[01:49] Hello. [01:50] How would I change the ethernet address (mac address) on a ubuntu server 16.04? [01:50] I tried the "old" way of passing hwaddress ether in /etc/network/interfaces under the specific ethernet port, but that just left me with an unaccesible box [01:51] now I need to do it on a 2nd server, and I'm kind of scared to try the same thing [01:57] Hi everyone! I am having an issue that is preventing server 16.04.1 from starting on my ThinkServer RS210. I believe it might be an issue with it's older uEFI, but I see no option to enable legacy BIOS only. 14.04 works perfectly, as well as Proxmox 3.3. I was wondering if anyone had success running 16.04 on this model of server, or had any pointers to help diagnose the issue. Thank you. [02:01] NickNackName: was this an upgrade from a working 14.04? or a fresh installation? (I'm not sure which I would expect to work better, I'd really expect both to be fine..) [02:02] NickNackName: what happens when it tries to boot? [02:02] I tried both fresh and upgrade. When it tries to boot, it gets to the HDD and just restarts like a boot manager is not installed. [02:03] (Yes, I selected install grub to the correct disk on install.) I've tried with an external boot manager (grub on a USB) and selected "boot from first hdd" and the same behavior occurs. [02:39] sarnold: Any ideas? === Mobutils_ is now known as Mobutils === JanC is now known as Guest78373 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [03:55] I'm trouble shooting a zone transfer issue between two ubuntu servers, I can manually force the transfer by restarting bind on the slave, but its getting denied when the master restarts [03:55] allow-transfer seems to be ok, its set to the ip of the master [04:13] fluvvell, that seems backwards [04:14] patdk-lap, tell me about it [04:14] why would you allow-transfer to the master? the master is the master [04:15] wait [04:15] I've mis-typed, [04:16] allow transfer is set on the master to the ip of the slave [04:16] both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses? [04:16] and on the slave, the master is listed correctly as the ip of the master [04:16] only ipv4 [04:18] but restarting the master does not push updates out to the slave. Should it? [04:18] no [04:18] why should it? [04:19] the slave only requests them, to make sure it's not outdated when it starts [04:19] because I've update it [04:19] the master has no idea what the slave has, or cares [04:19] you restarted the master though, how does it know? [04:19] oooh oh. [04:19] you did use nsupdate to update it right? [04:19] and you do have notify turned on? [04:19] you do not just EDIT the files, use nsupdate [04:20] not if you want it to notify your slaves [04:20] I've just been reading about notify [04:20] It would appear not. [04:20] oh, nsupdate. [04:22] wow, I've hand edited for years. [04:22] {bow} thank you, reading https://debian-administration.org/article/591/Using_the_dynamic_DNS_editor_nsupdate [04:22] now [04:24] patdk-lap, where does notify go ? [04:24] I was reading about allow-notify, which is not what I'm wanting is it? [04:25] allow-notify goes in the slaves [04:26] then notify yes, in the master [04:27] I'm pretty much using the same two nameservers for all my zones, can it be in the opening stanza rather than in each zone? [04:27] yes [04:30] warnings in the nsupdate manual about not editing by hand... am I going to screw up if I switch to nsupdate? [04:30] I mean when [05:17] Hi, I need help with apparmor [05:19] ask the question [05:20] I need to put a profile in complain mode but I don't have aa-complain [05:20] I use ubuntu core 15.04 thats why [05:21] I tried this sudo apparmor_parser -rC /var/lib/snappy/seccomp/profiles/lxd_lxc_2.0.5-1 but it doesnt work [05:26] sudo apparmor_parser -rC /var/lib/apparmor/profiles/click_lxd_lxc_2.0.5-1 I mean === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer === nchambers is now known as God === God is now known as nchambers === amoralej|off is now known as amoralej [10:25] Could somebody please sponsor this LP? