[00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1]
[00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1]
[00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1]
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted onboard [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.0-1ubuntu1]
[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aces3 (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.0.8-5build2 => 3.0.8-5.1build1] (no packageset)
[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ampliconnoise (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.29-5build1 => 1.29-5build2] (no packageset)
[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adios (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.9.0-12 => 1.9.0-12build1] (no packageset)
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aster (yakkety-proposed/universe) [11.5.0+dfsg2-4build3 => 11.5.0+dfsg2-4build4] (no packageset)
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blacs-mpi (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.1-37ubuntu1 => 1.1-37ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[01:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: boost1.60 (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.60.0+dfsg-6 => 1.60.0+dfsg-6build1] (no packageset)
[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected aces3 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.0.8-5.1build1]
[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ampliconnoise [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.29-5build2]
[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected blacs-mpi [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1-37ubuntu3]
[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected adios [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.9.0-12build1]
[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected boost1.60 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.60.0+dfsg-6build1]
[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected aster [source] (yakkety-proposed) [11.5.0+dfsg2-4build4]
[02:33] <stgraber> slangasek, pitti: confirmed that we have zesty images on images.linuxcontainers.org. For all arches except s390x. s390x failed becaues of the broken LXC. I've released the SRU, upgraded that box and triggered a new build, so we'll have s390x too in a couple hours.
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: petsc [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.7.4+dfsg1-2build1] (no packageset)
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [3.7.4+dfsg1-2build1]
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: petsc [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.7.4+dfsg1-2build1] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: petsc [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.7.4+dfsg1-2build1] (no packageset)
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [3.7.4+dfsg1-2build1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [3.7.4+dfsg1-2build1]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbox [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbox [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbox [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbox [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbox [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbox [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openbox [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openbox [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [3.6.1-3]
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openbox [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [3.6.1-3]
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openbox [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [3.6.1-3]
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openbox [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [3.6.1-3]
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openbox [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [3.6.1-3]
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openbox [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [3.6.1-3]
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openbox [i386] (zesty-proposed) [3.6.1-3]
[09:20] <ginggs> morning! anyone around to do some removals for openmpi2 transition? aster, p4est and deal.ii have not been fixed in debian yet
[10:17] <LocutusOfBorg> or demote ^^
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, I invoke you :)
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> if we can have openmpi2 in release, I guess it can be time for perl or boost1.62 :)
[11:40] <LocutusOfBorg> parallel=4 on arm64 breaks some haskell stuff https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-src-exts/1.17.1-2/+build/11049737
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-trusty [amd64] (precise-proposed/main) [3.13.0-101.148~precise1] (kernel)
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-46.67~14.04.1] (kernel)
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-vivid [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.19.0-74.82~14.04.1] (kernel)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-trusty [amd64] (precise-proposed) [3.13.0-101.148~precise1]
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-46.67~14.04.1]
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-vivid [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.19.0-74.82~14.04.1]
[13:47] <clivejo> how do I upload a new package to the archive if I dont have it listed in my packageset?
[13:56] <clivejo> The package I want to upload is - https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/kirigami_1.1.0-1.html
[14:14] <clivejo> infinity: are you on the DMB?
[15:00] <apw> clivejo, you could also ask for sponsorship in the meantime
[15:00] <clivejo> apw: how can I do that?
[15:03] <apw> clivejo, if it is going to be sync from debian you can just use request-sync and it will do the required i think
[15:04] <clivejo> LP 1635842
[15:04] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1635842 in Ubuntu "Add kirigami to Kubuntu Packageset" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1635842
[15:05] <clivejo> how do I request a sync?
[15:09] <jbicha> clivejo: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/requestsync.1.html
[15:10] <clivejo> :/
[15:10] <clivejo> Im not MOTU, so how does that help me?
[15:10] <jbicha> you don't have to be MOTU, just run requestsync from the command line
[15:10] <clivejo> but how do I get it in the archive?
[15:11]  * clivejo is confused
[15:12] <jbicha> requestsync opens a bug and subscribes ubuntu-sponsors to it so that it shows up on http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ so that someone with upload rights can take a look at it
[15:14] <jbicha> but...if it's just a new package it will show up in Ubuntu automatically as long as we aren't in Debian Import Freeze https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianImportFreeze
[15:15] <clivejo> E: The source package 'kirigami' does not exist in the Debian primary archive in sid, sid-security, sid-updates or sid-proposed
[15:16] <jbicha> yes, I'd just wait until kirigami gets into Debian unstable and it should be automatically synced into Ubuntu without you having to do anything
[15:18] <clivejo> any idea how long that will be?
[15:21] <clivejo> can it not be added to the Kubuntu package list that I can upload it directly?
