[05:01] <hikiko> hello !
[07:07] <Sweet5hark> moin
[07:28] <pitti> Good morning
[07:29] <didrocks> hey hey pitti, Sweet5hark
[07:29] <pitti> bonjour didrocks !
[07:35] <seb128> hey didrocks pitti Sweet5hark
[07:35] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[07:36] <didrocks> re seb128
[08:01] <flexiondotorg> Morning desktopers
[08:02] <Laney> ahoy
[08:03] <seb128> good morning u.k
[08:03] <seb128> how are things on the island?
[08:06] <flexiondotorg> This morning it is mostly full of fog.
[08:07] <didrocks> morning flexiondotorg, Laney
[08:07] <flexiondotorg> didrocks, seb128 Laney Morning.
[08:07] <flexiondotorg> Still very much suffering with Ubuflu :-(
[08:09] <pitti> hey Laney and flexiondotorg!
[08:09] <Laney> hi didrocks flexiondotorg seb128
[08:10] <Laney> and pitti!
[08:10] <flexiondotorg> pitti, o/
[08:10] <Laney> how's it going?
[08:10] <Laney> looking nice and autumnal here
[08:12] <pitti> actually, first day of sun again after a week of gray \o/
[08:16] <TheMuso> Hey folks.
[08:16] <TheMuso> Hope everybody had safe and uneventful travels.
[08:18] <seb128> hey TheMuso, how as your trip back?
[08:26] <TheMuso> seb128: Uneventful, thanks.
[08:26] <seb128> that's the best kind :-)
[08:38] <TheMuso> Indeed.
[08:58] <duflu> TheMuso: I don't recall ever asking... what do you play? (as a muso)
[08:59] <duflu> (I play the stereo)
[09:19] <xsdfdfsa> what's amaterasu
[09:19] <xsdfdfsa> watching over
[09:20] <xsdfdfsa> hi I'm getting the unity to change a few annoying things for the first time I really like the unity plugin, but why is it using the bazaar
[09:20] <pitti> Trevinho: I tested https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2101 and unity, compiz, and i-printers work fine; just for formality, are you okay with https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/unity/gdk-api/+merge/309404 ? (what we discussed last night)
[09:21] <xsdfdfsa> is there a way to contribute to unity
[09:38] <Trevinho> xsdfdfsa: well, bazaar is there for some time, and it's not bad as you might think 😃
[09:39] <Trevinho> xsdfdfsa: however, if you need some hint in how develop it or how to fix things you want, just ask
[09:39] <Trevinho> pitti: thanks...
[09:47] <pitti> Trevinho: can you please top-approve https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/compiz/standards-version/+merge/309365 ? publishing errors on this
[09:48] <pitti> Trevinho: oh, and I need this rubber-stamped in triplicate, with one copy each sent to Jane, Obama, and Putin for sign-off ☺
[09:49] <xsdfdfsa> well whats the current focus on anyway, anything they need a hand with ? :D next distro has a startup helper like bonzibuddy ???
[09:51] <pitti> Trevinho: grazie!
[09:52] <Trevinho> prego ;-)
[12:45] <jbicha> pitti: could you look into hinting gtk+3.0 in, like you did for pango1.0?
[12:55] <pitti> jbicha: not quite the same way -- pango1.0 didn't break gtkada, but it seems gtk+3.0 actually did
[12:56] <pitti> jbicha: or maybe gtkada needs to be rebuilt against new gtk or so?
[12:56] <pitti> a bit odd that it only hits two arches, but http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libg/libgtkada/zesty/ppc64el is pretty obviously a regression
[12:58] <jbicha> I assumed it was ada that was broken and not related to gtk 3.0 at all but I hardly know anything about ada…
[13:01] <sil2100> Ada sucks
[13:01] <pitti> could be, I haven't investigated yt
[13:01] <jbicha> looking at https://ci.debian.net/packages/libg/libgtkada/unstable/amd64/ the test passed with gtk 3.21.6-1 on September 15 and then started failing but gtk was still at 3.21.6-1
[13:01] <sil2100> Apologies for that, I just had some issues with dbusada
[13:02] <sil2100> I slowly start unwinding the issues, pushing some required no-change rebuilds to get that one unblocked
[13:02] <sil2100> You might also need some no change rebuilds for the package dependencies
[13:03] <sil2100> For dbusada I had to do a rebuild of ahven to get it building again (still not migrated from -proposed though)
[13:04] <jbicha> oh yeah, Debian's dbusada started failing its autopkgtests on Sep 16 also and it doesn't depend on gtk
[13:06] <sil2100> Yeah, many ada projects need to be no-change rebuilt, seems like a change in the toolchain (in gnat-6)
[13:06] <sil2100> For powerpc, ppc64el and s390x
[13:08] <pitti> jbicha: ah good, then I'll override it; thanks
[13:17] <Sweet5hark> yeha, libreoffice snap suceeeded to build on armhf, i386 and amd64.
[13:17] <Sweet5hark> no promise that it'll run on armhf of course. also ppc64el failed.
[13:18] <Sweet5hark> ... because cppunit configure says it cant guess the system type.
[13:20] <Sweet5hark> (with a 7 year old config.guess)
[15:32] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, hey
[15:44] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, any reason why you didn't cherry-pick the pdf-export patch as I asked?
[15:55] <Sweet5hark> ricotz: as discussed yesterday: will be in 5.2.4, doesnt seem more urgent than that (or its there a lp issue piling up "affects me"s)?
[16:03] <ricotz> Sweet5hark, there was no saying from that you won't pick it up, I explicitly asked you for it -- there is no report afaik -- keep doing your thing -- thanks for the tarballs!
[16:06] <Sweet5hark> ricotz: thanks for the hint, I just felt safer having it in 5.2.4 upstream, which sees some more testing than a (backported) vendor patch.
[16:59] <Laney> weeeeeeeeeeeellllllllll
[16:59] <Laney> quiet day today!
[17:01]  * Laney is off tomorrow, so see you monday
[17:01] <Laney> perl will have fixed itself by then
[17:01]  * Laney coughs
[17:11] <seb128> Laney, indeed, have a nice long w.e!
[17:21] <seb128> Laney, oh, and well done fixing that nautilus issue ;-)
[17:23] <seb128> andyrock, ^ just in case you didn't notice that he fixed it (so you don't dup work if you were looking at it)
[18:49] <seb128> have a good evening desktopers