| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| caraka | I see idle builders, and my packages have been in the queue for 5 hours. :/ | 07:57 |
|---|---|---|
| caraka | am I broken, or am I just stuck behind the zesty rebuild? | 07:58 |
| cjwatson | caraka: almost certainly the latter, and the only idle builders are on ppc64el/s390x; can't be sure without a ref to your build though | 09:09 |
| === gkadam is now known as Guest61459 | ||
| === Guest61459 is now known as gkadam | ||
| caraka | thanks cjwatson. As per Murphy's law, the amd64 builds reached the front of their queue after I bitched about it. Go figure. I probably just caught the buiilder's page just as a few builders finished cleaning themselves before jumping back into the fray. Cheers | 09:38 |
| cjwatson | caraka: yeah, there's often a 15-second idle period | 09:39 |
| cjwatson | or thereabouts | 09:40 |
| caraka | :D Murphy working overtime | 09:41 |
| cjwatson | ah, bunch of builders stuck cleaning though, will poke | 09:41 |
| caraka | that's a pretty big refactor of the whole thing, eh? and I guess it kind of has to happen all at once the first time around | 09:42 |
| cjwatson | there, that should help finish draining the queue | 09:42 |
| cjwatson | caraka: what do you mean? | 09:42 |
| caraka | rebuilding all of zesty at once. At least that's what it looked like to me | 09:42 |
| cjwatson | not in the least | 09:43 |
| caraka | building out the whole proposed section on top of yakkety. that's how it works with a fresh release, right? | 09:43 |
| cjwatson | no | 09:43 |
| cjwatson | we auto-sync packages that have changed in Debian unstable | 09:44 |
| cjwatson | after being in import freeze for a couple of months there's generally a bit of a queue of these | 09:44 |
| caraka | right. that's ind of what I meant. and the first time that happens with a new release, it's big | 09:44 |
| cjwatson | but it's usually on the order of a couple of thousand source packages, rather than all of zesty | 09:44 |
| cjwatson | order of magnitude difference there :) | 09:45 |
| caraka | I guess so. :P | 09:45 |
| cjwatson | a full rebuild takes more like a week to clear; the initial auto-sync runs at around half a day or less these days | 09:45 |
| caraka | wow. I guess that hasn;t really had to happen since the Badger days or ssomething | 09:46 |
| cjwatson | what, a full rebuild? | 09:46 |
| caraka | yes | 09:46 |
| cjwatson | we never rebuild everything in Ubuntu proper | 09:47 |
| cjwatson | but we do full test rebuilds a few times per release cycle | 09:47 |
| caraka | learn something new every day. | 09:47 |
| caraka | Well thank your for help, and I'm sure some other folks in the queue are grateful a few builders have had a nudge | 09:48 |
| cjwatson | no problem, should all clear out pretty soon now | 09:49 |
| cjwatson | the build farm requires a lot less manual babysitting than it used to | 09:49 |
| caraka | Silly questiin if I might - when will wily builds start to fail/reject. It must be soon. | 09:50 |
| caraka | Or am I getting away with it because I'm not using a recipe | 09:51 |
| cjwatson | it's up to the Ubuntu release team when to mark that as obsolete - it's overdue but was being held off due to an abundance of caution about products built on it | 09:52 |
| cjwatson | you should definitely not rely on that happening any more though | 09:53 |
| caraka | I don;t, and I've warned my users repeatedly that they are on borrowed time. I'm looking forward to the rejection letter. :D Now its time to set up some zesty test builds. | 09:57 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === icey-travel is now known as icey | ||
| === gkadam is now known as Guest6010 | ||
| === Guest6010 is now known as gkadam | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === daniel is now known as Guest19937 | ||
| === Guest19937 is now known as Odd_Bloke | ||
| nacc | is there an API in launchpadlib to obtain an arbitrary orig tarball (given a srcpkg and an upstream version)? or whereabouts I might look for that | 15:16 |
| dobey | i think you'd probably need some more details; but the archive endpoints would be where to start i think | 15:17 |
| nacc | dobey: ok, thanks -- this is for a helper tool for the server team importer, which means the version we are currently building doesn't necessarily exist, so I can't pull() it. I can extract what the upstream part is, but I guess I'd just need to find a published version with the same upstream value and pull() that | 15:21 |
| Promille | Hi guys. I have written a comment on a bug-thread. Does this "bump" the bug so the relevant people can see it? Thread in question: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/translate-shell/+bug/1572035?comments=all | 16:15 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1572035 in translate-shell (Ubuntu) "translate-shell outdated and broken" [Undecided,New] | 16:15 |
| dobey | Promille: people who are subscribed to the bug get e-mail, yes | 16:17 |
| Promille | dobey: Hm ok. Lets hope that thats enough. The comment has a link to new version from the developer which fixes a broken package in multiverse. | 16:21 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest59232 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === PaulW2U_ is now known as PaulW2U | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!