| === BrAsS_mOnKeY is now known as g2 | ||
| === Tribaal_ is now known as Tribaal | ||
| === czchen_ is now known as czchen | ||
| === andyrock_ is now known as andyrock | ||
| === Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| === leboz is now known as zobel | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === rumble is now known as grumble | ||
| pitti | buenos días amigos! | 08:04 |
|---|---|---|
| bdmurray | mvo: there are many snapd uploads in the yakkety queue, which ones can I reject? | 08:18 |
| ginggs | morning pitti! | 08:19 |
| smoser | pitti, you have a minute ? | 08:34 |
| slangasek | smoser: he's scratching his head at lp apis at the moment | 08:42 |
| pitti | smoser: sure, where are you? | 09:12 |
| mvo | bdmurray: hi, thanks for looking at the snapd yakkety queue. please reject all of them except for 2.17.1+16.10ubuntu1 (from 2016-12-06) | 10:12 |
| Laney | pitti: do you know if basic_reject()ing an item puts it back in the queue in the order of rejection? | 10:20 |
| * Laney is wondering about a script to move some requests to the front ... | 10:21 | |
| pitti | Laney: did you see the bug I filed this morning? I discussed prioritization of "slow" packages like glibc or perl with infinity yesterday | 10:23 |
| Laney | not yet | 10:23 |
| pitti | bug 1647948 | 10:23 |
| ubottu | bug 1647948 in britney "Better prioritization for packages with lots of tests" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1647948 | 10:23 |
| pitti | Laney: I *believe* rejecting an item doesn't fundamentally change its order in the queue | 10:24 |
| pitti | Laney: also, you break the transactional handling with that (reject and putting it back) | 10:24 |
| pitti | (but if that's a manual script that's probably not much of a concern) | 10:24 |
| Laney | oh FFS offlineimap | 10:26 |
| Laney | if I suspend while it's running it just hangs forever | 10:26 |
| Laney | -> no new emalis | 10:26 |
| nacc | is the autopkgtest queue length expected right now? maybe that was the glibc discussion earlier? | 10:57 |
| pitti | nacc: yep, glibc triggers three metric tons of tests (basically all of them) | 11:32 |
| pitti | nacc: you can see the contents of the queue on /running | 11:32 |
| nacc | pitti: yeah, i was looking at it now, thanks! | 11:32 |
| Laney | From RabbitMQ release 2.7.0, messages are always held in the queue in publication order, even in the presence of requeueing or channel closure | 11:33 |
| pitti | Laney: hm, I still see some lopsiding towards i386 | 11:33 |
| pitti | anyway, lunch :) | 11:34 |
| Laney | pitti: a bit of skew is to be expected with random | 11:34 |
| shadeslayer | chrisccoulson: hey, could you please update http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox.yakkety/view/head:/debian/changelog with update to yakkety? | 11:37 |
| shadeslayer | seems to be lagging behind what's in the archive | 11:37 |
| === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
| shadeslayer | chrisccoulson: and perhaps drop hardening-wrapper from thunderbird too like it was done for firefo | 12:55 |
| shadeslayer | *firefox | 12:55 |
| === freyes__ is now known as freyes | ||
| === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
| zobel | who is maintaining https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/locator/ ? | 13:13 |
| Odd_Bloke | zobel: o/ | 13:14 |
| Odd_Bloke | zobel: In case I don't respond (I'm at a sprint ATM), bugs for it are tracked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+filebug :) | 13:16 |
| === jamespag` is now known as jamespage | ||
| === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
| cyphermox | pitti: https://code.launchpad.net/~netplan-developers/netplan/+git/netplan/+merge/312682 | 15:08 |
| cyphermox | and https://code.launchpad.net/~netplan-developers/netplan/+git/netplan/+merge/312683 | 15:09 |
| xnox | infinity, the day has come, when i need to rebuild upstart.... and it fails its tests..... | 15:20 |
| xnox | like you told me so | 15:20 |
| infinity | xnox: I sure did. | 15:20 |
| infinity | xnox: Enjoy. | 15:20 |
| infinity | xnox: The best part is that when you fix it, it'll be fixed on s390x too, and we can undo all the hacks and removals that I told people they shouldn't do. :P | 15:21 |
| infinity | *cough*slangasek*cough* | 15:21 |
| doko | and libnih? | 15:22 |
| infinity | nih was never a problem. | 15:22 |
| xnox | tedg, what's left to port ubuntu-app-launch to systemd? | 15:25 |
| xnox | and does that need upstart/systemd to launch legacy apps at all? | 15:25 |
| tedg | xnox: tests and code reviews | 15:26 |
| tedg | xnox: Yes, it launches legacy apps under systemd as well | 15:26 |
| doko | infinity: http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/rebuilds/test-rebuild-20161202-zesty.html ftbfs everywhere | 15:33 |
| infinity | doko: I assume that uses a test toolchain? | 15:35 |
| doko | infinity: no, regular archive test rebuild | 15:36 |
| infinity | doko: Oh, no. Derp. Just doesn't have the ppc build fix in that version of glibc. Brain fart. Ignore me. | 15:36 |
| doko | and we removed the one in yakkety-proposed, because it failed to build | 15:36 |
