* slangasek wonders why xcffib shows up as 'bad' on the ghc tracker instead of 'unknown' | 00:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-1build1] (no packageset) | 01:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hackage-security [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.2.2-1build1] | 01:27 | |
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
=== valorie is now known as valorie_ | ||
=== valorie_ is now known as valorie | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3] | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3] | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3] | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3] | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3] | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3] | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [i386] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3] | 07:39 | |
LocutusOfBorg | the perl fun will defer haskell a bit :) | 08:33 |
---|---|---|
=== icey is now known as icey-travel | ||
ginggs | slangasek: do we still need a separate fftw3-mpi since archive re-org? | 09:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset) | 13:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset) | 13:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset) | 13:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset) | 13:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset) | 13:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset) | 13:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset) | 13:21 | |
LocutusOfBorg | who is handling the perl transition? | 15:55 |
LocutusOfBorg | Depends: perl (>= 5.24.1~rc3-3), perlapi-5.24.1, libc6 (>= 2.4) | 15:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | is it possible to sync libsub-name-perl? this should make dh-haskell installable again | 15:58 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, it sounded like Laney was going to do it if noone else did | 16:17 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: haskell-pointed 5-1 build-depends haskell-kan-extensions (>= 5), which build-depends ghc (>= 8); looks like there's a reason these are in experimental | 16:45 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, yes, they were a mistake, but they shouldn't block the transition | 16:49 |
LocutusOfBorg | this is why I didn't ask to kick them out | 16:49 |
LocutusOfBorg | but if you have the possibility, please do :) | 16:49 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: haskell-pointed shows on the transition tracker as 'uninstallable'; how would it not block? | 16:49 |
slangasek | anyway, I've already reverted and uploaded a no-change rebuild of 4.2.0.2 | 16:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek thanks, I'm not sure, maybe just a leaf package? but yeah, you were right | 16:51 |
slangasek | right, so the leaf package would still have to be either removed or fixed | 16:51 |
slangasek | (and it wasn't a leaf, reverse-depends shows haskell-vector-instances, fyi) | 16:51 |
slangasek | anyway - sorted now | 16:51 |
LocutusOfBorg | I have done probably some mistake when I did dak rm on coccia | 16:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | BTW it would have been autosyncd anyway :) | 16:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, I think haskell-aeson-extra and haskell-dice were rebuilt too early... can I rebuild? | 16:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | nvm | 17:12 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: it would certainly not have autosynced from experimental | 17:13 |
slangasek | pandoc rebuild currently blocked by licensecheck being uninstallable | 17:17 |
slangasek | (perl transition related) | 17:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, such packages are in unstable | 17:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | uploaded by mistake | 17:17 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: oh, you're right, haskell-pointed is in unstable | 17:18 |
slangasek | the rest in still in experimental | 17:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | I only syncd from unstable | 17:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | so I syncd the mistake in ubuntu too :/ | 17:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | isn't pandoc blocked by emacs24 too? | 17:18 |
slangasek | :-) | 17:18 |
slangasek | not AFAICS | 17:19 |
slangasek | if it is, that'll be ppc64el-only | 17:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | sorry, you are right | 17:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | s/pandoc/agda | 17:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | sorry, but I'm trying to understand how to fix agda | 17:19 |
tsimonq2 | infinity, slangasek: 10:32:47 PM < pabs> where do I report bugs against the Ubuntu archive? (zesty should have Suite: devel instead of Suite: zesty) | 18:56 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: I'm not aware that we have a place to file such bugs, but IMHO we ought to. infinity ? | 19:24 |
infinity | Err, but that's not a bug. | 19:28 |
infinity | If it were a but, it would be a launchpad bug, though. | 19:28 |
infinity | s/but/bug/ | 19:28 |
infinity | slangasek: Unlike Debian's ftp.debian.org pseudopackage, we just file bugs where the code lies, and sub ubuntu-archive where appropriate (ie: bug on package and sub for a removal, bug on LP and sub for the archive being published wrong, etc) | 19:30 |
infinity | tsimonq2: ^ | 19:30 |
infinity | But, I'll reiterate, that's not a bug. :P | 19:30 |
tsimonq2 | infinity: Ok, could you please tell pabs? ;) | 19:31 |
slangasek | infinity: so for e.g. missing / inaccurate supported metadata, would you consider that LP? | 19:31 |
infinity | slangasek: Yeah. | 19:31 |
slangasek | ok | 19:31 |
infinity | slangasek: Well. That one's actually ubuntu-archive-publishing, which I don't know if we have a project for, but close enough. | 19:31 |
infinity | (And thanks for the not-so-subtle reminder) | 19:32 |
infinity | tsimonq2: I would if I knew where he asked. | 19:32 |
tsimonq2 | infinity: OFTC/#debian-ubuntu | 19:32 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: haskell-cryptonite/armhf looks to be holding up quite a lot (and revdeps will need to be rebuilt on armhf once fixed, I think) | 23:49 |
tsimonq2 | Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do we do a full sync from Debian on packages without an Ubuntu delta at the beginning of a new development cycle? | 23:53 |
tsimonq2 | There's a few outdated packages that still haven't synced to Ubuntu, and checking the regular queues doesn't show anything. | 23:53 |
tsimonq2 | I could go crazy with requestsync but I would rather not if there's going to be a mass sync. | 23:54 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: from the opening of the cycle to the DebianImportFreeze; though I'm not sure that autosyncing has been turned on yet for the cycle, it may have gotten starved out last week by a sprint | 23:54 |
slangasek | well, there's no reason /not/ to requestsync, if it's something you need | 23:54 |
tsimonq2 | Well if it's going to happen within the next week or two, there's no rush. | 23:55 |
tsimonq2 | So I don't see a point in filing a bug. | 23:55 |
tsimonq2 | If only I was a MOTU... ;) | 23:56 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Any chance that could be turned on? | 23:57 |
slangasek | yes, there is a chance | 23:57 |
tsimonq2 | :P | 23:57 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Let me rephrase that — do you have the ability to turn that on, and if that answer is yes, would you be able to? | 23:59 |
slangasek | looks like the job is enabled | 23:59 |
tsimonq2 | Oh cool. | 23:59 |
slangasek | either that or I'm reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess#Previous_release_plus_1_day wrong | 23:59 |
slangasek | so if you see anything /not/ syncing, let us know and we'll debug | 23:59 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Anything specific queue I should watch then? | 23:59 |
slangasek | they should go straight in | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!