[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-twitch [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-2]
[00:14] <slangasek> pitti: nplan SRU still verification-needed?
[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: subiquity (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.0.22~16.04.1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: procps (xenial-proposed/main) [2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2 => 2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2.1] (core)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: budgie-desktop-environment (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.5.0]
[02:36] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: hmm, so why did you sync slepc before the openmpi transition was done, anyway?
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-hlandau-buildinfo [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20160722.0.b25d4b0-1] (no packageset)
[02:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-secret-sharing [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[02:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-secret-sharing [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-secret-sharing [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-secret-sharing [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-secret-sharing [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[02:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-secret-sharing [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[02:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-secret-sharing [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[03:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozc [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [2.18.2595.102+dfsg-1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[03:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozc [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [2.18.2595.102+dfsg-1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[03:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozc [armhf] (zesty-proposed/main) [2.18.2595.102+dfsg-1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop)
[03:46] <jbicha> hi, could uim-mozc be accepted into universe? (the rest of mozc is in main)
[03:46] <jbicha> this was discussed a bit at bug 1624369
[03:46] <ubot5`> bug 1624369 in mozc (Ubuntu) "Please sync mozc 2.18.2595.102+dfsg-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624369
[05:36] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, there is a binNMU request against slepc, so the britney output told me that it might be needed in Ubuntu too
[05:36] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't really understand their packages https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842135
[05:36] <ubot5`> Debian bug 842135 in release.debian.org "nmu: slepc4py_3.7.0-2+b3" [Normal,Open]
[05:37] <LocutusOfBorg> and since openmpi didn't migrate, the output was mentioning slepc and dolfin... I syncd it
[05:38] <LocutusOfBorg> why is still not syncd?
[05:38] <LocutusOfBorg> s/syncd/migrated
[06:00] <slangasek> ... it's not migrated because the slepc sync triggered a new transition... :)
[06:03] <slangasek> pitti: "A server error occurred. Please contact the administrator." http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/sumo/zesty/armhf
[07:09] <ginggs> openmpi \o/
[07:25] <pitti> slangasek: I'll verify bug 1635256 today, but I'd like the console-conf guys decide whether bug 1626617 is fixed now
[07:25] <ubot5`> bug 1635256 in systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) "[xenial] search domains in networkd do not get propagated to resolvconf" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1635256
[07:25] <ubot5`> bug 1626617 in subiquity (Ubuntu Xenial) "console-conf does not allow to set up dns for static ip" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1626617
[07:26] <pitti> slangasek: zumo server error> "sqlite3.OperationalError: database is locked"
[07:27] <pitti> slangasek: oops -- I guess that's during the minute or two when reads the Packages.gz and pokes that into the DB -- that runs at 06:02 every day, i. e. exactly at that time
[07:28] <pitti> slangasek: I'll check if sqlite can handle this better
[08:00] <LocutusOfBorg> lovely migration
[08:02] <pitti> Oh, openmpi is landing, nice!
[08:02] <LocutusOfBorg> one hour ago :)
[08:02] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, I'm going to have a look at perl now, do you have a list of things to fix?
[08:03] <LocutusOfBorg> oh well, accepting stuff in new will make also haskell migrate and also acmetool
[08:03] <pitti> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/perl5.24.html
[08:03] <pitti> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#perl
[08:03] <LocutusOfBorg> you syncd acmetool without syncing the golang dependencies :)
[08:03] <LocutusOfBorg> yep pitti I plan to look at that page once openmpi disappears from it
[08:03] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[08:03] <pitti> the latter is still a sea of red, but I suppose with the recent rebuilds we should do a mass-retry of that
[08:04] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: oh, meh -- these are such a mess :(
[08:04] <LocutusOfBorg> just accepting it from new queue should make everything go
[08:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I also sponsored them to jessie backports a few minutes ago :)
[08:05] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: ah, I remember why -- some golang libs got renamed, and Debian removed the old names
[08:05] <pitti> and we want to follow suit of course
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-hlandau-buildinfo [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0~git20160722.0.b25d4b0-1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-secret-sharing [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0.3-1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-secret-sharing [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0.3-1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-secret-sharing [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0.3-1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-secret-sharing [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0.3-1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-secret-sharing [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0.3-1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-secret-sharing [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0.3-1]
[08:07] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, you probably need a bigger hammer for perl
[08:07] <LocutusOfBorg> kvirc -> Demoted to zesty-proposed for perl 5.24 transition (LP: #1636804)
[08:07] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1636804 in uwsgi (Ubuntu) "perl 5.24 demotions" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1636804
[08:07] <LocutusOfBorg> and it landed
[08:07] <apw> say what ...
