/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/10/23/#ubuntu-release.txt

* slangasek wonders why xcffib shows up as 'bad' on the ghc tracker instead of 'unknown'00:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-1build1] (no packageset)01:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hackage-security [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.2.2-1build1]01:27
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
=== valorie is now known as valorie_
=== valorie_ is now known as valorie
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3]07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3]07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3]07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3]07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3]07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3]07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted perl [i386] (zesty-proposed) [5.24.1~rc3-3]07:39
LocutusOfBorgthe perl fun will defer haskell a bit :)08:33
=== icey is now known as icey-travel
ginggsslangasek: do we still need a separate fftw3-mpi since archive re-org?09:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset)13:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset)13:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset)13:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset)13:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset)13:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset)13:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: owfs [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1p4-1] (no packageset)13:21
LocutusOfBorgwho is handling the perl transition?15:55
LocutusOfBorgDepends: perl (>= 5.24.1~rc3-3), perlapi-5.24.1, libc6 (>= 2.4)15:57
LocutusOfBorgis it possible to sync libsub-name-perl? this should make dh-haskell installable again15:58
apwLocutusOfBorg, it sounded like Laney was going to do it if noone else did16:17
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: haskell-pointed 5-1 build-depends haskell-kan-extensions (>= 5), which build-depends ghc (>= 8); looks like there's a reason these are in experimental16:45
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, yes, they were a mistake, but they shouldn't block the transition16:49
LocutusOfBorgthis is why I didn't ask to kick them out16:49
LocutusOfBorgbut if you have the possibility, please do :)16:49
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: haskell-pointed shows on the transition tracker as 'uninstallable'; how would it not block?16:49
slangasekanyway, I've already reverted and uploaded a no-change rebuild of 4.2.0.216:50
LocutusOfBorgslangasek thanks, I'm not sure, maybe just a leaf package? but yeah, you were right16:51
slangasekright, so the leaf package would still have to be either removed or fixed16:51
slangasek(and it wasn't a leaf, reverse-depends shows haskell-vector-instances, fyi)16:51
slangasekanyway - sorted now16:51
LocutusOfBorgI have done probably some mistake when I did dak rm on coccia16:53
LocutusOfBorgBTW it would have been autosyncd anyway :)16:53
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, I think haskell-aeson-extra and haskell-dice were rebuilt too early... can I rebuild?16:58
LocutusOfBorgnvm17:12
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: it would certainly not have autosynced from experimental17:13
slangasekpandoc rebuild currently blocked by licensecheck being uninstallable17:17
slangasek(perl transition related)17:17
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, such packages are in unstable17:17
LocutusOfBorguploaded by mistake17:17
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: oh, you're right, haskell-pointed is in unstable17:18
slangasekthe rest in still in experimental17:18
LocutusOfBorgI only syncd from unstable17:18
LocutusOfBorgso I syncd the mistake in ubuntu too :/17:18
LocutusOfBorgisn't pandoc blocked by emacs24 too?17:18
slangasek:-)17:18
slangaseknot AFAICS17:19
slangasekif it is, that'll be ppc64el-only17:19
LocutusOfBorgsorry, you are right17:19
LocutusOfBorgs/pandoc/agda17:19
LocutusOfBorgsorry, but I'm trying to understand how to fix agda17:19
tsimonq2infinity, slangasek: 10:32:47 PM < pabs> where do I report bugs against the Ubuntu archive? (zesty should have Suite: devel instead of Suite: zesty)18:56
slangasektsimonq2: I'm not aware that we have a place to file such bugs, but IMHO we ought to. infinity ?19:24
infinityErr, but that's not a bug.19:28
infinityIf it were a but, it would be a launchpad bug, though.19:28
infinitys/but/bug/19:28
infinityslangasek: Unlike Debian's ftp.debian.org pseudopackage, we just file bugs where the code lies, and sub ubuntu-archive where appropriate (ie: bug on package and sub for a removal, bug on LP and sub for the archive being published wrong, etc)19:30
infinitytsimonq2: ^19:30
infinityBut, I'll reiterate, that's not a bug. :P19:30
tsimonq2infinity: Ok, could you please tell pabs? ;)19:31
slangasekinfinity: so for e.g. missing / inaccurate supported metadata, would you consider that LP?19:31
infinityslangasek: Yeah.19:31
slangasekok19:31
infinityslangasek: Well.  That one's actually ubuntu-archive-publishing, which I don't know if we have a project for, but close enough.19:31
infinity(And thanks for the not-so-subtle reminder)19:32
infinitytsimonq2: I would if I knew where he asked.19:32
tsimonq2infinity: OFTC/#debian-ubuntu19:32
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: haskell-cryptonite/armhf looks to be holding up quite a lot (and revdeps will need to be rebuilt on armhf once fixed, I think)23:49
tsimonq2Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do we do a full sync from Debian on packages without an Ubuntu delta at the beginning of a new development cycle?23:53
tsimonq2There's a few outdated packages that still haven't synced to Ubuntu, and checking the regular queues doesn't show anything.23:53
tsimonq2I could go crazy with requestsync but I would rather not if there's going to be a mass sync.23:54
slangasektsimonq2: from the opening of the cycle to the DebianImportFreeze; though I'm not sure that autosyncing has been turned on yet for the cycle, it may have gotten starved out last week by a sprint23:54
slangasekwell, there's no reason /not/ to requestsync, if it's something you need23:54
tsimonq2Well if it's going to happen within the next week or two, there's no rush.23:55
tsimonq2So I don't see a point in filing a bug.23:55
tsimonq2If only I was a MOTU... ;)23:56
tsimonq2slangasek: Any chance that could be turned on?23:57
slangasekyes, there is a chance23:57
tsimonq2:P23:57
tsimonq2slangasek: Let me rephrase that — do you have the ability to turn that on, and if that answer is yes, would you be able to?23:59
slangaseklooks like the job is enabled23:59
tsimonq2Oh cool.23:59
slangasekeither that or I'm reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess#Previous_release_plus_1_day wrong23:59
slangasekso if you see anything /not/ syncing, let us know and we'll debug23:59
tsimonq2slangasek: Anything specific queue I should watch then?23:59
slangasekthey should go straight in23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!