[15:23] <jbicha> new Ubuntu packages have to be manually approved and honestly it will be approved a lot faster if it's synced from Debian (so it's already been reviewed) than trying to upload to Ubuntu first
[15:24] <clivejo> we have a number of new packages this cycle, there must be an better way to do this!
[15:25] <jbicha> it's very early in the zesty release cycle; there's no need to panic yet :)
[15:26] <clivejo> LOL I seem to remember that being said about Yakkety, and lots of KDE software didnt make it in
[15:27] <jbicha> ok but the fastest way to get a new source package into Ubuntu is to upload it to Debian
[15:28] <clivejo> jbicha: its just frustrating working on packaging and not being able to get it into the archive
[15:29] <clivejo> jbicha: so where is it in Debian right now - https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/kirigami_1.1.0-1.html
[15:29] <clivejo> Maxy released it to UNSTABLE on the 3rd Oct
[15:30] <clivejo> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/kde-extras/kirigami.git/commit/?id=458cdc2aa29811dd2a3061bbd0f38efe3fd1540d
[15:31] <jbicha> all new source packages have to be reviewed first; kirigami is waiting for a member of the Debian ftpmaster team to review it
[15:31] <clivejo> do you know where I can see that?#
[15:31] <jbicha> maybe if you wait another week or two it will be fine
[15:33] <acheronuk> clivejo: listed under pending uploads here? https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org
[15:34] <clivejo> hummm if its anything like libdrumstick we will be waiting a LONG time
[15:37]  * clivejo wanders off to do OSM stuff
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: perl [s390x] (zesty-proposed/main) [5.24.1~rc3-3] (core)
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: perl [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/main) [5.24.1~rc3-3] (core)
[18:09] <ginggs> any archive admins around to do some removals to complete the openmpi2 transition please? aster, p4est and deal.ii are RC in Debian and have been removed from testing
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: perl [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [5.24.1~rc3-3] (core)
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: perl [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/main) [5.24.1~rc3-3] (core)
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [5.24.1~rc3-3] (core)
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: perl [armhf] (zesty-proposed/main) [5.24.1~rc3-3] (core)
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: perl [arm64] (zesty-proposed/main) [5.24.1~rc3-3] (core)
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fcitx (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:4.2.9.1-4 => 1:4.2.9.1-4ubuntu1.16.10.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:46] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: a couple packages FTBFS with the new openmpi (aster, p4est); do you have any ideas about these?
[21:48] <slangasek> and liggghts seems to have a legitimate autopkgtest failure on armhf
[21:48] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I wasdoing haskell rebuilds
[21:48] <LocutusOfBorg> I saw now you are handling them
[21:49] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, aster and p4est needs demotions, ginggs is aware of the issue, and according to him ^^ they are broken in debian too
[21:49] <slangasek> ok
[21:49] <LocutusOfBorg> [11:20:10] <ginggs> morning! anyone around to do some removals for openmpi2 transition? aster, p4est and deal.ii have not been fixed in debian yet
[21:50] <LocutusOfBorg> so, having the package migrate might be the best thing right now
[21:51] <LocutusOfBorg> agda on ppc64el has a strange failure " sbuild-build-depends-agda-dummy : Depends: dh-elpa but it is not going to be installed"
[21:51] <LocutusOfBorg> how can a package arch:all be uninstallable?
[21:51] <slangasek> because it depends on something which is /not/ arch all?
[21:52]  * LocutusOfBorg checks, but without a real arch... and no debhelper verbosity is not trivial
[21:53] <slangasek> Depends: perl, emacs24-nox | emacs24 (>= 24~) | emacs24-lucid (>= 24~)
[21:53] <LocutusOfBorg> emacs24
[21:53] <LocutusOfBorg> yes
[21:53] <LocutusOfBorg> indeed
[21:54] <LocutusOfBorg> "memory exausted"
[21:54] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh
[21:54] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe with parallel=2 it might work
[22:10] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg, ginggs: and gerris test results look a mess; I'm not sure what of these should be considered an openmpi bug vs. a bug in a revdep
[22:10] <slangasek> esys-particle and liggghts both have similar failures on armhf only (unexpected stderr output)
[22:14] <LocutusOfBorg> gerris is broken in debian, just the same way
[22:14] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure where is the fault
[22:22] <slangasek> haskell-attoparsec ftbfs on ppc64el, strange regression appears to be triggered solely by the rebuild
[22:26] <slangasek> there's Debian bug #814451 about openmpi and stderr
[22:26] <ubot5`> Debian bug 814451 in src:openmpi "openmpi 1.10 has stderr output by default, breaking autopkg tests" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/814451
[22:27] <slangasek> so our ARM vms have the appearance of infiniband support...?