so on | 22:35 |
drab_ | RoyK: pardon my ignorance, why is it easier? | 22:36 |
RoyK | drab_: it's not necessarily easier, but it's far more flexible and will give you more bandwidth to the switch | 22:37 |
RoyK | drab_: and perhaps you learn a thing or two on the way ;) | 22:37 |
drab_ | I'm always up for learning, but I'd need at least a pointer, right now I' | 22:38 |
drab_ | m having issues to even see how that'd work | 22:38 |
RoyK | given your switch supports VLAN, that is... | 22:38 |
drab_ | sure, it does, it's hp 2626, I'm using vlans on another that's the same model | 22:39 |
drab_ | you'd trunk 8 ports and put them on their own vlan and then the VMs would get an ip on that trunked host interface? | 22:41 |
RoyK | I'd use 802.1Q between the host and the switch with as many ports as you might need and then allocate VLANs where needed - usually VMs can be on the same VLAN without issues unless there you need to isolate them due to security | 22:43 |
RoyK | if the uplink on the switch isn't 10G, or perhaps just a few gigs, it doesn't make sense to use too many links in the trunk | 22:44 |
RoyK | don't put VMs on separate VLANs unless they're on separate IP (v4 or v6, doesn't matter) networks | 22:45 |
=== tsimonq2 is now known as simon-says | ||
=== simon-says is now known as tsimonq2 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!