[09:34] <cjwatson> pitti: the python-pip SRU in progress wasn't released for xenial because of python-virtualenv regressions; these turn out to be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/python-virtualenv/+bug/1626201 which you had a hand in.  Can we wave python-pip through?
[09:34] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1626201 in python-virtualenv (Ubuntu Xenial) "missing python*-dev and gcc dependencies" [Low,Triaged]
[09:38] <pitti> cjwatson: ah right, I remember; releasing
[09:46] <cjwatson> thanks!
[09:48] <ginggs> pitti: morning! i think blender is the last thing holding up the glew transition. what do you think of removing  2.78.a+dfsg0-1 which FTBFS on ppc64el (in Debian too) and uploading  a no-change rebuild of the previous versions as 2.77.a+dfsg0-9ubuntu1 ?
[09:50] <pitti> ginggs: I'm also fine with removing the current zesty-release ppc64el package
[09:51] <ginggs> pitti: ok, but don't we then have to remove a bunch of rdeps?
[09:51] <pitti> yes, blender-ogrexml-1.9 and morse-simulator
[09:51] <pitti> (these have no rdepends)
[09:52] <ginggs> pitti: sounds good to me
[09:53] <pitti> ginggs: done
[09:53] <ginggs> pitti: danke!
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, what will that removal fix? glew and openvdb?
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm trying hard gdal testsuite for mipp and i386 but it fails and is terribly slowly, not sure what is happening
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest-virt-ssh: WARNING: ssh connection failed. Retrying in 3 seconds...
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, ^^ does this ring a bell or I can assume it is normal?
[10:23] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: hopefully glew. openvdb should migrate at the same time
[10:23] <pitti> LocutusOfBorg: it's normal as long as it just happens a few times; if the machine takes more than, say, 20 s to boot, that becomes unexpected
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> lets cross fingers
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, it seems stuck since minutes, not seconds
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> but I'll wait some more time
[10:38] <pitti> right, that one surely is broken
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> is it possible to kick bino/arm64 out? the failure is somewhere related to qt, and the gles/gl incompatibilities I don't know who I have to blame or to fix
[10:51] <LocutusOfBorg> I might try to patch it, but probably qt needs fix
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream (xenial-backports/main) [0.9.4-1ubuntu1 => 0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted appstream [source] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.2 => 1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.3] (core)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:1.6.0-2ubuntu1.1 => 1:1.6.0-2ubuntu1.2] (core)
[11:02] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, I'm trying really harder, but it still fails this mipp stuff
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [ppc64el] (xenial-backports/main) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [amd64] (xenial-backports/main) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [i386] (xenial-backports/main) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [armhf] (xenial-backports/main) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [arm64] (xenial-backports/main) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [powerpc] (xenial-backports/main) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [s390x] (xenial-backports/main) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (trusty-proposed/main) [1:0.2.91.11 => 1:0.2.91.12] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (trusty-proposed/main) [0.6.2 => 0.6.2.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:37] <pitti> Logan: mipp/i386 is mostly broken anyway (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mipp/zesty/i386), I'll just hintit
[11:52] <pitti> Logan: sorry, not for you, that was for LocutusOfBorg
[13:08] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, can you please do something wrt such mipp/gdal?
[13:08] <LocutusOfBorg> oh you did already
[13:08] <pitti> 12:37:54 pitti | LocutusOfBorg: mipp/i386 is mostly broken anyway (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mipp/zesty/i386), I'll just hint it
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, the problem is that somewhere it picks up libroj9
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> this is something I need to understand
[13:11] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure why in local zesty i386 it isn't picked up, I have proposed enabled
[13:15] <LocutusOfBorg> can we please remove libglewmx-dbg from zesty? otherwise I guess glew won't migrate
[13:15] <LocutusOfBorg> in proposed it is already removed
[13:19] <cjwatson> that doesn't sound right
[13:20] <pitti> glewmx is *only* in proposed rightnow
[13:20] <cjwatson> if it's already removed in zesty-proposed then all that should be needed is for glew and glewmx to migrate together
[13:20] <cjwatson> or for glew to migrate first
[13:21] <cjwatson> so it should just be about sorting out the other failures from that big autohint
[13:21] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure why blender is there :/
[13:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll see  it more deeply
[13:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I never did a transition involving so many packages
[13:25] <LocutusOfBorg> kodi -.-'
[13:36] <LocutusOfBorg> please hint boost-defaults
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [amd64] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [armhf] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [powerpc] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [s390x] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [arm64] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [ppc64el] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [i386] (xenial-backports) [0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[16:09] <ChrisTownsend> Could I please get someone to reject libertine in zesty-proposed?
[16:11] <didrocks> ChrisTownsend: hum, I don't see it
[16:12] <ChrisTownsend> didrocks: Strange.  Maybe bileto removed it automatically when I updated my silo???
[16:12] <didrocks> could be?
[16:13] <ChrisTownsend> didrocks: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libertine
[16:13] <didrocks> ChrisTownsend: ah, it was already accepted
[16:13] <didrocks> sorry, I thought about the unapproved queue
[16:14] <ChrisTownsend> didrocks: Ok, no worries, I should have been clear:)
[16:14] <didrocks> hum, I'll let someone from the SRU team thus, they may have tools to mention the revert on the linked bugs
[16:15] <ChrisTownsend> didrocks: There is a packaging issue that I'm trying to fix.
[16:15] <ChrisTownsend> didrocks: So if this is removed, then I can republsih with the correct fix.
[16:15] <Laney> ChrisTownsend: You can just upload a fixed version over the top
[16:16] <didrocks> ChrisTownsend: nothing prevents you bumping and pushing a new version
[16:16] <didrocks> with -v<latest_version_not_in_proposed>
[16:16] <ChrisTownsend> Laney: didrocks: Ok, thanks.  bileto is giving me grief.  I'll follow up again with a trainguard then.
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted procps [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2.3]
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gce-compute-image-packages to ubuntu-cloud in yakkety
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gce-compute-image-packages to ubuntu-cloud in zesty
[19:40] <cyphermox> could someone please remove golang-go.crypto/1:0.0~git20161012.0.5f31782-1ubuntu0.16.10.2 from yakkety-proposed?
[19:51] <infinity> cyphermox: So, juju ends up using a vendored cyrpto instead?
[19:52] <infinity> Not convinced that's an improvement...
[20:16] <cyphermox> infinity: yeah, I know :/
[20:16] <cyphermox> it already was using a vendorized crypto though
[20:24] <infinity> Yes, with the understanding that it shouldn't be.
[20:24] <infinity> In retrospect, it should have just been rejected back then.
[20:28] <cyphermox> yep
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmahjongg (yakkety-proposed/universe) [4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1 => 4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu)
[22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: googletest (zesty-proposed/primary) [1.8.0-2]