[08:08] <pitti> apw: meh, the linux tests still seem to loop :( mind if I zap them from the queue for now?
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> the demotions landed on updates, so perl is again stuck
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> why did the block fail?
[08:08] <pitti> apw: we seem to have fixed the first two or three issues, but there's another one; I just have some high-urgency stuff to do today, I'm afraid
[08:09] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: please coordinate with Laney on perl (he just said good morning
[08:09] <Laney> hi
[08:09] <Laney> What?
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> hi Laney good morning!
[08:09] <Laney> What does "the demotions landed on updates" mean?
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean bug 1636804
[08:09] <ubot5`> bug 1636804 in uwsgi (Ubuntu) "perl 5.24 demotions" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1636804
[08:09] <apw> pitti, pleas zap anything you are worried about linux side ... please
[08:10] <pitti> e. g. kvirc is still in -proposed
[08:10] <LocutusOfBorg> shouldn't them stay in proposed until perl goes in?
[08:10] <Laney> They are in proposed
[08:10] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm bad cache
[08:10] <pitti> apw: curiously amd64 now works (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/linux/zesty/amd64), but i386 still loops
[08:10] <pitti> apw: so at least 50% better now :)
[08:10] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry nvm
[08:10] <apw> pitti, bugger :)
[08:11] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, they look to be in the right place to me ?
[08:11] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: Only hard stuff left, but you are welcome to try
[08:11] <Laney> pdl/armhf and the two that are red on s390x only
[08:12] <pitti> Laney: so I suppose a lot of the red on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#perl was due to second-level uninstallability, and the intermediate ones got rebuilt now; I. e. time for a mass-retry?
[08:13] <Laney> pitti: I clicked on about 10 reds and they were all due to uninstallability
[08:13] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, libterm-readline-gnu-perl should be removed on s390x, already removed in debian
[08:13] <LocutusOfBorg> oh not removed, but the same failure
[08:14] <pitti> Laney: right, me too -- but that doesn't really agree with the transition tracker any more, hence my hope that retries should work; I'll try one or two for now, and if that works better, retry the whole lot to see where we stand?
[08:17] <Laney> pitti: Sure
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-hcwiid (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.0.5-4]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-persistable-record (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.4.0.3-1]
[08:25]  * pitti kills the 20 gazillion content-hub test requests from silo 1994.1 -- WTF?
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted procps [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2.1]
[08:35] <LocutusOfBorg> do you foresee issues with a xapian transition?
[08:39] <LocutusOfBorg> I see them: cyrus-imapd libsearch-xapian-perl needs to land
[08:40] <pitti> Laney: looks  hopeful, doing mass-retry
[08:42] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh I forgot to sync some haskell new libraries
[08:46] <oSoMoN> pitti, the SRU for webbrowser-app that’s sitting in the unapproved queue should now be ready to be reviewed, as the corresponding fixes landed in zesty yesterday
[08:50] <pitti> Laney: ok, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running is now another mouthful :)
[08:54] <Laney> pitti: eek!
[08:54] <pitti> and someone said perls are rare
[08:54] <LocutusOfBorg> lol
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> btw just to add some fun today: ghc 8 is expected to land in Stretch, so it will start to transition probably in a week or two
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> and openssl 1.1 bugs are now RC
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> so.... zesty migth have it? :)
[09:33] <xnox> Laney, are we going to have perl5 -> perl6 transition?
