[16:00] <jgrimm> o/
[16:00] <powersj> o/
[16:01] <rharper> o/
[16:02] <jgrimm> beisner has a conflict so i'll chair again
[16:02] <rbasak> o/
[16:02] <jgrimm> unless anyone else wants to volunteer?
 :)
[16:02] <nacc> o/
[16:02] <nacc> sorry for being a bit late
[16:02] <jgrimm> #startmeeting ubuntu-server-team
[16:02] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Nov 15 16:02:56 2016 UTC.  The chair is jgrimm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:02] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[16:03] <jgrimm> no worries, light turnout today it looks like
[16:03] <jgrimm> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:03] <jgrimm> (jgrimm) email jamepage -> checkin with old iscsitarget users on relevancy with new kernels
[16:04] <jgrimm> not done. :/   will get that sent out today so this action can finally go away
[16:04] <jgrimm> (jgrimm) email to ubuntu-devel about powerpc arch future.
[16:04] <jgrimm> i held off on doing this ^^  as the tech board has picked this up
[16:05] <smoser> o/
[16:05] <jgrimm> and is in the process of talking to powerpc interested parties to see whether they'll pick up and own burden of the work (as debian is dropping the arch)
[16:06] <jgrimm> so i'm going to treat that one as done, except to watch what happens at the TB
[16:06] <jgrimm> #link https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/11/08/%23ubuntu-meeting-2.txt
[16:07] <jgrimm> if interested ^^
[16:07] <jgrimm> #topic Zesty Development
[16:07] <jgrimm> #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ZestyZapus/ReleaseSchedule
[16:08] <jgrimm> thank you for everyone that updated the blueprint and snagged workitems already
[16:08] <jgrimm> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-z-server-core
[16:08] <jgrimm> is there anything anyone wants to discuss with zesty?
[16:08] <rharper> jgrimm: that Zesty link doesn't get to a schedule for me
[16:08] <jgrimm> oh
[16:09] <powersj> don't think the page has been created yet
[16:09] <rharper> yeah, odd
[16:09] <powersj> most of the zesty pages were not up when I updated links
[16:09] <rharper> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ZestyZapus/DraftReleaseSchedule
[16:09] <jgrimm> yeah, i assumed it would be updated by now
[16:09] <jgrimm> thanks rharper
[16:09] <jgrimm> anyway, back to discussion, anything?
[16:10] <rharper> nothing for me
[16:10] <jgrimm> a good number of merges being worked, happy to see that
[16:10] <jgrimm> and i know cpaelzer has worked out plans around libvirt & qemu merges
[16:11] <rharper> jgrimm: oh, the /boot work is being done by foundations (xnox has the task)  ; in particular, /boot isn't needed for lvm installs
[16:11] <jgrimm> rharper, cool, we can just track it then
[16:11] <rharper> bug 1639801
[16:11] <rharper> yeah
[16:11] <jgrimm> thanks!!
[16:12] <xnox> rharper, done, celebrated on http://blog.surgut.co.uk/2016/11/boot-less-lvm-rootfs-in-zesty.html
[16:12] <xnox> please +1 on google plus too
[16:12] <rharper> xnox: \o/
[16:12] <jgrimm> xnox, nice!! \o/
[16:12] <xnox> rharper, info if ppc64el can boot off LVM is needed though. I am suspecting that it might be possible to enable ppc64el as well.
[16:12] <xnox> i doubt that arm* with u-boot can do it, generically on all boards.
[16:12] <rharper> i think if they can multipath, they should be able to lvm
[16:13] <jgrimm> xnox, maybe engage folks  that hang out on #ubuntu-powerpc?
[16:13] <rharper> we can certainly poke IBM for petiteboot changes if needed (it's linux anyhow)
[16:13] <xnox> well, multipath is "pick any, and use readonly" they look the same.
[16:13] <xnox> jgrimm, oooh, that's a thought.
[16:13] <smoser> xnox, well, ppc64el boots via either grub2 or petitboot
[16:13] <jgrimm> ibmers hanging out there that should know
[16:13] <smoser> grub2 probably does work, id' be surprised if it had arch specific errors.
[16:13] <smoser> petitboot i dont know.
[16:14] <jgrimm> anything else?
[16:14] <jgrimm> #subtopic Release Bugs
[16:14] <jgrimm> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-z-tracking-bug-tasks.html#ubuntu-server
[16:15] <jgrimm> a couple new ones on that list that i haven't read yet
[16:15] <cpaelzer> late o/ (needed all screens for a huge three way diff - sorry)
[16:15] <cpaelzer> thanks jgrimm for covering me
[16:16] <jgrimm> looks like they have owners, so i'll leave them alone
[16:16] <jgrimm> no worres cpaelzer
[16:16] <jgrimm> #topic Server & Cloud Bugs & SRU/Pending Uploads (caribou)
[16:17] <jgrimm> #topic Server & Cloud Bugs & SRU/Pending Uploads (caribou)
[16:17] <caribou> Active SRU list :
[16:17] <caribou>  LP: #1447715 - dhclient -6: Can't bind to dhcp address: Cannot assign requested address
[16:17] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : xenial
[16:17] <caribou>  LP: #1515278 - [SRU] rabbit queues should expire when unused
[16:17] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : trusty
[16:17] <caribou> LP: #1640275 - move nvme driver to linux-image
[16:17] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : trusty
[16:17] <caribou>  LP: #1640382 - Segfault event notifier because of race condition
[16:17] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : trusty
[16:17] <caribou> LP: #1640676 - libvirt 1.2.12 live-migration corrupts some instances
[16:17] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : trusty
[16:17] <caribou> these are the current SRU we have ongoing
[16:17] <caribou> anything from the server team we should be aware of ?
