veebers | babbageclunk: the help summary for show-model states "Shows information about the current or specified model." yet there is no way to specify a model (i.e. no -m) is the summary wrong or is it wrong that it doesn't take -m | 02:01 |
---|---|---|
veebers | ? | 02:01 |
babbageclunk | veebers: It takes model as a positional argument. | 02:12 |
veebers | babbageclunk: d'oh, reading fail for me. Thanks :-) | 02:12 |
babbageclunk | veebers: :) | 02:12 |
hoenir | can someone take a look at this ? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6556 | 11:29 |
mup | Bug #1640079 changed: LXDs doesn't start after a reboot <lxd-provider> <openstack> <uosci> <juju:Triaged> <juju (Ubuntu):Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1640079> | 13:32 |
mgz | no one for standup? | 15:03 |
macgreagoir | mgz: I can rejoin. I was there alone :-) | 15:07 |
natefinch | we just did a super short one | 15:07 |
mgz | macgreagoir: nate and I just did a lightning standup | 15:07 |
mgz | feel free to fill us in here | 15:07 |
macgreagoir | ipv6 blah blah blah | 15:10 |
macgreagoir | Just trying to see if the enable-ha issue I'm hitting is ipv6 relatd or something else. | 15:12 |
natefinch | macgreagoir: I wouldn't be surprised. | 15:18 |
natefinch | macgreagoir: what version of mongo? | 15:20 |
macgreagoir | 3.2 | 15:20 |
macgreagoir | .9 | 15:20 |
natefinch | hmmm... ok, if it had been 2.6 I'd almost assuredly think it was ipv6, but 3.2 is supposed to work | 15:21 |
natefinch | but definitely could be a juju specific bug | 15:21 |
macgreagoir | ipv6 seems good in 3.2. Seems to be an id clash somewhere in the momngo docs. | 15:24 |
hoenir | could someone take a look on this PR https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6556 ? and also could someone tell me that the CI logs are ok on the last commit ? | 17:22 |
hoenir | what are your thoughts on this? | 17:22 |
hoenir | someone? | 17:56 |
mgz | hoenir: sorry, have been deep in several things today | 18:02 |
mgz | hoenir: the checks passed, is there something in particular you want to see in the logs? | 18:02 |
hoenir | mgz, I'm referring on that "bad certificates" warnings.. | 18:23 |
mgz | there are some "remote error: bad certificate" lines on stdout for the trusty unit tests | 18:25 |
mgz | not actually causing any tests to fail | 18:25 |
hoenir | so it's safe to merge | 18:25 |
mgz | I don't know, what's the background? | 18:26 |
hoenir | The background is that, on a previous PR axw suggested, in order to make these changes possible I should move the juju/cert (all the generic-common pieces) into a utils/cert pkg , the utils/cert part is already merged. | 18:28 |
hoenir | this patch is already merged so.. I wanted to finish the job by merging the other patch in (juju-core). | 18:29 |
hoenir | https://github.com/juju/utils/pull/250 | 18:29 |
hoenir | so mgz it's safe to $$merge$$ this bad boy? | 18:33 |
mgz | as it's a us holiday and end of sprint, I think the people who were looking at your code just weren't around today | 18:33 |
mgz | hoenir: the check says yes, and perrito666 approved | 18:34 |
mgz | might be nice to send a message to the dev list about the cert error spam, so people are aware, and can follow up to fix? | 18:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!