[00:20] <alexisb> I am out for the day all
[00:20] <alexisb> email if you need something
[00:38]  * babbageclunk goes for a run
[03:09] <natefinch> Easy review anyone?  +1 -3  https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6581
[03:14] <babbageclunk> natefinch: +1 -3, my kind of review!
[03:17] <babbageclunk> natefinch: lgtm
[03:18] <wallyworld> axw: for when you're free https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6582
[03:24] <natefinch> babbageclunk: :D
[03:25] <natefinch> babbageclunk: I've fixed two bugs in the last couple days, total line changed count is under 20 :)
[04:00] <babbageclunk> natefinch: nice - better than redir's 60,000 line PR today
[04:00] <babbageclunk> natefinch: I wanna see negative line counts! you can only add a line if you're removing two.
[04:15] <natefinch> anyone seen this? 03:33:59 ERROR cmd supercommand.go:458 failed to bootstrap model: subprocess encountered error code 255
[04:44] <redir> babbageclunk: yeah I didn't realize the sstreams file was that big until I did the PR. It is <1K in reality
[04:44] <redir> and it isn't a bugfix
[04:45] <babbageclunk> redir: :) I'm just joshing you!
[04:45] <babbageclunk> I just felt bad for the OCR
[05:47] <axw> wallyworld: bleh, apparently it's not as simple as filtering out flavors with Disk=0. on canonistack, m1.tiny has Disk=0 but it let me start one without specifying a cinder volume for the boot disk... :|
[05:47] <wallyworld> damn
[05:47] <axw> could do it just for rackspace, but seems iffy
[05:48] <wallyworld> openstack is awesome
[10:24] <voidspace> fsck
[10:24] <voidspace> my local maas2 is screwed
[10:24] <voidspace> again
[10:24] <voidspace> but this time my fault
[10:24] <voidspace> reinstall from scratch
[10:24] <voidspace> lucky I wanted to try maas 1.9 *anyway*
[15:39] <perrito666> bbl lunch
[16:47] <voidspace> well, I'm back to a working maas 2 setup here and it's maas 2.1, so at least the day isn't a total bust
[16:57] <mgz> rick_h: have proposed and QA'd pull/6584 - can we bug someone to review?
[16:58] <rick_h> natefinch: can you help mgz please?
[17:37] <natefinch> rick_h: yep, sorry, had stepped out for lunch. Back now
[17:39] <natefinch> mgz: gah, use real links :/  lp:1642984 is not somethnig I can click on :/
[17:42] <lazyPower> natefinch - http://pad.lv/1642984
[17:42] <natefinch> I know :)  But still harder than just clicking :)
[17:43] <lazyPower> i'm not certain but i think there's an addon for weechat that turns lp: links into pad.lv urls for you
[17:43]  * lazyPower hopes he's not making this up
[17:44] <natefinch> probably, but I was talkig about a pull request :)
[17:44] <lazyPower> well a cursory google search tells me i'm full of lies.
[17:44] <natefinch> lazyPower: and also there's no addon?
[17:44] <lazyPower> yep, i'm full of lies
[17:44] <natefinch> :)
[17:44] <lazyPower> :ilied:
[17:44] <lazyPower> ^ replace with funky blue moon ilied meme guy
[17:49] <natefinch> mgz: lgtm
[17:53] <mgz> natefinch: ta
[19:39] <petevg> Hi, all. I've got a question about leadership and the websocket API: namely, is there a way to quickly check whether a unit is a leader? I know that the uniter facade has a method for watching leadership settings, but that's not actually exposed over the api, correct?
[19:40] <natefinch> I think we show that in status in 2.x
[19:43] <petevg> natefinch: Yeah. Calling status and parsing it for the star was going to be my fallback. I was just wondering if there was a construct in the API that I could call more neatly (also, without waiting for juju status to get back to me).
[19:44] <petevg> (Though I guess if juju status is lagging, any other given call won't necessarily be faster.)
[19:48] <petevg> natefinch: regardless, thank you for the quick answer. :-)