/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/10/17/#ubuntu-server.txt

skyis there a /var/mail directory in 16.04?03:30
JavezimHey All, anyone had issues with Samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu on Ubuntu Server 14.04.4 and being able to Read/Write Data from Windows Clients? ""An Unexpected Network Error has occurred""03:31
Javezimlog.smbd - http://paste.ubuntu.com/23336705/, log.<HOSTNAME> seeing a tonne of - http://paste.ubuntu.com/23336648/03:31
skyare /var/mail and /var/spool/mail somehow linked?03:36
skyi deleted a file in var/mail and the same file gets rmed from /var/spool/mail. but i cant tell that there is a symlink or anything03:37
skyoh, I fuound it03:38
skylooks like /var/spool/mail is a symlink to /var/mail03:38
lucas_aiHow can I have execute permissions on my files in an NTFS drive? Can't I use it as my /home ?04:22
Goriando you guys prefer to run LTS or non-LTS for your servers/06:01
hateballGorian: I only use LTS, but it is personal preference really. Depending if you *need* newer packages.06:17
Gorianhmm.. okay06:22
=== _ruben_ is now known as _ruben
hateballGorian: and depending on your scale of course06:27
hateballupgrading every 6-9 months can be a headache06:27
Gorianthat's a good point06:27
=== tinwood_ is now known as tinwood
maxagazHi09:44
maxagazmy user is in the group www-data, ownership of /var/www/html is www-data:www-data, why I don't have permission to execute "touch myfile.txt" in this directory ?09:45
sarnoldwhat are the permissions on /var/www/html?09:46
maxagazsorry, my bad, chmod g+w fixed it09:47
sarnold:)09:48
sarnoldmaxagaz: investigate the bsdgroups mount option; with that you can setgid on the directory, and all new files/directories in a setgid directory will get the group ownership set correctly09:50
=== caribou_ is now known as caribou
=== gnuoy` is now known as gnuoy
=== _degorenko|afk is now known as degorenko
jamespageddellav, coreycb`: creating stable/newton branches in all git repos now13:45
coreycb`jamespage, sounds good13:45
coreycb`jamespage, I have a pull-uca-source script working.  think I should push this to ubuntu-dev-tools?  http://paste.ubuntu.com/23338714/13:47
jamespagecoreycb`, I don't see why not13:50
coreycb`jamespage, ok doing that now then13:51
=== coreycb` is now known as coreycb
coreycbjamespage, zul, ddellav: I pushed pull-uca-source to ubuntu-dev-tools:  http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/ubuntu-dev-tools/trunk/revision/145114:00
ddellavcoreycb nice14:00
zulcoreycb: sweet14:00
=== Ussat is now known as They-All-Suck-20
=== They-All-Suck-20 is now known as They-suck-2016
=== mfisch` is now known as mfisch
=== mfisch is now known as Guest56218
=== They-suck-2016 is now known as VoteCthulu2016
=== baggar11_ is now known as baggar11
=== MrBIOS_ is now known as MrBIOS
=== Guest56218 is now known as mfisch
=== mfisch is now known as Guest8770
=== Guest8770 is now known as mfisch
=== dames is now known as thedac
powersjrbasak: still around?16:31
rbasakpowersj: o/16:34
powersjrbasak: there are 4 heimdal bugs all reporting install failures because of version mismatches.16:34
powersjthoughts on adding to backlog?16:34
rbasakAre they using yakkety-proposed by any chance?16:35
powersjall four have the tag "package-from-proposed"16:35
rbasakDupe of bug 1617963?16:35
ubottubug 1617963 in heimdal (Ubuntu) "package libasn1-8-heimdal:amd64 1.7~git20160703+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: package libasn1-8-heimdal:amd64 1.7~git20160703+dfsg-1 cannot be configured because libasn1-8-heimdal:i386 is at a different version (1.7~git20150920+dfsg-4ubuntu1)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/161796316:35
rbasakLooks like yakkety-proposed has not yet been cleared for SRUs.16:36
rbasakSo using yakkety-proposed is currently still wrong.16:36
rbasakThough that's interesting, because I wonder if that's a problem for users?16:36
* rbasak asked in #ubuntu-devel16:37
powersjrbasak: looks like the version each is trying to install is in fact the one from proposed.16:39
zulcoreycb: ping17:00
jamespagezul, coreycb: any reason why we can't make the pylxd integration tests run in autopkg test17:12
zuljamespage: no17:13
zuljamespage: ill open up a bug to remind me17:13
zuljamespage: #163420717:14
=== degorenko is now known as degorenko|afk
basilABNoticed 4.4.0-43 kernel has added in xenial-updates on 10-14-2016. But the same didn't get added in trusty-updates. Does anyone know whether it is expected?18:03
=== nodouble` is now known as nodoubleg
RoyKbasilAB: new kernels are added to the repos, but not installed automatically. If you (really) need the new kernel with its new features (read the changelog), just apt-get install it18:46