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1298061 Liang Chen quit. found nobodt touched long time. [10:25] Launchpad bug 1298061 in nova (Ubuntu Trusty) "nova should allow evacuate for an instance in the Error state" [Medium,In progress] [12:38] jamespage, zul: i'm starting to wonder if we should backport debhelper 10 to the ocata uca [12:39] coreycb: it probably would make life easier for us [12:39] coreycb: btw happy birthday ;) [12:39] zul, oh thanks :) [12:43] zul, ok going to try backporting that [12:43] coreycb: do it locally first just in case things dont blow up [12:44] zul, it'll land in the staging ppa first so it's sort of a testing grounds anyway [12:46] coreycb: im going to spend some time to get things updated again and make sure things are deployable [12:47] zul, going to start some early testing with the charms? [12:48] coreycb: yep [12:48] zul, sounds good, thanks === amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch === iberezovskiy|off is now known as iberezovskiy [13:22] rbasak: thanks for clearing the dovecot-antispam permissions [13:44] jamespage, coreycb: do you have an ETA for ocata packages in http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/ocata/ ? [13:45] EmilienM, probably next week [13:45] coreycb: ack [13:47] jamespage, zul: fyi trying to figure this out. http://paste.ubuntu.com/23516859/ related commit - https://github.com/openstack/xstatic-bootswatch/commit/49c0d56698bc14ae5e5c18cc00c3f2e290d2e724 [13:48] seriously an entire release in one commit [13:49] coreycb: erm...:) [14:00] coreycb, zul, ddellav: http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/cloud-archive/ocata_versions.html is kinda working - something is wonky with the UCA pockets for Ocata [14:02] jamespage, \o/ [14:02] coreycb, I did however revert your upstream version tracker commit [14:02] will deal with that separately [14:02] jamespage, :( [14:05] jamespage, btw IS installed python-git [14:05] coreycb, yeah on wrong server [14:05] jamespage, lol [14:16] cpaelzer: you're welcome! I've also been working on the strongswan review. I've done one pass badly. Now I'm figuring out a better process to do merge reviews and then I'll do it again :-) [14:16] This is probably just about the most complex thing to merge I've seen :-/ === amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej [14:23] rbasak: yeah it is an ugly one [14:23] rbasak: but it got better this time and last time [14:23] so progress - \o/ [14:23] rbasak: I tried to do it as linear as possible (like following changelog and such) [14:24] rbasak: let me know if you think I can help with this particular merge (not so mcuh with your review process) [14:37] jamespage, zul, the horizon issue may be due to python-django and python-django-compressor not being at upper-constraints [14:37] coreycb zul networking-ovn is updated. Has a depwait in xenial on debhelper lp:~ddellav/ubuntu/+source/networking-ovn [14:38] ddellav, ok thanks, i've backported debhelper 10.2.2 to xenial-ocata [14:45] ddellav, networking-ovn pushed/uploaded [14:46] coreycb ack [14:50] jamespage, zul: not sure what to do, i almost just want to open a bug since we're within the g-r range: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23517114/ [14:53] coreycb: do it [15:05] zul, jamespage going to try testing with compressor 2.1 first [15:35] cpaelzer: the strongswan merge is spread out across 9 terminal windows, 4 editor buffers in 3 editor windows using all six of my monitors! :-/ [15:35] First time I've usefully used all six for a single task I think. [15:38] rbasak: oh, geez, is that the one where we carry a zillion binary packages and debian doesn't? [15:38] nacc, ERROR:Failed to create local branch (debian/sid). Does it already exist (pass -f)? [15:39] nacc, I don't recall seeing that before, this is fresh usd pull, and fresh clone/merge [15:44] rharper -> [paelzer] Enable AIO backend for tgt: DONE [15:44] cool! [15:44] indeed! [15:48] mdeslaur: yes. I have a note to talk about that with you, BTW. We'd like to lose that delta too. [15:51] rbasak: me? not sure what I have to do with that :) [15:51] rbasak: losing the delta seems like a sane thing to do [15:53] mdeslaur: because I wonder if we're enabling plugins unnecessarily, and