[01:08] i hate fat [01:08] infinity, or cyphermox, would you please be able to help me? [01:08] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/292347541/buildlog_ubuntu-zesty-amd64.debian-installer_20101020ubuntu486_BUILDING.txt.gz [01:08] Using signed grub version 2.02~beta3-3 [01:08] mkfs.fat 4.0 (2016-05-06) [01:08] Disk full [01:08] config/x86.cfg:40: recipe for target 'x86_grub_efi' failed [11:40] xnox: Fixed, but looks like you need a libssl1.0.2-udeb and a rebuild of openssh to pick it up in shlibs. [11:40] (for s390x) [11:47] cjwatson: There's literally no mention of it in the changelog, but it seems we renamed libssl1.0.2 to libssl1.0.0 in Ubuntu? [11:47] cjwatson: That got dropped, along with the udeb (and likely other bits) with the source rename to openssl1.0 [11:47] cjwatson: I know not your baby, but you might care a bit, since a lot of this history seems to be yours. [11:49] cjwatson: Oh, I see it now. "don't bump soname" stuff. [11:49] mdeslaur: ^-- Perhaps this is more of interest to you. [11:50] mdeslaur: Given the upcoming transition to 1.1, I'd think keeping 1.0 as we've always shipped it would likely be a good plan. [11:50] (This may involve some rebuilds in proposed after it's fixed) [11:54] xnox: See above, re my libssl1.0.2-udeb ping, looks more like we need to reapply our 1.0 delta, including non-soname-bump, and rebuild anything that was built against 1.0.2. [11:54] (Thankfully, the mess is stuck in proposed, so should be limited) [11:55] Oh, and now I've found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl1.0/+bug/1638525 [12:05] infinity: Q_ is fixing the lack of udebs in Debian [12:05] I don't recall about the soname bump [12:05] cjwatson: Shiny. But we still need our delta for other reasons (see above) [12:05] cjwatson: But I'll leave that to mdeslaur, it seems to be his delta (the soname bit) [12:05] sounds plausible [22:41] OH FUN [22:41] infinity, but i don't want to start transition yet *sigh*