RoyKor apt install it, if you prefer the new method18:47
=== alexisb is now known as alexisb-afk
basilABRoyK: I was looking at the trusty-updates repo and not seeing the 4.4.0-43.  Still can see only 4.4.0-42.19:02
=== med_` is now known as medberry
RoyKbasilAB: oh - I see - possibly some mirrors being out of sync19:03
basilABIn xenial-updates, I can see the latest though. Yeah, may be a sync problem19:04
basilABI am running trusty lxd containers on top of Xenial with 4.4.0-43. To install new packages on trusty, some of dependencies are failing because of this.19:05
tarpmandoesn't look like a mirror sync issue - there's no 4.4.0-43 upload on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-xenial either19:09
=== alexisb-afk is now known as alexisb
=== med_ is now known as Guest62846
dannfsmoser: you still the right person to poke about maas-images? Need a merge to fix arm64/yakkety - https://code.launchpad.net/~dannf/maas-images/xgene-uboot-compressed-images/+merge/30851520:42
smoserdannf, myself or ltrager20:46
smoseri am ok with that change, i assume you've tested ?20:46
dannfsmoser: i've built trusty & yakkety images and verified that the image has the correct metadata in each case. i have not pointed a maas server at a custom stream w/ it (maas server w/ those systems is production)20:48
smoserdannf, merged21:09
dannfsmoser: thx!21:10
drab_hi, anybody running 14.04 on a proliant DL585?22:20
drab_this box has s 4 ports nic loadind the e1000 module, but then only one port is recognized per adapter22:21
drab_2xquad nics pci-e22:21
drab_the weird this is that ifconfig -a shows 8 eth22:21
drab_but then I get no link on any of them22:22
RoyKdrab_: never seen that - I've used ubuntu with quad e1000 cards, and it's worked well22:24
RoyKdrab_: does ethtool tell you anything about link status?22:25
drab_the weird thing is that in both cases it's the top port that works, the bottom 3 don't on either22:25
drab_checking that, was trying with mii-tool22:25
drab_RoyK: it gives the same exact info as the ones that work minus Link detect: no22:28
RoyKswitch config correct?22:28
drab_snd speed/duplex set to Unknown22:28
mybalzitchdrab_: tried bringing the interface up to see if that does anything?22:29
drab_yeah I even tested taking out the cable of the nic that works22:29
drab_and putting into the one that does't, no joy22:29
drab_so port/cable is not the issue22:29
RoyKwhat happens if you do an ifconfig ethx up?22:29
drab_I need a /dighole alias I guess...22:31
=== yoink_ is now known as yoink
drab_RoyK: it worked. I don't get it tho22:31
drab_why wouldnt' the light on the card come up? I don't think I've seen that before22:32
RoyKdrab_: pastebin /etc/network/interfaces, please22:32
drab_I get tyhat an interface may not come up if you don't configure it, but the link should still show I thought22:32
drab_even if the itnerface is unconfigured22:32
drab_RoyK: it only has the two interfaces that were working22:33
drab_I guess my problem is that I assume link light should have shown regardless22:33
RoyKok, add some more ;)22:33
RoyKwill you be trunking some of these?22:33
drab_nah, gonna run 8 VMs, each one gets one22:34
drab_well, 722:34
drab_one for the host22:34
RoyKerm - why? wouldn't VLANs be easier?22:34
RoyKjust setup a trunk and VLANs and so on22:35
drab_RoyK: pardon my ignorance, why is it easier?22:36
RoyKdrab_: it's not necessarily easier, but it's far more flexible and will give you more bandwidth to the switch22:37
RoyKdrab_: and perhaps you learn a thing or two on the way ;)22:37
drab_I'm always up for learning, but I'd need at least a pointer, right now I'22:38
drab_m having issues to even see how that'd work22:38
RoyKgiven your switch supports VLAN, that is...22:38
drab_sure, it does, it's hp 2626, I'm using vlans on another that's the same model22:39
drab_you'd trunk 8 ports and put them on their own vlan and then the VMs would get an ip on that trunked host interface?22:41
RoyKI'd use 802.1Q between the host and the switch with as many ports as you might need and then allocate VLANs where needed - usually VMs can be on the same VLAN without issues unless there you need to isolate them due to security22:43
RoyKif the uplink on the switch isn't 10G, or perhaps just a few gigs, it doesn't make sense to use too many links in  the trunk22:44
RoyKdon't put VMs on separate VLANs unless they're on separate IP (v4 or v6, doesn't matter) networks22:45
=== tsimonq2 is now known as simon-says
=== simon-says is now known as tsimonq2

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!