what the security quality of those plugins might be. But it's still just a note to myself - it may be fine and I haven't looked yet. [15:53] oh, hrm [16:00] rharper, nacc, smoser, magicalChicken, rbasak, powersj , caribou: irc meeting [16:01] o/ [16:21] coreycb: jamespage: please have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1624791 if you will, it does not relate to Ansible (we deploy with Chef), but I'm not sure whether to target it to Ubuntu packaging or Horizon upstream [16:21] Launchpad bug 1624791 in openstack-ansible "Horizon randomly fails to connect to the service APIs" [High,Won't fix] [16:35] caribou, i forgot to ask about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1614052 in meeting [16:36] Launchpad bug 1614052 in sosreport (Ubuntu Xenial) "SOSREPORT need to collect OPAL msglog" [High,In progress] [16:56] ddellav, it looks like swift is blocked on pyeclib autopkgtest failures, if you can shed any light on that: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html [16:56] coreycb ill take a look [17:18] coreycb: just uploaded a fix...libisasl2 is not available on non amd64 [17:19] zul, ok thanks. ddellav ^ [17:26] coreycb zul ack [17:33] coreycb: ceilometer hasnt cut a b1 release yet? [17:34] zul, i don't know [17:34] coreycb: it looks like they havent [18:05] coreycb: ping [18:05] zul, you can just ask your question :) [18:06] coreycb: its more of a thought than a question...since you backported debhelper this morning it makes sense to bump xenial compat levels in the openstack packages on zesty so things can get built again [18:07] :) [18:07] zul, i dropped all the ca-patches that lowered debhelper <= 9 [18:08] zul, so either we can rebuild them if they have issues now, or next time they get backported they'll use debhelper 10.2.2 [18:09] coreycb: yeah but im seeting stuff like this http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23518079/ [18:11] zul, hmm apache2-dev and dh-systemd weren't patched in ca-patches [18:12] i think you might need to backport that as well but dont quote me on that === JanC_ is now known as JanC [18:20] ddellav, zul, jamespage: tracking the horizon/xstatic issue in bug 1643964 [18:20] bug 1643964 in XStatic-bootswatch "compressing static assets fails with xstatic-bootswatch 3.3.7.0" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1643964 [18:21] I was able to recreate it from source so hopefully will get some attention now [18:21] coreycb: sweet === amoralej is now known as amoralej|off [19:51] coreycb/ddellav: swift should be coming out of proposed soon [19:51] zul, ok [20:07] zul, i think the debhelper issues should be fixed up now. there was a 10.* version recently backported to xenial-backports that was conflicting with the version in xenial-ocata. [20:07] coreycb: ok [20:10] coreycb: well see ;) [20:10] zul, yeah [20:45] coreycb: xenial seems to be building again [20:45] zul, \o/ [21:38] hi, how can recovery user/owner ? [21:38] chown -hR www-data:www-data /var/www/.* [21:38] .* (non bsd .git .composer ) [21:39] rsync 2 tree ? [21:55] showaz: sorry, what do you mean 'recover'? [21:55] nacc: chown -hR www-data:www-data /var/www/.* (../../****) [21:56] nacc: dpkg --configure -a [21:57] linux /.* glob ./**/* regex / bsd based only \.(*) objects [21:57] showaz: sorry, it's still not clear to me what you are asking or doing. [21:57] showaz: you recursively changed ownership on /var/www (why are you specifing .* if you are specifing recursive?) [21:57] showaz: also waht does (../../****) mean? [21:58] showaz: then you reconfigured all packages with dpkg? [21:58] showaz: and then you typed a bunch of regex, without any articles in the descriptions, so I have no idea what you were trying to explain [21:59] nacc: yes /var/www/* destroy permission owners group/user root dir, its need reconstruct on the basis of *.deb [22:00] showaz: so you (accidentally?) recursively changed the permisssons on /var/www? and now what to recreate exactly what the original .deb would have done? [22:01] nacc: /var/www/.* -> /var/**/* [22:01] showaz: what do you think that syntax means? [22:01] showaz: i have no idea what you are trying to say