=== JanC is now known as Guest76305
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
[07:23] <ducasse> hi all
[07:24] <Bashing-om> o/ ducasse Here but maybe not for much longer :)
[07:25] <ducasse> i see we have trolls. how fun. :-/
[07:28] <Bashing-om> Well, just started with the trolls, hope it is no indication of forthcomming events .
[07:30] <ducasse> let's hope not. this one wasn't even interesting...
[07:32] <Bashing-om> Uh Huh .. time now to embibe in my nasty habit .
[08:54] <Bashing-om> Time for me to retire, eyes crossing . Yall take care .
[13:03] <BluesKaj> Hey all
[13:04] <OerHeks> Hi BluesKaj :-D
[13:05] <OerHeks> when i woke up this morning, my cactus went flowering overnight :-D
[13:05] <OerHeks> .. pretty
[13:05] <OerHeks> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6885560/2016cactus-bloei-1.JPG https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6885560/2016cactus-bloei-2.JPG
[13:15] <BluesKaj> Hey OerHeks, nice ;-)
[13:18] <OerHeks> large piece of the cactus fell off, took it home, and now i have a new living friend
[15:36] <daftykins> ooh
[15:36] <daftykins> neat
=== JanC is now known as Guest70154
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
[18:51] <de-facto> we really need a Chromium 54, those NET::ERR_CERTIFICATE_TRANSPARENCY_REQUIRED against symantec are *really* annoying :(
[18:51] <daftykins> the whaaa?
[18:55] <de-facto> it refuses to connect to many many websites because they have an argument with symantec, the chromium guys say its resolved with 54
[18:56] <de-facto> so its ubuntu devs who need to do the next step to resolve this i guess
[19:02] <daftykins> !info chromium
[19:02] <ubot5`> Package chromium does not exist in xenial
[19:02] <daftykins> !info chromium-browser
[19:02] <ubot5`> chromium-browser (source: chromium-browser): Chromium web browser, open-source version of Chrome. In component universe, is optional. Version 53.0.2785.143-0ubuntu0.16.04.1.1254 (xenial), package size 60042 kB, installed size 230376 kB
[19:02] <daftykins> ah har
[19:49] <pauljw> Hi everyone
[19:50] <BluesKaj> Hi pauljw
[19:50] <pauljw> hey BluesKaj :)
[19:52] <BluesKaj> what's new ...not much here except 4 trees gone from the yard, but I probly mentioned that already :-)
[19:53] <pauljw> nothing new here either, you had mentioned the trees, hate to see em go.  can't risk damage or injury though. :)
[19:55] <daftykins> will you replant some, to be your legacy?
[19:59] <BluesKaj> still a couple red oaks and a yellow birch and an evergreen..the scrap jackpine s are gone as is the dangerous maple
[20:00] <BluesKaj> the oaks are 30 yrs old, so i guess they're legacy