| shadeslayer | chrisccoulson: oh and thunderbird doesn't seem to have a zesty branch | 15:37 |
| infinity | So many new pep8 failures... | 15:38 |
| dims | xnox : ping about https://bugs.launchpad.net/lazr.authentication/+bug/1609128 we had to pin some stuff in openstack as well since latest pkgs are not on pypi. Do you know who can help? | 16:14 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1609128 in lazr.authentication "PyPI metadata is wrong" [Undecided,New] | 16:14 |
| dims | cjwatson : perhaps you may know? | 16:16 |
| xnox | dims, i do not believe i can release that on pypi. Maybe barry or cjwatson or wgrant | 16:24 |
| dims | ah thanks xnox . cjwatson wgrant pretty please :) | 16:24 |
| xnox | tedg, where is it? | 16:24 |
| xnox | tedg, i like want to upload it into zesty right now. | 16:25 |
| xnox | tedg, and purge src:upstart from zesty asap | 16:25 |
| xnox | tedg, or i'm pondering to kick off unity8 session off desktop images | 16:25 |
| tedg | xnox: It's a secret :-P | 16:26 |
| tedg | xnox: It doesn't drop Upstart yet, it has both and chooses systemd if available. | 16:26 |
| tedg | xnox: Wanted to land that first, let it settle and then remove Upstart. | 16:26 |
| xnox | aha. | 16:26 |
| xnox | no. | 16:26 |
| tedg | xnox: Oh, it doesn't build on Zesty right now, need to fix the Google Mock stuff :-( | 16:27 |
| * tedg waves fist at Google Mock | 16:27 | |
| xnox | tedg, i think you want to wave fist at cmake-extras, and thus have your own copy of google mock in tree. no? | 16:28 |
| === tgm4883_ is now known as tgm4883 | ||
| tedg | xnox: I think that cmake-extras has been updated and I just need to match. A TODO more than a problem. | 16:29 |
| xnox | tedg, there are branch conflicts | 16:31 |
| tedg | xnox: Did you get all the branches? https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2105 | 16:32 |
| * tedg rebuilds that silo | 16:33 | |
| xnox | right | 16:33 |
| xnox | tedg, why do you target xenial? | 16:33 |
| xnox | tedg, you should land this in zesty now, continue to iterate, and land in xenial once the kinks are ironed out. | 16:34 |
| xnox | tedg, you totally should be using per-series branches here, and diverge zesty from xenial for now. | 16:34 |
| tedg | xnox: We're doing this work for the U8 session snap as well, that needs it. That snap is built from Xenial. | 16:34 |
| xnox | tedg, time and priority wise, not so much. | 16:35 |
| xnox | tedg, zesty should not have src:upstart yesterday. xenial will have upstart forever. | 16:35 |
| tedg | xnox: Heh, well, depends on how you look at it :-) Priority for me is the U8 snap. | 16:36 |
| xnox | tedg, shall i drop u8 session from zesty-desktop-amd64.iso then? | 16:36 |
| tedg | And zesty will still have Upstart, just not on the iso. | 16:36 |
| xnox | tedg, no. | 16:36 |
| xnox | tedg, it will not have src:upstart | 16:36 |
| tedg | xnox: I'm skeptical but would love to see you accomplish that. | 16:37 |
| xnox | $ cat debian/upstart-xsessions | 16:37 |
| xnox | # xsessions listed below are run inside an Upstart user session. | 16:37 |
| xnox | unity8-x11 | 16:37 |
| xnox | unity8-mir | 16:37 |
| xnox | in zesty | 16:37 |
| xnox | all other sessions moved off upstart. | 16:37 |
| tedg | xnox: Upstart is used by the greeters and some of the other flavors that start indicators. | 16:37 |
| xnox | there are no clicks pre-installed, and those don't make sense on desktop u8 anyway. | 16:37 |
| seb128 | tedg, I think pitti fixed the greeter | 16:38 |
| pitti | the branch landed, but it's stuck on ubuntu-greeter having broken tests due to some HiDPI changes | 16:38 |
| xnox | tedg, other flavours did not have upstart seeded, thus they reverted back to non-upstart session long time ago. | 16:38 |
| pitti | robert was looking into this | 16:38 |
| tedg | Clicks don't have any relation to Upstart. | 16:38 |
| pitti | tedg: ubuntu-app-launch? | 16:38 |
| pitti | (link of clicks to upstart) | 16:38 |
| tedg | The UAL that runs systemd will run Clicks under systemd | 16:38 |
| xnox | tedg, well, my point is that on u8 desktop session today, only apps ubuntu-app-launch is used is to launch legacy apps, and from my point of view, it can just exec those directly =) | 16:39 |
| tedg | But I imagine that'll be the next backend to get dropped. | 16:39 |
| xnox | tedg, i hope to not have src:click in zesty either. | 16:39 |
| xnox | tedg, all of bileto will have to have separate branches for xesty-overlay vs zesty. | 16:39 |
| * tedg giggles at xesty overlay | 16:40 | |
| tedg | xnox: You're welcome to fight that battle, I am not. | 16:40 |
| xnox | tedg, i don't need to find anything =) i will just break zesty seeds, and be done with it. | 16:41 |
| xnox | *fight | 16:41 |
| slangasek | "<infinity> nih was never a problem." <-- heh. | 16:47 |
| dobey | xnox, tedg: i'm not sure how much work it is, but it's probably feasible to get rid of click from zesty, and also thusly get rid of click support in xenial+overlay for the unity8 snap too | 16:49 |
