[09:25] <anpok_> alan_g: I think we want people to run miral-shell
[09:25] <anpok_> when they try clients..
[09:25] <anpok_> or unity8 directly
[09:25] <anpok_> so in some way mir demo servers give the wrong impression right now..
[09:25] <alan_g> agreed
[09:26] <anpok_> which does not make the documentation wrong..
[09:26] <anpok_> just thinking that we should have a disclaimer there ..
[09:27] <alan_g> I was planning to blog about it
[09:27] <alan_g> Which documentation?
[09:29] <anpok_> the intro documentation.. http://unity.ubuntu.com/mir-docs/0.25/using_mir_on_pc.html .. and http://unity.ubuntu.com/mir-docs/0.25/building_source_for_pc.html
[09:32] <alan_g> Sure, that could do with a refresh. Like you say the docs reflect what's in the lp:mir project, not what we've done that is useful
[09:32] <anpok_> yes
[09:33] <alan_g> So there are two cases:
[09:34] <alan_g> 1. testing client toolkits etc. against Mir servers - "just install miral-examples and use miral-shell"
[09:34] <alan_g> 2. writing servers - "use libmiral-dev"
[09:34] <anpok_> yes
[09:38] <alan_g> We should add a couple of paragraphs to those docs, check where the 0.25 release is at, and (maybe) "cherrypick".
[09:39] <alan_g> You want to write them? Or should I add to my list?
[09:45] <anpok_> alan_g: I can do that.. do we generate miral docs somewhere?
[09:47] <alan_g> not currently - it hasn't felt worth the effort of setting up automation for miral as we plan to roll it into lp:mir at some point.
[09:49] <alan_g> Once the Unity8 integration has settled down we won't need to release it so often and can progress that.
[09:52] <alan_g> Meantime, I guess http://voices.canonical.com/alan.griffiths/category/miral/ is the least bad option.
[17:09] <alan_g> anpok_: the blog post I mentioned: http://voices.canonical.com/alan.griffiths/2016/11/25/testing-for-mir/