| === dax is now known as thefam | ||
| === thefam is now known as famas | ||
| === famas is now known as dax | ||
| === G_ is now known as G | ||
| fnatter | hello ubuntu-motu! | 16:53 |
|---|---|---|
| fnatter | freeplane in Ubuntu 16.10 is broken due to a broken knopflerfish-osgi 5.2.0-1 | 16:54 |
| fnatter | update | 16:54 |
| fnatter | the fix is to sync knopflerfish-osgi 5.2.0-2 (as 5.2.0-1.1) to Ubuntu 16.10 | 16:54 |
| fnatter | rbasak told be to create a SRU for this | 16:54 |
| fnatter | I have read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 16:54 |
| fnatter | rbasak: could you help me create the request/report? | 16:54 |
| fnatter | (continuing our discussion for Wednesday) | 16:55 |
| fnatter | all: is rbasak even online? | 17:01 |
| rbasak | fnatter: it's my weekend! I suggest you ask your questions here, and somebody (maybe me) will be able to answer them directly. People don't usually volunteer to answer questions before they know what they are. | 17:57 |
| fnatter | hi rbasak, it's my weekend too ;-) | 18:18 |
| fnatter | Which bug shall I populate with my info (Impact / Test Case / Regression Potential, debdiff)? | 18:18 |
| fnatter | the SRU documentation (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates) assumes that I am a Ubuntu developer, but I am only Debian package maintainer | 18:18 |
| fnatter | there are two bugs / sub-bugs (tasks?) here: | 18:20 |
| fnatter | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeplane/+bug/1631361 | 18:20 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1631361 in knopflerfish-osgi (Ubuntu Yakkety) "fails to start in ubuntu 16.10 amd64." [Undecided,Confirmed] | 18:20 |
| rbasak | fnatter: populate the bug description. A bug has two tasks, but only one description, so you don't need to pick. | 18:35 |
| rbasak | (this bug, that is) | 18:35 |
| fnatter | ok, but are you sure to update LP:1631361, even if the problem must be fixed in knopflerfish-osgi? | 18:38 |
| rbasak | Yes. That's why we have multiple tasks in one bug. One root cause per bug, even if it affects multiple packages. | 18:41 |
| rbasak | And even if it needs different code changes in different packages, even though that's not the case here. | 18:42 |
| fnatter | and I shall write in prose about the plan for an SRU, along with Impact / Test Case / Regression Potential, debdiff (attached), proposed changelog entry? | 18:42 |
| rbasak | Yes please. Also this is a little complex, because the impact is to freeplane users but the fix is in knoplerfish-osgi. So do explain that. You'll need to talk about the regression potential for other users of both freeplane (presumably nil as it's completely broken) and knoplerfish-osgi (any direct users of that package, as well as reverse dependencies). | 18:44 |
| rbasak | The proposed changelog entry should be part of the debdiff. | 18:44 |
| fnatter | I create a debdiff between two _existing_ versions of knopflerfish-osgi in Debian. In that case I would have to manipulate the package which would be confusing. I will explain that in the bug, and include the changelog entry in the text. | 18:49 |
| fnatter | one more question: Is this proposed changelog entry ok? | 18:56 |
| fnatter | https://paste.debian.net/887503/ | 18:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!