[16:17] <jgrimm> thanks caribou.  i'll give a bit for folks to digest and/or ask questions
[16:18] <cpaelzer> caribou: does that mean you or the STS Team in general are looking into fixing 1640676?
[16:18] <caribou> cpaelzer: I would say yes, but let me confirm
[16:19] <jgrimm> nacc, rbasak, cpaelzer: any SRUs in process that STS should be aware of?
[16:20] <nacc> i will have one for bind9 i think
[16:20] <cpaelzer> bug 1633220 in proposed waiting for the reporter to check
[16:20] <nacc> LP: #1536181
[16:20] <nacc> I just imported it last night to use the drive-by process
[16:20] <cpaelzer> bug 1640805 waiting for spnsoring into Trusty
[16:21] <caribou> cpaelzer: I'll come back to you on LP: #1640676
[16:21] <jgrimm> I need to get back to this one, fixed in debian, so will see if it can be SRU'd: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1595096
[16:21] <cpaelzer> caribou: I might be EOD in a bit but happy to read whatever you find on it tomorrow morning in my log then - thank you
[16:21] <jgrimm> anyone else?
[16:22] <caribou> cpaelzer: sure, no worry
[16:22] <jgrimm> moving along, thanks folks
[16:23] <jgrimm> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (powersj)
[16:23] <powersj> Continued work on cloud-init integration, have actual tests running on our jenkins. Will add more tests for more modules this week.  Otherwise a bit of work with cpaelzer on qemu/libvirt live migration and "hardening" of jenkins jobs some are a little fragile
[16:23] <cpaelzer> and work on the s390x node
[16:23] <jgrimm> #link https://jenkins.ubuntu.com/server/
[16:23] <powersj> ah yes cpaelzer thank you!
[16:24] <powersj> although tests don't seem happy there, so we will talk thursday
[16:24] <jgrimm> questions for powersj?
[16:24] <jgrimm> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb, sforshee)
[16:25] <jgrimm> moving on
[16:25] <jgrimm> #topic Upcoming Call For Papers
[16:25] <jgrimm> #link https://lwn.net/Calendar/Monthly/cfp/
[16:26] <jgrimm> nothing
[16:26] <jgrimm> #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:27] <jgrimm> #link http://summit.ubuntu.com/
[16:27] <jgrimm> ^^ going on now
[16:27] <jgrimm> of possible interest to folks is the git-based workflow session by nacc & rbasak
[16:28] <jgrimm> #link http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1611/meeting/22710/git-based-merge-workflow/
[16:28] <powersj> that is in 90mins?
[16:28] <nacc> yeah
[16:28] <powersj> sweet
[16:28] <jgrimm> Yes, 1800 UTC
[16:29] <rharper> date -d "18:00 UTC"
[16:29] <jgrimm> #topic Open Discussion
[16:29] <jgrimm> cloud-init SRU status?
[16:29] <jgrimm> smoser, ^^
[16:30] <smoser> jgrimm, i pinged slangasek .. hoping to talk to him today
[16:30] <jgrimm> pinged meaning its ready to go? or needing to discuss yet?
[16:30] <smoser> rharper and i think that it shoudl be fine, but wanted to see what issues slangasek saw, or what he wnated me to do.
[16:31] <rharper> it's ready
[16:31] <jgrimm> ok good, that one's hot.
[16:31] <jgrimm> other open discussion?
[16:31] <smoser> i'm fairly sure we do not regress anything. the only thing would be a system with cloud-init and systemd-networkd which probably didnt work that well already.
[16:32] <rharper> powersj: I propose we look at figuring out some systemcd unit ordering tests; smoser and I have a few scenarios that we can describe
[16:32] <jgrimm> smoser, but that sounds like a follow-up bug then?
[16:32] <rharper> jgrimm: the bug is already open
[16:32] <jgrimm> ok, good.
[16:32] <rharper> there is an upstream issue with networkd and dbus
[16:32] <jgrimm> ack, i know that one
[16:32] <rharper> we might see if pitti wants to branch that separate issue off from cloud-init related
[16:32] <powersj> rharper: will you send me bug # so I can get context
[16:33] <rharper> it turns out that networkd wasn't fully baked w.r.t running super early (ie before dbus.service )
[16:33] <rharper> powersj: yes, on sec
[16:33] <rharper> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1636912
[16:33] <smoser> http://pad.ubuntu.com/tMdgYGEvgL <-- has more ifno
[16:33] <powersj> thank you
[16:33] <rharper> there's quite a bit in there
[16:33] <rharper> but the last update from pitti I think captures what remains
[16:34] <jgrimm> thanks folks
[16:34] <jgrimm> any other discussion
[16:35] <jgrimm> #topic Announce next meeting date, time and chair
[16:36] <jgrimm> same time/channel.  as beisner has a standing conflict will move on to next
[16:36] <jgrimm> will be thedac or possibly cpaelzer
[16:37] <jgrimm> as its possible thedac has the same conflict as beisner
[16:37] <beisner> thanks jgrimm
[16:37] <jgrimm> np sir
[16:37] <jgrimm> #endmeeting
[16:37] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Nov 15 16:37:17 2016 UTC.
[16:37] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-11-15-16.02.moin.txt
[16:37] <thedac> jgrimm: yes, I need to remove myself from that list, sorry.
[16:37] <nacc> jgrimm: thanks!
[16:37] <jgrimm> no worries at all!!