[09:35] <Laney> xnox: Don't ask me questions about perl. :P
[09:35] <Laney> But I seriously doubt it, since they are basically separate languages
[09:35] <xnox> Laney, are you still planning the perl5 -> haskell transition? =)))))) rewrite everything =)
[09:35] <Laney> Now you're talking
[09:39] <LocutusOfBorg> that would be funny
[09:40] <LocutusOfBorg> haskell works, zero bugs, easy transitions
[09:40] <LocutusOfBorg> nobody can understand the code and complain
[09:40] <xnox> https://xkcd.com/1312/
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> https://xkcd.com/353/
[09:41] <pitti> I like the popup
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, the funniest part is that
[09:42] <LocutusOfBorg> and I never found a way to see it on smartphone
[09:42] <Laney> m.xkcd.com
[09:42] <pitti> honestly, it's great for algorithmic stuff, but most programs are not like that, they do I/O and graphical stuff, where functional languages are inherently unwieldy at
[09:42] <pitti> OCaml was an interesting approach to that
[09:43] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, WOW
[09:43]  * LocutusOfBorg reminds everybody that somebody is maintaining a python-xkcd binding https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-xkcd.html
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-googleapis-proto-client-go (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.0~git20160726.0.e5790fe-1]
[09:57] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, ^^ forgot one :)
[09:59] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: done
[10:00] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-googleapis-proto-client-go [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.0~git20160726.0.e5790fe-1]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-secret-sharing [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0.3-1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-hlandau-dexlogconfig [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20160722.0.055e2e3-1] (no packageset)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hcwiid [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0.5-4] (no packageset)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-persistable-record [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hcwiid [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0.5-4] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hcwiid [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0.5-4] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hcwiid [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0.5-4] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-persistable-record [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-persistable-record [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hcwiid [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0.5-4] (no packageset)
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-persistable-record [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-persistable-record [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gobgp (zesty-proposed/primary) [1.12-1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-persistable-record [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hcwiid [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0.5-4] (no packageset)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hcwiid [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0.5-4] (no packageset)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-persistable-record [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[10:29] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, did protobuf compiler stop working? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-google-grpc/1.0.0-1/+build/11038838
[10:29] <LocutusOfBorg> I can reproduce locally but not in Debian
[10:29] <LocutusOfBorg> cpu 100% and stuck
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-3] (no packageset)
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-3] (no packageset)
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-3] (no packageset)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-3] (no packageset)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautilus (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:3.20.3-1ubuntu3 => 1:3.20.3-1ubuntu3.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-3] (no packageset)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-3] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [amd64] (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [1.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:00] <pitti> Laney: /me likes all the green on the http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/  history :)
[11:01] <pitti> looks like we need to buy another Binford 6100 scalingstack for MOAR POWER
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [1.2.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[11:29] <Laney> pitti: \o/
[11:29] <Laney> nice reference too
[11:30] <ogra_> hah
[11:31]  * Laney tries pdl from git out of desperation
[11:39] <apw> Laney, that is about half your red too ...
[11:42] <Laney> apw: pdl?
[11:52] <apw> Laney, yeah ...
[11:52] <Laney> mmm
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted papi [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [5.5.0-3]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted papi [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [5.5.0-3]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted papi [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [5.5.0-3]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu-contrib [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-2]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted papi [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [5.5.0-3]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted papi [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [5.5.0-3]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted papi [i386] (zesty-proposed) [5.5.0-3]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-1]
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu-contrib [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0+dfsg-2]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-persistable-record [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.0.3-1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hcwiid [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.5-4]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gobgp [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.12-1]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozc [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.18.2595.102+dfsg-1]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozc [i386] (zesty-proposed) [2.18.2595.102+dfsg-1]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-hlandau-dexlogconfig [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0~git20160722.0.055e2e3-1]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozc [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [2.18.2595.102+dfsg-1]
[12:13] <Laney> yeah still fails from git
[12:16] <apw> bah
[12:31] <rcj> infinity, Who should I ping with a zesty powerpc builder question?  Getting "There is already a live filesystem with the same name, owner, and distroseries." and not sure if we're provisioned correctly for powerpc.
