[00:01] <Javezim> Anyone having issues with Samba 4.3.11 not being able to read/write from Windows Machines. Getting "a network error occured"
[07:11] <farhad> can i use restore systems like backintime on vps?
[09:15] <farhad> is there any body use backintime or rsnapshot
[09:21] <cpaelzer> farhad: sorry only using duply (http://duply.net/wiki/index.php/Duply-documentation)
[09:26] <cpaelzer> rbasak: did you and nacc already complete the re-merge workflow?
[09:27] <rbasak> I'm not sure where the tooling is right now. Will need to check with nacc.
[09:27] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I'd have a case with dovecor to test it
[09:27] <cpaelzer> rbasak: ok
[09:27] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I'll just catch nacc around the IRC meeting then
[09:28] <rbasak> I'll guess that it probably works, but I would check with nacc :)
[09:28] <rbasak> Note that I@m out this afternoon.
[09:28] <cpaelzer> rbasak: enjoy it
[09:29] <rbasak> In fact from around 90 minutes from now.
[09:36] <cpaelzer> rbasak: ah before you leave - I was picking a few bugs from the server-next list and assigning them to me
[09:37] <cpaelzer> rbasak: if you have any known one which might need urgent love let me know - I tihnk I'll assign 1-2 more
[09:37] <cpaelzer> they always need some time to resolve with tests, package, discussion on repro and such anyway
[09:41] <rbasak> cpaelzer: I don't recall anything urgent - feel free to examine and choose as you think best.
[10:03] <lorenzo_> Someone has experience with kamailio sip server setup on ubuntu?
[11:08] <jamespage> ddellav, zul, coreycb: ok ocata/xenial branch builds are live - any failures are probably real now
[11:08] <jamespage> zesty - jobs created but zesty not open so ignore anything there atm
[11:40] <coreycb> jamespage, awesome thanks
[11:52] <fuzzywuzzy> Hi
[11:55] <fuzzywuzzy> I'm trying to redirect my apache2 from HTTP to HTTPS to serve only HTTPS.  I've added .htaccess and it works when I go direct to https version but not when I go to http.  I've also commented out #80 in ports.conf.  Any ideas?
[11:56] <fuzzywuzzy> Do I have to have a HTTP site running to do the redirect to https?
[11:57] <sarnold> something has to listen, accept, on port 80, and then hand back a 302 redirect to the URL that you want them to use, right?
[11:58] <sarnold> maybe that's apache, with mod_rewrite rules, maybe that's nginx configured to do rewrites .. it seems like a simple enough task I bet someone's written a tool that does -only- those 302 redirects...
[12:16] <farhad> can we use rsnapshot by command? o
[12:26] <fuzzywuzzy> sarnold, My friend who is a SEO expert said it should be listening on 80 but I just turned it up and now its all good.  Grasias
[12:27] <sarnold> fuzzywuzzy: listening on port 80 and issuing redirects is certainly kind for the people who wouldn't know to type https:// in their browser when trying to reach your site :)
[13:14] <joelio> farhad: sure can, rsnapshot {time period}.. ie rsnapshot hourly (or whatever)
[13:16] <farhad> joelio: i installed rsnapshot, but i cant use it. i cant understand document. forexample what should i command. rsnapshot what?
[13:18] <farhad> joelio: now, im working on backintime,it say me no error. but it doesnt work:       http://paste.ubuntu.com/23342988/
[13:18] <joelio> farhad: I'd read the documentation.. man rsnapshot
[13:19] <joelio> no idea what backintime is, I can guess but never used I'm afraid
[13:19] <joelio> rsnapshot will run via a cron, you speciffy the direcotries to backup and how to back them up in /etc/rsnapshot.conf (iirc)
[13:20] <joelio> the documentation is fairly comprehensive last time I used it (admittedly a few years back now)
[13:20] <farhad> it wrote about how config. how create bash file and other thing. but it doesnt say a bout how should backup or restore . atleast i cant find.
[13:20] <farhad> so i should just use cron. i cant use it via mannual command?
[13:21] <joelio> farhad: it uses a cron job that calls rsnapshot {monthly,weekly,daily,hourly}
[13:21] <joelio> read the docs :)
[13:21] <farhad> joelio: thanks alot for your feedback.
[13:22] <joelio> no worries
[13:23] <sarnold> part of what makes rsnapshot nice is that you can pickand choose the files to restore just by looking in the directories
[13:25] <joelio> yea, rsync and hardlinks make it pretty nifty.. it's basically what time machine uses I would imagine
[13:26] <sarnold> except time machine uses directory hardlinks (!) which breaks all kinds of tools
[13:26] <joelio> :/
[13:27] <farhad> i want a software that if i make mistake. i can go back. i search internet find snapper, backintime, timeshift, rsnapshot.
