[16:30] <tyhicks> hello
[16:30] <tyhicks> #startmeeting
[16:30] <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Dec  5 16:30:56 2016 UTC.  The chair is tyhicks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:30] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[16:30] <tyhicks> The meeting agenda can be found at:
[16:31] <tyhicks> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting
[16:31] <mdeslaur> \o
[16:31] <tyhicks> [TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report
[16:31] <tyhicks> jdstrand: you're up
[16:31] <chrisccoulson> hi :)
[16:31] <tyhicks> jdstrand: hey - you're up if you're ready
[16:32] <jdstrand> hey
[16:32] <jdstrand> I didn't get to anything I planned to last week except for review tools updates. Everything else was surrounding PR reviews, --classic, personal, bugs and base declaration updates. as such, this week is pretty much the same as last week:
[16:32] <jdstrand> follow up on dbus-app interface for snappy
[16:32] <jdstrand> snappy reviews
[16:32] <jdstrand> start looking at network-namespace interface
[16:32] <jdstrand> seccomp arg filtering policy as have time
[16:32] <jdstrand> that's it from me
[16:32] <jdstrand> mdeslaur: you're up
[16:33] <mdeslaur> I'm in the happy place this week
[16:33] <mdeslaur> I'm working on nss updates, that's about it as I go on vacation next week except for monday
[16:33] <mdeslaur> next!
[16:33] <tyhicks> I'm in the community role this week
[16:34] <tyhicks> I'm finishing the second part of the seccomp logging changes for snappy
[16:34] <tyhicks> that's the "complain mode" support
[16:34] <tyhicks> I still need to get to some eCryptfs issues
[16:34] <tyhicks> that includes the inode timestamps issue (LP: #1636890) and a crypto api usage issue
[16:35] <tyhicks> that's it for me
[16:35] <tyhicks> jjohansen: are you around?
[16:35] <tyhicks> sarnold: go ahead and we'll circle back if jjohansen gets here
[16:36] <sarnold> I'm on bug triage this week
[16:36] <sarnold> I didn't get much done on non-cve-triage last week, so just replay all that here :) libsmbios mir, starting swift-s3-something mir
[16:36] <sarnold> and I'm pretty sure I'm off friday, so short week
[16:37] <sarnold> that's it for me, chrisccoulson?
[16:37] <tyhicks> sarnold: is there anything left for you to do on that apt bug?
[16:37] <sarnold> tyhicks: oh! I forgot that one..
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> I need to do the oxide 1.19 release this week
[16:37] <sarnold> tyhicks: hopefullly apt has been let into the build queue by now, if it has, then i'll test it.
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> fingers crossed there will be no mozilla updates this week
[16:37] <sarnold> chrisccoulson: heh, didn't you just do one? :)
[16:38] <chrisccoulson> Other than that, I'm currently working on bug 1637190, and I need to do a review too
[16:38] <chrisccoulson> That's me done
[16:38] <tyhicks> sarnold: it is still in the trusy unapproved queue
[16:38] <chrisccoulson> sarnold, yeah ;)
[16:38] <tyhicks> thanks chrisccoulson
[16:38] <ratliff> I think I'm up
[16:38] <tyhicks> you are :)
[16:39] <ratliff> I'm on CVE triage this week
[16:39] <ratliff> I'm working on a ghostscript regression (LP: #1647276)
[16:40] <ratliff> that is it for me
[16:40] <sarnold> why do I suddenly want a pepsi..?
[16:40] <tyhicks> :)
[16:40] <tyhicks> [TOPIC] Highlighted packages
[16:40] <tyhicks> The Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so.
[16:40] <tyhicks> See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved.
[16:41] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/firebird2.5.html
[16:41] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/netty-3.9.html
[16:41] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/privoxy.html
[16:41] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/node-connect.html
[16:41] <tyhicks> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/libpgf.html
[16:41] <tyhicks> [TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions
[16:41] <tyhicks> Does anyone have any other questions or items to discuss?
[16:42] <tyhicks> jdstrand, mdeslaur, sarnold, ChrisCoulson, ratliff: Thanks!
[16:42] <tyhicks> #endmeeting
[16:42] <meetingology> Meeting ended Mon Dec  5 16:42:14 2016 UTC.
[16:42] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-12-05-16.30.moin.txt
[16:42] <mdeslaur> thanks tyhicks
[16:43] <ratliff> thank you tyhicks!
[16:43] <jdstrand> thanks tyhicks :)
[16:44] <sarnold> thanks tyhicks!
[19:01] <slashd> Hi, Is there a mtg today "Developer Membership Board" ?
[19:03] <rbasak> o/
[19:04] <rbasak> I'm afraid I don't think we'll have quorum today.
[19:04] <rbasak> Most DMB staff who are also Canonical employees are sprinting this week.
[19:04] <fossfreedom_> oh dear!
[19:05] <micahg> o/
[19:05] <HEXcube> Uh.. Oh..