[12:34] <rcj> wgrant, cjwatson ^
[12:52] <jbicha> did whoever approved mozc see my comment about the uim-mozc binary pkg needing to be in universe?
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: es-module-loader-0.17.js (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.17.11+dfsg-1]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: webcomponentsjs-custom-element-v0.js (zesty-proposed/primary) [1.0.1-1]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: carettah [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2] (no packageset)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: carettah [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2] (no packageset)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-query [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: carettah [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2] (no packageset)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: carettah [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2] (no packageset)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-query [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: carettah [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2] (no packageset)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-query [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-query [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: carettah [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2] (no packageset)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: carettah [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2] (no packageset)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-query [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-query [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted carettah [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.2-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted carettah [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.2-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted carettah [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.2-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted carettah [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.2-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-query [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.3.1-1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-query [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.3.1-1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-query [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.3.1-1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted carettah [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.2-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted carettah [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.2-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-query [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.3.1-1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted carettah [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.2-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-query [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.3.1-1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-query [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.3.1-1]
[13:37] <sil2100> I guess the publisher is really busy today
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-rfc3986 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-rfc3986 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fcitx [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:4.2.9.1-4ubuntu1.16.10.1]
[14:07] <apw> sil2100, i am not sure the publisher is particularly busy, britney is probabally crying in a corner in zesty though
[14:07] <apw> sil2100, and cirtainly the ADT queues are a bit mental for perl
[14:08] <sil2100> Yeah, britney for sure, but I also saw that there was a long delay between a package copy and it actually appearing on launchpad  in -proposed
[14:08] <pitti> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/zesty/2016-10-27/
[14:09] <pitti> britney runs every 20 minutes or more often
[14:09] <pitti> but that's fairly normal with this queue length
[14:09] <apw> publishing take something like 45m a cycle, so if you are unlucky it can be as much as double that
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-themes [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [16.10+16.10.20161024-0ubuntu1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-themes [sync] (xenial-proposed) [14.04+16.04.20161024-0ubuntu1]
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tcsh [source] (yakkety-proposed) [6.18.01-5ubuntu0.1]
[14:43] <tyhicks> bdmurray: hey - if you're around doing SRU work today, xenial apparmor has received all the proper bug fix verifications and is only hung up on an unrelated mysql autopkgtest failure
[14:43] <tyhicks> bdmurray: that mysql failure was introduced, upstream, by a security update a couple months ago
[14:44] <bdmurray> rbasak: ^^
[14:44]  * rbasak looks
[14:46] <tyhicks> rbasak: you're not at fault (test results at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mysql-5.7/xenial/amd64)
[14:46] <rbasak> I've asked upstream to take a look.
[14:46] <bdmurray> tyhicks: He's doing SRU training with me right now.
[14:46] <tyhicks> aha
[14:46] <tyhicks> I mistakenly made the mysql <-> rbasak connection
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:3.20.3-1ubuntu3.1]
[15:31] <cyphermox> could someone please review golang-go.crypto and juju-core in xenial, yakkety proposed queues?
[15:43] <cyphermox> balloons: ^
[15:47] <oSoMoN> could someone please have a look at webbrowser-app that’s sitting in the yakkety proposed queue?
[16:10] <rbasak> oSoMoN: see my ping above.
[16:11] <rbasak> oSoMoN: there seems to be an extra patch but no bug reference.
[16:11] <rbasak> oSoMoN: sorry, it was in #ubuntu-devel, not this channel.
[16:11] <rbasak> About three hours ago.
[16:12] <oSoMoN> rbasak, oh, sorry, I missed that one, just seeing it now
[16:14] <sergiusens> bdmurray hello, mind allowing snapcraft into xenial-proposed?