[13:27] <farhad> but i cant use none of them.
[13:27] <farhad> snapper has bug on my distro
[13:28] <Smurphy> farhad: That does not exist. Stupidity is not fixable ... Only experience can prevent fatal mistakes from happening.
[13:29] <joelio> farhad: a better way would be to use a development/test environment for the specific thing you're doing - that way you can snapshot a good known state and then rollback if it gets broken. You don't do that on your live system then, but a developemnt vm or something
[13:29] <farhad> forexample i write a bash and i make a mistake on this line forexample:  echo blablabla > file       instead of echo blablabla >> file
[13:30] <farhad> and all of the file damage.d and then i had to
[13:31] <farhad> and all of the file damaged . then i had to install all things again.
[13:31] <joelio> farhad: think before you press enter.. it's the only way
[13:31] <Smurphy> farhad: That's why you don't make mistakes. Problem here is that you are overwriting data in a file at the same starting address, hence not recoverable
[13:31] <farhad> isnt there any solution for these mistakes?
[13:32] <joelio> don't make them in the 1st place?
[13:32] <farhad> i know.
[13:32] <Smurphy> no. There is not. If you rm a file, then eventually you can use undelete. Overwriting an existing file at its same address, no.
[13:32] <Smurphy> farhad: What you could try is use a versioning filesystem. Dunno if btrfs is doing that yet.,
[13:32] <joelio> you could backup with rsnapshot of course
[13:33] <joelio> ZFS does snapshotting too, it works well fwiw :)
[13:33] <Smurphy> ZFS require 1GB of Ram per TB storage. What a waste.
[13:33] <sarnold> it does not
[13:33] <joelio> if you us l2arc, yea..
[13:33] <joelio> not otherwise
[13:33] <farhad> smurphy: btrfs great. i use snapper on btrfs. but now i should use ext4. and snapper doesnt work on it.
[13:33] <sarnold> that rule of thumb is mostly for de-dupe. do not use dedup.
[13:34] <Smurphy> sarnold: ok. Will eventually rechheck it once.
[13:34] <Smurphy> When I "redo" my NAS :D
[13:34] <Smurphy> which will not happen soon ...
[13:35] <Ussat> How is that a waste ?
[13:35] <joelio> got a lot of time for ZFS personally, it 'just works' imho
[13:36] <farhad> joelio: can i use mannually command to use rsnapshot. Iv seen, it just work by cron?
[13:37] <joelio> farhad: cron calls the command you run manaually, as I mentioned
[13:37] <joelio> you need to set your backup stores first of course
[13:58] <dreadkopp> hey guys. which cloudstorage provider can you guys suggest? must be 'fuse-able' rw, minimum 200MBit/s connection, minimum 1TB best unlimited
[14:03] <RoyK> dreadkopp: I use crowncloud for a few VMs
[14:05] <dreadkopp> RoyK: thanks. just checked crowncloud... however they only offer vServers (?) i am looking for a cloudstorage like Google drive / amazon s3 / whatsoever
[14:17] <joelio> dreadkopp: datacentred.co.uk - backblaze - google cloud - exoscale etc?
[14:22] <dannf> smoser: do you know when the next maas dailies will be produced? looks like 20161014 is most recent
[14:25] <dreadkopp> joelio: hmm.. backblaze says unlimited storage for 5$/m which sounds very nice. but is it mountable to a server somehow?
[14:27] <joelio> dreadkopp: yes, though not s3 afair
[14:27] <joelio> ymmv, if unsure maybe stick to know s3 ones
[14:27] <dreadkopp> joelio: thanks a lot. will start a trail and see what's possible ;) 5$ seems like a steal for unlimited data :)
[14:28] <joelio> there's no such thing as a free lunch etc.
[14:28] <joelio> choose 2 good/cheap/fast
[14:28] <joelio> etc etc :)
[14:29] <dreadkopp> joelio: fast is not needed. ~20 MB/s would be sufficient :) exoscale is a bit expensive. for that price i could just rent another pair of vservers :)
[14:32] <Chris_W> Hey Guys, I am trying to get an OpenStack setup up and running (trial/demo) running inside of VMware (if it makes a difference). When running openstack-install I choose Auto, and get to the screen where it looks for machines in MAAS. It just sits here and wont allow me to select Continue (it has detected 4 machines with power control).
[14:32] <Chris_W> Am I missing something here? As I have a green tick, and Continue is there, but its still waiting for sufficient resources in MAAS
[14:33] <smoser> dannf, i think dailies build ~ twice a week for stable releases. but i dont think they necessarily build at all unless there is a package change inside them.
