[00:59] <Unit193> Dowh, we lost the nice ~/.cache/upstart/startxfce4.log now. :(
[01:35] <bluesabre> evening all
[01:36] <Unit193> Howdy.
[01:36] <bluesabre> flocculant, indeed, I misunderstood there
[01:36] <bluesabre> hi Unit193!
[02:18] <Unit193> Hrm, wasn't I going to nag you about something minor again? :P
[20:32] <knome> good evening people
[20:40] <flocculant> hi knome 
[20:45] <knome> 'lo flocculant 
[20:45] <knome> everything running well in the trackerland, eg. the times are up?
[20:46] <flocculant> yup
[20:46] <knome> great to hear
[20:47] <knome> to both you and akxwi-dave; anything else you'd like to see tracker do for QA?
[20:47] <flocculant> don't actually look much - not doing much more than hassle Sean with bugs ;)
[20:47] <flocculant> I did fleetingly think about adding 16.04 to status
[20:48] <flocculant> but given the amount of testing we get thought it rather ppointless
[20:48] <akxwi-dave> same here at moment just  iso testing to make sure no major probs
[20:48] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: and writing a mail to dev list re milestones :p
[20:49] <akxwi-dave> yup.. better get that done... :-)
[20:49] <flocculant> :D
[20:50] <flocculant> point release isn't far off really - with xmas and new year looming
[20:51] <akxwi-dave> actually I noticed that earlier, when checking it..  
[20:51] <knome> i really plan to move everything in the tracker to release-based system, eg. you can have status for each release (easily) separately
[20:51] <knome> and also, can easily have several releases visible/enabled in the tracker
[20:52] <flocculant> not sure that's appropriate for more than lts's 
[20:52] <knome> well there you go
[20:53] <flocculant> anything really major for non-lts would only ever be sru 
[20:53] <knome> currently that's not really "supported" :)
[20:53] <flocculant> yea
[20:53] <knome> but the thing is - once the new stuff is in place, it doesn't really matter if you want to track SRU stuff separately, as it's going to be so easy (tm)
[20:53] <flocculant> and frankly I'm not sure how many people actually ever look at that page
[20:54] <knome> i should look more, but since i've been kind of out of the loop/not contributing much, i haven't
[20:54] <flocculant> outside of team
[20:54] <knome> part of the reason i'm asking questions is to try to make it more useful for others as well
[20:54] <flocculant> yea
[20:54] <knome> it has good potential as it is now
[20:54] <flocculant> might be worth asking outside 'team'
[20:54] <knome> a bit more human text and not graphs and it can do much better
[20:54] <flocculant> not that you need do that of course
[20:55] <knome> sure, but that'd mean it would be nice if you had time to potentially put together new bits if something nice shows up
[20:55] <knome> as it is now, i don't have time to do the changes i want that would help the team, so better not fill the TODO list ;)
[20:55] <flocculant> the original idea being to let other people know easily if iso was a dud
[20:56] <knome> too bad ubuntu wasn't accepted for GCI this time btw
[20:56] <knome> that would have potentially meant more work on the tracker
[20:56] <knome> but maybe i should try to poke matthew to hear if he wanted to work on the API
[20:58] <flocculant> lol at time :p
[20:58] <flocculant> as I said - bout the only thing which had crossed my mind was lts's 
[20:59] <knome> sure
[20:59] <flocculant> and that was fleeting ...
[20:59] <knome> the thing is - one more of the benefits for storing data internally is the release-based approach
[20:59] <knome> so it's kind of built-in already to the new code
[20:59] <flocculant> :)
[23:09] <krytarik> I'll mention that two weeks ago, I split off my improved Xubuntu splash image for CD Image from the doomed Core bundle: https://code.launchpad.net/~krytarik/debian-cd/xubuntu-splash/+merge/311982
[23:10] <Unit193> Yet still doomed?
[23:10] <krytarik> ..Apparently.