[16:15] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I'll have a look
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: zfcpdump-kernel (xenial-proposed/primary) [4.4-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[16:15] <apw> ^ xnox -- your zfcpdump-kernel pulled-back to xenial ...
[16:15] <xnox> \o/
[16:16] <bdmurray> sergiusens: you said xenial proposed? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1
[16:16] <xnox> absolutely fabulous =)
[16:16] <sergiusens> bdmurray yes
[16:16] <sergiusens> I didn't get a confirmation email which worries me a bit, I uploaded almost an hour ago
[16:17] <apw> sergiusens, if the thing is not signed it just gets lost
[16:17] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I'd be worried as I don't see it in the queue.
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-schemas [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:19] <xnox> sergiusens, was that a dput or copy? i have seen copies fail.
[16:19] <sergiusens> apw http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23388955/ looks like it is ok
[16:20] <sergiusens> xnox no no copy, I uploaded the almost same thing to zesty last night
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-schemas [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.4-2] (desktop-core)
[16:21] <xnox> sergiusens, same version number?
[16:22] <xnox> weird
[16:22] <apw> sergiusens, i have dumped something in the upload queue and seen it pop thorugh to xenial new so it is working
[16:22] <apw> sergiusens, throw it in again and see what happens
[16:22] <xnox> sergiusens, pastebin your .changes file?
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-schemas [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-schemas [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:25] <sergiusens> xnox http://paste.ubuntu.com/23388970/
[16:27] <apw> strange indeed perhaps launchpad oops'd
[16:27] <apw> really shove it at the upload queue again, and see if it works better this time
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-schemas [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:29] <sergiusens> apw I'll dput again
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-schemas [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.19 => 2.20] (no packageset)
[16:31] <sergiusens> apw ok, good now [ubuntu/xenial-proposed] snapcraft 2.20 (Waiting for approval)
[16:35] <bdmurray> Okay, I'll review that now.
[16:36] <apw> sergiusens, clearly sunspots ....
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webbrowser-app [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.23+16.10.20161018-0ubuntu1]
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.20]
[16:57] <apw> sergiusens, did the same sunspots hit the yakkety-proposed upload ?
[16:57] <sergiusens> apw should I consider yakkety?
[16:57] <sergiusens> apw let me ask this differently, is it required to cater for yakkety?
[16:58] <apw> sergiusens, well if anyone upgrades from xenial to yakkety they will have a regression
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.19+16.10 => 2.20+16.10] (no packageset)
[17:03] <sergiusens> apw [ubuntu/yakkety-proposed] snapcraft 2.20+16.10 (Waiting for approval)
[17:03] <apw> bdmurray, are you still on a queue scan ?
[17:03] <apw> sergiusens, thanks queuebot just noticed it too
[17:04] <slangasek> sergiusens: yes, it's required; and particularly as this is a developer-oriented tool I think you care about getting the non-LTS releases
[17:07] <sergiusens> slangasek right, but our only 'core' is xenial based, we can discuss more next week. I will follow the rules for now.
[17:07] <slangasek> sergiusens: snapcraft isn't being released to the distro by way of the core
[17:07] <apw> sergiusens, right but where people make their snaps isn't necessarily an UC system
[17:10] <sergiusens> right, it is not a UC system but they run with core as the base so there may be library incompatibilities (they are all solveable I guess, like needing to manually add your stdc++ lib)
[17:12] <sergiusens> anywyas, it is making its way so no worries!
[17:13]  * sergiusens gets back to his day off :-)
[17:13] <sergiusens> thanks!
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.20+16.10]
[17:52] <balloons> bdmurray, can you review juju and golang-go.crypto in the xenial and yakkety queues? It's the 2.0.0 upload, and the golang-go.crypto update is needed to build
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (zesty-proposed/main) [8-3 => 8-3] (core)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (zesty-proposed/main) [8-3 => 8-3] (core)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.1] (core)
[18:18] <bdmurray> balloons: Is the 2.0.0 upload one which slangasek had concerns about?