[14:38] <dannf> smoser: *nod*
[14:38] <smoser> maas images build with cloud-images entirely now. no separate process.
[14:39] <dannf> ah, cool
[14:44] <zul> coreycb: any reason why we didnt get a mir for python-ldap3?
[14:45] <coreycb> zul, I don't think so, I think we were just really late in the cycle
[14:46] <zul> coreycb: ok #1634535
[14:47] <coreycb> zul, thanks, would be great to drop that patch
[15:03] <Chris_W> Can anyone advise of logs to check for this OpenStack install, I have been searching for any logs for the last hour and just no luck. I even added another machine to MAAS which instantly shows up in the Openstack install, but still sits there waiting for sufficent resources
[15:10] <nacc> cpaelzer: has the importer been run on dovecot since your versionw as uploaded?
[15:10] <nacc> cpaelzer: particularly in the y branch
[15:10] <cpaelzer> nacc: hi
[15:11] <cpaelzer> nacc: last importer run was my merge a few months ago
[15:12] <cpaelzer> nacc: and current yakkety (and soon testy) is still at the same level I merged back then
[15:13] <nacc> cpaelzer: excellent
[15:13] <nacc> cpaelzer: let me do some checks and then i'll get back to you
[15:14] <nacc> cpaelzer: do you have the MR handy?
[15:14] <cpaelzer> nacc: the old one?
[15:14] <cpaelzer> nacc: or the bug that now causes the need for a merge in zesty?
[15:14] <nacc> cpaelzer: the old one that was completed
[15:14] <cpaelzer> nacc: just a sec
[15:15]  * cpaelzer checking
[15:17] <cpaelzer> nacc: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+git/dovecot/+merge/298040
[15:33] <nacc> cpaelzer: thanks
[15:39] <nacc> cpaelzer: ah great, it's already tagged -- let me do a dry-run here to see if it 'just works' :)
[15:39] <cpaelzer> nacc: I'm following only 80%, but I totally trust you know what you do
[15:40] <cpaelzer> nacc: so you are currently trying to import the latest debian on top of our existing git right?
[15:40] <cpaelzer> nacc: so that from there the process is as-usual then
[15:40] <nacc> cpaelzer: right so let me see if i can draw a quick picture ;)
[15:41] <cpaelzer> nacc: eventually IIRc you want to write a doc anyway - it is just that I ran into a bug that needs that
[15:41] <cpaelzer> nacc: anyway - ping me once I can help or continue on it
[15:42] <nacc> cpaelzer: it's a good test :)
[15:43] <cpaelzer> nacc: that I thought
[15:43] <cpaelzer> nacc: and it is good to start with a package that has not multiple versions in debian and ubuntu since then :-)
[15:43] <cpaelzer> nacc: get the issues one by one :-P
[15:43] <nacc> cpaelzer: yeah :)
[15:50] <nacc> cpaelzer: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23344291/
[15:58] <cpaelzer> nacc: fine for now
[15:58] <nacc> cpaelzer: it seems to have worked (the importer), so i'm pushing the latest tree up now
[15:58] <cpaelzer> nacc: thanks
[15:58] <cpaelzer> nacc: I'll hopefully get to work on it tomorrow and let you know if I run into issues
[16:00] <Braven> I have a problem with dns and multihone linux server. One interface is dhcp (used for deployment) and one is static. The issue is that the static DNS record keep getting over written by dhcp IP
[16:02] <nacc> cpaelzer: alright, pushed!
[17:17] <zul> coreycb/jamespage/ddav: is there a reason why we are still carrying this patch? could we send it upstream? https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/cinder/tree/debian/patches/fix-long-casting.patch
[17:18] <coreycb> zul, seems like it could go upstream
[17:19] <zul> coreycb: looks like it was a python2.7 problem fixed already https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinder/+bug/1435242
[17:20] <zul> coreycb: im going to drop it and keep a eye on the daily ppa
[17:20] <coreycb> zul, cool sounds good
[19:29] <kegan_> hi, friends. I've forsaken windows as my environment after spending
[19:29] <kegan_> perhaps a week attempting to help a friend setup their MAMP stack
[19:30] <kegan_> might one of you suggest a good server stack for a standard 16.x installation?
[19:31] <kegan_> my MAMP worked fine, but I was so disgusted with the process I had to shower
[19:31] <kegan_> and it never worked in the end, anyway
[19:48] <kegan_> oh, look, a topic with precisely the answer to the question I asked
[19:48] <kegan_> sorry
[19:49] <kegan_> it was truncated, in my defense...
[19:49] <kegan_> and at a point which I might not immediately assume such, being unfamiliar with this client