lfaraone | cyphermox: can you push the latest version of `initramfs-tools` to git.launchpad.net? last I see is 0.125ubuntu2; yakkety has 0.125ubuntu5 | 03:08 |
---|---|---|
=== hikiko|off is now known as hikiko | ||
cpaelzer | good morning | 05:47 |
pitti | Good morning | 06:09 |
ginggs | morning pitti: does openmpi need a hint to run autopkgtests with gerris 20131206+dfsg-11ubuntu1 ? | 07:15 |
pitti | ginggs: yes, presumably; I'll try the same for vtk6 | 07:18 |
pitti | half of the perl stuff will be the same I figure | 07:19 |
ginggs | pitti: thanks. do you know if there is anything different about the s390x environment for running autopkgtests? | 07:19 |
pitti | ginggs: i386/amd64/ppc64el are running in nova instances, i. e. QEMU; armhf runs in lxd containers, s390x runs in lxc containers | 07:20 |
pitti | there's some work to move s390x into scalingstack, i. e. to provide full VMs; but until that, we use some hand-crafted setup | 07:20 |
ginggs | hmm, because I still see an error on s390x, which looks like the error when trying to run mpi programs in a chroot | 07:22 |
pitti | ginggs: does it happen on armhf too? | 07:22 |
ginggs | no, only s390x | 07:23 |
pitti | lxc and lxd are not that much different wrt. isolation -- if anything, there should be *more* problems on lxd as it uses user containers which are a bit more "strange" | 07:23 |
ginggs | pitti: would you ignore the s390x result for now, or should I try to work around that? | 07:25 |
pitti | ginggs: for which package? (presumably I would ignore it, yes) | 07:25 |
ginggs | pitti: sorry, still on gerris | 07:25 |
pitti | ginggs: ah, yes; I'm currently doing a mass-retry against -proposed (for the perl transition and also your's) and once that settles I'll go through excuses.html and sort out the rest | 07:26 |
cpaelzer | doko: I'd work on merging latest dovecot in zesty if you are ok with that | 08:06 |
cpaelzer | IIRC last time we did that at the same time :-/, so double worth to ask this time | 08:06 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk | ||
LocutusOfBorg | hi juliank does python-apt needs some updates for zesty?http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python-apt/zesty/i386 | 08:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | and pitti fixed it ^^ | 08:41 |
LocutusOfBorg | so, underscore testsuite has to run against python-apt/proposed | 08:41 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: or rather, I'll let p-apt land, and retry the failures afterwards | 08:48 |
pitti | but the queue is hopelessly long right now (I didn't even submit the non-s390x retries for perl), so settling this will still take a while | 08:48 |
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
juliank | This whole copy-last-distribution-and-change-name thing is a bit annoying. | 08:50 |
cpaelzer | doko: almost forgot - please ignore my former question I was looking at X instead of Y changelog | 08:59 |
pitti | juliank: couldn't this be derived from distro-info-data somehow? | 09:15 |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, syncpackage distro-info-data? | 09:16 |
juliank | Well, it could be merged into that | 09:17 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: yep, indeed; doing | 09:17 |
juliank | python-apt also keeps around mirror lists, information about components | 09:17 |
juliank | And translate user-visible names for components and suites | 09:17 |
pitti | $ distro-info -f --devel | 09:18 |
pitti | Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" | 09:18 |
pitti | juliank: yeah, the "supported/unsupported/partner" bits are not there indeed | 09:18 |
juliank | Stuff like -proposed => Pre-released updates, -backports => Unsupported updates | 09:18 |
pitti | juliank: but given that the only kind of information I poured into the above upload was to s/16.10/17.04/, s/yakkety/zesty/ and s/Yakkety Yak/Zesty Zapus/, this is all in d-i-d | 09:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | ta! | 09:19 |
juliank | That's true. All the other fields are defined per distribution though, and then you have ParentSuite and stuff. It would require a lot of work to more generically describe this thing in some kind of "default" section | 09:20 |
stefanct | hm... is launchpad known to be broken atm? cannot submit a new bug for inkscape | 09:24 |
