[04:32] <babbageclunk> If anyone fancies doing a review, take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6622, thanks!
[09:45] <mgz> mornin' all
[10:05] <macgreagoir> mgz: G'day, is there a magic touch for PR test retries that you have?
[10:05] <macgreagoir> https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6620
[10:17]  * frobware needs to step out for ~1 hour.
[10:32] <deanman> Morning, is there a configuration on 2.x where you could configure an openstack cloud deployment to use by default floating IPs on the controller? Something like https://jujucharms.com/docs/1.25/config-openstack ? I can't seem to be able to find any reference for 2.0 ?
[11:24] <macgreagoir> deanman: I think you should be able to pass that to bootstrap as a --config option.
[11:25] <deanman> macgreagoir: yeah i just found out by peeking the Go code, there is a use-floating-ip configuration option which i wasn't sure whether is implemented in 2.0. I use https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/models-config as a reference for available keys.
[11:26] <macgreagoir> deanman: I was just peeking at the provider code too :-)
[11:29] <deanman> macgreagoir: (y)
[12:17] <mgz> macgreagoir: so, cleanup done, though you upset the checkjob by targetting against staging first
[12:18] <mgz> I have poked, and have another thing to try as well if needed
[12:18] <macgreagoir> mgz: Guilty!
[12:30] <bac> morning
[14:47] <macgreagoir> fnordahl anastasiamac mgz: juju/juju/pull/6617 merged successfully. Thanks fnordahl!
[14:49] <fnordahl> macgreagoir: thank you!
[15:13] <natefinch> rick_h: what was the windows thing you wanted me to look at?
[15:14] <rick_h> natefinch: should have a GH email from the PR
[15:20] <natefinch> rick_h: ahh, ok, I forgot I finally fixed it so github notifications for juju go to my canonical address and not my gmail address, no wonder I couldn't find it. :)
[15:31] <mgz> wait, why did I think the afternoon standup was now, not half an hour ago
[15:31] <mgz> it hasn't even changed time
[15:33] <rick_h> mgz: ah I figured you were skipping the second one as you were at the first one so I rep'd you for it
[15:33] <rick_h> mgz: not sure as far as the time slot lack of movement :)
[15:33] <rick_h> mgz: to be clear though, the hard requirement is just one of them, two is optional
[15:34] <mgz> rick_h: thanks for repin'
[15:41] <natefinch> rick_h: btw, I feel like "verify" is more accurate for what we're doing with the endpoints.  To me "validation" means "check against a regex" or some other check of general shape, whereas verification is more "actually try it".
[15:41] <natefinch> rick_h: but maybe I'm splitting hairs
[15:42] <rick_h> natefinch: I'm find with the verify internally, but I feel like end user input validation is the end user side of things
[15:42] <rick_h> natefinch: validate all the user's input, you might validate by verifying the url is reachable...etc
[15:44] <natefinch> rick_h: *shrug* ok
[18:21] <frobware> do we care that the bridge script (based on my current changes) would no longer work for 1.25?
[18:21] <frobware> rick_h: ^^
[18:21] <frobware> because what I'm doing now makes this a reality
[18:22] <frobware> my expectation is that 1.25 is bug fix only, so we would do the minimal anyway
[18:29] <rick_h> frobware: +1
[18:30] <frobware> rick_h: right now it's a mutiny - characters are being dropped, functions have gone, compatability has been tossed... :)
[19:38] <thumper> morning folks
[19:39] <natefinch> morning
[19:45] <babbageclunk> morning!
[19:53] <natefinch> is the maas API only exposed over http?
[19:54] <rick_h> natefinch: or https?
[19:54] <natefinch> correct
[19:54] <natefinch> and is it only exposed over the standard ports, or is that configurable?
[19:55] <rick_h> natefinch: so http/https via apache.
[19:55] <rick_h> natefinch: it could be custom if the user monkeys with it
[19:56] <natefinch> bleh, ok
[19:56] <natefinch> does juju support all that?
[19:58] <rick_h> natefinch: you tell me, can you specify the port as part of the url?
[19:59] <natefinch> you certainly can.... I presume it just works as long as we don't do anything stupid
[20:00] <rick_h> natefinch: I'd assume so
[20:06] <alexisb> voidspace, you aournd still?
[20:39] <babbageclunk> menn0: take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6622 please?
[20:40] <babbageclunk> menn0: also - do we only want to delete logs for a model when it's migrating? Or should we also do it when it's destroyed?
[20:40] <menn0> babbageclunk: will do in 5
[20:40] <menn0> babbageclunk: certainly when it's destroyed too
[20:41] <babbageclunk> menn0: Ta, not blocked so no rush.
[20:41] <babbageclunk> menn0: Ok
[20:41] <menn0> babbageclunk: it's an oversight that we're not doing that already
[20:42] <menn0> babbageclunk: the log pruner will catch them eventually (all gone in 3 days), but better to do it up front
[21:24] <mup> Bug #1645477 opened: Problem deploying openstack-ha with juju deploy  <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645477>
[21:33] <mup> Bug #1645477 changed: Problem deploying openstack-ha with juju deploy  <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645477>
[21:36] <mup> Bug #1645477 opened: Problem deploying openstack-ha with juju deploy  <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645477>
[21:45] <natefinch> GAAHHHHHH
[21:45] <natefinch> man, I can't tell you how much I hate test suites
[21:46] <thumper> natefinch: what's the problem?
[21:47] <natefinch> setup test doing things I didn't realize it did, which causes me to waste an hour debugging why my test is passing when it shouldn't
[21:56] <alexisb> babbageclunk, I am going to be late
[21:56] <alexisb> will ping
[22:01] <babbageclunk> alexisb: no worries
[22:05] <alexisb> ok babbageclunk I am joining the HO
[22:52] <menn0> babbageclunk: did you still want me to review that change given that thumper has already approved it?
[22:54] <babbageclunk> menn0: he's approved the removing logs one - I don't think you need to look at it, it's pretty straightforward.
[22:54] <menn0> babbageclunk: I just quickly looked anyway and it LGTM
[22:54] <babbageclunk> menn0: I think you should still take a look at the other one.
[22:55] <menn0> babbageclunk: will do
[22:56] <babbageclunk> menn0: cool thanks
[23:16] <menn0> babbageclunk: done
[23:16] <babbageclunk> menn0: thanks - going through them (and thumper's) now
[23:46] <alexisb> perrito666, ping
[23:46] <alexisb> thumper, ping