| infinity | cjwatson: Can you think of any valid reason for platform/installer-gtk continuing to exist? | 18:01 |
|---|---|---|
| infinity | cjwatson: We don't build the gtk d-i flavour (have we ever?), and if we did, those udebs would get yanked in by my debian-installer-udebs hack now. | 18:01 |
| infinity | (cf: my hunting down why a udeb was supported that really shouldn't be, and finding a seed there that doesn't make much sense to me) | 18:02 |
| infinity | Tempted to just rm the file (and the STRUCTURE entry) and see what poops out to universe. | 18:03 |
| * infinity does that. | 18:04 | |
| infinity | Thanks for the chat. | 18:04 |
| infinity | :P | 18:04 |
| cjwatson | heh. I'm not fussed by it. | 18:10 |
| cjwatson | we did build it at one point. | 18:10 |
| infinity | That must be in the distant past. | 18:12 |
| infinity | Perhaps pre-ubiquity. | 18:12 |
| infinity | Oh, hrm. Or 2013. | 18:14 |
| * infinity shrugs. | 18:14 | |
| infinity | No on seems to miss it. | 18:14 |
| xnox | we should have killed the desktop-alt images with optional gtk builts in 2013, after the full disk encryption work done in ubiquity. | 18:43 |
| infinity | 56 binaries and 6 sources demoted. Yay. | 19:18 |
| infinity | xnox: Don't see how that relates. | 19:18 |
| infinity | xnox: The desktop alternate images exist due to ubiquity lacking a small footprint (text, perhaps) frontend. | 19:19 |
| infinity | The only people who seem to care are lubuntu, but they care a lot. :P | 19:19 |
| * xnox for the ubuntu desktop flavour, the gtk d-i, i was told existed because ubiquity could not do full disk encryption. | 19:20 | |
| xnox | indeed the non-gtk, curses only, is the low-memory/minimal thing. | 19:20 |
| infinity | Oh. Right, Ubuntu alternates are long dead. | 19:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!