juliank | pff, it's broken half of the time I want to do stuff... | 09:27 |
stefanct | :) | 09:27 |
juliank | (gitlab is far worse) | 09:28 |
highvoltage | gitlab.com was upgrading this morning but has been working fine for me since the last hour or so | 09:31 |
pitti | juliank: right, some kind of "template" with macros for short/long name, version etc. | 09:36 |
juliank | Well. gitlab is so busy it tends to send out emails or git hooks 30 minutes after the event | 09:36 |
highvoltage | juliank: yikes | 09:39 |
Son_Goku | I've been okay on gitlab for the last hour or so | 09:52 |
Son_Goku | poking around with mir stuff | 09:53 |
pitti | xnox: your gerris retries should have used all-proposed=1.. | 09:54 |
pitti | xnox: see conversation with ginggs earlier here | 09:54 |
Son_Goku | juliank, if I attach my own runner to my project, all of my issues tend to go away | 09:56 |
xnox | pitti, ah, true! how do i do all-proposed=1 in the url construct? &all-proposed=1 | 10:03 |
* xnox did not know there is all-proposed. | 10:03 | |
xnox | pitti, what's up with s390x? it seems unusual that it has the highest queue length. | 10:03 |
pitti | xnox: I mass-retried perl with --all-proposed on it (but not the other arches yet as they still have too much to catch up with) | 10:04 |
xnox | ah, i see. | 10:04 |
xnox | fair enough. | 10:04 |
pitti | xnox: I'm using some big hammers to try and get on top of the haskell+perl transitions | 10:04 |
xnox | pitti, could you ingoretest openmpi to let it through. It's actually good, and is holding up starting boost transition. | 10:09 |
xnox | unless it's two sizes too big of a hammer | 10:10 |
pitti | xnox: ok; seems vtk6 is a victim of some mysql uninstallability | 10:10 |
pitti | but indeed at some point it's easier to fix the fallout after these huge chunks landed | 10:10 |
doko | cpaelzer: please go ahead, the package belongs to the server team | 10:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks pitti | 10:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | xnox, I did create a boost1.62 transition tracker, but I didn't fix it :/ | 10:14 |
xnox | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.62.html looks ok. | 10:14 |
pitti | xnox: openmpi hinted | 10:15 |
xnox | it's too early to upload boost-defaults pointing at 1.62, as I usually like to have the new boost migrated into the release pocket, to avoid huge build ups in -proposed. | 10:15 |
LocutusOfBorg | xnox, this because you fixed it :) http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/430 | 10:15 |
Laney | LocutusOfBorg: are you looking at mariadb ftbfs by any chance? | 10:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | Laney, I don't know how to fix it :/ | 10:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | but it is in the long todo | 10:18 |
pitti | xnox: hinted gerris/390x as well now, so hopefully openmpi should land in the next iteration | 10:48 |
xnox | well. are all of these http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/openmpi.html in zesty-proposed and not in release? i guess i should check if these need fixing first. | 10:49 |
xnox | looks like there are still 8 potentially outstanding packages which would still clog it up. | 10:49 |
pitti | xnox: ok, so s/land/not being blocked by tests/ :) | 10:50 |
xnox | or maybe the tracker is bad. i'm not sure why it's bad to depend on mpich12 | 10:51 |
pitti | xnox: indeed, e. g. bagel is missing its s390x build | 10:51 |
xnox | *** Error in `../TestSuite': malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x000002aa0fdda070 *** | 10:54 |
xnox | then it got stuck, then killed. | 10:54 |
=== alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g | ||
=== Guest95404 is now known as ahasenack | ||
=== ahasenack is now known as Guest59736 | ||
ginggs | xnox, pitti: tracker is bad, bagel builds with mpich not openmpi | 11:01 |
* xnox pushes tracker update. | 11:03 | |
xnox | well, we shall see what proposed-migration complains about now, if any. | 11:03 |
xnox | pitti, vtk6 should be hinted through, the only regression is known to pass with all-proposed. | 12:00 |
xnox | i would ask to hint boost1.60 over mongodb/armhf failure too. However, it does seem odd. | 12:01 |
xnox | ditto boost1.61 | 12:01 |
