[00:09] <nacc> smoser: while trying to import freeradius `gbp import-orig` died on seeing '-- Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>  Thu, 30 April 2014 11:35:00 +0100
[00:09] <nacc> as dpkg-parsechangelog requires Apr not APril
[00:11] <nacc> i think it's unfortuante (and sort of unclear to me) why gbp uses debian/changelog on an upstream to determine the version
[00:11] <nacc> oh i see
[00:11] <nacc> it uses if it can find it, but doesn't properly ahndle parse errors
[00:12] <nacc> smoser: i might make pristine-tar failure non-fatal
[01:32] <nacc> doko: sigh, it seems like there is not a measn to disable collectd in freeradius 3.x
[01:32] <nacc> rbasak: jgrimm --^
[01:43] <nacc> doko: ah interesting, just dropping the build-dep, though, does seem to work
[09:41] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: are you explicitly syncing haskell packages?
[10:07] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, yes, in the correct order
[10:07] <LocutusOfBorg> see -release discussion a few hours ago
[10:32] <mapreri> does launchpad understands and make use of alternate build-dependencies, as opposed to wanna-build?
[10:39] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't think so, but not sure
[12:56] <cjwatson> mapreri: yes - specifically it uses sbuild --resolve-alternatives
[12:56] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: ^-
[13:01] <mapreri> cjwatson: I see, thank you.
[15:37] <ilmaisin> is trying to getting 16.04 working right somehow considered a lost cause now?
[15:38] <ilmaisin> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1598300
[15:40] <ilmaisin> quite serious bugs are ignored for months
[15:46] <ilmaisin> it's hard to imagine such important bug being ignored like this in any other mainstream distro, of course this happens often on many less important packages, but on ubuntu this happens on core components
[15:57] <ilmaisin> as of now it's hard to recommend ubuntu or at least 16.04 to "normal" people who would rather use their computers instead of working around ridiculous bugs
[16:15] <dobey> clearly the wey to get bugs fixed is troll on irc
[16:16] <dobey> and the bug hardly seems to be "ignored for months"
[16:20] <ilmaisin> dobey: ubuntu's "wey" seems to be name-calling and and not doing any qa
[19:14] <gQuigs> mhall119: hi there, would it be possible to have this event moved earlier on Wednesday? - http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1611/meeting/22714/architecture-discussions/