[00:08] <mastier> no idea, anyone ? what can cause that changing timeout and max_wait for datasource doesn't work
[00:09] <mastier> can you guide me how to debug it ?
[08:12] <smoser> mastier, ?
[08:12] <smoser> what was the question ?
[10:41] <ffledgling> Hello, I was going through the examples on https://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/examples.html
[10:42] <ffledgling> It seems like https://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/examples.html#adjust-mount-points-mounted uses an option called "nobootwait" and mentions that this should be used for volumes that may not be attached at instance boot
[10:43] <ffledgling> It seems like that's not a valid option for fstab in general and was only supported by certain versions of ubuntu
[10:44] <ffledgling> The correct option to use is likely "nofail", can the example be changed to reflect that?
[10:50] <nacc> ffledgling: i assume that could be done with a merge request somewhere
[10:52] <ffledgling> nacc: I think I need to modify the docs folder in https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init
[10:53] <ffledgling> But I wanted to confirm that that's not an intentional mention
[10:55] <nacc> ffledgling: fyi, http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/53456/what-is-the-difference-between-nobootwait-and-nofail-in-fstab
[10:56] <nacc> ffledgling: so you could verify they are semantically the same (and if not, file a diffeent bug :)
[10:57] <ffledgling> nacc: I saw that question, I can confirm that nobootwait does not work on fedora (which is how I started digging in the first place), and from the comments - "nobootwait is no longer a valid option in Ubuntu 16.04 (as of 2016-07-10 ...)" :)
[10:57] <ffledgling> I don't think they're semantically the same either
[11:02] <nacc> ffledgling: yeah, makes sense. I would suggest sending a merge request with explanation there and see what the maintainers say
[11:06] <ffledgling> nacc: Will do
[14:39] <ffledgling> Hi, I opened up a MR for change to docs - https://code.launchpad.net/~ffledgling/cloud-init/+git/cloud-init-1/+merge/312917
[14:39] <ffledgling> I'm not entirely sure who to mark for review, if someone could take a look and give me feedback, that'd be great.