xnox | sigh | 12:01 |
xnox | these three seem to be the ones that "Depends: openmpi" and thus block openmpi migrating. | 12:02 |
xnox | oh mongo ftbfs | 12:03 |
pitti | xnox: hinted liggghts/armhf | 12:05 |
xnox | for mongo, i'm podering to sync the modern mongodb from experimental. | 12:06 |
xnox | because 2.6 is acient. | 12:06 |
xnox | even juju-mongodb moved to 3.2 | 12:06 |
xnox | 2.6 has FTBFS in debian too. | 12:07 |
xnox | https://tracker.debian.org/news/794834 looks sensible | 12:07 |
=== mhall119_ is now known as mhall119 | ||
=== timrc_ is now known as timrc | ||
jbicha | xnox: I think mongodb doesn't build on all the architectures these days but maybe that's ok? | 13:08 |
xnox | jbicha, it fails on armhf, and i think that's ok. | 13:11 |
jbicha | mongodb 2.6 is eol upstream this month: https://www.mongodb.com/support-policy | 13:13 |
=== ubuntu is now known as Guest74698 | ||
LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, lirc is fine in Debian | 13:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | totem works now, just sync from experimental when possible | 13:18 |
jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: thank you! | 13:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks to you, I plan to do a transition, it shoulnd't migrate without rebuilding reverse-dependencies | 13:18 |
* LocutusOfBorg sets a ben file | 13:19 | |
=== zumbi_ is now known as zumbi | ||
=== tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks | ||
=== herb_ is now known as herb | ||
caribou | doko: infinity: mdeslaur: we have a potential fix for LP: #1584485 (libnss-winbind / libpam-winbind static libraries). Anyone interested in reviewing the patch ? | 14:09 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1584485 in samba (Ubuntu Yakkety) "Upgrading samba to latest security fixes together with winbind in nsswitch.conf can harm entire OS" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1584485 | 14:09 |
mdeslaur | caribou: you should ask someone from the SRU team | 14:10 |
caribou | mdeslaur: well, yes, it will end-up on all releases so I guess that'd be better | 14:12 |
caribou | apw: bdmurray: pitti: slangasek: ^^ | 14:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | anybody wants to try the new sbuild? https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa/+sourcepub/7059276/+listing-archive-extra | 14:30 |
sil2100 | doko: hey, do you have some gnat related knowledge? I stumbled upon some issues with gnat when trying to run dbusada tests or even no-change rebuild dbusada on powerpc, ppc64el and s390x | 14:31 |
pitti | caribou: the patch itself is fairly straightforward (well, I'm completely unfamiliar with the build system, but it basically says "link this statically") | 14:31 |
pitti | caribou: which seems reasonable, as long as it doesn't make it unreasonably large | 14:31 |
sil2100 | doko: would you be able to help me out? To me it looks like this might be some toolchain issue, but I don't know ada at all | 14:31 |
=== pavlushka is now known as pavlushka_ | ||
caribou | pitti: thanks for checking. I'll check the difference in size before uploading | 14:32 |
=== pavlushka_ is now known as pavlushka | ||
caribou | pitti: I was wondering if this would require a Break/Replace on the previous version. Don't think so but just want to be sure | 14:33 |
pitti | caribou: no, I wouldn't know why | 14:33 |
caribou | didn't think so either, thanks | 14:33 |
infinity | caribou: A breaks/replaces against what? :P | 14:50 |
infinity | caribou: $package implicitly breaks/replaces/conflicts $package, cause, well, it's the same package. | 14:51 |
doko | sil2100: no, you didn't tell about the issue you have :-/ | 14:51 |
caribou | infinity: B/R are still kind of nebulous to me so I'm always a bit worried to miss them | 14:51 |
caribou | infinity: still needs to do the readings you suggested | 14:51 |
doko | is there a replacement for iptraf? | 14:51 |
infinity | caribou: So, the thing I'd like to see (once this is tested to DTRT, etc) is something upstreamable and upstreamed, so we don't have to carry a hideous patch forever. | 14:53 |
infinity | caribou: Given the intense upgrade pain, I'm firmly of the belief here that if the rest of samba is linked dynamically (which is a reasonable option), those two bits should still always be static. | 14:54 |