| petn-randall | Hi, were would I find the packaging VCS to rng-tools? I plan on introducing rng-tools5 to Debian again, and I'd like to inherit the VCS history to retain the contributions of the Ubuntu maintainers. | 18:02 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| tyhicks | @pilot in | 20:39 |
| lutostag | anybody know how I would install golang-1.7 in 16.10 and get a 'go' executable? | 21:12 |
| tianon | either via src:golang-defaults (ie, "golang"/"golang-go") or via PATH | 21:12 |
| tianon | export PATH=/usr/lib/go-1.7/bin:$PATH | 21:13 |
| lutostag | tianon: perfect, thanks! | 21:14 |
| tianon | :) | 21:14 |
| chiluk | nacc can you sponsor https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1634304 ? | 21:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1634304 in virt-manager (Ubuntu Zesty) "Unable to complete install: 'Couldn't find hvm kernel for Ubuntu tree" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 21:16 |
| chiluk | actually can anyone sponsor https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1634304 for me please? | 21:17 |
| loladiro | I vaguely remember a discussion somewhere about the graphics drivers dynamically linking LLVM on Ubuntu. I keep seeing applications be bitten by this, so I wanted to add my strong support to undoing that and linking LLVM statically again. Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to find that issue. Anybody have a hunch where that would have been? | 21:53 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: I'll have a look (I'm patch piloting right now) | 22:06 |
| chiluk | thanks tyhicks. | 22:06 |
| chiluk | tyhicks: what's the process when a package sources are the same accross two releases? | 22:07 |
| chiluk | do you just end up uploading the newest one and sync back to the older one? | 22:07 |
| chiluk | tyhicks in this case zesty and yakkety are the same source base and both need the change. | 22:07 |
| chiluk | I really don't want to fork the versioning for yakkety. | 22:08 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: you'd apply the same debdiff to both except that yakkety's version would be 1:1.3.2-3ubuntu3.1 and zesty's would be 1:1.3.2-3ubuntu4 | 22:08 |
| chiluk | tyhicks: see that seems strange to me. | 22:09 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: how come? | 22:09 |
| chiluk | tyhicks because now you have the same sources with two different versions. | 22:09 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: but the resulting binary packages are built against different build-depends | 22:09 |
| chiluk | true.. | 22:10 |
| chiluk | so there's no way to keep the versions the same accross the two releases? | 22:10 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: no because you want a machine upgrading from yakkety to zesty to upgrade to the zesty version that was built against zesty build-depends | 22:11 |
| tyhicks | (or maybe zesty enables some better compiler hardening options) | 22:12 |
| chiluk | yeah I get your point. | 22:13 |
| chiluk | didn't think about the upgrades possibly being an issue with the same versioning. | 22:14 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: mind if I adjust the versioning myself in the zesty+yakkety debdiff as I upload to zesty and yakkety? | 22:16 |
| tyhicks | (there's no sense in having you attach new debdiffs for that) | 22:16 |
| === NCommander is now known as Guest41885 | ||
| tyhicks | chiluk: your debdiffs look great but I have one question about the upstream patch | 22:44 |
| chiluk | shoot | 22:44 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: have any idea why the added comment says "default to amd64" but then it defaults to i386? https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager/blob/master/virtinst/urlfetcher.py#L1110 | 22:45 |
| chiluk | yeah tyhicks have at the versioning change.. there's no sense in uploading a new debdiffaltogether | 22:45 |
| chiluk | tyhicks I'm really not sure. | 22:46 |
| chiluk | I found that peculiar as well. | 22:46 |
| chiluk | what I do know though is I tested the fix on yakkety as well as xenial | 22:46 |
| chiluk | and it fixed things in both cases. | 22:46 |
| chiluk | this was pretty much a straight cherry-pick | 22:47 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: ok, I left a question in the upstream PR but will proceed with sponsoring | 22:47 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: nice debdiffs! | 22:47 |
| chiluk | tyhicks: since I have you in the mood https://wiki.ubuntu.com/chiluk/CoreDevApplication | 22:48 |
| chiluk | ;) | 22:48 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: I mean cmon... they aren't THAT nice | 22:48 |
| chiluk | ouch. | 22:48 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: just kidding, I'm happy to leave a nice comment :) | 22:48 |
| chiluk | tyhicks you mean endorsement | 22:48 |
| tyhicks | yes | 22:49 |
| chiluk | I'm going to try to get through the process before too long. | 22:49 |
| tyhicks | you shouldn't have any problems | 22:50 |
| tyhicks | chiluk: done (uploads sponsored) and done (coredev endorsement)! | 23:12 |
| chiluk | thanks tyhicks.. now to find an sru sponsor. | 23:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!