babbageclunk | If anyone fancies doing a review, take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6622, thanks! | 04:32 |
---|---|---|
=== axw_ is now known as axw | ||
mgz | mornin' all | 09:45 |
=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
macgreagoir | mgz: G'day, is there a magic touch for PR test retries that you have? | 10:05 |
macgreagoir | https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6620 | 10:05 |
* frobware needs to step out for ~1 hour. | 10:17 | |
deanman | Morning, is there a configuration on 2.x where you could configure an openstack cloud deployment to use by default floating IPs on the controller? Something like https://jujucharms.com/docs/1.25/config-openstack ? I can't seem to be able to find any reference for 2.0 ? | 10:32 |
macgreagoir | deanman: I think you should be able to pass that to bootstrap as a --config option. | 11:24 |
deanman | macgreagoir: yeah i just found out by peeking the Go code, there is a use-floating-ip configuration option which i wasn't sure whether is implemented in 2.0. I use https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/models-config as a reference for available keys. | 11:25 |
macgreagoir | deanman: I was just peeking at the provider code too :-) | 11:26 |
deanman | macgreagoir: (y) | 11:29 |
mgz | macgreagoir: so, cleanup done, though you upset the checkjob by targetting against staging first | 12:17 |
mgz | I have poked, and have another thing to try as well if needed | 12:18 |
macgreagoir | mgz: Guilty! | 12:18 |
bac | morning | 12:30 |
macgreagoir | fnordahl anastasiamac mgz: juju/juju/pull/6617 merged successfully. Thanks fnordahl! | 14:47 |
fnordahl | macgreagoir: thank you! | 14:49 |
natefinch | rick_h: what was the windows thing you wanted me to look at? | 15:13 |
rick_h | natefinch: should have a GH email from the PR | 15:14 |
natefinch | rick_h: ahh, ok, I forgot I finally fixed it so github notifications for juju go to my canonical address and not my gmail address, no wonder I couldn't find it. :) | 15:20 |
mgz | wait, why did I think the afternoon standup was now, not half an hour ago | 15:31 |
mgz | it hasn't even changed time | 15:31 |
rick_h | mgz: ah I figured you were skipping the second one as you were at the first one so I rep'd you for it | 15:33 |
rick_h | mgz: not sure as far as the time slot lack of movement :) | 15:33 |
rick_h | mgz: to be clear though, the hard requirement is just one of them, two is optional | 15:33 |
mgz | rick_h: thanks for repin' | 15:34 |
natefinch | rick_h: btw, I feel like "verify" is more accurate for what we're doing with the endpoints. To me "validation" means "check against a regex" or some other check of general shape, whereas verification is more "actually try it". | 15:41 |
natefinch | rick_h: but maybe I'm splitting hairs | 15:41 |
rick_h | natefinch: I'm find with the verify internally, but I feel like end user input validation is the end user side of things | 15:42 |
rick_h | natefinch: validate all the user's input, you might validate by verifying the url is reachable...etc | 15:42 |
natefinch | rick_h: *shrug* ok | 15:44 |
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes | ||
frobware | do we care that the bridge script (based on my current changes) would no longer work for 1.25? | 18:21 |
frobware | rick_h: ^^ | 18:21 |
frobware | because what I'm doing now makes this a reality | 18:21 |
frobware | my expectation is that 1.25 is bug fix only, so we would do the minimal anyway | 18:22 |
rick_h | frobware: +1 | 18:29 |
frobware | rick_h: right now it's a mutiny - characters are being dropped, functions have gone, compatability has been tossed... :) | 18:30 |
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
thumper | morning folks | 19:38 |
natefinch | morning | 19:39 |
babbageclunk | morning! | 19:45 |
natefinch | is the maas API only exposed over http? | 19:53 |
rick_h | natefinch: or https? | 19:54 |
natefinch | correct | 19:54 |
natefinch | and is it only exposed over the standard ports, or is that configurable? | 19:54 |
rick_h | natefinch: so http/https via apache. | 19:55 |
rick_h | natefinch: it could be custom if the user monkeys with it | 19:55 |
natefinch | bleh, ok | 19:56 |
natefinch | does juju support all that? | 19:56 |
rick_h | natefinch: you tell me, can you specify the port as part of the url? | 19:58 |
natefinch | you certainly can.... I presume it just works as long as we don't do anything stupid | 19:59 |
rick_h | natefinch: I'd assume so | 20:00 |
alexisb | voidspace, you aournd still? | 20:06 |
babbageclunk | menn0: take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6622 please? | 20:39 |
babbageclunk | menn0: also - do we only want to delete logs for a model when it's migrating? Or should we also do it when it's destroyed? | 20:40 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: will do in 5 | 20:40 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: certainly when it's destroyed too | 20:40 |
babbageclunk | menn0: Ta, not blocked so no rush. | 20:41 |
babbageclunk | menn0: Ok | 20:41 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: it's an oversight that we're not doing that already | 20:41 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: the log pruner will catch them eventually (all gone in 3 days), but better to do it up front | 20:42 |
mup | Bug #1645477 opened: Problem deploying openstack-ha with juju deploy <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645477> | 21:24 |
mup | Bug #1645477 changed: Problem deploying openstack-ha with juju deploy <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645477> | 21:33 |
mup | Bug #1645477 opened: Problem deploying openstack-ha with juju deploy <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645477> | 21:36 |
natefinch | GAAHHHHHH | 21:45 |
natefinch | man, I can't tell you how much I hate test suites | 21:45 |
thumper | natefinch: what's the problem? | 21:46 |
natefinch | setup test doing things I didn't realize it did, which causes me to waste an hour debugging why my test is passing when it shouldn't | 21:47 |
alexisb | babbageclunk, I am going to be late | 21:56 |
alexisb | will ping | 21:56 |
babbageclunk | alexisb: no worries | 22:01 |
alexisb | ok babbageclunk I am joining the HO | 22:05 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: did you still want me to review that change given that thumper has already approved it? | 22:52 |
babbageclunk | menn0: he's approved the removing logs one - I don't think you need to look at it, it's pretty straightforward. | 22:54 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: I just quickly looked anyway and it LGTM | 22:54 |
babbageclunk | menn0: I think you should still take a look at the other one. | 22:54 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: will do | 22:55 |
babbageclunk | menn0: cool thanks | 22:56 |
menn0 | babbageclunk: done | 23:16 |
babbageclunk | menn0: thanks - going through them (and thumper's) now | 23:16 |
alexisb | perrito666, ping | 23:46 |
alexisb | thumper, ping | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!