caribou | infinity: understood, I've already asked for the WAF customization to be upstreamed | 14:54 |
infinity | caribou: So, the option should be there upstream to do it at the flick of a switch, and said switch should be proposed as the default (though if we have to differ with a --configure-option, so be it) | 14:54 |
caribou | infinity: for the rest, they already stated that those should be packaged with samba-libs | 14:55 |
caribou | infinity: here is the ML thread : https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2016-October/116619.html | 14:56 |
infinity | caribou: Hrm. Indeed, shipping them in samba-libs with the libnss/libpam packages only providing the config glue would work too. | 15:00 |
infinity | caribou: That could be the path of least pain if upstream isn't keen on the static approach. | 15:01 |
caribou | infinity: I still keep this in my LoS anyway | 15:02 |
infinity | caribou: The pam and nss modules are tiny, so that approach wouldn't bug me too much. | 15:02 |
caribou | k | 15:02 |
infinity | And they'd be inert by default if we keep the configuration bits in the libpam-foo/libnss-foo packages. | 15:03 |
caribou | infinity: there is a debian bug opened for that too, I'll bring it up there | 15:03 |
infinity | That seems to me a reasonable solution. Wish I'd thought of it before I sent you down the static rabbit hole. :P | 15:03 |
caribou | infinity: I learned a lot during the fall :) | 15:03 |
infinity | Well, not a total loss then. ;) | 15:04 |
infinity | THis would effectively just be a 4-line patch to the current packaging. | 15:04 |
infinity | ie: remove the modules from the module packages, install them in the libs package, done. | 15:05 |
infinity | caribou: Of course, it gets a bit more complex, because both also depend on libwbclient0, which should probably just move to samba-libs. | 15:08 |
sil2100 | doko: yeah, sorry, got preempted by a meetings - the issues I see are that when gnatbind-6 runs, it gets a lot of errors like: '"somethingsomething.adb" must be recompiled ("system.ads" has been modified)' | 15:29 |
doko | sil2100: get things resolved when packages are rebuilt? | 15:39 |
sil2100 | doko: I saw that system.ads is part of gnat-6, not sure what they mean - since all those 'somethingsomething.ads' files seem to get built on during package build | 15:39 |
sil2100 | No, a no-change rebuild of dbusada ends up with such a failure on the 3 arches, example log: | 15:40 |
sil2100 | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/290714344/buildlog_ubuntu-zesty-s390x.dbusada_0.3.3-1build1~test1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 15:40 |
sil2100 | There are also some 'obsolete' errors there for dependent libraries I guess, but the system.ads ones worry me the most | 15:40 |
sil2100 | Similar issues when running dbusada autopkgtests | 15:41 |
doko | sil2100: looks like you need to rebuild dbusads's deps. you may want to ask the debian-ada team about it. I would have to do the same here | 15:42 |
sil2100 | doko: ACK | 15:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, do you know why the new sbuild picks up dose and fails? | 15:51 |
LocutusOfBorg | it is here btw https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa | 15:54 |
slangasek | infinity, kees, mdeslaur, stgraber: TB meeting in 3? | 15:57 |
infinity | slangasek, stgraber, ... WHAT HE SAID. | 15:57 |
mdeslaur | slangasek: ack | 15:57 |
slangasek | :) | 15:57 |
slangasek | I notice the agenda wasn't updated | 15:57 |
slangasek | our next meeting is probably not Oct 11, 2016 | 15:58 |
infinity | Potentially not. | 15:58 |
infinity | But I'm likely the chair, since I wasn't there on the 11th. | 15:59 |
infinity | So, meh. | 15:59 |
rbasak | Is anyone SRUing debootstrap to yakkety? | 16:17 |
rbasak | I hear that powersj has volunteered if not. | 16:18 |
rbasak | Does this need an SRU bug? | 16:18 |
rbasak | Looks like there have been SRU bugs in teh past. | 16:19 |
rbasak | arges, apw: ^? | 16:19 |
apw | rbasak, it would probabally want an SRU bug ... for tracking i'd say | 16:20 |
apw | i am not myself sru'ing it | 16:21 |
rbasak | powersj: ^ all yours. | 16:26 |
powersj | ok | 16:27 |
powersj | thx! | 16:27 |
