[00:17] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1649736 [00:17] Ubuntu bug 1649736 in unity (Ubuntu) "unity picks poor hidpi scale factor defaults" [Undecided,New] === JanC is now known as Guest9817 === JanC_ is now known as JanC === shuduo-afk is now known as shuduo === dandrader_ is now known as dandrader === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader === boiko_ is now known as boiko [14:05] dmj_s76: mh, intresting, can you please try to debug to see what's the correct value? Unfortunately I've not such wide hardware to test, so... it's not easy for me [14:05] andyrock: too ^^^^ [14:07] rounding to integer makes sense to me === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk [15:02] dandrader|afk, greyback: ok 2150 is landing, will be able to start 2160 for realz in a few seconds [15:02] mterry: nice work, thank you [15:02] mesa is still a problem, looks like someone just pushed u8 through anyway -- so it may hit your autopkg test runs === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader [15:19] greyback: the branches in 2160 need updating [15:19] 2150 merged to trunk, should be fine to merge now [15:19] mterry: yep known, dandrader is on it [15:19] mterry, qtmir there needs mir 0.25, but silo https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2180 still stuck [15:19] ah cool [15:20] maybe I was too proactive :) [15:28] pstolowski, josharenson I created a silo 2302 for https://code.launchpad.net/~josharenson/unity-scopes-shell/fix-overview-results-sorting/+merge/313075 pawel, can you have a look at it too? [15:33] cimi, oh, nice finding from josharenson, thanks! yes, i will take a look, but probably tomorrow [15:33] pstolowski: thanks === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader [17:31] Trevinho: andyrock: Rounding to integer makes the most sense to me as well. There are some hardware vendors that pick displays that won't be ideal (3K panels on a 15" laptop being the most obviously bad.) [17:42] However the pathological displays out there really have no good (feasible) solution: On a 3K display 2x scaling results in effectively 720p, which will be a little too big for most while 1x scaling will be a little too small. 1.5x scaling there will result in just-right size, but bad, hacky widget rendering. [17:46] We should probably not even try to know what's right for those displays, since 1x vs 2x is a matter of preference between eagle-eyes who want more space and the bifocal crowd that wants bigger widgets, and non-integer scaling rendering issues *by default* would make Ubuntu look bad and unpolished. [17:48] Trevinho: andyrock: Take 140dpi as our "ideal" like we're doing now, but round to the nearest whole integer. [19:27] dmj_s76: oki i'll preper a branch tomorrow [19:27] a good solution would be to round up just the gtk scaling to the clostest integer [19:28] e.g. right now if the scaling is 1.75 the gtk scaling is 1 [19:28] 2 would make more sense