[18:19] <cyphermox> bdmurray: should no longer be the case, I'd hope, unless he expressed these concerns today?
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.74 => 1.74.1] (core)
[18:20] <bdmurray> cyphermox: I thought there were some the week before last or so
[18:21] <cyphermox> yeah, should have been addressed already, I would think. I've been iterating on this with balloons for a bit
[18:21] <cyphermox> it certainly doesn't include an epoch bump now ;)
[18:22] <bdmurray> Okay, I don't know what they were - just trying to get some context.
[18:23] <slangasek> I don't know what they were either, I may have spoken them aloud in the channel :)
[18:23] <cyphermox> I'm not sure, except for the epoch.
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.9+1465500757.14a5905.is.0.8-0ubuntu3 => 0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync)
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-go.crypto [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.0~git20161012.0.5f31782-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[18:32] <slangasek> cyphermox: I remember there was an Arch: all/any thing which I hope is now resolved
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.21.3 => 1.21.4] (core)
[18:32] <cyphermox> yes
[18:33] <cyphermox> and there, all the pieces are in the queue for the shim SRU, except none have bug tags :'(
[18:33] <cyphermox> I fial
[18:33] <cyphermox> fail, too.
[18:35] <slangasek> apw: could you delete these packages from zesty instead of demoting them to -proposed, please?  If we've already decided they're not important enough for us to fix for the transition and we're letting Debian do it, we don't need to leave the never-again-installable version hanging around in -proposed
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.21.4]
[18:43] <cyphermox> slangasek: if you're rejecting shim-signed, please also reject grub and grub-signed, I'll reupload them all with the right bug tags
[18:43] <cyphermox> I was just creating a proper bug to use for this
[18:44] <cyphermox> obviously, shim itself can't be changed.
[18:44] <slangasek> cyphermox: done, thanks
[18:45] <slangasek> cyphermox: shim itself will have bug refs already, maybe reuse LP: #1624096 ?
[18:45] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1624096 in shim (Ubuntu) "yakkety: backport (or rebase to) fix eliminating a double-close in shim" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624096
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.74.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.1]
[18:45] <slangasek> or maybe LP: #1581299 is better
[18:45] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1581299 in shim-signed (Ubuntu) "shim: set second stage not work" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581299
[18:46] <cyphermox> slangasek: I'll close 1581299 too, but I rather have something new where it will be more obvious if things regress again
[18:46] <cyphermox> (and tracking for each release, and test cases, etc.)
[18:46] <cyphermox> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1637290
[18:46] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1637290 in shim-signed (Ubuntu Yakkety) "Update to the signed 0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-0ubuntu1 shim binary from Microsoft" [Undecided,New]
[18:47] <slangasek> ok
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.21.3 => 1.21.4] (core)
[18:51] <bdmurray> balloons, cyphermox: were pitti's concerns in bug 1631038 addressed?
[18:51] <ubot5`> bug 1631038 in juju-core (Ubuntu Yakkety) "Need /etc/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1631038
[18:52] <cyphermox> go me, network failure.
[18:54] <balloons> bdmurray, we would like to ship these files as a workaround for now. You can see my explanation in the SRU details on the bug itself. The values set will affect the entire machine, however, they have been deemed reasonable and safe to do so. We did implement them in the place suggested by pitti -- I sought his feedback on the bug itself before agreeing to ship anything
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.1] (core)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.74 => 1.74.1] (core)
[18:54] <balloons> The real fix is happening upstream and stgraber can comment more on that. LXD hadn't planned to ship any changes itself; rather to fix the upstream kernel
[18:55] <cyphermox> slangasek: they're back in the queue.
[18:55] <stgraber> right, inotify namespacing in the kernel should be merged in a few weeks, we can then try to get the kernel team to backport those bits in our stable kernels
[18:56] <bdmurray> what would happen with these changes then?
[18:58] <bdmurray> I mean if the kernel changes were backported
[18:58] <balloons> We will drop the changes once the real fixes land
[18:58] <stgraber> in most cases, they just wouldn't be necessary anymore. The knobs will still be there but will just become the default value for each of the namespaces.