rbasak | powersj: if you create the debootstrap and assign yourself, hopefully that'll flag a lock to others. | 16:27 |
rbasak | the debootstrap bug | 16:27 |
powersj | ok | 16:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, pretty please, upload this lirc https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/debhelper | 16:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | there is a typo that prevents smooth upgrades from debian | 16:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | from xenial/yakkety I mean | 16:57 |
jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: why don't you upload that to experimental and we can sync from there? | 17:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, because the current one is broken | 17:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | I want to fix it and in the meanwhile I already asked the maintainer to fix it | 17:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | sorry, but it landed on -release, so I broke upgrade path | 17:02 |
* LocutusOfBorg is doing rebuilds of reverse dependencies right now | 17:02 | |
jbicha | those running zesty already should expect some breakage | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, I prefer not from me :) | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | but as you wish | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | I might upload it tonight in debian, so expect a sync request tomorrow | 17:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | that version fixes totem and upgrade path, this is why I prefer to see it uploaded right now, but one day might not make much difference | 17:03 |
jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: ok I uploaded it for you :) | 17:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks, in the meanwhile I'm doing test rebuilds, and in case I'll upload a -3 in Debian with some build-fixes if there are some | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | I don't have hurry now :) | 17:09 |
jbicha | too bad we didn't see that an hour or two ago before it migrated to -release | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | yep indeed | 17:12 |
LocutusOfBorg | stupid typo | 17:12 |
LocutusOfBorg | and people are running upgrades from sid to experimental, not sure why they didn't open a bug | 17:12 |
LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, debian is not broken, because by chance, the library wasn't in multiarch location before, so the clash has been funnily avoided | 17:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | loool | 17:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | ubuntu had a multiarch location, so the path didn't change | 17:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | :) | 17:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | I see ~5 reverse-dependencies failing to rebuild, will look at them | 17:19 |
jbicha | it looks like you don't have -proposed enabled for that ppa | 17:21 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: fyi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1580463/comments/29 | 19:44 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1580463 in im-config (Ubuntu Xenial) "Snap blocks access to system input methods (ibus, fcitx, ...)" [Medium,Fix committed] | 19:44 |
tyhicks | jdstrand: thanks! I'm hoping to do the apparmor testing by EOD | 19:45 |
jdstrand | good timing then :) | 19:46 |
jbicha | bdmurray: so webkit2gtk/yakkety is being blocked because of phased updates | 20:11 |
jbicha | https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/31f280fa5539449d440e411a60b92bb28e48e41b has the same title at least as | 20:12 |
jbicha | https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/53de313c8e0c7a05c093808248f8ce1ab17a1f21 (except the first is i386 and the second is amd64) | 20:12 |
jbicha | but the amd64 bug was found in the older webkit2gtk | 20:13 |
bdmurray | jbicha: Okay, I'll get that error taken care of, what about https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/18b5e69225bd63387d958707585693d52919b7c4? Its curious there aren't any crashes with 2.14.0-1. | 20:16 |
jbicha | bdmurray: I don't know; I do know that the update fixes some crash bugs and I'm hoping it fixes more crashes than it creates :| | 20:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!