[19:05] <slashd> rbasak, Is it possible to get +1/-1 via email instead of waiting for next meeting ? just asking if possibe
[19:05] <slashd> I think I already saw that in the past (if you think it is applicable)
[19:07] <rbasak> slashd: I think most prefer IRC, but I believe ML-only has been offered (and done) before.
[19:07] <slashd> rbasak, ok was only proposing since I don't think there is much mtg in 2016 right ?
[19:08] <slashd> it starts back in "January 16th 2017" from what I see
[19:08] <rbasak> I had proposed that we skip the 19 Dec meeting as I didn't think there would be much attendance.
[19:08] <rbasak> Perhaps we can re-instate it if there's demand and we can check that DMB members will be available.
[19:09] <rbasak> Or, indeed, exceptionally do one next week or somethin ginstead.
[19:10] <slashd> rbasak, ok I'm really up to any propositions (email, next week, 19dec, ...) and worst case I will re-apply in Jan 2017
[19:10] <rbasak> I'm quite happy to make accomodations, but of course I'm here and the others who would need to show up to that aren't here :-/
[19:10] <slashd> rbasak, yeah this is why I thought that email would be a good alternative, but again worst case I will re-re-apply in 2017 lol
[19:11] <rbasak> I can try to ask around tomorrow as most of the Canonical DMB staff not here right now around in the same building as me tomorrow.
[19:12] <rbasak> Who was the other applicant?
[19:12] <fossfreedom> hi - that would be me
[19:12] <rbasak> o/
[19:12] <fossfreedom> :)
[19:13] <rbasak> I guess broadly the options are: 1) defer to another IRC meeting; 2) defer to ML
[19:13] <fossfreedom> sorry - ML ?
[19:13] <slashd> mailling list
[19:13] <rbasak> Mailing list (devel-permissions@)
[19:13] <fossfreedom> k
[19:14] <rbasak> Another IRC meeting could be 12th, 19th, another date, or January.
[19:14] <rbasak> And time to be determined.
[19:14] <rbasak> slashd, fossfreedom: if we followed that path, what would be your availability?
[19:14] <fossfreedom> hmm - kind of a problem maybe for Ubuntu Budgie?
[19:14] <slashd> rbasak, ok 12th and 19th would work for me
[19:14] <fossfreedom> I will try to make myself available anyhow
[19:15] <rbasak> OK, what sort of times? 1900 UTC like this one? 1500 UTc/
[19:15] <rbasak> UTC?
[19:15] <fossfreedom> would prefer if poss 1900UTC
[19:15] <slashd> 19:00 UTC is fine for me
[19:16] <rbasak> OK. I'll try to ask the others tomorrow if they're willing to do 12th or 19th, 1900UTC.
[19:16] <fossfreedom> thnx
[19:16] <slashd> thanks rbasak
[19:16] <rbasak> If we can get a quorate number available, we could do that.
[19:16] <slashd> much appreciated
[19:16] <fossfreedom> cheers
[19:17] <rbasak> I can currently do the 12th at 1900, but not the 19th at 1900.
[19:17] <rbasak> micahg: how about you?
[19:17] <micahg> I think that's fine
[19:17] <micahg> either one
[19:18] <slashd> 12th 1900 works for me
[19:20] <rbasak-lag> My main connection seems to have died :-(
[19:20] <rbasak-lag> 19:17 <rbasak> I can currently do the 12th at 1900, but not the 19th at 1900.
[19:20] <rbasak-lag> 19:17 <rbasak> micahg: how about you?
[19:20] <rbasak-lag> Is what I saw last.
[19:21] <micahg> [13:17] <micahg> I think that's fine
[19:21] <micahg> [13:17] <micahg> either one
[19:21] <micahg> [13:17] <slashd> 12th 1900 works for me
[19:21] <sarnold> rbasak-lag: < micahg> I think that's fine < micahg> either one < slashd> 12th 1900 works for me
[19:21] <rbasak-lag> Thanks :)
[19:21] <rbasak-lag> OK, shall we leave it there then? I'll report back tomorrow.
[19:21] <fossfreedom> rbasak - quick question ... on a related matter - we need someone to review and feedback our sponsors ubuntu-budgie-meta package - I see the ubuntu sponsors team are quite backed up at the moment.  Anyone available that you know that can review?  We believe this is one of the last steps before asking for ISOs production (probably).
[19:22] <slashd> rbasak-lag' works for me, let's reconvene tomorrow with final decision
[19:23] <rbasak-lag> I'm afraid most of the people who could review that are busy this week. I would, but I'm sorry I'm not confident reviewing that.
[19:23] <rbasak-lag> slashd: great. Thanks! And sorry for the trouble.
[19:23] <micahg> fossfreedom: have you asked in #ubuntu-motu?
[19:23] <fossfreedom> haven't as yet - will try.
[19:24] <slashd> rbasak-lag, don't be sorry I totally understand, I was myself in a sprint 2 weeks ago.
[19:24] <HEXcube> Anytime between 12th 15:00UTC and 19:00 UTC
[19:24] <slashd> rbasak-lag, enjoy Seville