[18:01] <infinity> cjwatson: Can you think of any valid reason for platform/installer-gtk continuing to exist?
[18:01] <infinity> cjwatson: We don't build the gtk d-i flavour (have we ever?), and if we did, those udebs would get yanked in by my debian-installer-udebs hack now.
[18:02] <infinity> (cf: my hunting down why a udeb was supported that really shouldn't be, and finding a seed there that doesn't make much sense to me)
[18:03] <infinity> Tempted to just rm the file (and the STRUCTURE entry) and see what poops out to universe.
[18:04]  * infinity does that.
[18:04] <infinity> Thanks for the chat.
[18:04] <infinity> :P
[18:10] <cjwatson> heh.  I'm not fussed by it.
[18:10] <cjwatson> we did build it at one point.
[18:12] <infinity> That must be in the distant past.
[18:12] <infinity> Perhaps pre-ubiquity.
[18:14] <infinity> Oh, hrm.  Or 2013.
[18:14]  * infinity shrugs.
[18:14] <infinity> No on seems to miss it.
[18:43] <xnox> we should have killed the desktop-alt images with optional gtk builts in 2013, after the full disk encryption work done in ubiquity.
[19:18] <infinity> 56 binaries and 6 sources demoted.  Yay.
[19:18] <infinity> xnox: Don't see how that relates.
[19:19] <infinity> xnox: The desktop alternate images exist due to ubiquity lacking a small footprint (text, perhaps) frontend.
[19:19] <infinity> The only people who seem to care are lubuntu, but they care a lot. :P
[19:20]  * xnox for the ubuntu desktop flavour, the gtk d-i, i was told existed because ubiquity could not do full disk encryption.
[19:20] <xnox> indeed the non-gtk, curses only, is the low-memory/minimal thing.
[19:20] <infinity> Oh.  Right, Ubuntu alternates are long dead.