[18:59] <stgraber> as for pitti's comment, the problem is that we can't do that in LXD as bumping those values impact kernel memory use. It's fine for juju to bump them as it knows it's running on pretty beefy instances and knows that the containers it will be running will need those inotify watches.
[18:59] <stgraber> it's however not fine to have LXD do so everywhere as that'd mean bumping those sysctls on small ARM boards that'd effectively OOM immediately
[19:00] <stgraber> similarly, you won't hit that kind of issue if you're running android, alpine or even Ubuntu 14.04 containers, the use of inotify watches very much depends on your workload
[19:01] <stgraber> currently for LXD, we have those knobs documented upstream in our production-setup documentation, along with a few other knobs that people may need to tweak based on their particular environment but we haven't found anything that we feel can be safely applied to every Ubuntu system
[19:01] <balloons> right, see https://github.com/lxc/lxd/blob/master/doc/production-setup.md
[19:05] <bdmurray> Okay, thanks for the info
[19:05] <balloons> Note, our set value for  fs.inotify.max_user_watches is half what is shown in the table. The fs.inotify.max_user_instances is much more conservative at just double the default value
[19:06] <balloons> These values will revert to default if the package is removed of course
[19:07] <pitti> balloons: you're shipping that in /usr now?
[19:07] <pitti> not /etc?
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.5 (xenial-proposed/main) [9.5.4-0ubuntu0.16.04 => 9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04] (core)
[19:10] <balloons> pitti, yes, we install to /usr/lib/sysctl.d/10-juju.conf
[19:10] <balloons> sorry, /usr/lib/sysctl.d/juju-2.0.conf
[19:11] <bdmurray> balloons: juju-core 2.0.0 is still in zesty proposed due a test failure.  will we see a similar issue with y and x?
[19:14] <balloons> bdmurray, no. There are two issues to note with zesty. The first is that autopkgtests are running 32-bit arches, which is invalid. The second is a true failure, current-manual-provider. This test is failing because there is not yet a published zesty agent.
[19:15] <bdmurray> balloons: okay, cool
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted juju-core [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted juju-core [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.5 (yakkety-proposed/main) [9.5.4-1 => 9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.10] (core)
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.3 (trusty-proposed/main) [9.3.14-0ubuntu0.14.04 => 9.3.15-0ubuntu0.14.04] (no packageset)
[19:56] <pitti> bdmurray: are you still doing SRUs? would be great if you could review bug 1637236 (just the usual formality)
[19:56] <ubot5`> bug 1637236 in postgresql-9.5 (Ubuntu Yakkety) "New upstream microreleases 9.1.24, 9.3.15, 9.5.5" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1637236
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.1 (precise-proposed/main) [9.1.23-0ubuntu0.12.04 => 9.1.24-0ubuntu0.12.04] (core)
[19:59] <pitti> . o O { looking at the test queues: can we run x86/ppc64el QEMU emulators on s390x? ☺  }
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.1 (trusty-proposed/universe) [9.1.23-0ubuntu0.14.04 => 9.1.24-0ubuntu0.14.04] (core)
[20:14] <bdmurray> pitti: I'll have a look shortly
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.5 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.10]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.5 [source] (xenial-proposed) [9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04]
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.3 [source] (trusty-proposed) [9.3.15-0ubuntu0.14.04]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.1 [source] (trusty-proposed) [9.1.24-0ubuntu0.14.04]
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.1 [source] (precise-proposed) [9.1.24-0ubuntu0.12.04]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php-smbclient [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.8.0~rc1-2build1]
[20:47] <pitti> bdmurray: cheers!
[20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mistral [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvme-cli [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5-1ubuntu0.1]
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tcsh (yakkety-proposed/universe) [6.18.01-5 => 6.18.01-5ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset)
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: greybird-gtk-theme (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.20.1-1 => 3.20.1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[22:15] <infinity> rcj: That's from, what?  An LP API call?